Who files Form 1120?

  • 15+Years of cross-border experience
  • 18,000+Clients served
  • 5.0Google rating
  • 4Global offices — India, USA, Canada & UAE
  • 15+ years of cross-border experience
  • 18,000+ clients served
  • 24-hour helpline: +1 (416) 619-0068
Answer

US corporations, including US subsidiaries of foreign groups and US companies with foreign operations. The obligation is decided by facts rather than by tax owing, which is why a nil position does not remove it.

The rule on who files

US corporations, including US subsidiaries of foreign groups and US companies with foreign operations.

The team reviewing a file together at a desk

Where it does not apply

A treaty does not reduce a US corporation's own tax — it is a US resident. Treaty questions on this return are about payments in and out of it, which is why the structure conversation happens before incorporation, not at filing.

Who files Form 1120?
ItemAmount
Income taxed in both countriesC$68,000
Tax paid abroad (assumed 20%)C$13,600
Home tax on the same income (assumed 39%)C$26,520
Credit available (lesser of the two)C$13,600
Home tax still payableC$12,920

The credit absorbs C$13,600 and leaves C$12,920 payable at home, because the home rate on this income is the higher of the two. The balance is real cash and it is due on the home timetable, which is why instalments get raised in the first meeting.

Example figures throughout, selected to make the rule visible, with rates and thresholds assumed for the demonstration. Your actual filing uses figures confirmed with the issuing authority for your tax year.

What to do next

The full treatment — who it binds, the deadline, the penalty and the fixed fee — is on 1120 — US corporation return and treaty claims. We will tell you if you do not need us. That happens more often than you would expect.

Reviewed for the 2025 and 2026 filing seasons by Udit Gupta, Cross-Border Tax Expert, Legal Quotient Consultants. General guidance only. Your own facts decide the answer, so bring them to a call before relying on this.

Who has to file US tax return — what this page covers

Most readers of this page are looking for who has to file US tax return. What follows sets out how it works for Form 1120: who is caught by it, what has to be filed, and what the work costs, agreed before it begins.

What these engagements turn on

Case study 1

Structure agreed before a foreign group incorporated its US sales company

A group planning a US sales presence asked us to look at the structure while the incorporation papers were still in draft. The questions that mattered were who would own the shares, which company would employ the sales staff, and what the US company would pay the parent for goods and support. We set those out, documented the intended flows, and then prepared the first corporation return against them. The engagement produced an incorporation that matched the trading facts, and a first return whose intercompany positions were documented when they were agreed rather than reconstructed a year later.

Read how this one runs
Case study 2

Dormant US subsidiary brought up to date on a nil basis

A foreign parent had incorporated a US subsidiary for a project that never began, and had filed nothing for several periods on the understanding that a company with no income had nothing to file. We confirmed that the company had genuinely not traded, working from bank statements and the parent's own records, then prepared and filed the outstanding returns on a nil basis in date order. The engagement produced a complete filing history for the company and a written note of the evidence relied on for each dormant year, which the group needed for a lender's questionnaire.

Read how this one runs
Case study 3

Payments to a foreign parent documented on the US company's return

A US subsidiary had been paying its foreign parent for management support and the use of a brand, with no written terms and no thought given to what should be withheld on the payments out. The corporation's own tax was not the issue; the treatment of the cross-border payments was. We established what the payments were for, put terms in writing, identified the treaty position on each, and disclosed the relationship and the amounts on the return. The engagement produced a return consistent with the agreements behind it, and a withholding position the group can explain.

Read how this one runs
Case study 4

US corporation with a foreign branch mapped into one return

A US company had built an operating team in another country without deciding whether it was a branch of the US corporation or a separate company, and the bookkeeping ran through a single ledger. We separated the activity, established which taxes the foreign operation was already paying, and brought the whole worldwide result onto the US corporation return with the foreign tax positions taken by category. The engagement produced a return that reported the foreign operation properly, and a schedule the company now maintains monthly, so the following year was a compilation rather than an investigation.

Read how this one runs
Case study 5

Founder living abroad separates personal reporting from the company return

A founder who had incorporated in the United States while living in another country had been treating the company's bank account as an extension of their own. Both the company and the founder had returns to make, and neither could be prepared from the records as they stood. We rebuilt the company's ledger, reclassified the amounts that had moved between founder and company as salary, dividends, loans or expenses, and documented each class. The engagement produced a corporation return the company can stand behind, a personal position consistent with it, and loan documentation for the balance still outstanding.

Read how this one runs
Case study 6

Intercompany terms rewritten before a year end rather than after

A group with a US company in the middle of its supply chain asked us to look at the arrangements before the year end, having been told that the previous return had been difficult to support. We worked forward instead of backward: agreed what each company did, priced the flows on that basis, put the agreements in place before the period closed, and then filed against them. The engagement produced contemporaneous intercompany documentation and a return prepared from it, in that order, which is the order that makes the position defensible.

Read how this one runs
Case study 7

One Salary, Two Countries Claiming It

A US citizen resident in Canada, taxed in full on both sides because each return was prepared without the other in view. Deciding which country has the first right to the income, then claiming relief on the second return in the right order, is what stops the same dollar being taxed twice.

Read how this one runs
Case study 8

A US Filer Married to Someone Outside the System

Electing to treat a non-resident spouse as a US filer buys joint rates and brings that spouse's worldwide income and foreign accounts into the return. The election is easy to make and hard to revoke, so both positions are modelled first.

Read how this one runs

All case studies — every published engagement in one place.

Core International & Cross-Border Tax Services

International Tax Planning & Advisory

Strategy and compliance for income, assets and families spread across borders.

One coordinating team: filings on every side of the border are sequenced so treaty relief and foreign tax credits are claimed once — and in the right country.

U.S. & Cross-Border Tax Returns

Dual filers: U.S. citizens in Canada and Canadians with U.S. income run two parallel systems — we prepare both, in the right order, every year.

Expat & Emigration Tax

The move year is its own project: the elections and valuations filed that year decide the next decade of both countries’ returns.

Non-Resident Canadian Tax

Default withholding is 25% of gross: elective returns routinely turn over-withheld rent and pensions into refunds.

Transfer Pricing & BEPS

Documentation prepared with the return is the cheapest insurance in international tax; reconstructing it during an audit is the most expensive.

Cross-Border Estates & Trusts

Wills drafted for one country routinely misfire in the other — deemed disposition here, estate tax there, credits in between.

Cross-Border Corporate Tax

Expansion raises the same four questions every time — entity, PE, repatriation, payroll. We answer them before the tax authorities do.

India Tax for NRIs & Returning Residents

The deduction is taken on the sale price, not the gain — which is why an NRI property sale strands cash unless the certificate is applied for before closing.

Canadian Tax with a Foreign Element

Residency is decided on facts, not on a form — and the year you arrive or leave is the one where the largest amounts turn on the smallest details.

UAE Tax for Expats & Their Home Country

A zero-tax country is only half the answer — the question that decides the bill is whether the country you came from still treats you as resident.

Industries & Client Types We Serve Worldwide

Global E-commerce & Marketplaces
Technology & SaaS
Professional Services Firms
Cross-Border Real Estate
Importers, Exporters & Manufacturers
Athletes, Artists & Entertainers
Remote Workers & Digital Nomads
Investment Funds & Holding Companies

Global E-commerce & Marketplaces

Cross-border tax for sellers shipping worldwide: marketplace withholding, foreign registrations and inventory nexus handled before they become audits.

Marketplaces withhold, remit and report in their own right, so the tax position of a single sale is decided by where the stock sat, where the buyer was and which platform collected — not by where the company is registered. We reconcile the platform's own filings against the returns before either is submitted.

  • Foreign VAT / GST / sales tax registrations
  • Marketplace withholding reviews
  • Inventory nexus & PE analysis
  • Multi-currency books reconciled
Explore E-commerce & Marketplaces

Technology & SaaS

  • Cross-border revenue sourcing & withholding
  • IP structuring with real substance
  • Equity for cross-border teams
  • U.S. expansion: entity & PE setup
Explore Technology & SaaS

Importers, Exporters & Manufacturers

  • Transfer pricing documentation (s.247)
  • Customs value vs transfer price
  • Foreign affiliate reporting (T1134)
  • Country-by-country reporting
Explore Trade & Manufacturing

Athletes, Artists & Entertainers

  • Reg 105 & U.S. CWA agreements
  • Multi-state & country calendars
  • Touring income allocation
  • Royalty & image-rights withholding
Explore Athletes & Entertainers

Remote Workers & Digital Nomads

  • Residency analysis before moving
  • Employer payroll exposure
  • Totalization & social security
  • Foreign tax credits
Explore Remote Workers

Investment Funds & Holding Companies

  • Treaty access & PPT reviews
  • FAPI & surplus computations
  • Withholding-efficient routing
  • Governance & substance
Explore Funds & Holdcos

More on Form 1120

Does my US company file Form 1120 if it had no activity?

Yes. The return belongs to the corporation because of what it is, not because of what it earned, so a dormant year is a nil return rather than no return. This is the commonest reason a foreign group ends up with a stack of unfiled years: the US subsidiary was incorporated ahead of a plan that changed, nobody traded through it, and everybody assumed the obligation began with the first invoice. A nil return filed on time is a small piece of work and it keeps the company's filing history intact. An unfiled year is a gap that has to be explained later, usually at the worst possible moment.

My foreign company owns a US subsidiary — which one files Form 1120?

The US subsidiary, in its own name. It is a US corporation and therefore a US taxpayer on its own account, and the foreign parent does not become a filer of that return by virtue of owning it. What the ownership changes is the content rather than the identity of the filer: the payments between the two companies, the terms they are on, and the disclosure of the relationship all belong on the subsidiary's return. That is where a foreign group's real work sits. The parent's own US position, if it has one, is a separate question from this return and turns on the parent's own activity.

Can a tax treaty stop my US corporation paying US tax?

No, and it is worth being clear about that before a structure is chosen. A US corporation is a US resident, and the treaty does not reduce a resident's own tax on its own profits. Where the treaty bears on this return is the payments going into and out of the company — what is withheld on a dividend, interest or royalty paid to a foreign shareholder or affiliate, and how the other country treats what it receives. So a treaty question here is almost always about a payment crossing the border, not about the corporation's rate. The consequence is practical: the useful conversation happens before incorporation, not at filing.

Do I report the company's profit on Form 1120 or on my own return?

The corporation files and pays on its own profit. It is a separate taxpayer, so its income is not your income simply because you own the shares. What reaches you is what the company pays you, and that is reported by you when it is paid. Owners of small US corporations often run one set of books for both and are then surprised that the two returns tell different stories. Keeping the company's transactions in the company, and documenting anything that moves between the two of you — salary, dividends, loans, expenses met personally — is what makes both returns defensible.

We incorporated in Delaware but trade entirely outside the US — do we file?

Yes. Where the company was formed is what makes it a US corporation, and a US corporation files on its worldwide profit, so trading abroad does not take the return away. It adds to it, because foreign operations bring foreign tax, currency and disclosure questions onto a US return. Founders who incorporated in the United States for investors and then built the business elsewhere are the usual version of this. The return is unavoidable. What deserves attention is whether the structure that produced it is the one the business actually needs, and that is a question about the group rather than about the form.

Should we take advice before incorporating or at the first filing?

Before. Almost everything that makes a cross-border US corporation expensive is fixed when the entity is set up and the flows between it and its affiliates are agreed: who owns the shares, which company employs the people, what the US company pays for and on what terms. By the time the first return is being prepared those facts are history, and the return can only report them. The pre-incorporation conversation is short and concrete, and it is about the payments in and out of the company rather than about the form itself. Our fee for it is agreed in writing before work starts.

Why are corporations double taxed?

Corporate double taxation happens because the company and its owners are separate taxpayers. The company pays tax on its profit; when the after-tax profit is distributed, the shareholder pays tax on the dividend. Canada softens this with the dividend gross-up and credit, which is meant to leave a shareholder roughly where they would have been earning the income directly. The United States taxes the C corporation and then the dividend, with no equivalent integration. See dividends to a foreign parent.

Can I set up a trust that works in two countries?

You can, but the two systems classify and tax trusts differently enough that a structure which is efficient in one is often a reporting problem in the other — a Canadian family trust with a US beneficiary, or a US revocable trust holding Canadian property, are the classic pairs. Canada's twenty-one-year deemed disposition, the US grantor rules and each country's reporting have to be read together, before drafting rather than after. See cross-border wills and trusts.

Our practitioners are alumni of leading accounting and tax institutions

Where our partners studied — CPA Canada (In-Depth Tax Program), AICPA, the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India and the Malaysian Institute of Accountants.

Request a Quote +1 (416) 619-0068