India's tax year runs from April to March, so an Indian return never lines up with a Canadian or United States calendar-year return. Income has to be allocated to the Indian year it falls in, which for anyone filing in both countries means one set of receipts is always split across two returns on the other side. Doing that properly at the outset is what allows the credit position between the two countries to be worked out later. Doing it roughly is what makes two returns tell different stories about the same income.
Filing an Indian return from Canada or the US — what does India require?
- 15+Years of the founder's cross-border experience
- 18,000+Clients served across our offices in India, the USA, Canada and the UAE
- 5.0Google rating
- 4Global offices — India, USA, Canada & UAE
The return is prepared on India's April-to-March year, reconciled against the department's own information statement, and verified electronically. India collects at source before considering any exemption, so most Indian files are a reconciliation and a recovery rather than a payment.
What India requires
The return is prepared on India's April-to-March year, reconciled against the department's own information statement, and verified electronically. Where a refund is claimed, the bank account must be pre-validated in the filer's own name.

The exception worth knowing
Filing in India from abroad is an electronic process keyed to an Indian identifier, an Indian bank account for refunds, and a verification step that trips most first-time filers.
What to do next
The full treatment — who it binds, the deadline, the penalty and the fixed fee — is on Filing an Indian return from Canada or the US. Whatever you have is enough to start the conversation, including nothing but the dates.
Reviewed for accuracy for the 2025 and 2026 filing seasons by Udit Gupta, International Tax, Cross-Border Tax & Transfer Pricing Expert, Legal Quotient Consultants. General information, not advice for your circumstances — call our 24-hour helpline to discuss your own position.
Cross-border situations we are engaged for
A return filed from abroad that was never verified
The client believed he had filed for a year in which a refund was due, and could not understand why nothing had happened. The submission had gone through; the electronic verification had not, so nothing had been filed at all as far as the department was concerned. We established the position, completed verification within what the process allowed for that year, and put the return into processing. The engagement produced a return on record and a refund claim that finally existed.
Read how this one runsCorrecting the account a refund could not be paid into
A refund had been agreed and had repeatedly failed to arrive. The account nominated on the return was held jointly with a parent and had never been pre-validated, so the payment had nowhere to go. We identified an account in the client's own name, completed its validation, and had the payment instruction corrected. The engagement produced a paid refund and a note in the client's file naming the account to use on every future Indian return, which is where this problem begins.
Read how this one runsReconciling a return against the department's own statement
The client prepared her Indian figures from the bank letters she happened to have received. The department's information statement for the year showed interest from a deposit she had forgotten and a deduction against it she had never claimed. We worked from the statement, set her own records against it line by line, and filed on the reconciled position. The engagement produced a return that matched what the department already held, and recovered a deduction that would otherwise have gone unclaimed.
Read how this one runsAligning an April to March year with a calendar year return
A client filing in both India and the United States had income arising through the year and two returns with different year-ends. Each set of figures had been prepared independently of the other, and they did not agree. We built an apportionment schedule that allocated every receipt to the correct Indian year and to the correct calendar year, then reconciled the two. The engagement produced one working paper standing behind both returns, which is what any later question about the credit position is answered from.
Read how this one runsSequencing several unfiled Indian years for a filer abroad
Nothing had been filed for several years and the client wanted to begin with the most recent, because that was the year carrying the refund. Filing out of order leaves each year's opening position unsupported. We determined which years remained open, filed them oldest first so that each position carried forward on the record, and completed verification of each one before starting the next. The engagement produced a filed sequence of years and claims for those still open to them.
Read how this one runsFiling where deduction at source exceeded the actual liability
The client had assumed that Indian tax deducted from his income closed the matter, and had therefore never filed. The deduction had been applied to gross receipts without regard to what was actually chargeable, and it exceeded the liability for each year by a wide margin. We computed the real position for each open year, filed, and matched the deductions shown in the payers' records to the credits claimed. The engagement produced filed years and recovery of the excess collected.
Read how this one runsA Second Opinion on a Return Already Filed
A cross-border return prepared on one side only is usually right in isolation and wrong in combination. The review checks residence, source and relief in that order, and says plainly whether an amendment is worth making.
Read how this one runsA Canadian Landlord With Property in the United States
Gross withholding on US rents takes no account of mortgage interest, tax or repairs, so a leveraged property can face tax on turnover. An election onto net basis fixes that, and it has its own timing and its own filing.
Read how this one runsAll case studies — every published engagement in one place.
Core International & Cross-Border Tax Services
Strategy and compliance for income, assets and families spread across borders.
Industries & Client Types We Serve Worldwide
- Foreign VAT / GST / sales tax registrations
- Marketplace withholding reviews
- Inventory nexus & PE analysis
- Multi-currency books reconciled
- Cross-border revenue sourcing & withholding
- IP structuring with real substance
- Equity for cross-border teams
- U.S. expansion: entity & PE setup
- Reg 105 / 102 waivers
- Permanent establishment risk
- Partner mobility planning
- Cross-border withholding recovery
- Section 216 rental returns
- FIRPTA withholding recovery
- Section 116 clearance
- Treaty credit optimization
- Transfer pricing documentation (s.247)
- Customs value vs transfer price
- Foreign affiliate reporting (T1134)
- Country-by-country reporting
- Reg 105 & U.S. CWA agreements
- Multi-state & country calendars
- Touring income allocation
- Royalty & image-rights withholding
- Residency analysis before moving
- Employer payroll exposure
- Totalization & social security
- Foreign tax credits
Holding structures live or die on treaty access, beneficial ownership and substance — the MLI's principal-purpose test now sits over every arrangement.
A holding structure is only as good as its reporting. Foreign affiliates, accrued passive income and distributions each carry their own return, and the penalties on those attach to the form rather than to any tax being owed — so a structure that saves tax can still cost money if the information returns are late.
- Treaty access & PPT reviews
- FAPI & surplus computations
- Withholding-efficient routing
- Governance & substance
Filing an Indian return from Canada or the US: further questions
Verification is an electronic step, and it is separate from submitting the return. A return that has been filed but never verified is treated as though it was not filed, which is the failure that catches most people filing from abroad for the first time. Check that verification has actually completed rather than assuming the submission confirmation covers it. Documents can be exchanged and signed through secure cloud software, so the practical difficulty is usually knowing that the step exists, not carrying it out.
The most frequent reason is the bank account nominated for it. A refund is paid into an Indian account that has been pre-validated and that stands in the filer's own name, so an account held jointly, held by a relative, or never validated will stop the payment even where the return is accepted and the refund agreed. The return is not the problem in these cases; the payment instruction is. Nominating an account in your own name and completing its validation is usually all that is needed.
No. The account has to stand in the filer's own name and be pre-validated before a refund can be paid into it. Families often keep one Indian account running for everything once the others have moved abroad, and it is the natural place to send the money, but a refund will not follow it. Where you have closed your own Indian accounts, opening or validating one in your own name is part of the work of claiming rather than an afterthought to it.
Often yes, and usually to your advantage. Deduction at source is applied without regard to the deductions, exemptions and treaty positions that determine what you actually owe, so it routinely exceeds the final liability. Filing is the only mechanism that reconciles the two and turns the excess into a refund. There is also the reconciliation side of it: the department holds its own information statement of what was reported about you, and the return is where your figures are set against that.
Because Indian payers report what they pay and what they deduct, and the department compiles it into an information statement for each taxpayer. A return filed from abroad is reconciled against that statement, so an amount omitted by the filer but present in the statement shows up immediately. The practical consequence is to start from the statement rather than from memory or from a drawer of bank letters. Where something is in the statement and not in the return, that difference is what gets asked about.
They are the certification pair required before certain remittances leave India. Form 15CA is the remitter's declaration filed online; Form 15CB is the accountant's certificate supporting the tax treatment and the rate applied, including any treaty relief. Which combination you need depends on the nature and size of the payment, and banks will generally not process the remittance without them. See Form 15CA.
Receiving your own money is not income, and a gift from a specified relative is exempt however large. Two things do bite. A gift from someone outside that relative list is taxable to the recipient once the year's receipts pass the threshold in the gift provisions. And money that is really payment for something — fees, rent, interest, a share of profit — is taxed as that income whatever the bank narration says. The paperwork should match the substance. See gifting money to family in India.



