What do I have to file as Canadian working in the US?

  • 15+Years of cross-border experience
  • 18,000+Clients served
  • 5.0Google rating
  • 4Global offices — India, USA, Canada & UAE
  • Offices in India, the USA, Canada and the UAE
  • Fixed fee agreed before work starts
  • Google rating 5.0 out of 5
Answer

The federal treaty allocates employment income and gives the credit that prevents double tax; states set their own residency and sourcing rules and are not bound by it. The filing set follows from the position, so the position is established first and the forms follow.

What actually has to be filed

The federal treaty allocates employment income and gives the credit that prevents double tax; states set their own residency and sourcing rules and are not bound by it. Social security is handled separately again, through the totalization agreement rather than the tax treaty.

Two of the firm’s advisers and the team in the open-plan office

The carve-out

A Canadian on a US work visa is usually taxable in both countries in the same year, with a state that may ignore the treaty entirely sitting on top.

What do I have to file as Canadian working in the US?
ItemAmount
Annual salaryC$138,000
Working days in the year230
Days worked in the other country96
Days worked at home134
Income sourced to the other countryC$57,600
Income sourced at homeC$80,400

C$57,600 is sourced abroad on this split, which is the figure the host country taxes and the figure the home credit is computed on. Reproduce this from a travel record, not from memory — it is the first thing an auditor asks for.

Example figures throughout, selected to make the rule visible, with rates and thresholds assumed for the demonstration. Your actual filing uses figures confirmed with the issuing authority for your tax year.

Where to go from here

The full treatment — who it binds, the deadline, the penalty and the fixed fee — is on Canadian working in the US — taxes on a TN, H-1B or L-1. We will tell you if you do not need us. That happens more often than you would expect.

Reviewed for accuracy for the 2025 and 2026 filing seasons by Udit Gupta, Cross-Border Tax Expert, Legal Quotient Consultants. Published as general information. For a position on your own file, call the 24-hour helpline.

Canadian working in US taxes, in practice

This is the page to read on Canadian working in US taxes. It takes Canadian working in the US in order — the test that decides who is affected, the returns and forms that follow from it, and a fee quoted in writing before anything starts.

People also search for: double tax.

Files that look like this one

Case study 1

A first dual year prepared in the right order

An engineer moved to a United States employer on a work visa in the spring and had two sets of obligations for one year. We settled residency for each country first, divided the employment income by where the duties were performed, prepared the return carrying the primary charge, and then claimed the credit on the other. The engagement produced two federal returns that agree with each other, a state filing consistent with both, and a working paper setting out the sourcing split.

Read how this one runs
Case study 2

State residency argued on domicile evidence rather than day counts

A worker had left a state mid-assignment but that state continued to treat him as resident, pointing to a house and a driving licence he had never dealt with. Its test was its own, and the federal treaty had nothing to say about it. We assembled evidence of the change of domicile — lease, registration, family location, working location — and filed on that basis. The engagement produced a stated non-resident position for the state, and a schedule of the ties that had to be closed to support it.

Read how this one runs
Case study 3

Workdays split between an Ontario home and a US office

A commuter crossed the border most weeks and worked some days from her home, and the payroll system treated the whole salary as arising in one place. The division mattered to the federal allocation and to the state. We built the sourcing from her own calendar and border crossing records rather than an estimate, then applied it consistently across the filings. The engagement produced a documented day split, returns in both countries prepared on the same figures, and a record she now maintains weekly.

Read how this one runs
Case study 4

Duplicate social security contributions unwound for a secondee

A seconded employee was contributing to both countries social security systems on the same earnings, because the tax side of his file had been handled and the contributions question had not. That question sits under the totalization agreement rather than the treaty. We established which system he should have been in, obtained the certificate that evidences it, and took it to both payroll departments. The engagement produced contributions to one system only, a corrected payroll record, and recovery of the duplicated deductions for the period covered.

Read how this one runs
Case study 5

Residency settled first for a transferee who kept Canadian ties

An intra-group transferee moved to the United States but left a family home, a spouse and provincial arrangements behind, and had been told two different things about whether he remained resident in Canada. Everything else depended on that. We worked through the ties and the pattern of presence, formed a position, and only then prepared the filings. The engagement produced a documented residency conclusion for the year, returns in both countries built on it, and a list of the ties that would change the answer if they changed.

Read how this one runs
Case study 6

Several years of Canadian filings brought up to date

A visa holder had filed diligently in the United States for years and not at all in Canada, on the understanding that paying tax in one country settled the matter. Canadian residency had never actually been broken. We established the residency position for each year, prepared the missing returns, and claimed relief for the United States tax charged on the same employment income. The engagement produced a filed set of years, a documented credit position, and an answer to the state question nobody had asked.

Read how this one runs
Case study 7

Never Filed a US Return — and Only Just Found Out

Born in the United States, left as an infant, and told by a bank that the returns were owed all along. The work is sequencing: establish which years are actually open, choose the catch-up route on the facts rather than filing quietly, and claim the exclusions and credits that were never taken.

Read how this one runs
Case study 8

Years Filed Quietly, and What That Cost

Posting missing returns without taking a view on the route gives up the certification-based protection and can itself be read as an indicator. The first task on these files is mapping which years remain eligible for which route.

Read how this one runs

All case studies — every published engagement in one place.

Core International & Cross-Border Tax Services

International Tax Planning & Advisory

Strategy and compliance for income, assets and families spread across borders.

One coordinating team: filings on every side of the border are sequenced so treaty relief and foreign tax credits are claimed once — and in the right country.

U.S. & Cross-Border Tax Returns

Dual filers: U.S. citizens in Canada and Canadians with U.S. income run two parallel systems — we prepare both, in the right order, every year.

Expat & Emigration Tax

The move year is its own project: the elections and valuations filed that year decide the next decade of both countries’ returns.

Non-Resident Canadian Tax

Default withholding is 25% of gross: elective returns routinely turn over-withheld rent and pensions into refunds.

Transfer Pricing & BEPS

Documentation prepared with the return is the cheapest insurance in international tax; reconstructing it during an audit is the most expensive.

Cross-Border Estates & Trusts

Wills drafted for one country routinely misfire in the other — deemed disposition here, estate tax there, credits in between.

Cross-Border Corporate Tax

Expansion raises the same four questions every time — entity, PE, repatriation, payroll. We answer them before the tax authorities do.

India Tax for NRIs & Returning Residents

The deduction is taken on the sale price, not the gain — which is why an NRI property sale strands cash unless the certificate is applied for before closing.

Canadian Tax with a Foreign Element

Residency is decided on facts, not on a form — and the year you arrive or leave is the one where the largest amounts turn on the smallest details.

UAE Tax for Expats & Their Home Country

A zero-tax country is only half the answer — the question that decides the bill is whether the country you came from still treats you as resident.

Industries & Client Types We Serve Worldwide

Global E-commerce & Marketplaces
Technology & SaaS
Professional Services Firms
Cross-Border Real Estate
Importers, Exporters & Manufacturers
Athletes, Artists & Entertainers
Remote Workers & Digital Nomads
Investment Funds & Holding Companies

Global E-commerce & Marketplaces

  • Foreign VAT / GST / sales tax registrations
  • Marketplace withholding reviews
  • Inventory nexus & PE analysis
  • Multi-currency books reconciled
Explore E-commerce & Marketplaces

Technology & SaaS

  • Cross-border revenue sourcing & withholding
  • IP structuring with real substance
  • Equity for cross-border teams
  • U.S. expansion: entity & PE setup
Explore Technology & SaaS

Importers, Exporters & Manufacturers

Related-party purchasing, customs value versus transfer price, and foreign-affiliate structures put trading businesses inside the s.247 documentation rules.

Goods crossing a border move the tax question from income to indirect: registration thresholds, place of supply, the customs value and the transfer price between related entities all have to agree with each other. When they do not, the adjustment arrives from two authorities at once and each one uses the other's number.

  • Transfer pricing documentation (s.247)
  • Customs value vs transfer price
  • Foreign affiliate reporting (T1134)
  • Country-by-country reporting
Explore Trade & Manufacturing

Athletes, Artists & Entertainers

  • Reg 105 & U.S. CWA agreements
  • Multi-state & country calendars
  • Touring income allocation
  • Royalty & image-rights withholding
Explore Athletes & Entertainers

Remote Workers & Digital Nomads

  • Residency analysis before moving
  • Employer payroll exposure
  • Totalization & social security
  • Foreign tax credits
Explore Remote Workers

Investment Funds & Holding Companies

  • Treaty access & PPT reviews
  • FAPI & surplus computations
  • Withholding-efficient routing
  • Governance & substance
Explore Funds & Holdcos

The follow-up questions on Canadian working in the US — taxes on a TN, H-1B or L-1

Do I have to file in both Canada and the US in the same year?

Frequently yes. Working in the United States on a work visa while keeping Canadian ties commonly makes you taxable in both countries on the same employment income for the same year, and neither filing removes the other. What the federal treaty does is decide which country may tax what, and give a credit so the same income is not taxed twice over. That relief is claimed on a return. So the practical answer is two federal filings that have to agree with each other, plus whatever the state requires on its own rules.

Does the Canada US treaty protect me from state tax as well?

No, and this is the part that catches people. The treaty binds the two federal governments. States write their own residency and sourcing rules and are not obliged to follow a federal treaty position at all, so income the treaty allocates one way can still be taxed by a state on its own test. The state analysis is therefore a separate exercise with its own conclusion, run alongside the federal one rather than derived from it. A file that looks only at the two federal returns is an incomplete file.

Which country taxes my US salary first, Canada or the US?

Ask instead which country has the primary claim on that income under the treaty, because the credit mechanism depends on the answer. Employment income is generally allocated to the country where the duties were performed, and the other country, typically the one where you remain resident, allows relief for the tax the first one charged. The practical consequence is the order of preparation. The return carrying the primary charge is prepared first, because its final figure is an input to the credit claimed on the other. In the wrong order you prepare one of them twice.

How do I avoid paying social security contributions in both countries?

Through a different instrument. Social security is not dealt with by the tax treaty but by the totalization agreement between the two countries, which decides which system a worker contributes to and prevents contributions to both on the same earnings. It is claimed with its own documentation, obtained through the relevant authority, and a payroll department will keep deducting until it sees that document. Because it sits apart, it can be missed entirely on a file where the tax side was handled carefully, so it is worth raising explicitly rather than assuming the treaty covered it.

I moved to the US mid-year on a TN visa — what do I file?

Start by settling residency for each country across that year, because the filings follow from it and not the other way round. A move part-way through a year commonly produces a period in each country and a return in each, with the employment income divided by where the duties were performed rather than by where the salary was deposited. Then run the state question separately. In that order — residency, sourcing, credit, state — each step has one answer. Beginning instead with the forms means revisiting all four.

My US employer kept withholding state tax after I left the state — now what?

This is a state matter rather than a treaty one, and it is resolved on that state own rules about residency and where work was performed. Two things need doing. The payroll record has to be corrected so the deduction stops, which usually needs evidence of where you now live and where the duties are actually carried out. And the amounts already deducted are recovered from that state by filing for the year on the basis that the income was not its to tax. Keep the evidence of your working location, because it decides both.

Would a state exit tax even be constitutional?

A levy imposed purely for leaving would face serious challenge under the constitutional protections for interstate commerce and the right to travel, which is part of why proposals stall. But that is not what most states are doing. Taxing income that was earned or sourced within the state before you left is conventional, long upheld, and where almost all real disputes sit — which is why the useful question is sourcing and domicile, not constitutionality. See state non-resident returns.

Do dual citizens have to file US taxes if they live abroad?

Yes. US filing follows citizenship, not residence or where the income arose, and the obligation continues for as long as the citizenship does. Two further obligations travel with it and are keyed to account balances rather than income, so they can apply in a year with no US tax at all: the foreign bank account report to FinCEN, and the specified foreign asset statement with the return. Most people who discover a problem discover it there. See two returns as a dual citizen.

Our practitioners are alumni of leading accounting and tax institutions

Where our partners studied — CPA Canada (In-Depth Tax Program), AICPA, the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India and the Malaysian Institute of Accountants.

Request a Quote +1 (416) 619-0068