Country-by-country reference

Global Transfer Pricing Policy

Transfer pricing policy in 25 countries, grouped by region. Each page names the revenue authority, sets out the documentation and the methods, and states plainly whether its figures were read in a primary source or deliberately left unquoted.

Countries covered
25
Regions
6
Sections per country
6
Unverified figures
None, anywhere in the guide

What this guide is, and what it refuses to be

Transfer pricing is the single tax question a multinational group cannot answer once and file away. The arm’s-length principle is close to universal, and almost nothing else is: the documentation a jurisdiction demands, the deadline it demands it by, the method it prefers, the consequence of getting it wrong and the appetite of its administration for an argument are all set nationally. A group operating in five countries has five positions to hold, and they have to be consistent with each other because the authorities exchange the group’s own data.

So this guide is organised the way the problem is: by country, each page written from that jurisdiction’s own rules rather than from a regional template. Each covers how the regime works, what documentation is required, how a price is tested, what we do about it, where audits actually concentrate, and who the obligation lands on at different sizes of business.

It also refuses to do the thing most country-by-country tax guides do, which is quote a threshold, a penalty or a filing date without saying where it came from. On these pages a section number, a rate, a currency amount or a day count appears only where it was read in the revenue authority’s own material or the country’s own legislation, and the page names that source and the date it was read. Everywhere else the mechanism is described and no number is given. A wrong figure in a transfer pricing file is not a typo — it is a position a client acts on and carries the penalty for.

Africa

3 countries

Transfer pricing arrived comparatively late across much of the continent and has been arriving fast: documentation duties, related-party disclosure schedules and dedicated audit teams have all been added inside the last decade, and the authorities that run them are among the most active in the world relative to the size of their taxpayer base.

Asia Pacific

7 countries

The region holds both the oldest and the newest regimes in this guide, and the widest spread of administrative style — from jurisdictions where an audit opens with a request for a value-chain analysis to ones where a single surcharge attaches automatically to any adjustment. Group structures that route through more than one of them rarely satisfy all of them with one file.

North America

3 countries

Two of the three regimes here predate the OECD guidelines in their current form and neither defers to them entirely, so a North American file is usually written twice: once to the local standard and once to the standard the counterparty jurisdiction applies. Getting that pair to agree is most of the work on a cross-border engagement.

Europe

7 countries

European transfer pricing looks harmonised from the outside — the same arm’s-length principle, the same three-tier documentation shape — and is not, because the documentation obligation, the production deadline and the audit posture are set nationally. A group with subsidiaries in five European states has five documentation calendars.

South America

3 countries

The region has been moving toward the OECD model from its own starting point, which in several jurisdictions was a set of fixed-margin and commodity-pricing rules that owed nothing to comparables analysis. Where that shift is under way, the transition year is the year the documentation has to carry both stories.

Australia

2 countries

Two mature regimes with unusually explicit reporting statutes and tax administrations that publish what they are looking at. That transparency cuts both ways: it tells you what an audit will ask for, and it means an unprepared file is unprepared against a published standard.

Where this connects to the rest of the practice

The guide is orientation for a group working out which jurisdictions it has an obligation in. The pages below are the work itself — the service, the fees, the surrounding cross-border questions a transfer pricing position raises, and the definitions behind the vocabulary used throughout.

24-hour helpline: +1 (416) 619-0068

Talk through your group’s transfer pricing exposure before the deadline decides it for you

Send us the group structure and the intercompany agreements. We will tell you which documentation actually applies, what the file needs to contain, and what it costs — in writing, before any work begins.

  • Fixed fee agreed before work starts
  • 18,000+ clients served across 4 global offices
  • Offices in India, the USA, Canada and the UAE, wherever the entity sits

What these engagements turn on

Case study 1

Whether Documentation Was Required At All

The obligation turns on the transactions that actually happened rather than on the size of the group, and the penalty for contemporaneous documentation is charged by reference to the adjustment. The review establishes which side of the line the company sits.

Read how this one runs
Case study 2

A Pricing Study That Started With Who Does What

Functions, assets and risks decide which entity should earn the return, and the method follows from that rather than the other way round. Getting the sequence backwards is how a study fails on its first question.

Read how this one runs
Case study 3

Choosing Between Methods on the Evidence

A comparable uncontrolled price is the strongest method where one genuinely exists, and reaching for it where it does not is weaker than a properly applied alternative. The choice is documented with the reasons for rejecting the others.

Read how this one runs
Case study 4

Documentation Built to the US Standard

The US requirements differ from the OECD-aligned ones in what has to exist at the time of filing, and a file prepared for one regime can leave the other unprotected. The engagement builds to whichever governs.

Read how this one runs
Case study 5

A Family Trust Abroad With Reporting on Both Sides

A trust settled in one country and a beneficiary living in another produces reporting for the trust, the settlor and the beneficiary, on different forms and different dates. The engagement maps who files what before anything is prepared.

Read how this one runs
Case study 6

An Assignment Priced on an Equalisation Promise

A policy that leaves the assignee no better or worse off has to be computed, not just stated, and the hypothetical deduction runs alongside the real one. The engagement builds both and reconciles them at year end.

Read how this one runs
Case study 7

A Taxable Presence Created Without an Office

A dependent agent habitually concluding contracts can create a permanent establishment where there is no premises at all. The review tests what the person actually does against what the treaty describes.

Read how this one runs
Case study 8

Withheld at the Statutory Rate When a Treaty Rate Applied

Where withholding has already gone out at the full domestic rate, the treaty rate is recovered rather than applied. The file establishes entitlement for each payment, then puts the documentation in place so the following year runs at the correct rate from the start.

Read how this one runs

All case studies — every published engagement in one place.

Core International & Cross-Border Tax Services

International Tax Planning & Advisory

Strategy and compliance for income, assets and families spread across borders.

One coordinating team: filings on every side of the border are sequenced so treaty relief and foreign tax credits are claimed once — and in the right country.

U.S. & Cross-Border Tax Returns

Dual filers: U.S. citizens in Canada and Canadians with U.S. income run two parallel systems — we prepare both, in the right order, every year.

Expat & Emigration Tax

The move year is its own project: the elections and valuations filed that year decide the next decade of both countries’ returns.

Non-Resident Canadian Tax

Default withholding is 25% of gross: elective returns routinely turn over-withheld rent and pensions into refunds.

Transfer Pricing & BEPS

Documentation prepared with the return is the cheapest insurance in international tax; reconstructing it during an audit is the most expensive.

Cross-Border Estates & Trusts

Wills drafted for one country routinely misfire in the other — deemed disposition here, estate tax there, credits in between.

Cross-Border Corporate Tax

Expansion raises the same four questions every time — entity, PE, repatriation, payroll. We answer them before the tax authorities do.

India Tax for NRIs & Returning Residents

The deduction is taken on the sale price, not the gain — which is why an NRI property sale strands cash unless the certificate is applied for before closing.

Canadian Tax with a Foreign Element

Residency is decided on facts, not on a form — and the year you arrive or leave is the one where the largest amounts turn on the smallest details.

UAE Tax for Expats & Their Home Country

A zero-tax country is only half the answer — the question that decides the bill is whether the country you came from still treats you as resident.

Industries & Client Types We Serve Worldwide

Global E-commerce & Marketplaces
Technology & SaaS
Professional Services Firms
Cross-Border Real Estate
Importers, Exporters & Manufacturers
Athletes, Artists & Entertainers
Remote Workers & Digital Nomads
Investment Funds & Holding Companies

Global E-commerce & Marketplaces

  • Foreign VAT / GST / sales tax registrations
  • Marketplace withholding reviews
  • Inventory nexus & PE analysis
  • Multi-currency books reconciled
Explore E-commerce & Marketplaces

Technology & SaaS

  • Cross-border revenue sourcing & withholding
  • IP structuring with real substance
  • Equity for cross-border teams
  • U.S. expansion: entity & PE setup
Explore Technology & SaaS

Importers, Exporters & Manufacturers

Related-party purchasing, customs value versus transfer price, and foreign-affiliate structures put trading businesses inside the s.247 documentation rules.

Goods crossing a border move the tax question from income to indirect: registration thresholds, place of supply, the customs value and the transfer price between related entities all have to agree with each other. When they do not, the adjustment arrives from two authorities at once and each one uses the other's number.

  • Transfer pricing documentation (s.247)
  • Customs value vs transfer price
  • Foreign affiliate reporting (T1134)
  • Country-by-country reporting
Explore Trade & Manufacturing

Athletes, Artists & Entertainers

  • Reg 105 & U.S. CWA agreements
  • Multi-state & country calendars
  • Touring income allocation
  • Royalty & image-rights withholding
Explore Athletes & Entertainers

Remote Workers & Digital Nomads

  • Residency analysis before moving
  • Employer payroll exposure
  • Totalization & social security
  • Foreign tax credits
Explore Remote Workers

Investment Funds & Holding Companies

  • Treaty access & PPT reviews
  • FAPI & surplus computations
  • Withholding-efficient routing
  • Governance & substance
Explore Funds & Holdcos

Our practitioners are alumni of leading accounting and tax institutions

Where our partners studied — CPA Canada (In-Depth Tax Program), AICPA, the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India and the Malaysian Institute of Accountants.

Request a Quote +1 (416) 619-0068