Yes. The relief is claimed, not automatic. A student or trainee article does not switch itself on because you hold a study permit or because the payer knows you are a student, and nothing in the return infers it from your enrolment. It is claimed on the return for the year, and it usually requires a statement filed with that return identifying the article relied on and the income it covers. Filing without that statement is the ordinary way the exemption is lost, and it is lost quietly, because the assessment simply taxes the income you reported.
How does the treaty article on students and trainees work?
- 15+Years of the founder's cross-border experience
- 18,000+Clients served across our offices in India, the USA, Canada and the UAE
- 5.0Google rating
- 4Global offices — India, USA, Canada & UAE
The relief is claimed, not automatic, and it usually requires a statement with the return. The mechanism is the answer; the paperwork is what makes the mechanism available.
How it works in practice
The relief is claimed, not automatic, and it usually requires a statement with the return. Days excluded from residency counts and treaty-exempt income are separate reliefs that have to be claimed separately.

When it does not bind you
Student and trainee articles exempt maintenance payments and, in some treaties, limited local earnings — for a period that begins on arrival and does not restart.
What to do next
The full treatment — who it binds, the deadline, the penalty and the fixed fee — is on Students and trainees — the treaty article. If you already have an adviser, we will tell you what they should be asking rather than replacing them.
Read and approved for the 2025 and 2026 filing seasons by Udit Gupta, International Tax, Cross-Border Tax & Transfer Pricing Expert, Legal Quotient Consultants. This is general information rather than advice about your file — a short call is the way to get the second.
What these engagements turn on
Doctoral student who had filed three returns without the treaty statement
A postgraduate had reported everything received from abroad as ordinary income for three consecutive years, on the understanding that the student article applied by itself. It does not. We fixed the arrival date from immigration and tenancy records, established that the exemption period still covered all three years, and separated maintenance payments from the amounts paid for teaching work. Each year was then claimed on its own, with the statement identifying the article and the income relied on. The engagement produced three amended positions on file and a written note of when the period ends.
Read how this one runsTrainee whose exemption period had been counted from the wrong arrival
A secondee returned for a second placement and treated the second arrival as the start of a fresh exemption period. The article runs from the original arrival and does not restart. We traced both entries, corrected the start date, and identified the point at which the period had in fact expired, which fell part way through the placement then under way. The engagement produced a dated statement of the period, a split of the current year between covered and uncovered months, and an agreed basis for the remaining months.
Read how this one runsPostgraduate assessed as resident because the day count was never addressed
The client had claimed the student article on maintenance payments and assumed that also kept the study years out of a residency count. The two reliefs are separate and each must be claimed. The exemption had been accepted; residence had not been addressed at all, and the assessment treated the whole period as resident. We prepared the residency position on its own evidence and kept the income claim untouched. The engagement produced two separate documented claims for the same years rather than one claim doing work it cannot do.
Read how this one runsResearch stipend and teaching pay separated into two different reliefs
One institution paid both a maintenance stipend and wages for taught seminars, on a single annual statement. The treaty article covered the first. Whether it reached the second depended on wording in that particular treaty about limited local earnings, and on the limit written into it. We split the payments by what each was for, tested the employment portion against the article, and reported the excess as ordinary income. The engagement produced an income-by-income schedule tied to the article, and a claim the assessing officer could follow without asking for a reconciliation.
Read how this one runsPayer withholding at full rate because no claim was on file
An institution abroad continued to withhold on payments to a trainee, correctly, because nothing had been filed to show a treaty position. The relief here is claimed on a return rather than assumed by a payer, and the client had been waiting for the deduction to stop on its own. We prepared the return for the year with the supporting statement, and set out for the client which document the payer would need going forward and which one the tax authority would. The engagement produced a filed claim and a written sequence for the following year.
Read how this one runsSecond degree treated as a new exemption period by the family
A family asked us to confirm that starting a second programme at a different institution reopened the student article. It does not. The period begins on arrival in the country and a new course, permit or institution does not reset it. We set out the start date, the point at which the period ends, and which of the remaining years of study would fall outside the article entirely. The engagement produced a year-by-year table of what the treaty covers and a plan for reporting the uncovered years as ordinary income.
Read how this one runsDeduction at Source on Deposit Interest, Recovered
Where the treaty rate is lower than what was deducted, the difference comes back through a return rather than at source. The file establishes entitlement and files for the years still open.
Read how this one runsOne Salary, Two Countries Claiming It
A US citizen resident in Canada, taxed in full on both sides because each return was prepared without the other in view. Deciding which country has the first right to the income, then claiming relief on the second return in the right order, is what stops the same dollar being taxed twice.
Read how this one runsAll case studies — every published engagement in one place.
Core International & Cross-Border Tax Services
Strategy and compliance for income, assets and families spread across borders.
Industries & Client Types We Serve Worldwide
- Foreign VAT / GST / sales tax registrations
- Marketplace withholding reviews
- Inventory nexus & PE analysis
- Multi-currency books reconciled
Software revenue crosses borders by default — sourcing rules, withholding on licence-like payments and IP location decide the effective rate.
Software revenue is rarely taxed where the team sits. Licence, subscription and service income are characterised differently by each side, and the answer decides withholding at source, treaty relief and whether a foreign customer creates a taxable presence at all — questions that are cheap to settle before the contract and expensive afterwards.
- Cross-border revenue sourcing & withholding
- IP structuring with real substance
- Equity for cross-border teams
- U.S. expansion: entity & PE setup
- Reg 105 / 102 waivers
- Permanent establishment risk
- Partner mobility planning
- Cross-border withholding recovery
- Section 216 rental returns
- FIRPTA withholding recovery
- Section 116 clearance
- Treaty credit optimization
- Transfer pricing documentation (s.247)
- Customs value vs transfer price
- Foreign affiliate reporting (T1134)
- Country-by-country reporting
- Reg 105 & U.S. CWA agreements
- Multi-state & country calendars
- Touring income allocation
- Royalty & image-rights withholding
- Residency analysis before moving
- Employer payroll exposure
- Totalization & social security
- Foreign tax credits
- Treaty access & PPT reviews
- FAPI & surplus computations
- Withholding-efficient routing
- Governance & substance
Students and trainees — the treaty article: further questions
No. The period runs from arrival and it does not restart. That is the single feature of these articles people most often assume works the other way round: a break in the middle, a new programme, a new institution or a change of visa does not put the clock back to zero. So the question to settle at the outset is when the period began, not when the current course did. Work out that start date, write it in the file with the evidence for it, and you know which years the article can still cover before you rely on it.
Student and trainee articles are written to exempt maintenance payments, which is what payments for your living and education costs from outside the country are. That is the core of the relief, and it is usually the easiest part of a claim to support, because the evidence is the transfers themselves and the purpose they were sent for. Two cautions. The exemption belongs to the article in your particular treaty, so read that text rather than a general description of it. And it still has to be claimed on the return with the supporting statement.
Sometimes, and it depends entirely on the treaty. Some student and trainee articles exempt limited local earnings alongside maintenance payments; others exempt the maintenance payments only and leave employment income taxable where the work is done. The wording differs treaty by treaty, so this is not a question that can be answered from the general shape of the relief. Read the article that applies to you, and if it does cover local earnings, note the limit written into it, because earnings above that limit are outside the exemption and belong on the return as ordinary income.
Treat that as a separate question with a separate answer. Days excluded from a residency count and treaty-exempt income are two different reliefs, and they have to be claimed separately. An exemption on your maintenance payments does not by itself keep the study period out of a day count, and excluded days do not by themselves make any income exempt. Deciding one and assuming the other follows is how a return ends up half right. Settle residence first, then the income article, and record the basis for each.
The claim can usually still be made, but it is made the same way it should have been made originally: for the specific year, with the statement identifying the article and the income it covers. So the work is year by year rather than a single correction. Reconstruct the arrival date and the exemption period, decide which of those years the article reaches, and check whether the income you reported in each of them was maintenance or local earnings, because the treaty may treat those differently. Where residence was also misstated, that is a second claim, not part of this one.
The treaty has a procedure for exactly that. You apply to the competent authority in your residence country, which takes the case up with its counterpart, and the two negotiate a position that removes the double taxation. Some treaties add binding arbitration if they cannot agree. It is slow and it runs on documents, so the practical work is preserving the record and filing protective claims while the clock runs. See our treaty work.
Around sixty, including Canada, the United Kingdom, India, Australia and most of western Europe — but the list matters less than the terms, because each treaty caps rates and allocates income differently. Two countries with treaties can produce opposite answers on the same pension or the same royalty. What decides your position is the specific article covering your income type. See our country guides.



