What is the late filing penalty for Section 195?

  • 15+Years of cross-border experience
  • 18,000+Clients served
  • 5.0Google rating
  • 4Global offices — India, USA, Canada & UAE
  • 24-hour helpline: +1 (416) 619-0068
  • Fixed fee agreed before work starts
  • 18,000+ clients served
Answer

The withholding obligation on payments to non-residents, and the determination of the rate that applies. The exposure on this kind of filing is charged by reference to the form and the delay rather than to the tax, which is why an unfiled year with no tax can still be expensive.

What a late filing costs

The withholding obligation on payments to non-residents, and the determination of the rate that applies.

The team reviewing a file together at a desk

The exception

The duty to determine taxability sits on the payer, and the consequence of getting it wrong is the payer's own liability plus disallowance. Individuals buying a flat from an NRI are payers under this section and almost never know it.

What is the late filing penalty for Section 195?
ItemAmount
Gross amount receivedC$31,000
Withheld at source (assumed 26% of gross)C$8,060
Deductible costsC$25,110
Net amount actually earnedC$5,890
Tax on the net amount (assumed graduated result)C$1,590
Difference recoverable by filingC$6,470

Filing on a net basis recovers C$6,470 of the C$8,060 withheld. That difference is the entire reason the elective return exists, and it is lost by not filing.

Example figures throughout, selected to make the rule visible, with rates and thresholds assumed for the demonstration. Your actual filing uses figures confirmed with the issuing authority for your tax year.

Your next step

The full treatment — who it binds, the deadline, the penalty and the fixed fee — is on Section 195 — TDS on payments abroad in India. Describe the situation in your own words; translating it into forms is our job.

Reviewed for accuracy for the 2025 and 2026 filing seasons by Udit Gupta, Cross-Border Tax Expert, Legal Quotient Consultants. General guidance only. Your own facts decide the answer, so bring them to a call before relying on this.

Where penalty for not declaring foreign bank account comes into this file

This is the page to read on penalty for not declaring foreign bank account. It takes Section 195 in order — the test that decides who is affected, the returns and forms that follow from it, and a fee quoted in writing before anything starts.

What these engagements turn on

Case study 1

Deducted but undeposited withholding put right before anything else

A payer had deducted correctly on a series of remittances and had not paid the amounts over, and the finance team's plan was to sort out the reporting first. We reversed that order. The sums held were quantified and deposited with interest for the period they had been retained, and only then did we deal with the returns for the affected quarters. The engagement produced the money back where it belonged, corrected reporting behind it, and a written chronology of the default and its correction for the file.

Read how this one runs
Case study 2

Two open years of payments to an overseas supplier corrected together

An Indian company had paid an overseas group entity for some years with no deduction, on an internal view that nothing was chargeable, and its auditors had begun to question the expense. We examined what each payment was for and concluded that a chargeable sum did arise on part of it. We quantified the deduction for the open years, paid it over with interest, corrected the reporting and documented the analysis. The engagement produced a consistent position across those years and a determination the company now applies prospectively.

Read how this one runs
Case study 3

Flat bought from a non-resident with no deduction at all

An individual had bought a flat from a seller who turned out to have been non-resident throughout, and no deduction had been made on any instalment. The seller had since stopped responding. We reconstructed the seller's chargeable sum from the sale documents and the title history, quantified what should have been deducted, paid it over with interest under the buyer's own details and reported it so the credit sat with the right person. The engagement produced a closed exposure for the buyer and a documented basis for pursuing the seller under the sale agreement.

Read how this one runs
Case study 4

Disallowed expense brought back by paying the withholding over

A profitable company had lost the deduction for a substantial payment abroad because no withholding had been made, and the extra tax on its own profits was the largest part of the damage. We established the chargeable element of the payment, paid the withholding over with interest, and set out the sequence on which the expense could be brought back into account. The engagement produced a paid deduction, corrected reporting, and a written position on the expense that the company's auditors could work from for the accounts.

Read how this one runs
Case study 5

Old default examined and found not to be chargeable

A payer came to us expecting to settle a shortfall on several years of remittances to a foreign supplier. Before quantifying anything we tested the assumption that a chargeable sum arose at all, because nobody had ever documented it. On the facts, and on the treaty with the supplier's country, most of the stream was not chargeable in India. The engagement produced a written determination supporting the deductions that had not been made, a corrected position on the smaller element where the analysis went the other way, and a file that answers the question if it is asked.

Read how this one runs
Case study 6

Reporting corrected where the deduction itself had been right

The deduction had been made and deposited on time, but the remittances had been reported under the wrong details, so the non-resident could see no credit for tax taken out of its money and had begun asking the payer for it back. Nothing was owing to the department. We identified each misreported payment, had the quarterly filings corrected, and issued the recipient certification that matched. The engagement produced credits sitting against the right payee and a commercial dispute with the supplier closed on documents rather than on goodwill.

Read how this one runs
Case study 7

A Foreign Affiliate Return Filed Years Late

The reporting obligation on a company held abroad runs separately from the corporate return and carries its own exposure. The work is reconstructing the surplus position across the open years before any filing goes in.

Read how this one runs
Case study 8

A Family Trust Abroad With Reporting on Both Sides

A trust settled in one country and a beneficiary living in another produces reporting for the trust, the settlor and the beneficiary, on different forms and different dates. The engagement maps who files what before anything is prepared.

Read how this one runs

All case studies — every published engagement in one place.

Core International & Cross-Border Tax Services

International Tax Planning & Advisory

Strategy and compliance for income, assets and families spread across borders.

One coordinating team: filings on every side of the border are sequenced so treaty relief and foreign tax credits are claimed once — and in the right country.

U.S. & Cross-Border Tax Returns

Dual filers: U.S. citizens in Canada and Canadians with U.S. income run two parallel systems — we prepare both, in the right order, every year.

Expat & Emigration Tax

The move year is its own project: the elections and valuations filed that year decide the next decade of both countries’ returns.

Non-Resident Canadian Tax

Default withholding is 25% of gross: elective returns routinely turn over-withheld rent and pensions into refunds.

Transfer Pricing & BEPS

Documentation prepared with the return is the cheapest insurance in international tax; reconstructing it during an audit is the most expensive.

Cross-Border Estates & Trusts

Wills drafted for one country routinely misfire in the other — deemed disposition here, estate tax there, credits in between.

Cross-Border Corporate Tax

Expansion raises the same four questions every time — entity, PE, repatriation, payroll. We answer them before the tax authorities do.

India Tax for NRIs & Returning Residents

The deduction is taken on the sale price, not the gain — which is why an NRI property sale strands cash unless the certificate is applied for before closing.

Canadian Tax with a Foreign Element

Residency is decided on facts, not on a form — and the year you arrive or leave is the one where the largest amounts turn on the smallest details.

UAE Tax for Expats & Their Home Country

A zero-tax country is only half the answer — the question that decides the bill is whether the country you came from still treats you as resident.

Industries & Client Types We Serve Worldwide

Global E-commerce & Marketplaces
Technology & SaaS
Professional Services Firms
Cross-Border Real Estate
Importers, Exporters & Manufacturers
Athletes, Artists & Entertainers
Remote Workers & Digital Nomads
Investment Funds & Holding Companies

Global E-commerce & Marketplaces

  • Foreign VAT / GST / sales tax registrations
  • Marketplace withholding reviews
  • Inventory nexus & PE analysis
  • Multi-currency books reconciled
Explore E-commerce & Marketplaces

Technology & SaaS

  • Cross-border revenue sourcing & withholding
  • IP structuring with real substance
  • Equity for cross-border teams
  • U.S. expansion: entity & PE setup
Explore Technology & SaaS

Importers, Exporters & Manufacturers

  • Transfer pricing documentation (s.247)
  • Customs value vs transfer price
  • Foreign affiliate reporting (T1134)
  • Country-by-country reporting
Explore Trade & Manufacturing

Athletes, Artists & Entertainers

Performance income is taxed where earned — Regulation 105 in Canada, withholding agreements in the U.S. — with special treaty articles overriding the usual rules.

Performance income is taxed where the performance happens, and the deduction is usually taken at source on the gross fee before expenses. Recovering the difference is a filing exercise in the other country, and it only works if the tour, the residency and the withholding certificates were documented while the work was being done.

  • Reg 105 & U.S. CWA agreements
  • Multi-state & country calendars
  • Touring income allocation
  • Royalty & image-rights withholding
Explore Athletes & Entertainers

Remote Workers & Digital Nomads

  • Residency analysis before moving
  • Employer payroll exposure
  • Totalization & social security
  • Foreign tax credits
Explore Remote Workers

Investment Funds & Holding Companies

  • Treaty access & PPT reviews
  • FAPI & surplus computations
  • Withholding-efficient routing
  • Governance & substance
Explore Funds & Holdcos

Also asked about Section 195

What is the penalty if I did not deduct tax on a payment abroad?

The exposure is not a single figure. The tax that should have been deducted becomes recoverable from you as payer, interest runs on it for the period it was not with the department, and where the payment was a business expense the deduction for that expense can be disallowed. Separate consequences attach to failing to report what was deducted, as distinct from failing to deduct at all. Because the amounts turn on the sum involved and the length of the delay rather than on a flat charge, the first useful step is quantifying the shortfall.

I deducted the tax but never deposited it — how bad is that?

Worse than not deducting, and treated differently. Money taken out of someone else's payment and kept is not a filing lapse. It is a sum held on account of the department that has not been handed over, and the consequences reflect that. The advice is always the same: deposit it, with interest for the period it was held, before anything else is done on the file. Putting that right first also changes the character of the later conversation, because the remaining question becomes reporting and timing rather than money still missing.

Can I still claim the expense if I pay the withholding now?

Paying late is generally better than not paying, and the position on the expense is one of the main reasons to fix an old default rather than leave it alone. Disallowance is the part that hurts a profitable payer most, because it converts a withholding failure into extra tax on your own profits. Whether and when the expense comes back into account depends on when the deduction is actually paid over, relative to the year in which the expense was claimed, so the sequence matters and is worth establishing before you remit.

The non-resident already paid tax at home — do I still owe anything?

On the face of it, yes. Your obligation as payer is not discharged by the recipient's tax position elsewhere, and a foreign tax payment is not a substitute for a deduction that should have been made in India. Whether the sum was chargeable in India at all is a different and better question, and it is the one worth examining, because if it was not chargeable there was nothing to deduct. That determination is what should have been documented at the time, and it can still be documented now from the same facts.

I bought a flat from an NRI years ago and deducted nothing — what now?

You were the payer, so the shortfall is yours, and the seller is usually no longer reachable in any practical sense. That is uncomfortable, but it is better handled than discovered. The work is to establish what the seller's chargeable sum was, quantify the deduction that should have been made, pay it over with interest and report it properly under your own details. Where the sale documents contained an indemnity or a retention, there may also be a civil route to recovery from the seller, which is separate from the tax position.

Will fixing one old default get my other payments looked at?

It can draw attention to the same payment stream in other years, which is why we look at the whole series before touching one year of it. Correcting a single payment while identical payments sit unexamined on either side of it is the position that goes badly. The better sequence is to establish the determination for the whole stream first, quantify every year affected, then put them right together, so that what goes in is a complete and consistent position rather than an invitation to ask about the rest.

What is Part XIII withholding?

Canada's flat withholding on certain payments to non-residents — dividends, interest to related parties, rents, royalties, pension and annuity payments, management fees. The payer withholds and remits, and is liable if they do not, which is why they insist on documentation. A treaty can reduce the rate, but only where the recipient has given the payer the declaration establishing entitlement before payment. Where too much was withheld, a refund claim is the route, with its own time limit. See Part XIII withholding review.

When is Form 1116 not required?

Three situations. You elect the exception for a small amount of creditable foreign tax that arises from passive income and is reported to you on a payer statement such as a 1099 or K-1. You choose to deduct the foreign tax instead of crediting it. Or all the foreign income was excluded under the foreign earned income exclusion, in which case there is no credit to claim on it in the first place. The first option costs you the carryover. See Form 1116.

Our practitioners are alumni of leading accounting and tax institutions

Where our partners studied — CPA Canada (In-Depth Tax Program), AICPA, the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India and the Malaysian Institute of Accountants.

Request a Quote +1 (416) 619-0068