We provide transparent pricing with zero surprise bills. Review your final returns, compilations, and GST filings with us before they are filed, on a fee agreed in writing first. Ask us about affordable Transfer Pricing Documentation Services: call the 24-hour helpline on +1 (416) 619-0068, or request a written fixed quote today.
Our standard fixed-rate structures help you manage business cash flows with complete confidence. Avoid hourly billing surprises.
Local file | Benchmarking | s.247 compliance
We offer customized billing structures for high-volume transactions and enterprise requirements.
All Pricing PlansCovers: A documented search: screening criteria, quantitative and qualitative filters, a manual rejection log with reasons, and the resulting range with the tested party's position in it.
What moves it up: How defensible the comparables have to be. A study intended for a filing and a study intended to survive an audit are different pieces of work.
See this fee pageCovers: The local file for one entity: functional analysis, method selection with the alternatives explained, comparables with the search documented, and the results tested against the range.
What moves it up: The number of transaction types. Goods, services, royalties and financing are four analyses rather than one, and each needs its own method and its own comparables.
See this fee pageCovers: The group-level documentation and the country-by-country report, prepared so they agree with each other and with every local file in the footprint.
What moves it up: The number of jurisdictions. Each one reads the same master file, so an inconsistency anywhere is visible everywhere through information exchange.
See this fee pageProviding tailored Transfer Pricing Documentation tax filing and planning to reduce liabilities, maximize refunds, and ensure CRA compliance.
Transfer Pricing Documentation filing quoted as a fixed fee before work begins, with no hidden extras — the number you are quoted is the number you are billed.
From information returns to corporate audits, protect your Transfer Pricing Documentation business with CRA compliance and expert cross border tax strategies.
Documents, questions and signatures move through one secure portal, so a Transfer Pricing Documentation file runs the same from Toronto, Dubai or Delhi.
Quoted up front, in writing.
Contact UsT2 corporate tax filing, balance sheets, income statements compilation, corporate tax optimization, and direct CRA representation.
T5013 partnership information returns, K-1 partner schedule allocations, structural planning, and tax minimization advisory.
Functional analysis, benchmarking study, local file and master file, prepared so the pricing policy stands up to an examination on either side of the border.
T3 trust tax return filing, testamentary trust setups, estate distribution allocations, and strategic inheritance planning.
Form 1040 from abroad with the exclusion or the credit, FinCEN 114 and Form 8938 where the tests are met, and the Canadian return reconciled against it.
Unfiled years brought current in the order that works, the disclosure route chosen on the facts, and the earliest year prepared first because it sets the rest.
T1 tax returns compilation for students, salaried employees, and self-employed. Covers T4/T5 matching, RRSP credits, and medical deductions.
Sales tax ledger reconciliation, Input Tax Credits (ITCs) verification, Netfile electronic submission to CRA, and provincial compliance checks.
CA (India), CA (Malaysia)
CA (India)
FCA (India)
CPA (Canada), CPA (USA), CA (India)
CPA (Canada), CA (India)
Transfer Pricing Documentation starts at $From- $2500. The quote is locked at the outset and does not change mid-engagement, and you review the deliverable with us before it is filed. Compare every plan on our transparent pricing page.
At minimum: prior-year returns and notices of assessment, your bank and credit-card statements for the fiscal period, payroll records if you have employees, and GST/HST filings. We send a checklist tailored to your situation after the first call to our 24-hour helpline.
Most engagements are completed within 3 to 5 business days once your documents are complete. Catch-up work covering multiple years takes longer, and we tell you the realistic timeline before you commit rather than after.
We respond on your behalf at no extra charge for any return we prepared. Every figure we file is supported by documentation retained in your file, which is what turns a CRA review from a crisis into correspondence. See how our CRA audit support works.
Yes. The late-filing penalty is 5% of the balance owing plus 1% of that balance for each full month the return is late, to a maximum of 12 months (CRA, 2025 tax year). Interest is what compounds, daily, on top. We prioritise catch-up work and, where eligible, file under the CRA's Voluntary Disclosures Program to reduce penalties.
Yes. We work with clients wherever they live, from our offices in India, the USA, Canada and the UAE, and your location does not change the price or the service. Browse our coverage by country and region to find yours.
We work across construction, healthcare, e-commerce, professional services, restaurants, real estate, transportation, technology and non-profits, each with its own deduction profile and the points tax authorities scrutinise. See all industries we serve.
Software applies the rules you told it about. It does not ask whether a treaty caps the withholding on that payment, whether the foreign credit was claimed in the right country, whether an information return was due on an account that earned nothing, or whether your related-party pricing is documented. Those are the questions that move the number on a cross-border file.
Call the 24-hour helpline, +1 (416) 619-0068. We establish which filings your position actually needs, then send a fixed fee in writing before any work starts — the number does not move once it is agreed.
No. All our pricing is fixed and transparent. Any additional charges (e.g., for transaction volumes beyond the package limits) are discussed and agreed upon upfront.
Yes. A certified tax accountant will be assigned to manage your account and will be available for direct support via email and phone.
A Canadian company manufactures at a cost of one hundred and its US subsidiary sells to customers for one hundred and eighty. If the parent invoices the subsidiary at one hundred and ten, most of the margin is taxed in the United States; invoice at one hundred and seventy and most of it is taxed in Canada. Nothing about the business changed — only which treasury collects. That is why the arm's length price, the one unrelated parties would have agreed, is the reference point both authorities use. See our transfer pricing work.
Five, in two groups. Three compare transactions: comparable uncontrolled price, resale price, and cost plus. Two compare profits: the transactional net margin method, and profit split. The OECD asks for the most appropriate method on the facts rather than a fixed hierarchy; the United States applies a best-method rule to similar effect. Selection is itself a documented judgment, and a method chosen without recording why is a weak position under audit. See our transfer pricing work.
Still have questions? View our FAQ page or contact us.
A Canadian subsidiary had been paying its overseas parent a monthly management charge for several years. There was an invoice and a bank transfer, and nothing else. The work started with interviews to establish what the parent's staff actually did for the Canadian company, separating stewardship activity from services the subsidiary genuinely received. An intercompany agreement was drafted to match that reality, the service categories were costed, and the mark-up was benchmarked against independent providers. The engagement produced a signed agreement, a local file describing the arrangement, and a documented basis for the charge going forward.
A study prepared elsewhere arrived with a final range and a list of accepted comparables. Nothing explained how the starting population had been narrowed, and no rejected company carried a reason. The search was rebuilt from the database screen upwards: written criteria, the quantitative filters in sequence, then a manual review of every survivor with the reason for each rejection recorded as it was made. Several companies previously accepted failed the independence test. The engagement produced a search a reviewer can retrace end to end, and a range the client can explain without reference to the earlier work.
A Canadian distributor's operating margin fell under the range its own study had produced. Before adjusting the price, the characterisation was retested. The functional analysis showed the Canadian entity carried marketing risk and held the local customer relationships, which is not the limited risk distributor the study had assumed. Recharacterising the tested party changed the comparable set, and the range with it. The engagement produced a revised local file explaining why the margin was appropriate for what this entity actually does, rather than a price adjustment made to fit a range built on the wrong premise.
A loan from a foreign affiliate carried a rate that had been chosen because it looked reasonable. The work was to price it as a lender would. That meant establishing the borrower's stand alone credit position without group support, then searching for debt issued on comparable terms as to currency, tenor, security and seniority. The terms in the loan agreement were tightened so that what was written matched what was being priced. The engagement produced an interest rate supported by independent issuances, a revised agreement, and documentation covering the years already elapsed as well as the remaining term.
A group charged its Canadian company a royalty for technology, while most of the development staff sat in Canada. The functional analysis recorded who performed the development functions, who controlled the decisions about them, and who bore the funding risk. That picture did not support a simple licensee characterisation. The engagement produced a documented position on which entity had earned the return on the intangible, a revised charging structure agreed between the group's advisers, and a local file that sets out the analysis rather than asserting the outcome.
A query landed on a year that had closed, with no study in place. The first step was to fix what was contemporaneous and what was not, so that nothing was presented as a record when it was a reconstruction. Contracts, board minutes, pricing correspondence and costing files from the period were gathered and dated. The comparables search was run on the data as it stood for that year rather than today's. The engagement produced a documented response, a plain account of what had been prepared afterwards, and a schedule to put proper documentation in place for the open years.
A comparables set is only as good as the screening behind it, and a rejected set takes the margin with it. The study selects the tested party first, screens on function rather than on industry code, and records why each comparable survived.
Read how this one runsThe obligation sits with the group and the filing can fall on a surrogate where the parent's jurisdiction does not exchange. Establishing who files where comes before preparing anything.
Read how this one runsAll case studies — every published engagement in one place.
Strategy and compliance for income, assets and families spread across borders.
Cross-border tax for sellers shipping worldwide: marketplace withholding, foreign registrations and inventory nexus handled before they become audits.
Marketplaces withhold, remit and report in their own right, so the tax position of a single sale is decided by where the stock sat, where the buyer was and which platform collected — not by where the company is registered. We reconcile the platform's own filings against the returns before either is submitted.
Where our partners studied — CPA Canada (In-Depth Tax Program), AICPA, the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India and the Malaysian Institute of Accountants.
