What is the late filing penalty for Form T1145 / T1146?

  • 15+Years of cross-border experience
  • 18,000+Clients served
  • 5.0Google rating
  • 4Global offices — India, USA, Canada & UAE
  • Offices in India, the USA, Canada and the UAE
  • 24-hour helpline: +1 (416) 619-0068
  • Fixed fee agreed before work starts
Answer

The agreements that allocate transfer-pricing adjustments and related amounts between group members. The exposure on this kind of filing is charged by reference to the form and the delay rather than to the tax, which is why an unfiled year with no tax can still be expensive.

What a late filing costs

The agreements that allocate transfer-pricing adjustments and related amounts between group members.

The firm’s founder at his desk in the Delhi office

When the rule breaks

A one-sided adjustment taxes the same profit twice. These agreements are the mechanism that makes the Canadian adjustment consistent with the counterparty's position, and they are time-limited.

What is the late filing penalty for Form T1145 / T1146?
ItemAmount
Gross amount receivedC$58,000
Withheld at source (assumed 18% of gross)C$10,440
Deductible costsC$34,220
Net amount actually earnedC$23,780
Tax on the net amount (assumed graduated result)C$5,945
Difference recoverable by filingC$4,495

Filing on a net basis recovers C$4,495 of the C$10,440 withheld. That difference is the entire reason the elective return exists, and it is lost by not filing.

The figures here are an illustration, not an engagement: amounts are picked so the mechanism is easy to follow, and every rate or threshold is an assumption of the example. Before anything is filed for you, each one is confirmed with the issuing authority for your own tax year.

Where to go from here

The full treatment — who it binds, the deadline, the penalty and the fixed fee — is on T1145 / T1146 — transfer pricing agreements. The quote comes before the work, in writing.

Reviewed against current guidance for the 2025 and 2026 filing seasons by Udit Gupta, Cross-Border Tax Expert, Legal Quotient Consultants. General information, not advice for your circumstances — call our 24-hour helpline to discuss your own position.

Penalty for not declaring foreign bank account, in practice

The subject here is Form T1145 / T1146, which is what people mean when they search for penalty for not declaring foreign bank account. This page covers who it applies to, the filings it produces, and the fixed fee agreed before work begins.

What these engagements turn on

Case study 1

An adjustment identified after the window for the agreements had closed

The group discovered an unallocated adjustment long after the period for lodging the agreements had run. The instinct was to file anyway and hope. We established first when the window had opened and closed, then what each member had actually reported in its filed returns for the year, so that any approach could describe the position accurately rather than optimistically. The submission set out the facts, the cause of the delay and what was being asked for. The engagement produced a documented request built on an accurate record, and a clear statement of the alternatives if it is refused.

Read how this one runs
Case study 2

Establishing what the counterparty had filed before approaching the CRA

A Canadian entity wanted to correct a one-sided adjustment and assumed its foreign affiliate had made the matching entry. It had not. Before anything went to the CRA we obtained the affiliate's filed return and its local adviser's confirmation of what had been reported. That changed the approach entirely, because the question was no longer whether Canada would align but whether the other country still could. The engagement produced a factual foundation for the submission, and a decision taken on what both returns actually said rather than on what the group believed they said.

Read how this one runs
Case study 3

A late corporate return that carried an unlodged adjustment with it

A corporation filed its return late in a year that also carried an unlodged transfer-pricing adjustment, and treated the two as a single problem. They are not. We quantified the balance owing and the penalty attaching to the late return, then dealt separately with the adjustment and the agreements, whose timetable and consequences are different. Keeping them apart allowed the balance to be settled while the allocation was still being agreed with the counterparty. The engagement produced a closed return position, and an adjustment handled on its own terms rather than rushed to fit a return deadline.

Read how this one runs
Case study 4

Reconstructing the date the agreement window actually opened

Nobody in the group could say when the adjustment had actually been made. The accounts, the board minutes and the intercompany ledger each pointed to a different moment. Since the window for the agreements runs from the adjustment, that date decided whether the forms were late at all. We worked through the underlying records, established the event the documents genuinely supported, and set the evidence out in a memorandum. The engagement produced a defensible date, and on that date the forms were within time, which turned an assumed failure into an ordinary filing.

Read how this one runs
Case study 5

A group that found the foreign limitation period was binding

The Canadian side of an adjustment was still open, but the counterparty's country allowed a shorter period for amending the matching return and it had nearly expired. The group had been working on the Canadian paperwork first. We reversed the order, secured the foreign amendment while it was still possible, and prepared the Canadian agreements to match what had been filed abroad. The engagement produced consistent positions in both countries, and a standing rule for the group that the shorter limitation period sets the timetable for the whole exercise.

Read how this one runs
Case study 6

Outstanding agreements across several years brought into a single submission

Adjustments had been made across a run of years without the agreements ever being lodged, and each year had been examined in isolation whenever somebody remembered it. We built one schedule showing, for every year, the adjustment made, the allocation between members, what each entity had filed, and where the window stood. The years were then brought forward together so the positions could not contradict one another. The engagement produced a consistent record across all the years concerned, in place of a series of partial and competing explanations.

Read how this one runs
Case study 7

Ten Years of Missed Returns Filed as One Engagement

Filing many years at once is a sequencing problem: carry-forwards, instalments and credits from the earliest year feed the latest. Filing them out of order is what turns a recoverable position into an assessed one.

Read how this one runs
Case study 8

A Disclosure Where the Facts Were Not Innocent

Where non-compliance was not inadvertent, the certification-based routes are unavailable and a different practice applies, with its own protections and its own price. Establishing which side of that line the facts fall on is done before contact is made.

Read how this one runs

All case studies — every published engagement in one place.

Core International & Cross-Border Tax Services

International Tax Planning & Advisory

Strategy and compliance for income, assets and families spread across borders.

One coordinating team: filings on every side of the border are sequenced so treaty relief and foreign tax credits are claimed once — and in the right country.

U.S. & Cross-Border Tax Returns

Dual filers: U.S. citizens in Canada and Canadians with U.S. income run two parallel systems — we prepare both, in the right order, every year.

Expat & Emigration Tax

The move year is its own project: the elections and valuations filed that year decide the next decade of both countries’ returns.

Non-Resident Canadian Tax

Default withholding is 25% of gross: elective returns routinely turn over-withheld rent and pensions into refunds.

Transfer Pricing & BEPS

Documentation prepared with the return is the cheapest insurance in international tax; reconstructing it during an audit is the most expensive.

Cross-Border Estates & Trusts

Wills drafted for one country routinely misfire in the other — deemed disposition here, estate tax there, credits in between.

Cross-Border Corporate Tax

Expansion raises the same four questions every time — entity, PE, repatriation, payroll. We answer them before the tax authorities do.

India Tax for NRIs & Returning Residents

The deduction is taken on the sale price, not the gain — which is why an NRI property sale strands cash unless the certificate is applied for before closing.

Canadian Tax with a Foreign Element

Residency is decided on facts, not on a form — and the year you arrive or leave is the one where the largest amounts turn on the smallest details.

UAE Tax for Expats & Their Home Country

A zero-tax country is only half the answer — the question that decides the bill is whether the country you came from still treats you as resident.

Industries & Client Types We Serve Worldwide

Global E-commerce & Marketplaces
Technology & SaaS
Professional Services Firms
Cross-Border Real Estate
Importers, Exporters & Manufacturers
Athletes, Artists & Entertainers
Remote Workers & Digital Nomads
Investment Funds & Holding Companies

Global E-commerce & Marketplaces

Cross-border tax for sellers shipping worldwide: marketplace withholding, foreign registrations and inventory nexus handled before they become audits.

Marketplaces withhold, remit and report in their own right, so the tax position of a single sale is decided by where the stock sat, where the buyer was and which platform collected — not by where the company is registered. We reconcile the platform's own filings against the returns before either is submitted.

  • Foreign VAT / GST / sales tax registrations
  • Marketplace withholding reviews
  • Inventory nexus & PE analysis
  • Multi-currency books reconciled
Explore E-commerce & Marketplaces

Technology & SaaS

  • Cross-border revenue sourcing & withholding
  • IP structuring with real substance
  • Equity for cross-border teams
  • U.S. expansion: entity & PE setup
Explore Technology & SaaS

Importers, Exporters & Manufacturers

  • Transfer pricing documentation (s.247)
  • Customs value vs transfer price
  • Foreign affiliate reporting (T1134)
  • Country-by-country reporting
Explore Trade & Manufacturing

Athletes, Artists & Entertainers

  • Reg 105 & U.S. CWA agreements
  • Multi-state & country calendars
  • Touring income allocation
  • Royalty & image-rights withholding
Explore Athletes & Entertainers

Remote Workers & Digital Nomads

  • Residency analysis before moving
  • Employer payroll exposure
  • Totalization & social security
  • Foreign tax credits
Explore Remote Workers

Investment Funds & Holding Companies

  • Treaty access & PPT reviews
  • FAPI & surplus computations
  • Withholding-efficient routing
  • Governance & substance
Explore Funds & Holdcos

Questions that come up on Form T1145 / T1146

What happens if we miss the deadline for the T1145 agreement forms?

The forms are time-limited, so the cost of missing the window is not primarily a penalty. It is the loss of the mechanism itself. Without the agreements the Canadian adjustment and the counterparty's treatment are no longer tied together, and the group is exposed to the same profit being taxed in both countries. That is a permanent cost rather than a charge for lateness. Where the window has passed, the work is to establish exactly when it closed, what position each side has actually taken in its filed returns, and what routes remain for bringing the two back into line.

Is there a penalty for filing Form T1145 late?

The charge people usually have in mind is the late-filing penalty on a corporate return, which is worked out on the balance owing for that return. It attaches to the return and not to the agreement forms, so reaching for it here answers the wrong question. Treating a percentage charge as the worst case also understates the position badly. The real exposure on a missed window is the adjusted profit being taxed in both countries: no penalty schedule measures it, no ceiling caps it, and it does not fall away with time. Price the double taxation first, then deal separately with anything owed on the return.

Can the CRA accept the transfer-pricing agreements after the time limit has passed?

That is not something anyone should promise in advance. What can be said is what a request needs to contain to be worth making: when the adjustment arose, when the window closed, why the agreements were not lodged in time, what position each group member has taken in its own filed returns, and precisely what the group is asking for. Assemble that before approaching the CRA rather than during. Establish the counterparty country's position at the same time, because an accommodation in Canada is of limited use if the other side can no longer amend.

Does a late agreement mean our group gets taxed twice on the same profit?

It is the risk, and it is why timing matters so much on these forms. An adjustment made on one side only leaves the same profit in two tax bases. The agreements are what makes the Canadian adjustment consistent with the counterparty's position, so when they are not in place that consistency has to come from somewhere else. Usually that means an amendment in the other country, if its limitation period is still open, or a treaty route, which is slower and takes the decision out of the group's hands. Establish which of those is still available before assuming an outcome.

Our corporation's return was late as well. How is that penalty calculated?

For the 2025 tax year the late-filing penalty is 5% of the balance owing plus 1% for each full month the return is late, to a maximum of 12 months. Where the CRA issued a demand to file and charged a late-filing penalty in any of the three preceding tax years, the charge for that same tax year is 10% plus 2% for each full month, to a maximum of 20 months. Both limbs of that trigger have to be met. Filing late repeatedly, by itself, does not reach the higher rate. Check the notices for the earlier years before accepting any figure.

Does interest keep running while the agreement forms are outstanding?

Interest runs on an unpaid balance and it compounds daily. The agreement forms carry no balance of their own, so outstanding forms are not themselves generating interest. What they can do is leave an adjustment unresolved, and an adjustment that increases the Canadian entity's income produces a balance that does attract it. Separate the two when deciding what to do first. Paying down a quantified balance stops the daily charge growing, while the agreements address the quite different question of whether the profit is taxed once or twice.

What is double tax relief and how is it given?

Three mechanisms, and which one you get depends on your residence country's law and the treaty. Exemption leaves the foreign income out of the residence-country base. Credit taxes it and then subtracts the foreign tax, capped at the residence-country tax on that income. Deduction merely reduces taxable income by the foreign tax, and is usually the weakest. Canada and the United States lead with credit; several treaties give exemption for specific income types. See claiming the credit.

I have not filed for several years while living abroad — what are my options?

Both countries have routes back, and using one before they contact you is what preserves the relief. On the US side there are procedures aimed at taxpayers whose failure was not wilful, including one designed for people living outside the country, and separate procedures for late account reports and information returns alone. Canada has its voluntary disclosures programme and taxpayer relief for penalties and interest. Filing quietly and hoping is the one approach with no protection attached to it. See catch-up filing.

Our practitioners are alumni of leading accounting and tax institutions

Where our partners studied — CPA Canada (In-Depth Tax Program), AICPA, the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India and the Malaysian Institute of Accountants.

Request a Quote +1 (416) 619-0068