Yes. There is a separate application route for non-residents, and it carries its own documentation and attestation requirements rather than the ones an Indian resident would meet. The identifier is usually the first item on any Indian file, because without it a treaty declaration cannot be lodged, a refund cannot be claimed, and tax deducted by an Indian payer cannot be credited to you. Begin it early. The attestation step depends on other parties abroad, and it is the part that most often forces a second submission.
PAN and Aadhaar for non-residents — what does India require?
- 15+Years of the founder's cross-border experience
- 18,000+Clients served across our offices in India, the USA, Canada and the UAE
- 5.0Google rating
- 4Global offices — India, USA, Canada & UAE
The non-resident application route has its own documentation and attestation rules, and the biometric identifier requirements differ for non-residents. India collects at source before considering any exemption, so most Indian files are a reconciliation and a recovery rather than a payment.
What India requires
The non-resident application route has its own documentation and attestation rules, and the biometric identifier requirements differ for non-residents. Deductions credited against the wrong identifier are corrected by the deductor, not the taxpayer.

The exception
Without an Indian tax identifier, an NRI cannot file the treaty declaration, claim a refund, or have a deduction credited to them — which makes it the first bottleneck in every Indian file.
Where to go from here
The full treatment — who it binds, the deadline, the penalty and the fixed fee — is on PAN and Aadhaar for non-residents. Whatever you have is enough to start the conversation, including nothing but the dates.
Checked and signed off for the 2025 and 2026 filing seasons by Udit Gupta, International Tax, Cross-Border Tax & Transfer Pricing Expert, Legal Quotient Consultants. Written as general guidance, not as a recommendation for your situation. Talk it through with us before acting on it.
What these engagements turn on
Obtaining an identifier so a property sale could complete
A sale had been agreed and the buyer could not make the deduction correctly, because the seller, a long-departed non-resident, held no Indian tax identifier. We ran the non-resident application, arranged attestation of the identity and overseas address documents by an authority the route accepts, and gave the buyer the identifier together with the written basis for the deduction. The engagement produced a completed application and a deduction credited to the seller rather than lost, which is what makes it recoverable on the return.
Read how this one runsCorrecting deductions credited against an old identifier
Deductions on Indian deposit interest across several periods had been credited against an identifier the client no longer used, so none of it appeared against her. She had been trying to have it corrected herself. We reconciled every deduction to the payment that produced it, prepared the schedule the bank needed in order to file its correction, and followed it through until the credits appeared where they belonged. The engagement produced corrected credits at source and a claim that could then be made on the return.
Read how this one runsSettling the identifier position for a long-departed non-resident
The client had left India decades earlier and had been told different things about which identifiers a non-resident must hold and link. Each attempt had been made on an assumption rather than on a determination. We established his status, set out which identifier requirements attached to it and which did not, and dealt only with those. The engagement produced a written statement of the position, so that the next bank or payer who asks is answered from a file rather than from a fresh attempt.
Read how this one runsFiling open years once an identifier finally existed
Deductions had been made on Indian income for years, the client had never held an identifier, and nothing had ever been claimed. Obtaining the identifier was the first step rather than the last. We then established which years remained open, reconstructed the deductions for each from the payers' records, and filed them in order so that each year's claim stood on its own. The engagement produced a filed set of years and recovery of the deductions for those still within reach.
Read how this one runsReplacing an attestation the application route would not accept
An application had been returned without much explanation and the client assumed the identifier had been refused. The documents had in fact been certified by an authority the non-resident route does not accept, and only some pages had been certified at all. We identified an acceptable authority in the client's own country, had the pack attested consistently, and resubmitted it as one application. The engagement produced an accepted application and a written record of what the route requires, used by the family members who applied later.
Read how this one runsLodging a treaty declaration that a bank had refused
A bank had been deducting on deposit interest at the rate it applies where no declaration is on file, because the client's identifier did not match the bank's record of him. We reconciled the bank's record to the identifier, had the mismatch corrected, and lodged the declaration for the periods still ahead. The engagement produced a declaration on file with the bank going forward, and a reconciliation of the earlier periods for the return to carry as a credit.
Read how this one runsThe Two-Year Window After Returning to India
Returning residents pass through a transitional status in which foreign income is largely outside the Indian net. The engagement establishes when the window opens and closes, and puts the transactions that benefit inside it.
Read how this one runsCanadian Dividends and Interest Paid to a Non-Resident
Flat withholding applies at source whether or not a return would produce the same figure. The engagement establishes treaty entitlement, files what is needed to claim the reduced rate, and recovers what went out at the domestic rate.
Read how this one runsAll case studies — every published engagement in one place.
Core International & Cross-Border Tax Services
Strategy and compliance for income, assets and families spread across borders.
Industries & Client Types We Serve Worldwide
Cross-border tax for sellers shipping worldwide: marketplace withholding, foreign registrations and inventory nexus handled before they become audits.
Marketplaces withhold, remit and report in their own right, so the tax position of a single sale is decided by where the stock sat, where the buyer was and which platform collected — not by where the company is registered. We reconcile the platform's own filings against the returns before either is submitted.
- Foreign VAT / GST / sales tax registrations
- Marketplace withholding reviews
- Inventory nexus & PE analysis
- Multi-currency books reconciled
- Cross-border revenue sourcing & withholding
- IP structuring with real substance
- Equity for cross-border teams
- U.S. expansion: entity & PE setup
- Reg 105 / 102 waivers
- Permanent establishment risk
- Partner mobility planning
- Cross-border withholding recovery
- Section 216 rental returns
- FIRPTA withholding recovery
- Section 116 clearance
- Treaty credit optimization
- Transfer pricing documentation (s.247)
- Customs value vs transfer price
- Foreign affiliate reporting (T1134)
- Country-by-country reporting
- Reg 105 & U.S. CWA agreements
- Multi-state & country calendars
- Touring income allocation
- Royalty & image-rights withholding
- Residency analysis before moving
- Employer payroll exposure
- Totalization & social security
- Foreign tax credits
- Treaty access & PPT reviews
- FAPI & surplus computations
- Withholding-efficient routing
- Governance & substance
More on PAN and Aadhaar for non-residents
The biometric identifier requirements are not the same for non-residents as for residents, so the starting point is to establish which category you fall in before assuming that an obligation attaches to you. Working the other way round is what causes the trouble, because an application or a linkage attempted on the wrong footing is rejected and has to be begun again. Settle your status first, then deal with the identifier requirement that actually applies to it rather than the one described in general guidance.
Not by you. Where a deduction has been credited against the wrong identifier, the correction is made by the party who made the deduction, so the work is to establish what was deducted, show where it was credited, and put the deductor in a position to file the correction. Until that is done the amount is not available to you as a credit, however clearly it was your income. Expect to prepare the reconciliation yourself and hand it over, because the deductor rarely holds the full picture.
The non-resident route asks for proof of identity and of an address abroad, and it specifies who may attest those documents. The attestation rules are the part that matters in practice: papers certified by an authority the route does not accept are returned, and the application begins again. Before submitting, establish which authority is acceptable for the country you are in, and have every page attested consistently. Where the application supports a transaction already under way, allow for a resubmission in the timetable.
No. The identifier is what a return, a credit and a refund all attach to, so without it there is nothing for the department to match a claim against. That is why a non-resident who has suffered deductions for years but never obtained an identifier usually has an unrecovered position rather than a disputed one. The order of work is always the same: obtain the identifier, then bring the deductions into a claim for each year that is still open to one.
Almost always because the identifier is missing, or does not match the bank's record of you. A declaration that a treaty rate applies has to be capable of being matched to a taxpayer, so a bank will not accept one without the identifier behind it. Until it is lodged, the bank deducts at the rate it applies where no declaration is on file, and the difference becomes something to reconcile on the return rather than something avoided at source.
The statement a US payer issues to a non-resident showing US-source income paid and tax withheld — the non-resident counterpart to a 1099. Use it two ways. In your own country it evidences the US tax paid for credit purposes. And where the rate withheld was higher than your treaty entitlement, or the income was not taxable at all, the way back to the money is a US non-resident return claiming the refund. Check the income and exemption codes before assuming the rate was right. See Form 1042-S.
The treaty tie-breaker resolves it to one residence, applied in order: where your permanent home is, then your centre of vital interests, then your habitual abode, then nationality, with a competent-authority referral if all of those fail. It is an evidence exercise rather than an election — you document the home and the life around it. Getting a single residence settled is what makes every other position in both returns consistent. See the residency tie-breaker.



