Who files Form 1120-F?

  • 15+Years of cross-border experience
  • 18,000+Clients served
  • 5.0Google rating
  • 4Global offices — India, USA, Canada & UAE
  • Offices in India, the USA, Canada and the UAE
  • 18,000+ clients served
  • 24-hour helpline: +1 (416) 619-0068
Answer

Foreign corporations with a US permanent establishment, US business activity, or US income where the treaty position needs to be claimed on a return. The obligation is decided by facts rather than by tax owing, which is why a nil position does not remove it.

The rule on who files

Foreign corporations with a US permanent establishment, US business activity, or US income where the treaty position needs to be claimed on a return.

Two of the firm’s advisers at the glass desk in the Delhi office

The case that is treated differently

The protective return is the point most groups miss: filing on time preserves deductions and treaty positions even when the conclusion is that no US tax is owed, and a late return can lose the deductions entirely.

Who files Form 1120-F?
ItemAmount
Income taxed in both countriesC$160,000
Tax paid abroad (assumed 32%)C$51,200
Home tax on the same income (assumed 29%)C$46,400
Credit available (lesser of the two)C$46,400
Home tax still payableC$0

The credit fully absorbs the home liability on this income, so nothing further is payable at home — but the return still has to be filed and the credit still has to be claimed, by category and by country.

Treat these numbers as a worked example rather than advice — they exist to make the mechanics visible, and the rates and thresholds are assumed for the illustration. For a real filing, we verify each figure with the authority that publishes it, for your year.

What to do next

The full treatment — who it binds, the deadline, the penalty and the fixed fee — is on 1120-F — foreign corporation return. One call is usually enough to know whether this is a filing or a project.

Reviewed against current guidance for the 2025 and 2026 filing seasons by Udit Gupta, Cross-Border Tax Expert, Legal Quotient Consultants. Published as general information. For a position on your own file, call the 24-hour helpline.

Where who has to file US tax return comes into this file

People reach this page searching for who has to file US tax return. It is covered here as it applies to Form 1120-F — who it applies to, what has to be filed, and what it costs, at a fixed fee agreed before the work starts.

Files that look like this one

Case study 1

Project site tested and a protective return filed for the period

A foreign engineering company had installed and commissioned equipment at a US site over several months using its own staff, and had assumed that a project without an office was not a taxable presence. We took the facts as they were: time on site, who supervised, what was contracted and where it was negotiated. The conclusion was arguable rather than clear, so we filed for the period on the basis that preserved the company's deductions and treaty position. The engagement produced a documented permanent establishment analysis and a return filed on time for the period the work was done.

Read how this one runs
Case study 2

Withholding reclaimed by filing the return that claims the treaty rate

A foreign corporation receiving US-source royalties had been withheld on at the domestic rate for several periods, because the payer had never been given the documentation it needed. The overpaid amount could only be recovered on a return. We established the treaty position, obtained the payment and withholding records from the payer, filed for the open periods claiming the correct treatment, and corrected the documentation the payer holds. The engagement produced a recovered withholding for the periods still open, and a payer file that stops the same overwithholding recurring.

Read how this one runs
Case study 3

Whether a subsidiary's activity reached its foreign parent

A group with an established US subsidiary was told during an internal examination that the parent might itself have US business activity, because the subsidiary's staff were negotiating contracts in the parent's name. We separated what each company did, reading the contracts and the signing authorities rather than the organisation chart, and concluded that some contracts were the parent's own business. The parent filed for the affected periods. The engagement produced a written division of activity between the companies, a filed return for the parent, and revised signing authorities so that future contracts sit where the group intends.

Read how this one runs
Case study 4

Employees seconded into the United States and the filings that followed

A foreign company had seconded engineers to a US customer for a long assignment, under an arrangement drafted for immigration purposes and never examined for tax. The people were the company's employees, working on the company's contract, at the customer's premises. We set out what the arrangement actually was, identified the resulting US business activity of the foreign company, and filed for the periods concerned. The engagement produced a return for each affected period, a memorandum on the secondment arrangement, and an amended template for future assignments that reflects the tax position as well as the visa one.

Read how this one runs
Case study 5

Filing position set before the first US contract was signed

A foreign manufacturer preparing to sell into the United States asked us to establish its filing position before it appointed anyone or signed anything. We worked through the alternatives as facts rather than theory: a distributor buying and reselling, an agent with authority to bind, or staff travelling to customers. Each produced a different answer. The client chose an arrangement whose consequences it was content with, and we documented the basis and filed for the first period on that footing. The engagement produced a chosen structure, the evidence for it, and a first return consistent with both.

Read how this one runs
Case study 6

Final periods filed after US activity was wound down

A foreign corporation that had run a US operation for years stopped the activity, closed the bank account and moved on, without filing for the last periods or recording that the activity had ended. Long afterwards a bank asked questions. We established when the activity actually ceased, from contracts, payroll records and the last customer invoices, and filed for the outstanding periods with the cessation documented. The engagement produced the completed filings, a dated record of when US business activity ended, and a clean answer to the bank's question.

Read how this one runs
Case study 7

A Pricing Study That Started With Who Does What

Functions, assets and risks decide which entity should earn the return, and the method follows from that rather than the other way round. Getting the sequence backwards is how a study fails on its first question.

Read how this one runs
Case study 8

Ten Years of Missed Returns Filed as One Engagement

Filing many years at once is a sequencing problem: carry-forwards, instalments and credits from the earliest year feed the latest. Filing them out of order is what turns a recoverable position into an assessed one.

Read how this one runs

All case studies — every published engagement in one place.

Core International & Cross-Border Tax Services

International Tax Planning & Advisory

Strategy and compliance for income, assets and families spread across borders.

One coordinating team: filings on every side of the border are sequenced so treaty relief and foreign tax credits are claimed once — and in the right country.

U.S. & Cross-Border Tax Returns

Dual filers: U.S. citizens in Canada and Canadians with U.S. income run two parallel systems — we prepare both, in the right order, every year.

Expat & Emigration Tax

The move year is its own project: the elections and valuations filed that year decide the next decade of both countries’ returns.

Non-Resident Canadian Tax

Default withholding is 25% of gross: elective returns routinely turn over-withheld rent and pensions into refunds.

Transfer Pricing & BEPS

Documentation prepared with the return is the cheapest insurance in international tax; reconstructing it during an audit is the most expensive.

Cross-Border Estates & Trusts

Wills drafted for one country routinely misfire in the other — deemed disposition here, estate tax there, credits in between.

Cross-Border Corporate Tax

Expansion raises the same four questions every time — entity, PE, repatriation, payroll. We answer them before the tax authorities do.

India Tax for NRIs & Returning Residents

The deduction is taken on the sale price, not the gain — which is why an NRI property sale strands cash unless the certificate is applied for before closing.

Canadian Tax with a Foreign Element

Residency is decided on facts, not on a form — and the year you arrive or leave is the one where the largest amounts turn on the smallest details.

UAE Tax for Expats & Their Home Country

A zero-tax country is only half the answer — the question that decides the bill is whether the country you came from still treats you as resident.

Industries & Client Types We Serve Worldwide

Global E-commerce & Marketplaces
Technology & SaaS
Professional Services Firms
Cross-Border Real Estate
Importers, Exporters & Manufacturers
Athletes, Artists & Entertainers
Remote Workers & Digital Nomads
Investment Funds & Holding Companies

Global E-commerce & Marketplaces

  • Foreign VAT / GST / sales tax registrations
  • Marketplace withholding reviews
  • Inventory nexus & PE analysis
  • Multi-currency books reconciled
Explore E-commerce & Marketplaces

Technology & SaaS

  • Cross-border revenue sourcing & withholding
  • IP structuring with real substance
  • Equity for cross-border teams
  • U.S. expansion: entity & PE setup
Explore Technology & SaaS

Importers, Exporters & Manufacturers

  • Transfer pricing documentation (s.247)
  • Customs value vs transfer price
  • Foreign affiliate reporting (T1134)
  • Country-by-country reporting
Explore Trade & Manufacturing

Athletes, Artists & Entertainers

Performance income is taxed where earned — Regulation 105 in Canada, withholding agreements in the U.S. — with special treaty articles overriding the usual rules.

Performance income is taxed where the performance happens, and the deduction is usually taken at source on the gross fee before expenses. Recovering the difference is a filing exercise in the other country, and it only works if the tour, the residency and the withholding certificates were documented while the work was being done.

  • Reg 105 & U.S. CWA agreements
  • Multi-state & country calendars
  • Touring income allocation
  • Royalty & image-rights withholding
Explore Athletes & Entertainers

Remote Workers & Digital Nomads

  • Residency analysis before moving
  • Employer payroll exposure
  • Totalization & social security
  • Foreign tax credits
Explore Remote Workers

Investment Funds & Holding Companies

  • Treaty access & PPT reviews
  • FAPI & surplus computations
  • Withholding-efficient routing
  • Governance & substance
Explore Funds & Holdcos

The follow-up questions on Form 1120-F

Do we file Form 1120-F if the treaty says we owe no US tax?

Usually yes, and the treaty position is the reason to file rather than a reason not to. The return is where a foreign corporation claims its position, so a conclusion reached in a memorandum and never filed is a conclusion nobody has been told about. There is a second reason that matters more. Filing on time preserves deductions and treaty positions even where the outcome is that no US tax is due, and a return filed late can lose the deductions altogether, which turns a nil position into tax on a gross figure. That asymmetry is the whole argument for filing.

What is a protective return and do we need one?

It is a return filed by a foreign corporation that believes it has no US tax liability, filed precisely so that the belief is on the record and the positions behind it are preserved. You need one whenever the answer to whether the company is taxable in the United States is arguable rather than obvious — a project site, people travelling in, an agent acting on the company's behalf, a subsidiary whose activities might be attributed to it. The cost of filing one is known in advance. The cost of being wrong without one is that deductions and treaty positions may no longer be available to you.

Does having a salesperson in the US create a filing obligation for us?

It can, and the answer turns on what the person actually does rather than on their job title or where their contract was signed. Someone who solicits and concludes business, or who habitually acts for the company in a way that binds it, points towards US business activity and a permanent establishment. Someone gathering information does not. This is a facts exercise: diaries, correspondence, authority to sign, where negotiations happen. Because the conclusion is arguable in most real cases, the sensible course is to document the facts as you go and file on the position they support, rather than settle it in hindsight.

All our US income was withheld on already — do we still file 1120-F?

It depends on whether the income is connected with a US trade or business, and on whether you want to claim anything. The return covers income effectively connected with a US trade or business and US-source income that was not fully withheld on, so income correctly withheld on at the right rate, unconnected with any US business, may need nothing further. Two things commonly change that answer: withholding taken at a higher rate than the treaty allows, which is reclaimed on a return, and US activity that the group had never recognised as a business at all.

Does a US warehouse or a US contractor make our company taxable?

Both are live questions rather than settled ones, and the analysis is about the function performed, not the label used. A storage facility used for delivery sits differently from one where orders are fulfilled and customers served. A contractor working for many principals sits differently from one working only for you, on your instructions, for years. What we do in practice is describe the arrangement as it actually operates, test it against the permanent establishment question, and then decide whether to file and on what basis. Where it is arguable, a protective return keeps the positions available.

Which company in our group files Form 1120-F?

The foreign corporation that has the US activity or the US income, in its own name. It is not the group's ultimate parent by virtue of being the parent, and it is not the US subsidiary, which files its own return as a US corporation. In groups where several foreign companies touch the United States the answer can be more than one of them, because the company that contracted, the company whose staff travelled and the company that received the income are often different. We map the flows and the people company by company, then file for each company the facts put in scope.

Do I need to report a foreign business I own?

Almost certainly, and on more than one form. Canada requires reporting of foreign affiliates on the T1134; the United States has a family of returns keyed to the entity type and your level of control, and several carry penalties that apply whether or not any tax is owed. These are information returns, so the obligation follows the ownership rather than the profit. See T1134.

What is a foreign trust for US tax purposes?

A trust that is not a domestic trust — broadly, one that fails the tests looking at whether a US court can exercise primary supervision and whether US persons control the substantial decisions. The classification decides everything downstream: whether the settlor is taxed on the income as owner, how distributions to US beneficiaries are taxed, and which annual information returns are due. Many ordinary foreign arrangements, including some pension and education savings vehicles, land inside the definition. See Form 3520-A.

Our practitioners are alumni of leading accounting and tax institutions

Where our partners studied — CPA Canada (In-Depth Tax Program), AICPA, the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India and the Malaysian Institute of Accountants.

Request a Quote +1 (416) 619-0068