What is the late filing penalty for Form 8938 vs FBAR?

  • 15+Years of cross-border experience
  • 18,000+Clients served
  • 5.0Google rating
  • 4Global offices — India, USA, Canada & UAE
  • 18,000+ clients served
  • Fixed fee agreed before work starts
  • Offices in India, the USA, Canada and the UAE
Answer

How the two US foreign-asset reports differ, and why most cross-border filers must file both with different contents. The exposure on this kind of filing is charged by reference to the form and the delay rather than to the tax, which is why an unfiled year with no tax can still be expensive.

What a late filing costs

How the two US foreign-asset reports differ, and why most cross-border filers must file both with different contents.

Two of the firm’s advisers and the team in the open-plan office

The exception worth knowing

Different agency, different form, different threshold, different asset list, different due date, different penalty regime. Reporting the same accounts twice is not duplication — it is two separate obligations, and satisfying one does nothing for the other.

What is the late filing penalty for Form 8938 vs FBAR?
ItemAmount
Current account, highest balanceUS$9,000
Savings account, highest balanceUS$7,000
Account held with a relative, signature authority onlyUS$5,000
Aggregate tested against the thresholdUS$21,000
Reporting threshold (verified, FinCEN)US$10,000

The aggregate of US$21,000 exceeds the US$10,000 threshold, so all three accounts are reported — including the one that is not the filer's money, because signature authority counts.

Illustrative figures, not a client engagement: the amounts are chosen to make the mechanism legible, and the rates and thresholds are assumptions stated for the example only. We confirm every one of them against the issuing authority for your own tax year before anything is filed.

Your next step

The full treatment — who it binds, the deadline, the penalty and the fixed fee — is on 8938 vs FBAR — filing both. One call now is worth more than a filing season of guessing.

Reviewed against current guidance for the 2025 and 2026 filing seasons by Udit Gupta, Cross-Border Tax Expert, Legal Quotient Consultants. General information, not advice for your circumstances — call our 24-hour helpline to discuss your own position.

What is form 8938 — what this page covers

This is the page to read on what is form 8938. It takes Form 8938 vs FBAR in order — the test that decides who is affected, the returns and forms that follow from it, and a fee quoted in writing before anything starts.

People also search for: form 8938 fbar · how to do fbar filing.

Cross-border situations we are engaged for

Case study 1

Two catch-up tracks running at once for one filer

Several years of missing account reports sat alongside returns filed without the specified asset statement. We ran them as two jobs: back reports to the one agency, worked from a year-by-year balance schedule, and amended returns to the other carrying the statement each year required. The contents of the two differed, deliberately, because the asset lists do. The engagement produced a complete set of filed back reports, amended returns for the years that needed them, and one classification schedule explaining every difference between the pair in any given year.

Read how this one runs
Case study 2

An enquiry about the return after the reports were caught up

A filer who had brought the account reports current on their own received a question about the returns some time afterwards, the statement having never been attached to any of them. We identified which years were still open, prepared the statement for each on its own threshold rather than copying the report already filed, and amended those returns. The engagement produced corrected returns for the open years, a written explanation of why the earlier catch-up did not reach them, and a diary entry pairing the two filings in future years.

Read how this one runs
Case study 3

An inherited account that made several years reportable

An account came to the filer on a parent's death and was left largely untouched, which is why nobody had thought of it as theirs. Both reports look at accounts the filer has an interest in, not only the ones they use. We established the date the interest arose, tested each year from that date against both thresholds, and filed what each year required. The engagement produced back filings from the correct starting year, an estate document trail supporting that date, and a note of the earlier years that were not in scope.

Read how this one runs
Case study 4

A catch-up spanning years either side of a move abroad

The filer had lived abroad for part of the period and in the United States for the rest, so the specified asset thresholds were not the same in every year, and the presence test had to be applied year by year. Some years needed both reports and some needed only one. We built the schedule first and filed second. The engagement produced a year-by-year record of which threshold governed and why, the filings each year actually required, and no filings for the years that required none.

Read how this one runs
Case study 5

A dormant account inside one threshold and below the other

A small savings account left behind in another country had never been mentioned to anybody. Its balances cleared the account aggregate test in most years and came nowhere near the specified asset thresholds. The catch-up was therefore reports only, with no amendment to any return. The engagement produced the back reports for the years the balances required, a written basis for filing nothing on the return side, and a measurement of the peak balance in each year taken from statements rather than estimated.

Read how this one runs
Case study 6

Amending filed returns rather than filing something new

The filer expected the fix to be a fresh submission and it was not. The statement belongs to the return, so the years at issue had to be reopened and amended one by one, oldest first, with a consistent asset classification running through all of them. We prepared them as a set for that reason. The engagement produced amended returns for each affected year, a single classification schedule behind them, and an explanation of the difference in treatment between the two reports for the same holdings.

Read how this one runs
Case study 7

Accounts Reported Late When the Income Already Was

Where the income was on the return and only the account report was missed, a narrow route allows late filing with a reason attached. It is open only while no income is unreported and no examination has begun, which is why it is checked first.

Read how this one runs
Case study 8

Unreported Foreign Income Disclosed Before the CRA Asked

A voluntary disclosure has to be genuinely voluntary — once a letter arrives, the route usually closes. The engagement establishes whether the programme is still available, prepares the years, and puts the relief request in with the filing rather than after it.

Read how this one runs

All case studies — every published engagement in one place.

Core International & Cross-Border Tax Services

International Tax Planning & Advisory

Strategy and compliance for income, assets and families spread across borders.

One coordinating team: filings on every side of the border are sequenced so treaty relief and foreign tax credits are claimed once — and in the right country.

U.S. & Cross-Border Tax Returns

Dual filers: U.S. citizens in Canada and Canadians with U.S. income run two parallel systems — we prepare both, in the right order, every year.

Expat & Emigration Tax

The move year is its own project: the elections and valuations filed that year decide the next decade of both countries’ returns.

Non-Resident Canadian Tax

Default withholding is 25% of gross: elective returns routinely turn over-withheld rent and pensions into refunds.

Transfer Pricing & BEPS

Documentation prepared with the return is the cheapest insurance in international tax; reconstructing it during an audit is the most expensive.

Cross-Border Estates & Trusts

Wills drafted for one country routinely misfire in the other — deemed disposition here, estate tax there, credits in between.

Cross-Border Corporate Tax

Expansion raises the same four questions every time — entity, PE, repatriation, payroll. We answer them before the tax authorities do.

India Tax for NRIs & Returning Residents

The deduction is taken on the sale price, not the gain — which is why an NRI property sale strands cash unless the certificate is applied for before closing.

Canadian Tax with a Foreign Element

Residency is decided on facts, not on a form — and the year you arrive or leave is the one where the largest amounts turn on the smallest details.

UAE Tax for Expats & Their Home Country

A zero-tax country is only half the answer — the question that decides the bill is whether the country you came from still treats you as resident.

Industries & Client Types We Serve Worldwide

Global E-commerce & Marketplaces
Technology & SaaS
Professional Services Firms
Cross-Border Real Estate
Importers, Exporters & Manufacturers
Athletes, Artists & Entertainers
Remote Workers & Digital Nomads
Investment Funds & Holding Companies

Global E-commerce & Marketplaces

  • Foreign VAT / GST / sales tax registrations
  • Marketplace withholding reviews
  • Inventory nexus & PE analysis
  • Multi-currency books reconciled
Explore E-commerce & Marketplaces

Technology & SaaS

  • Cross-border revenue sourcing & withholding
  • IP structuring with real substance
  • Equity for cross-border teams
  • U.S. expansion: entity & PE setup
Explore Technology & SaaS

Importers, Exporters & Manufacturers

  • Transfer pricing documentation (s.247)
  • Customs value vs transfer price
  • Foreign affiliate reporting (T1134)
  • Country-by-country reporting
Explore Trade & Manufacturing

Athletes, Artists & Entertainers

Performance income is taxed where earned — Regulation 105 in Canada, withholding agreements in the U.S. — with special treaty articles overriding the usual rules.

Performance income is taxed where the performance happens, and the deduction is usually taken at source on the gross fee before expenses. Recovering the difference is a filing exercise in the other country, and it only works if the tour, the residency and the withholding certificates were documented while the work was being done.

  • Reg 105 & U.S. CWA agreements
  • Multi-state & country calendars
  • Touring income allocation
  • Royalty & image-rights withholding
Explore Athletes & Entertainers

Remote Workers & Digital Nomads

  • Residency analysis before moving
  • Employer payroll exposure
  • Totalization & social security
  • Foreign tax credits
Explore Remote Workers

Investment Funds & Holding Companies

  • Treaty access & PPT reviews
  • FAPI & surplus computations
  • Withholding-efficient routing
  • Governance & substance
Explore Funds & Holdcos

What people ask us about Form 8938 vs FBAR

What happens if I never filed an FBAR?

The report stays outstanding and the exposure sits with FinCEN, under a penalty regime of its own which is not the one that applies to a late tax return or to a late Form 8938. That is the first thing to take in, because there are two regimes here and the answer for one report tells you nothing about the other. The second is that this report is not a tax return, so having no tax to pay does not remove it, or the charge for its absence. What decides how a catch-up is handled is usually whether the omission was inadvertent, and that is a question about the facts of your own file.

Is the penalty for a late Form 8938 the same as for a late FBAR?

No. Different agency, different form, different due date and different penalty regime. The two reports overlap in content and share nothing in their enforcement. Form 8938 is part of the income tax return, so its absence is a defect in the return itself. The FBAR is a separate filing to FinCEN, and its absence is a defect in a report that has nothing to do with the return. A single catch-up therefore runs on two tracks, often with different look-backs and different documents, and the work is easier if it is planned as two jobs from the start.

I filed my late FBARs, is the Form 8938 problem fixed?

No, and the returns are where the remaining work sits. Satisfying one report does nothing for the other, so the late account reports leave every year whose return should have carried the statement still defective. Those years are corrected through the return rather than through a fresh report, which usually means amending returns already filed rather than submitting something new. Whether the two catch-ups cover the same years is worth checking early, because they often do not, and the first job is then to work out which years belong to which track.

I was over the FBAR threshold but under the Form 8938 one, what do I file?

Only the report whose threshold you crossed. The account aggregate test is US$10,000 at any time in the calendar year, on the IRS figures verified in August 2026, while the specified asset thresholds start far higher, at US$50,000 on the last day of the tax year for an unmarried filer in the United States and higher again for joint filers and for those living abroad. So a filer with modest balances routinely has years of missing account reports and no Form 8938 obligation at all. Test each year separately, because the thresholds are annual and one year does not settle the rest.

How many years of late FBARs do I have to catch up?

It depends on the route rather than on how long the accounts have existed. Each year is its own report, and the number of years filed in a catch-up is generally set by the terms of the approach used rather than chosen by the filer. Which routes are open turns on the facts, principally whether the failure was inadvertent, and on whether anybody has already been in touch about it. So the first step is a year-by-year schedule of account balances against the threshold, which shows how many years are genuinely in scope before any route is chosen.

Can I be penalised for a late report if I owed no tax?

Yes. Neither report is a tax return, and neither penalty regime is calculated from tax owing, which is why filers with nothing to pay are surprised to find an exposure at all. It is the report that is late, and the charge attaches to that. The practical consequence is that a quiet year with small balances and no tax still needs its filing, and the cheapest moment to deal with it is before anybody asks. A year with no tax is also the simplest to file, because the only thing to establish is the balances themselves.

What is the difference between FBAR and Form 8938?

They overlap but are not the same report. The FBAR goes to FinCEN and covers foreign financial *accounts*; Form 8938 goes to the IRS with the return and covers a wider class of specified foreign financial *assets*, with thresholds that vary by filing status and whether you live abroad. Many people must file both for the same accounts, and satisfying one does nothing for the other. See filing both.

Do Canada and the United States share tax information?

Yes, through more than one channel. The treaty has an exchange-of-information article that supports both routine and on-request exchange. Separately, an intergovernmental agreement has Canadian financial institutions identify US-reportable accounts and report them to the CRA, which passes them to the IRS, with the reverse flow for Canadian residents. Most other country pairs use the Common Reporting Standard for the same purpose. See FATCA reporting.

Our practitioners are alumni of leading accounting and tax institutions

Where our partners studied — CPA Canada (In-Depth Tax Program), AICPA, the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India and the Malaysian Institute of Accountants.

Request a Quote +1 (416) 619-0068