What is the late filing penalty for Form 8938?

  • 15+Years of cross-border experience
  • 18,000+Clients served
  • 5.0Google rating
  • 4Global offices — India, USA, Canada & UAE
  • Fixed fee agreed before work starts
  • 24-hour helpline: +1 (416) 619-0068
  • Google rating 5.0 out of 5
Answer

The FATCA statement of specified foreign financial assets — accounts, foreign-issued securities, interests in foreign entities and certain foreign contracts. The exposure on this kind of filing is charged by reference to the form and the delay rather than to the tax, which is why an unfiled year with no tax can still be expensive.

What a late filing costs

The FATCA statement of specified foreign financial assets — accounts, foreign-issued securities, interests in foreign entities and certain foreign contracts.

The firm’s founder at his desk in the Delhi office

When the rule breaks

It is not a duplicate of the FBAR. Form 8938 attaches to the tax return, covers assets an account report does not reach, and has thresholds that move with filing status and residence — which is why most cross-border filers file both, with different asset lists on each.

What is the late filing penalty for Form 8938?
ItemAmount
Current account, highest balanceUS$4,000
Savings account, highest balanceUS$5,000
Account held with a relative, signature authority onlyUS$4,000
Aggregate tested against the thresholdUS$13,000
Reporting threshold (verified, FinCEN)US$10,000

The aggregate of US$13,000 exceeds the US$10,000 threshold, so all three accounts are reported — including the one that is not the filer's money, because signature authority counts.

These amounts illustrate the mechanism only. The rates and thresholds are assumptions of the example, not your numbers: each is checked against the issuing authority for your specific tax year before any return is filed.

Where to go from here

The full treatment — who it binds, the deadline, the penalty and the fixed fee — is on 8938 — statement of foreign assets. We will tell you if you do not need us. That happens more often than you would expect.

Reviewed against current guidance for the 2025 and 2026 filing seasons by Udit Gupta, Cross-Border Tax Expert, Legal Quotient Consultants. General information, not advice for your circumstances — call our 24-hour helpline to discuss your own position.

Form 8938 — what this page covers

People reach this page searching for form 8938. It is covered here as it applies to Form 8938 — who it applies to, what has to be filed, and what it costs, at a fixed fee agreed before the work starts.

People also search for: form 8938 fatca · statement of specified foreign financial assets.

Files that look like this one

Case study 1

A preparer who never asked about assets held abroad

Returns had gone in on time for years, prepared by someone who never asked whether anything was held outside the United States. The work started with the asset picture rather than with the form: what was held in each year, in what shape, and how much of it an account report would already have covered. Each year was then placed on the route its own facts supported, and the statements were filed with amended returns where a return existed. It produced the missing statements, a written reasonable-cause narrative, and a schedule of reportable assets the annual return is now prepared against.

Read how this one runs
Case study 2

An inheritance abroad that crossed the reporting threshold

Securities and cash reached the client through a family estate in another country and stayed there, in an adviser's hands, for years. Nobody involved treated it as a United States matter. Two separate obligations followed from the same event, on different forms and different timetables, and only one of them concerned the assets continuing to be held. The engagement separated them, established the year each first arose, and dealt with the receipt and the holding as two questions rather than one. It produced the statements for the open years and a written position on which form each element of the inheritance belonged on.

Read how this one runs
Case study 3

Shares in an employer abroad that no account report reached

A senior employee of a company in another country held shares and unvested units in it, none of them inside a bank or brokerage account. Because nothing looked like an account, the annual account report had been filed and had shown none of it, and the asset statement had never been filed at all. The work was characterising each holding — securities issued by a foreign company and held directly, and an interest in the company itself — and establishing when the total first crossed the line for this filing status. It produced the statements for each affected year and a valuation basis the plan is now reported on.

Read how this one runs
Case study 4

A letter arrived before the client came forward

The first anyone mentioned the statement was a letter from the IRS about the failure to file it. That changes the work, because the cheaper catch-up routes depend on coming forward first, and the exposure keeps growing while a failure continues after notice. The immediate task was reading the letter for what it actually proposed and the date it had to be answered by, then filing the outstanding forms against a documented account of what the client knew and when. It produced the response, the filed statements, and a penalty argument in writing rather than an assertion of good intent.

Read how this one runs
Case study 5

A year amended quietly before anyone looked at the route

The client had already amended one year to attach the statement, on the reasonable-sounding view that putting it right quietly was putting it right. It is not. An amendment filed outside a route gives up the protection a certification would have carried, and it can itself be read as evidence about intent. The opening work was therefore an assessment of the damage: which years remained eligible for which route, and what the filed amendment now had to be reconciled with. It produced a map of the remaining years by route, the filings for them, and the earlier amendment addressed rather than left to be found.

Read how this one runs
Case study 6

A company abroad that appeared on more than one return

A founder living outside the United States had incorporated her business in the country she had moved to. The company was an interest in a foreign entity for the asset statement and a reportable corporation on an information return of its own, and the two were never going to be prepared separately without an overlap or a gap between them. The engagement set out which return carried the full description of the company and which one merely identified it, the order the two were prepared in, and how the local accounts had to be restated for the corporate package. It produced both filings for the open years and a running order for each year to come.

Read how this one runs
Case study 7

Catching Up From Inside the United States

The domestic route suits a filer who was resident in the US through the missed years, and it differs from the offshore one in what it asks for and what it costs. Choosing between them before anything is filed is the whole engagement.

Read how this one runs
Case study 8

A Penalty Argued on the Facts Rather Than the Form

Reasonable cause is a documented story with dates, not an assertion of good intent. The engagement assembles what the client actually knew and when, and puts the sequence in writing alongside the filings it explains.

Read how this one runs

All case studies — every published engagement in one place.

Core International & Cross-Border Tax Services

International Tax Planning & Advisory

Strategy and compliance for income, assets and families spread across borders.

One coordinating team: filings on every side of the border are sequenced so treaty relief and foreign tax credits are claimed once — and in the right country.

U.S. & Cross-Border Tax Returns

Dual filers: U.S. citizens in Canada and Canadians with U.S. income run two parallel systems — we prepare both, in the right order, every year.

Expat & Emigration Tax

The move year is its own project: the elections and valuations filed that year decide the next decade of both countries’ returns.

Non-Resident Canadian Tax

Default withholding is 25% of gross: elective returns routinely turn over-withheld rent and pensions into refunds.

Transfer Pricing & BEPS

Documentation prepared with the return is the cheapest insurance in international tax; reconstructing it during an audit is the most expensive.

Cross-Border Estates & Trusts

Wills drafted for one country routinely misfire in the other — deemed disposition here, estate tax there, credits in between.

Cross-Border Corporate Tax

Expansion raises the same four questions every time — entity, PE, repatriation, payroll. We answer them before the tax authorities do.

India Tax for NRIs & Returning Residents

The deduction is taken on the sale price, not the gain — which is why an NRI property sale strands cash unless the certificate is applied for before closing.

Canadian Tax with a Foreign Element

Residency is decided on facts, not on a form — and the year you arrive or leave is the one where the largest amounts turn on the smallest details.

UAE Tax for Expats & Their Home Country

A zero-tax country is only half the answer — the question that decides the bill is whether the country you came from still treats you as resident.

Industries & Client Types We Serve Worldwide

Global E-commerce & Marketplaces
Technology & SaaS
Professional Services Firms
Cross-Border Real Estate
Importers, Exporters & Manufacturers
Athletes, Artists & Entertainers
Remote Workers & Digital Nomads
Investment Funds & Holding Companies

Global E-commerce & Marketplaces

  • Foreign VAT / GST / sales tax registrations
  • Marketplace withholding reviews
  • Inventory nexus & PE analysis
  • Multi-currency books reconciled
Explore E-commerce & Marketplaces

Technology & SaaS

  • Cross-border revenue sourcing & withholding
  • IP structuring with real substance
  • Equity for cross-border teams
  • U.S. expansion: entity & PE setup
Explore Technology & SaaS

Professional Services Firms

Firms and partners working across borders meet Regulation 105 withholding, PE risk on long engagements and per-country payroll for travelling staff.

A partnership is taxed in the hands of its partners, so one engagement abroad can reach every partner's personal return. The order matters: the waiver is applied for before the invoice, the presence is tracked before it becomes an establishment, and the payroll is registered before the first day worked in the other country.

  • Reg 105 / 102 waivers
  • Permanent establishment risk
  • Partner mobility planning
  • Cross-border withholding recovery
Explore Professional Services

Importers, Exporters & Manufacturers

  • Transfer pricing documentation (s.247)
  • Customs value vs transfer price
  • Foreign affiliate reporting (T1134)
  • Country-by-country reporting
Explore Trade & Manufacturing

Athletes, Artists & Entertainers

  • Reg 105 & U.S. CWA agreements
  • Multi-state & country calendars
  • Touring income allocation
  • Royalty & image-rights withholding
Explore Athletes & Entertainers

Remote Workers & Digital Nomads

  • Residency analysis before moving
  • Employer payroll exposure
  • Totalization & social security
  • Foreign tax credits
Explore Remote Workers

Investment Funds & Holding Companies

  • Treaty access & PPT reviews
  • FAPI & surplus computations
  • Withholding-efficient routing
  • Governance & substance
Explore Funds & Holdcos

What people ask us about Form 8938

I forgot Form 8938 and owed no tax — is there still a penalty?

Yes. The charge attaches to the form and the year rather than to the balance on the return, so a year that settles at nil is not a year with nothing at stake. A further addition runs where the failure continues after the IRS has written to you about it, and where income was understated and the asset behind it had never been disclosed, the accuracy-related addition to tax is computed at a higher rate than the ordinary one. The practical point is that the cheapest years to put right are the ones put right before anybody asks. See the route for delinquent information returns.

How do I file Form 8938 late for a year I have already filed?

The statement is an attachment to the return, so a late one travels with an amended return for that year rather than being posted in on its own. What goes with it is the real decision. If income was also unreported, an amendment on its own gives up the protection a certification-based catch-up route would have carried, and that cannot be taken back once it is filed. If nothing was unreported and only the statement was missed, the form can go in late with a written reasonable-cause statement attached to it. We settle which of those two describes your years before anything is drafted. See amending a filed return.

Can the penalty be removed if I never knew about the form?

Not knowing is where the argument starts rather than where it ends. Relief turns on reasonable cause, judged on facts you can evidence: what you were told, by whom and when — a preparer who never asked about assets abroad, an estate administered entirely in another country, an illness, a death in the family. The statute is explicit that one thing is not reasonable cause, and it is the one people reach for: that the country holding the asset would penalise you for disclosing it. So the work is documentary. We assemble the sequence with dates and the papers behind it, and file it alongside the form rather than waiting to be asked for it. See reasonable cause.

Does a missing Form 8938 keep the year open for the IRS?

It can. Where a return was filed without a statement it should have carried, the period the IRS has for assessing that return does not close on its ordinary timetable — it stays open, and filing the missing information is what eventually closes it. An old year with a missing statement is therefore less settled than its age suggests. That is why the years are mapped before any of them is touched. Which years remain open to assessment, which are past the point where a refund can still be claimed, and which catch-up route covers them are three separate questions, and the answers rarely line up. The order the years go in decides which reliefs survive to be claimed.

I filed the FBAR but not Form 8938 — am I covered?

No. These are two obligations with different agencies, thresholds, asset lists and due dates, and the account report goes to FinCEN instead of being attached to your return, so satisfying one does nothing for the other. The asset statement also reaches things an account report does not — foreign-issued securities held directly, interests in foreign entities, certain foreign contracts — which is why a filer who reported every account can still have a missing statement for the same year. The two carry separate penalty regimes as well, so the route that fixes one is not automatically the route that fixes the other. See filing both.

How many past years of Form 8938 do I have to file?

The number is set by the route back in rather than by the obligation itself. The duty reaches every year your specified foreign financial assets were above the threshold for your filing status and for where you were living, which can be a long run of years. What you actually file depends on which catch-up route the facts support: the certification-based routes ask for a defined run of back years and turn off the offshore penalties for those who qualify, while the delinquent-return route asks only for the missing forms with a reasonable-cause statement, and is open only while no income is unreported and no examination has begun. Settle the route first. See the streamlined foreign offshore route.

What is a PFIC, and why do Canadian mutual funds cause trouble for US persons?

A passive foreign investment company is a non-US company that is mostly passive by income or by assets — which describes almost every Canadian mutual fund and ETF. For a US owner the default regime taxes distributions and gains punitively with an interest charge for the years the value built up. Two elections fix it, and both need annual information the fund may not produce for you. Holding the same exposure through US-domiciled funds usually avoids the problem entirely. See PFICs and Canadian mutual funds.

Does the United States tax gifts I receive from a foreign person?

The recipient is not taxed on a gift, and a foreign donor with no US-situs property is outside US gift tax — so often no tax arises on either side. What does arise is reporting: a US person receiving gifts above the annual reporting thresholds from a foreign individual, or from a foreign corporation or partnership at a lower threshold, files the information return for the year. The distinction between a gift and a distribution from a foreign trust matters here, because they are reported differently. See Form 3520.

Our practitioners are alumni of leading accounting and tax institutions

Where our partners studied — CPA Canada (In-Depth Tax Program), AICPA, the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India and the Malaysian Institute of Accountants.

Request a Quote +1 (416) 619-0068