For employment income the country where the work is physically performed normally has the first claim, so a German assignment salary is generally taxed there first and the US return is computed afterwards with relief for the German tax properly paid. Rates are rarely where the difficulty lies in this corridor. The difficulty is the items that do not belong neatly to one year or one country, such as equity awards straddling a move and pension arrangements whose treatment has to be established rather than assumed, and those decide the final figure.
Which country taxes me first, US or Germany?
- 15+Years of the founder's cross-border experience
- 18,000+Clients served across our offices in India, the USA, Canada and the UAE
- 5.0Google rating
- 4Global offices — India, USA, Canada & UAE
Equity granted in one country and vested in the other is split by workdays; pension arrangements need characterising under the specific articles. One country taxes at source and the other gives credit, and getting that order wrong is what produces double taxation on paper.
Which country goes first
Equity granted in one country and vested in the other is split by workdays; pension arrangements need characterising under the specific articles.

Where it does not apply
An engineering, pharma and academic corridor with long assignments and a well-used treaty, where the difficulty is the interaction of pensions and equity rather than the rates.
Your next step
The full treatment — who it binds, the deadline, the penalty and the fixed fee — is on US ↔ Germany cross-border tax. If that describes your position, the next step is a short call — not a form.
Checked and signed off for the 2025 and 2026 filing seasons by Udit Gupta, International Tax, Cross-Border Tax & Transfer Pricing Expert, Legal Quotient Consultants. General information, not advice for your circumstances — call our 24-hour helpline to discuss your own position.
Cross-border situations we are engaged for
Apportioning an equity award by workdays across a move
A client was granted equity by a US employer, moved to a German role during the vesting period and vested after arrival. Both returns had included the full amount. We reconstructed the workday record across the whole period from grant to vesting, apportioned the award between the two countries on that basis, and recomputed each return to the same split. The engagement produced an allocation both filings share, relief claimed on the correct side, and a workday log kept from then on for every award still unvested.
Read how this one runsCharacterising a German pension before a long assignment began
An engineer accepting a long German assignment asked about the pension arrangement before signing. We characterised the German arrangement and the US plan being left behind against the specific treaty articles dealing with pensions, on the actual terms of each, and set out what would enter the US computation during the assignment and what would not. The engagement produced a written characterisation with its reasoning, a return position applied consistently from the first assignment year, and a note for the employer's mobility file describing the arrangement in the same terms.
Read how this one runsTwo payrolls reporting the same award in full
A client's German payroll and US payroll each reported one equity award in full, so the two reported figures together exceeded the award itself. We traced the award from grant to settlement, established the workday split, and identified which country was entitled to tax which part first. Each payroll was corrected where it could be, and the returns were prepared on the allocation regardless. The engagement produced returns reconciling to the actual award, a documented allocation, and a correction request the employer used for the following year's reporting.
Read how this one runsRelief recomputed on the German assessment rather than withholding
A client had claimed relief on the US return for the German wage tax shown on monthly payslips. The German assessment, once issued, was a different figure, because the package included equity and pension elements the payroll had handled provisionally. We waited for the assessed position, matched it to the correct US year, and recomputed the relief claim on that basis. The engagement produced an amended return supported by the German assessment, a reconciliation between withholding and assessment, and a sequence for later years that files the German side first.
Read how this one runsA research contract examined for the right treaty category
A researcher moved to a German university on a contract the previous preparer had treated as ordinary employment. Reading the contract showed a payment that needed testing against the treaty's specific categories rather than the general employment rule. We established what the payment actually was, identified the provision applying to it, and computed both returns accordingly. The engagement produced a return position grounded in the contract wording, a note of the analysis for the institution's records, and a review of the pension arrangement the post also created.
Read how this one runsA returning assignee drawing benefits from a German arrangement
A client returned to the United States after many years in Germany and began drawing benefits from the arrangement built up there. The earlier US returns had taken no position on it at all, so there was nothing to build on. We characterised the arrangement under the specific treaty articles, established what had and had not been taxed during the working years, and computed the treatment of the benefits now being paid. The engagement produced a stated position for the payment years, the supporting history behind it, and consistency with the years still open.
Read how this one runsA Non-Resident Estate Holding US Assets
US situs assets sit inside the US estate tax net regardless of where the owner lived, and the exemption available to a non-resident is not the resident one. The file establishes situs asset by asset before any relief is claimed.
Read how this one runsGreen Card Kept, Moved to Canada — Both Returns Still Due
Holding a green card does not end the US filing obligation, and living in Canada starts a Canadian one. The engagement fixes residence under the treaty tie-breaker, then decides which return the relief is claimed on so the two do not contradict each other.
Read how this one runsAll case studies — every published engagement in one place.
Core International & Cross-Border Tax Services
Strategy and compliance for income, assets and families spread across borders.
Industries & Client Types We Serve Worldwide
- Foreign VAT / GST / sales tax registrations
- Marketplace withholding reviews
- Inventory nexus & PE analysis
- Multi-currency books reconciled
Software revenue crosses borders by default — sourcing rules, withholding on licence-like payments and IP location decide the effective rate.
Software revenue is rarely taxed where the team sits. Licence, subscription and service income are characterised differently by each side, and the answer decides withholding at source, treaty relief and whether a foreign customer creates a taxable presence at all — questions that are cheap to settle before the contract and expensive afterwards.
- Cross-border revenue sourcing & withholding
- IP structuring with real substance
- Equity for cross-border teams
- U.S. expansion: entity & PE setup
- Reg 105 / 102 waivers
- Permanent establishment risk
- Partner mobility planning
- Cross-border withholding recovery
- Section 216 rental returns
- FIRPTA withholding recovery
- Section 116 clearance
- Treaty credit optimization
- Transfer pricing documentation (s.247)
- Customs value vs transfer price
- Foreign affiliate reporting (T1134)
- Country-by-country reporting
- Reg 105 & U.S. CWA agreements
- Multi-state & country calendars
- Touring income allocation
- Royalty & image-rights withholding
- Residency analysis before moving
- Employer payroll exposure
- Totalization & social security
- Foreign tax credits
- Treaty access & PPT reviews
- FAPI & surplus computations
- Withholding-efficient routing
- Governance & substance
Also asked about US and Germany
Equity granted in one country and vested in the other is split by workdays. The award is treated as earned over the period between grant and vesting, and the earnings are apportioned according to where the work was physically done during that period, so an award granted before a move and vested after it belongs partly to each country. That makes a workday record covering the whole vesting period, not just the year of vesting, the document the position depends on. Reconstructing it years later from calendars and travel bookings is the expensive way to do this.
Both countries are likely to have a claim, in proportions set by where you worked over the vesting period rather than by where you were living on the vesting date. Payroll in each country will often report the whole amount, because each system sees only its own side, and the two reports then overlap. The work is to compute the workday split once, use it in both returns, and claim relief on the correct side for the tax the other country was entitled to take first. Two full inclusions with no allocation is the usual position we are asked to unwind.
It has to be characterised before that can be answered. Pension arrangements in this corridor need characterising under the specific treaty articles dealing with them, on the arrangement's actual terms, rather than by analogy to a US plan. The characterisation decides whether employer contributions and internal growth stay outside the US computation until benefits are drawn, or enter it as they arise. Reach the conclusion once, write down the reasoning, and file consistently on it. A treatment that changes between preparers is what produces correspondence years later.
Relief is generally available for foreign tax properly paid on income Germany was entitled to tax first, but the claim rests on tax finally determined, not on the amount withheld through the payroll. German withholding and the eventual German assessment often differ, and an assignment package carrying equity and pension elements is exactly where they differ most. So the sequence is to complete the German position, take the assessed figure, match it to the right US year, and claim relief on that. A payslip total is a provisional number.
Start with where the work is done and what the payment actually is, then check whether a specific treaty provision applies to that class of payment, because the treaty deals with several categories individually rather than leaving everything to the general employment rule. A stipend, a salaried research post and a grant paid to an institution are not the same thing for this purpose, and the contract wording matters more than the job title. Academic moves in this corridor are also often long enough for pension and equity questions to arise alongside the pay.
With paperwork built for both systems rather than one. In practice that means wills that work where each asset actually sits, an executor with authority a foreign bank or land registry will accept, clearance certificates before the estate distributes so the executor is not left personally exposed, and an estate tax exposure calculation done while the person is alive and can still act on it. Doing it afterwards costs more and forecloses most of the options. See cross-border wills and trusts.
American expats and green card holders need to file US returns for life, and many of them pay little or no US tax once the relief is applied — but the filing is what unlocks the relief, so the two questions have different answers. The exclusion for foreign earned income, the credit for foreign tax already paid and the treaty between the two countries between them usually leave the total at roughly the higher of the two countries' tax rather than the sum. Skip the return and none of it applies. See Americans abroad.



