What is the late filing penalty for Form T106?

  • 15+Years of cross-border experience
  • 18,000+Clients served
  • 5.0Google rating
  • 4Global offices — India, USA, Canada & UAE
  • 15+ years of cross-border experience
  • 18,000+ clients served
  • Offices in India, the USA, Canada and the UAE
Answer

The information return of non-arm's-length transactions with non-residents — goods, services, royalties, interest, and loans. The exposure on this kind of filing is charged by reference to the form and the delay rather than to the tax, which is why an unfiled year with no tax can still be expensive.

What a late filing costs

The information return of non-arm's-length transactions with non-residents — goods, services, royalties, interest, and loans.

Two of the firm’s advisers at a desk in the Delhi office

When the rule breaks

This return is the transfer-pricing risk map the CRA reads first. It asks whether documentation exists, so answering it honestly is often the moment a group discovers its intercompany pricing has never been supported.

What is the late filing penalty for Form T106?
ItemAmount
Current account, highest balanceUS$8,000
Savings account, highest balanceUS$7,000
Account held with a relative, signature authority onlyUS$4,000
Aggregate tested against the thresholdUS$19,000
Reporting threshold (verified, FinCEN)US$10,000

The aggregate of US$19,000 exceeds the US$10,000 threshold, so all three accounts are reported — including the one that is not the filer's money, because signature authority counts.

An illustration, not a client file. The sums are chosen for legibility and the thresholds are stated for the example alone — nothing reaches a filing until it has been confirmed at source for your own year.

What to do next

The full treatment — who it binds, the deadline, the penalty and the fixed fee — is on T106 — non-arm's-length transactions. Describe the situation in your own words; translating it into forms is our job.

Reviewed against current guidance for the 2025 and 2026 filing seasons by Udit Gupta, Cross-Border Tax Expert, Legal Quotient Consultants. This is general information rather than advice about your file — a short call is the way to get the second.

Penalty for not declaring foreign bank account — what this page covers

Most readers of this page are looking for penalty for not declaring foreign bank account. What follows sets out how it works for Form T106: who is caught by it, what has to be filed, and what the work costs, agreed before it begins.

Cross-border tax case studies

Case study 1

Historic returns filed after a query about royalties

A CRA question about royalty deductions made it clear that the group's dealings with its foreign affiliate had never been reported on the information return. Answering the query and fixing the reporting were treated as one piece of work: we totalled the royalty flows by year, identified the other categories moving between the companies, and filed the outstanding years alongside the reply. The engagement produced returns for each year in scope and a single consistent account of the intercompany arrangements, given to the CRA in both places.

Read how this one runs
Case study 2

An amended return for a related party left off

The group had filed on time for years, but a foreign affiliate acquired part way through had never been added to the return. The omission mattered because the return is meant to show every non-arm's-length counterparty, and this one had been receiving service charges throughout. We quantified those charges by category for each affected year and amended the returns, rather than adding the party silently to the current one. The engagement produced amended filings for the affected years and a written note of how the affiliate came to be missed.

Read how this one runs
Case study 3

Pricing support built before the late returns went in

The client wanted the outstanding returns filed immediately. We advised the opposite order, because the return asks whether the pricing of the reported dealings is supported by documentation, and at that point it was not. The work was therefore an analysis of the intercompany services first, and the filings second. The engagement produced a documented pricing basis and a set of late returns whose documentation answer was accurate on the day it was given, instead of a prompt filing that would have had to be revisited.

Read how this one runs
Case study 4

A financing balance that had quietly created unfiled years

Nothing was traded between the Canadian company and its parent, so the group had never looked at the return. The parent had funded the company, and the balance with the interest charged on it was reportable. The work was periodic rather than one-off: establish the balance and interest for each year from the intercompany account, then test each year separately against the filing requirement. The engagement produced returns for the years that fell inside it and a schedule showing the years that did not, so the conclusion can be re-checked.

Read how this one runs
Case study 5

Deciding how many years were genuinely in scope

The client assumed every year since incorporation was unfiled and wanted them all prepared. Testing each year separately against the threshold showed that several early years fell below it, when the group was small and the recharges occasional. Scoping first therefore reduced both the work and the exposure, and it gave the client a defensible answer to the question of why some years carry no return. The engagement produced filings for the years that were over the threshold and a per-year calculation supporting the omission of the rest.

Read how this one runs
Case study 6

A partnership catching up on several fiscal periods

Service recharges from an affiliated practice abroad had run for several periods with no reporting, because the firm believed the return applied only to companies. We confirmed the non-arm's-length relationship, quantified the recharges for each period, and filed from the oldest forward so the submission read as one disclosure. A written explanation of the misunderstanding went with it. The engagement produced returns for every period in scope and a request that penalties and interest be cancelled, resting on that explanation.

Read how this one runs
Case study 7

Catching Up From Inside the United States

The domestic route suits a filer who was resident in the US through the missed years, and it differs from the offshore one in what it asks for and what it costs. Choosing between them before anything is filed is the whole engagement.

Read how this one runs
Case study 8

A Foreign Subsidiary That Nobody Had Been Reporting

Owning a company abroad triggers an information return separate from the corporate return, with its own penalty. The work is the surplus and income computations behind it, which also determine how a future dividend is taxed on the way home.

Read how this one runs

All case studies — every published engagement in one place.

Core International & Cross-Border Tax Services

International Tax Planning & Advisory

Strategy and compliance for income, assets and families spread across borders.

One coordinating team: filings on every side of the border are sequenced so treaty relief and foreign tax credits are claimed once — and in the right country.

U.S. & Cross-Border Tax Returns

Dual filers: U.S. citizens in Canada and Canadians with U.S. income run two parallel systems — we prepare both, in the right order, every year.

Expat & Emigration Tax

The move year is its own project: the elections and valuations filed that year decide the next decade of both countries’ returns.

Non-Resident Canadian Tax

Default withholding is 25% of gross: elective returns routinely turn over-withheld rent and pensions into refunds.

Transfer Pricing & BEPS

Documentation prepared with the return is the cheapest insurance in international tax; reconstructing it during an audit is the most expensive.

Cross-Border Estates & Trusts

Wills drafted for one country routinely misfire in the other — deemed disposition here, estate tax there, credits in between.

Cross-Border Corporate Tax

Expansion raises the same four questions every time — entity, PE, repatriation, payroll. We answer them before the tax authorities do.

India Tax for NRIs & Returning Residents

The deduction is taken on the sale price, not the gain — which is why an NRI property sale strands cash unless the certificate is applied for before closing.

Canadian Tax with a Foreign Element

Residency is decided on facts, not on a form — and the year you arrive or leave is the one where the largest amounts turn on the smallest details.

UAE Tax for Expats & Their Home Country

A zero-tax country is only half the answer — the question that decides the bill is whether the country you came from still treats you as resident.

Industries & Client Types We Serve Worldwide

Global E-commerce & Marketplaces
Technology & SaaS
Professional Services Firms
Cross-Border Real Estate
Importers, Exporters & Manufacturers
Athletes, Artists & Entertainers
Remote Workers & Digital Nomads
Investment Funds & Holding Companies

Global E-commerce & Marketplaces

  • Foreign VAT / GST / sales tax registrations
  • Marketplace withholding reviews
  • Inventory nexus & PE analysis
  • Multi-currency books reconciled
Explore E-commerce & Marketplaces

Technology & SaaS

  • Cross-border revenue sourcing & withholding
  • IP structuring with real substance
  • Equity for cross-border teams
  • U.S. expansion: entity & PE setup
Explore Technology & SaaS

Cross-Border Real Estate

Foreign property income and sales are taxed in both countries by default; Section 216, FIRPTA and treaty credits are the standing toolkit.

Property is taxed where it sits, which is the one rule no treaty overrides. What the treaty does decide is the credit, the rate on the rent and what happens on the sale — and the clearance certificate on a disposition is applied for before closing, not after the buyer has already held the money back.

  • Section 216 rental returns
  • FIRPTA withholding recovery
  • Section 116 clearance
  • Treaty credit optimization
Explore Real Estate

Importers, Exporters & Manufacturers

  • Transfer pricing documentation (s.247)
  • Customs value vs transfer price
  • Foreign affiliate reporting (T1134)
  • Country-by-country reporting
Explore Trade & Manufacturing

Athletes, Artists & Entertainers

  • Reg 105 & U.S. CWA agreements
  • Multi-state & country calendars
  • Touring income allocation
  • Royalty & image-rights withholding
Explore Athletes & Entertainers

Remote Workers & Digital Nomads

  • Residency analysis before moving
  • Employer payroll exposure
  • Totalization & social security
  • Foreign tax credits
Explore Remote Workers

Investment Funds & Holding Companies

  • Treaty access & PPT reviews
  • FAPI & surplus computations
  • Withholding-efficient routing
  • Governance & substance
Explore Funds & Holdcos

Form T106 — the questions that follow

What happens if we file Form T106 late?

The exposure on an information return is charged by reference to the form and the length of the delay rather than to the tax, which is why a year with nothing to pay can still be expensive. For context on the CRA's ordinary late-filing charge, for the 2025 tax year a return with a balance owing attracts 5% of that balance plus 1% for each full month it is late, to a maximum of 12 months. Form T106 reports transactions rather than a tax liability, so the practical priority is different: get the return in, since the delay is the only variable still under your control.

We filed T106 but left out one related company — what now?

An incomplete return is a live problem rather than a finished filing, because the point of the return is to show the CRA the whole map of your dealings with related non-residents. The fix is an amended return for each year that counterparty was missing, with the totals by category for it. Two things are worth doing at the same time. Check whether the omission also affects the answer given on documentation, since a party nobody reported is usually a party nobody priced. And record how the omission arose, because that account is what any request for relief will rest on.

Does a late T106 increase our transfer pricing audit risk?

Treat it as raising visibility rather than as a formula. This return is the transfer-pricing risk map the CRA reads first, so a group that files late arrives with the map missing, and its related-party relationships get disclosed by something other than its own return. The more consequential half is what the return says once filed: which related parties, which categories, and whether the pricing is supported by documentation. A group filing late at least has time to build that support before answering, and an accurate answer with support behind it is a better position than a prompt filing that answers no.

Does a second late filing within three years double the penalty?

Repetition by itself is not the trigger, which is where most descriptions of this go wrong. The higher rate applies where the CRA has issued a demand to file and has charged a late-filing penalty in any of the three preceding tax years. Where it does apply, for the 2025 tax year the ordinary 5% plus 1% for each full month to a maximum of 12 months becomes 10% plus 2% for each full month to a maximum of 20 months — a higher rate over a longer run of months rather than a straight doubling. Establish first whether a demand was actually issued. A group that has filed this return every year and simply filed one of them late does not fall into the higher category on that fact alone.

Can we file missing T106 returns for past years ourselves?

Yes, and filing before the question is put to you is generally the better position. Sequence the work. Build the structure chart, identify every non-arm's-length non-resident counterparty, total the dealings with each by category for each year, then file the years that were over the threshold, oldest first. Settle the documentation answer honestly before filing rather than after. A written account of how the returns came to be missed should accompany them, supporting a request that penalties and interest be cancelled. That account carries more weight when each step in it is tied to a document.

Is a late T106 worth filing if we barely passed the threshold?

Yes. Whether the return was due is decided by that year's transactions against the filing threshold, and a year that was over it by a little was over it. Filing closes the year, and a marginal year is usually quick to prepare, because the intercompany dealings are few enough to list. There is a second reason not to leave it. The threshold is tested every year, so a group that ignores one marginal year tends to ignore the next as well, and what would have been a single short return becomes a run of unfiled years to reconstruct.

How is a GILTI inclusion calculated, in outline?

Start at the foreign company: its tested income or loss for the year, computed under US principles. Aggregate those across all your controlled foreign corporations, net the losses, then reduce by a return on qualifying tangible business assets less certain interest expense. What remains is your inclusion, brought into your own return, where the deduction and any credit are applied. Every one of those percentages has been amended, so the mechanism is stable and the arithmetic is year-specific. See the GILTI inclusion and Form 8992.

What is Form 5471 and who has to file it?

The information return a US person files about a foreign corporation they own or control, in one of several filer categories that determine which schedules apply. It is not a tax computation, which is exactly why it gets missed — and why the penalty regime is severe. The consequence people underestimate is that a missing 5471 can keep the limitation period open on the whole return, not merely on the foreign company's figures. See Form 5471.

Our practitioners are alumni of leading accounting and tax institutions

Where our partners studied — CPA Canada (In-Depth Tax Program), AICPA, the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India and the Malaysian Institute of Accountants.

Request a Quote +1 (416) 619-0068