Schedule FA is the dedicated part of the Indian return where foreign assets are reported, and it is drawn widely. Bank and custodial accounts, shares and other securities, interests in entities, and signing authority over an account held by somebody else all belong there, with no minimum value to clear first. The schedule asks for identifying details of the institution and of the holding rather than a single figure, so most of the work is in assembling records for each item. The sensible order is to build a complete inventory and then fill the schedule from it, rather than filling it from memory.
What do I have to file as Indian resident with foreign assets?
- 15+Years of the founder's cross-border experience
- 18,000+Clients served across our offices in India, the USA, Canada and the UAE
- 5.0Google rating
- 4Global offices — India, USA, Canada & UAE
Disclosure sits in a dedicated schedule and is tested against information India receives automatically from foreign institutions. The filing set follows from the position, so the position is established first and the forms follow.
What actually has to be filed
Disclosure sits in a dedicated schedule and is tested against information India receives automatically from foreign institutions. Non-disclosure is dealt with under a separate statute from ordinary tax law, with its own assessment powers and penalties.

The exception
India's foreign-asset disclosure has no minimum. One overseas bank account, one foreign share, one signing authority on someone else's account — all of it goes on the return.
What to do next
The full treatment — who it binds, the deadline, the penalty and the fixed fee — is on Indian resident with foreign assets (Schedule FA). If that describes your position, the next step is a short call — not a form.
Reviewed for the 2025 and 2026 filing seasons by Udit Gupta, International Tax, Cross-Border Tax & Transfer Pricing Expert, Legal Quotient Consultants. General guidance only. Your own facts decide the answer, so bring them to a call before relying on this.
Cross-border situations we are engaged for
Rebuilding a brokerage history for a completed disclosure
A client who had worked abroad for years held a brokerage account with holdings bought and sold across many of them. His Indian returns reported the account but not the securities inside it. We obtained annual statements from the broker, listed each holding and the period it was held, and reconstructed the detail the schedule asks for. The engagement produced item-by-item disclosure for the years in scope, a reconciliation between the broker's statements and what had previously been filed, and a working file the client can extend himself each year.
Read how this one runsVested employer shares that never reached the schedule
An employee of an overseas group had shares vest under a plan while she was resident in India. The shares sat with a plan administrator rather than a bank, and she had not recognised them as a foreign asset at all. We obtained the plan statements, established the vesting and holding dates, and set out how the holding and the administrator's account both fall to be reported. The engagement produced disclosure for the affected years, a written note distinguishing the income events from the holding, and a checklist tied to the plan's vesting calendar.
Read how this one runsSigning authority confirmed with an employer before filing
A finance manager could sign on two of her employer's overseas accounts. She had no interest in the funds and had never reported the authority. We explained why the authority is reportable regardless of beneficial interest, drafted the request the employer needed in order to confirm the account particulars and the dates, and reported both accounts once those confirmations arrived. The engagement produced disclosure supported by the employer's own written confirmation, and a note for the company's records setting out what its India-resident signatories are each expected to report.
Read how this one runsA mismatch query answered with a reconciled inventory
A client received a query about an overseas account after India was sent information about it by the institution holding it. Nothing was missing in substance, but the return did not match the record the department held. We built a complete inventory, reconciled it line by line against the information reported to India, and identified where the difference arose. The engagement produced a reconciled schedule, a written explanation of the discrepancy with supporting statements behind each line, and revised disclosure for the year in question.
Read how this one runsJoint account with a non-resident sibling reported correctly
Two siblings held an overseas account jointly; one lived in India and one did not. The resident sibling had left it off her return on the basis that the money was her brother's. We reviewed the funding and the account terms, established her interest and her authority on the account, and set out why her position was reportable even where the funds were not hers. The engagement produced disclosure for the years concerned, a note of the evidence on funding, and a written position both siblings now keep on file.
Read how this one runsDormant account found during an inventory of foreign holdings
A returning professional asked us to prepare the current year's schedule. The inventory we built from his own records and old correspondence turned up an account opened for a short overseas assignment years earlier and never closed. He had forgotten it existed. We obtained statements from the bank, established the years it was open while he was resident, and brought it into the disclosure. The engagement produced corrected schedules for the affected years, the bank's confirmation of the account's status, and a closure instruction so it stops recurring.
Read how this one runsWhether the Year Made Someone an NRI
Indian residence is decided by presence tests applied to the financial year, and a single trip can change the answer for the whole of it. The status is established before any return or exemption is considered.
Read how this one runsA US Citizen Settled in India, Filing on Both Sides
Residence in India and citizenship in the United States produce two annual returns for one income. The order decides the credit, and the Indian financial year and the US calendar year have to be reconciled before either is prepared.
Read how this one runsAll case studies — every published engagement in one place.
Core International & Cross-Border Tax Services
Strategy and compliance for income, assets and families spread across borders.
Industries & Client Types We Serve Worldwide
- Foreign VAT / GST / sales tax registrations
- Marketplace withholding reviews
- Inventory nexus & PE analysis
- Multi-currency books reconciled
- Cross-border revenue sourcing & withholding
- IP structuring with real substance
- Equity for cross-border teams
- U.S. expansion: entity & PE setup
- Reg 105 / 102 waivers
- Permanent establishment risk
- Partner mobility planning
- Cross-border withholding recovery
- Section 216 rental returns
- FIRPTA withholding recovery
- Section 116 clearance
- Treaty credit optimization
- Transfer pricing documentation (s.247)
- Customs value vs transfer price
- Foreign affiliate reporting (T1134)
- Country-by-country reporting
Performance income is taxed where earned — Regulation 105 in Canada, withholding agreements in the U.S. — with special treaty articles overriding the usual rules.
Performance income is taxed where the performance happens, and the deduction is usually taken at source on the gross fee before expenses. Recovering the difference is a filing exercise in the other country, and it only works if the tour, the residency and the withholding certificates were documented while the work was being done.
- Reg 105 & U.S. CWA agreements
- Multi-state & country calendars
- Touring income allocation
- Royalty & image-rights withholding
- Residency analysis before moving
- Employer payroll exposure
- Totalization & social security
- Foreign tax credits
- Treaty access & PPT reviews
- FAPI & surplus computations
- Withholding-efficient routing
- Governance & substance
Indian resident with foreign assets (Schedule FA) — the questions that follow
No. There is no value threshold at all. One overseas bank account with a nominal balance, one foreign share, or signing authority on an account belonging to a relative or an employer is enough to require disclosure. This is the most common misunderstanding we see, usually because other countries' reporting regimes do have thresholds and the assumption travels with the client. The absence of a floor also means a dormant account nobody has looked at for years is a reporting item, so the inventory has to be complete rather than merely material.
Largely because it is told. India receives information about accounts held abroad automatically from foreign institutions, and what you report is tested against what arrives. That is why the mismatch, rather than the omission in the abstract, is usually what prompts a query: the department already holds a record that your schedule does not match. It also means disclosure built from a complete inventory is far easier to stand behind than one assembled item by item as questions come in. We prepare the inventory first for that reason.
Yes, and it is reported whether or not the money is yours. Signing authority over an account held by someone else, whether an employer, a parent or a company you work for, is a disclosure item in its own right, and having no beneficial interest does not remove it. What you need is the institution's confirmation of the account particulars and of the dates your authority ran, which usually has to come from the account holder rather than from you. Asking early matters, because employers can be slow to provide it.
An account held at any point in the year is part of the picture, so closing it partway through does not make it disappear from the schedule. What the schedule wants includes the details of the account and the period it was held, which is precisely why closing statements are worth keeping at the time rather than requesting later. Banks abroad archive or destroy records for closed accounts on their own timetable, not yours. If a closure is coming, download the statements and the closing confirmation before it happens.
It is dealt with under a separate statute from ordinary tax law, with its own assessment powers and its own penalties, which is why it is not safely treated as a late-filing problem. The first step is still factual: establish which years you were fully resident, build the inventory, and work out precisely what was omitted in each year. That position, documented, is what any route forward depends on. We do that work on a fixed fee agreed in writing before it starts, and you can reach us on +1 (416) 619-0068.
Yes. Equity held directly, shares acquired under an employee plan once they have vested to you, units in foreign funds, the custodial account they sit in and the foreign bank account that funds it are all disclosable by a resident — separately, with acquisition cost, peak value and income for the year. This is where returning employees of multinational groups most often have a gap, because the plan administrator reports to the employer, not to you. See Schedule FA reporting.
There is no single period that settles it. Canada looks at whether your ties were actually severed, not at a day count; the United States taxes citizens regardless of where they live; India applies day-count thresholds with a second limb reaching back over earlier years. Time abroad is evidence, not a rule — what decides it is where your home, family and economic life sit. See tax residency.



