Expatriation tax (US s.877A) — what should I check first?

  • 15+Years of cross-border experience
  • 18,000+Clients served
  • 5.0Google rating
  • 4Global offices — India, USA, Canada & UAE
  • 24-hour helpline: +1 (416) 619-0068
  • 18,000+ clients served
  • Google rating 5.0 out of 5
Answer

An income test, a net-worth test and a compliance certification each independently create covered status. One question decides whether this is a filing or a project.

What to check first

An income test, a net-worth test and a compliance certification each independently create covered status. Because the certification looks back over prior years, the planning is done before the expatriation, not at the final return.

The firm’s founder at his desk in the Delhi office

The exception worth knowing

The US exit regime applies a mark-to-market charge to a covered expatriate — and covered status is determined by three tests, any one of which is enough.

Expatriation tax (US s.877A) — what should I check first?
ItemAmount
Cost of the propertyC$355,000
Value on the departure dayC$568,000
Accrued gain treated as realisedC$213,000
Amount assumed to enter incomeC$106,500
Tax at an assumed 31%C$33,015

C$33,015 becomes payable in a year with no sale and no cash. That is what makes the departure date a planning variable: losses realised before it, an election to defer payment against security, and defensible valuations for anything private all change this number.

An illustration, not a client file. The sums are chosen for legibility and the thresholds are stated for the example alone — nothing reaches a filing until it has been confirmed at source for your own year.

Your next step

The full treatment — who it binds, the deadline, the penalty and the fixed fee — is on Expatriation tax (US s.877A). The first call establishes whether there is work to do. Everything after that is quoted.

Reviewed for accuracy for the 2025 and 2026 filing seasons by Udit Gupta, Cross-Border Tax Expert, Legal Quotient Consultants. This is general information rather than advice about your file — a short call is the way to get the second.

Expatriation tax, in practice

The search that brings most people to this page is expatriation tax. It is answered here for expatriation tax: what creates the obligation, which filings discharge it, and the fee agreed before the work starts.

People also search for: expatriation tax us.

Cross-border situations we are engaged for

Case study 1

A renunciation appointment moved once the tests were run

A client came to us with an embassy appointment already booked and an assumption that their modest balance sheet settled the matter. We ran each of the tests against the actual facts. The financial ones were comfortably clear; the compliance certification was not, because several years had never been filed. The appointment was rescheduled to allow the filings to be completed properly first. The engagement produced a written assessment of each test, a filing plan, and an expatriation date chosen after the record was in order.

Read how this one runs
Case study 2

Net worth well inside the test but the filing record was not

A client was confident about the net-worth test and was right about it. The work that mattered lay elsewhere. We established which years had actually been filed, obtained the record from the authority rather than relying on recollection, and identified the gaps and the information reporting that had been overlooked alongside the returns. The engagement produced a reconstructed filing history, the outstanding years prepared and filed, and a documented basis for the certification instead of a hopeful answer to it.

Read how this one runs
Case study 3

Valuing private company shares before the departure date

A client's wealth sat largely in an operating company with no quoted price, and a mark-to-market charge needs a value for the relevant day. Assembling that evidence afterwards would have meant arguing backwards. We gathered the financial statements, shareholder agreements and comparable evidence in advance, commissioned the valuation work on a defined basis, and documented the assumptions. The work produced a valuation file dated before the expatriation, capable of supporting the figure reported without reconstruction long after the event.

Read how this one runs
Case study 4

Reporting a completed expatriation that had never been filed

A client had expatriated some years earlier, filed nothing about it, and hoped the matter had closed itself. Planning was no longer available; accurate reporting was. We fixed the expatriation date from the documents, established the asset position as it stood on that day, and documented the mark-to-market position on that evidence, then addressed the prior years that remained open. The engagement produced a filed final-year position and a set of catch-up filings, with the reasoning behind each figure recorded.

Read how this one runs
Case study 5

A couple expatriating together and tested one at a time

A married couple planned to expatriate on the same day and assumed the analysis was a joint one. The tests apply person by person. We looked at each of them separately: how assets were actually held between them, each one's own income history, and each one's filing record, which differed more than they expected. The work produced a separate written assessment for each spouse, a decision about whether to expatriate on the same date, and one plan reflecting both positions.

Read how this one runs
Case study 6

Sorting which Canadian holdings needed valuation and which needed treaty analysis

A client living in Canada held registered plans, an interest in a private company and Canadian real property, and had been given one blanket answer about all of it. We went through the holdings and split them: those needing valuation evidence for a deemed disposal, and those whose treatment turned on the treaty and on how each is characterised. The engagement produced a schedule of holdings with the work each required, and a final-year position built on that analysis rather than on a single assumption.

Read how this one runs
Case study 7

A TFSA That Costs More Than It Saves

Canadian tax-free accounts are not tax-free to a US person, and some of them carry a reporting form of their own. The file is a review of what is held, what each account triggers on the US side, and whether the account is worth keeping once the reporting is priced in.

Read how this one runs
Case study 8

A Non-Resident Estate Holding US Assets

US situs assets sit inside the US estate tax net regardless of where the owner lived, and the exemption available to a non-resident is not the resident one. The file establishes situs asset by asset before any relief is claimed.

Read how this one runs

All case studies — every published engagement in one place.

Core International & Cross-Border Tax Services

International Tax Planning & Advisory

Strategy and compliance for income, assets and families spread across borders.

One coordinating team: filings on every side of the border are sequenced so treaty relief and foreign tax credits are claimed once — and in the right country.

U.S. & Cross-Border Tax Returns

Dual filers: U.S. citizens in Canada and Canadians with U.S. income run two parallel systems — we prepare both, in the right order, every year.

Expat & Emigration Tax

The move year is its own project: the elections and valuations filed that year decide the next decade of both countries’ returns.

Non-Resident Canadian Tax

Default withholding is 25% of gross: elective returns routinely turn over-withheld rent and pensions into refunds.

Transfer Pricing & BEPS

Documentation prepared with the return is the cheapest insurance in international tax; reconstructing it during an audit is the most expensive.

Cross-Border Estates & Trusts

Wills drafted for one country routinely misfire in the other — deemed disposition here, estate tax there, credits in between.

Cross-Border Corporate Tax

Expansion raises the same four questions every time — entity, PE, repatriation, payroll. We answer them before the tax authorities do.

India Tax for NRIs & Returning Residents

The deduction is taken on the sale price, not the gain — which is why an NRI property sale strands cash unless the certificate is applied for before closing.

Canadian Tax with a Foreign Element

Residency is decided on facts, not on a form — and the year you arrive or leave is the one where the largest amounts turn on the smallest details.

UAE Tax for Expats & Their Home Country

A zero-tax country is only half the answer — the question that decides the bill is whether the country you came from still treats you as resident.

Industries & Client Types We Serve Worldwide

Global E-commerce & Marketplaces
Technology & SaaS
Professional Services Firms
Cross-Border Real Estate
Importers, Exporters & Manufacturers
Athletes, Artists & Entertainers
Remote Workers & Digital Nomads
Investment Funds & Holding Companies

Global E-commerce & Marketplaces

  • Foreign VAT / GST / sales tax registrations
  • Marketplace withholding reviews
  • Inventory nexus & PE analysis
  • Multi-currency books reconciled
Explore E-commerce & Marketplaces

Technology & SaaS

  • Cross-border revenue sourcing & withholding
  • IP structuring with real substance
  • Equity for cross-border teams
  • U.S. expansion: entity & PE setup
Explore Technology & SaaS

Importers, Exporters & Manufacturers

Related-party purchasing, customs value versus transfer price, and foreign-affiliate structures put trading businesses inside the s.247 documentation rules.

Goods crossing a border move the tax question from income to indirect: registration thresholds, place of supply, the customs value and the transfer price between related entities all have to agree with each other. When they do not, the adjustment arrives from two authorities at once and each one uses the other's number.

  • Transfer pricing documentation (s.247)
  • Customs value vs transfer price
  • Foreign affiliate reporting (T1134)
  • Country-by-country reporting
Explore Trade & Manufacturing

Athletes, Artists & Entertainers

  • Reg 105 & U.S. CWA agreements
  • Multi-state & country calendars
  • Touring income allocation
  • Royalty & image-rights withholding
Explore Athletes & Entertainers

Remote Workers & Digital Nomads

  • Residency analysis before moving
  • Employer payroll exposure
  • Totalization & social security
  • Foreign tax credits
Explore Remote Workers

Investment Funds & Holding Companies

  • Treaty access & PPT reviews
  • FAPI & surplus computations
  • Withholding-efficient routing
  • Governance & substance
Explore Funds & Holdcos

Expatriation tax (US s.877A): further questions

How do I know if I will be a covered expatriate?

By working through the tests, because covered status is determined by three of them and any one is enough. There is an income test, a net-worth test and a compliance certification, and they are independent: satisfying two comfortably does not help if the third catches you. The mistake is assuming a modest balance sheet settles the question. The certification concerns your filing history rather than your wealth, so someone well inside the financial tests can still be covered on their record alone.

Do I have to be up to date on past US returns before expatriating?

This is the test people find out about last, and it is the one with the longest lead time. The compliance certification looks back over prior years, so it is a statement about a filing history that either exists or has to be built. If years are missing, the work is filing them properly before the expatriation, not attaching an explanation to the final return. Once the expatriation has happened, the look-back period is fixed and the record is whatever it was on the day.

Does the exit tax apply if I sell nothing that year?

Yes, for a covered expatriate, and that is the feature that catches people financially rather than technically. The regime applies a mark-to-market charge, which treats assets as disposed of rather than waiting for an actual sale. So a charge can arise in a year with no transaction and no cash coming in. Anything without a quoted price — private company shares, an interest in a partnership, property — needs a defensible valuation as at the relevant day, and that evidence is easier to assemble beforehand.

Can I still plan once I have already renounced?

Much less than before, which is why the planning is done before the expatriation rather than at the final return. Before the date, the levers are real: the timing itself, the composition of the balance sheet, realising losses, and getting the filing record into the state the certification requires. Afterwards the facts are fixed and the work becomes reporting them accurately and, where years are missing, catching up. Plenty still needs doing after the event; it is simply no longer planning.

Can unfiled back years alone make me a covered expatriate?

Yes. The compliance certification stands on its own footing, alongside the income and net-worth tests, and any one of the three is sufficient. So a person whose income and assets sit well inside both financial tests can still be covered because of the state of their filings. It is worth saying plainly, because it is the test most easily fixed in advance and the one most often discovered too late. Establish what was filed, and for which years, before anything else is decided.

What should I check first before giving up US citizenship?

The filing record, then the balance sheet, then the date. The record comes first because the certification looks back over prior years and fixing gaps takes the longest. The balance sheet comes next, both for the net-worth test and because a mark-to-market charge needs values for assets that have no market price. The date comes last, once the first two are understood, since it is the variable you control. Reversing that order is how people book an appointment and then discover the problem.

Do green card holders living abroad have to file US taxes?

Yes. A lawful permanent resident is a US tax resident, taxed on worldwide income, and that status does not end simply because you moved away — it ends when it is formally abandoned or administratively terminated. Two traps follow. Filing as a non-resident on a treaty claim can put the immigration status itself at risk. And ending the status after holding it long-term can bring you inside the expatriation regime. See giving up a green card.

Am I a US tax resident if I live overseas?

If you are a US citizen or a green card holder, yes — the United States taxes on status, not location, and living abroad changes the reliefs available rather than the obligation to file. If you are neither, residence turns on the substantial presence test, a weighted day count over three years, with exceptions for certain visa categories and a closer-connection claim available in some circumstances. The two paths lead to completely different returns. See filing US taxes from abroad.

Our practitioners are alumni of leading accounting and tax institutions

Where our partners studied — CPA Canada (In-Depth Tax Program), AICPA, the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India and the Malaysian Institute of Accountants.

Request a Quote +1 (416) 619-0068