Who files Form 24Q?

  • 15+Years of cross-border experience
  • 18,000+Clients served
  • 5.0Google rating
  • 4Global offices — India, USA, Canada & UAE
  • 18,000+ clients served
  • Fixed fee agreed before work starts
  • 24-hour helpline: +1 (416) 619-0068
Answer

Indian employers, and foreign employers with staff whose salary is taxable in India. The obligation is decided by facts rather than by tax owing, which is why a nil position does not remove it.

The rule on who files

Indian employers, and foreign employers with staff whose salary is taxable in India.

Two of the firm’s advisers and the team in the open-plan office

The exception that catches people

Expatriate payroll is where this return gets difficult: split payroll, foreign-paid components and treaty-exempt portions all have to be reflected here, and the employee's Indian return is built from what it reports.

Who files Form 24Q?
ItemAmount
Gross amount receivedC$34,000
Withheld at source (assumed 24% of gross)C$8,160
Deductible costsC$19,380
Net amount actually earnedC$14,620
Tax on the net amount (assumed graduated result)C$4,094
Difference recoverable by filingC$4,066

Filing on a net basis recovers C$4,066 of the C$8,160 withheld. That difference is the entire reason the elective return exists, and it is lost by not filing.

Example figures throughout, selected to make the rule visible, with rates and thresholds assumed for the demonstration. Your actual filing uses figures confirmed with the issuing authority for your tax year.

Where to go from here

The full treatment — who it binds, the deadline, the penalty and the fixed fee — is on Form 24Q — TDS on salary in India. Ask before the move rather than after it, because most of the useful options expire on the date.

Reviewed for the 2025 and 2026 filing seasons by Udit Gupta, Cross-Border Tax Expert, Legal Quotient Consultants. Written as general guidance, not as a recommendation for your situation. Talk it through with us before acting on it.

Who needs to file FATCA, in practice

Most readers of this page are looking for who needs to file FATCA. What follows sets out how it works for Form 24Q: who is caught by it, what has to be filed, and what the work costs, agreed before it begins.

Files that look like this one

Case study 1

First Indian hire for a company with no local entity

A software business took on an engineer who moved to India and stayed on the home payroll, with nothing in India to prompt a payroll question. We established the position of the salary in India from the duties performed and the individual's presence, then set out what reporting followed and how an employer with no Indian company could meet it. The engagement produced a written position on the taxability of the salary, a reporting arrangement for the quarters ahead, and a schedule of what the home payroll must supply each period so that the figures reconcile.

Read how this one runs
Case study 2

Split payroll reported on the local component only

An assignee to an Indian subsidiary drew part of their salary locally and part from the home payroll. Only the local part had been reflected in the quarterly salary reporting for over a year, because the two payrolls never exchanged figures. The employee's own filing had been built on the understated amount. We obtained the home payroll's detail for each period, restated the salary taxable in India, corrected the reporting, and rebuilt the employee's position. The engagement produced reconciled payroll figures for both components and a quarterly data exchange between the two payroll teams.

Read how this one runs
Case study 3

Secondment documented only by an intercompany invoice

Three staff had been working at an Indian entity for two years under an arrangement recorded in nothing but a monthly intercompany charge. Whether their salary was reported through the Indian entity depended on facts nobody had written down. We interviewed the managers on both sides, assembled the evidence of who directed the work and what the charge covered, and set the arrangement out in a secondment agreement that matched those facts. The engagement produced a documented basis for the salary reporting the Indian entity had been doing, and a charge from the parent consistent with it.

Read how this one runs
Case study 4

A treaty-relieved portion left out of the reporting

An employer had applied treaty relief to part of an assignee's salary and simply omitted that part from the quarterly reporting, so the employee's Indian return and the employer's records described different pay. We established the basis for the relief from the assignment terms and the individual's days and duties, reflected both the salary and the position taken on it in the reporting, and revised the affected quarters. The engagement produced consistent figures across the employer's reporting and the employee's filing, with the working for the relief kept alongside the payroll records.

Read how this one runs
Case study 5

Full-year deductions on an employee who left in the autumn

A departing expatriate had been paid through most of the year with deductions calculated as though the whole year would be spent in India. Nobody revisited the position when they left, and the quarterly reporting carried the full-year assumption. We established the salary properly taxable in India for the part-year from the assignment dates and the duties performed, corrected the reporting for the quarter of departure, and set out the individual's own position. The engagement produced a part-year salary figure supported by the payroll records and a reporting entry their final Indian filing could be built on.

Read how this one runs
Case study 6

Two payrolls, two sets of figures, one employee

A group ran an Indian payroll for local staff and a separate global payroll for assignees, and an employee who transferred between them appeared on both for part of a quarter. The salary reporting therefore counted some pay twice and missed the rest. We rebuilt the individual's pay period by period from both systems, established what had actually been paid and what was taxable in India, and corrected the quarter. The engagement produced a single reconciled record for that employee and a transfer checklist the two payroll teams now follow when somebody moves between them.

Read how this one runs
Case study 7

Tax Deducted When Buying From an NRI

Withholding on a sale by a non-resident is applied to the sale value rather than to the gain, so it routinely exceeds the tax due. A lower-deduction certificate obtained before completion avoids locking the difference up.

Read how this one runs
Case study 8

An NRI Selling Indian Property With Tax Withheld on the Price

Withholding on a sale by a non-resident is applied to the sale value rather than to the gain, so it routinely exceeds the tax due. A lower-deduction certificate obtained before completion avoids locking the difference up until a return is assessed.

Read how this one runs

All case studies — every published engagement in one place.

Core International & Cross-Border Tax Services

International Tax Planning & Advisory

Strategy and compliance for income, assets and families spread across borders.

One coordinating team: filings on every side of the border are sequenced so treaty relief and foreign tax credits are claimed once — and in the right country.

U.S. & Cross-Border Tax Returns

Dual filers: U.S. citizens in Canada and Canadians with U.S. income run two parallel systems — we prepare both, in the right order, every year.

Expat & Emigration Tax

The move year is its own project: the elections and valuations filed that year decide the next decade of both countries’ returns.

Non-Resident Canadian Tax

Default withholding is 25% of gross: elective returns routinely turn over-withheld rent and pensions into refunds.

Transfer Pricing & BEPS

Documentation prepared with the return is the cheapest insurance in international tax; reconstructing it during an audit is the most expensive.

Cross-Border Estates & Trusts

Wills drafted for one country routinely misfire in the other — deemed disposition here, estate tax there, credits in between.

Cross-Border Corporate Tax

Expansion raises the same four questions every time — entity, PE, repatriation, payroll. We answer them before the tax authorities do.

India Tax for NRIs & Returning Residents

The deduction is taken on the sale price, not the gain — which is why an NRI property sale strands cash unless the certificate is applied for before closing.

Canadian Tax with a Foreign Element

Residency is decided on facts, not on a form — and the year you arrive or leave is the one where the largest amounts turn on the smallest details.

UAE Tax for Expats & Their Home Country

A zero-tax country is only half the answer — the question that decides the bill is whether the country you came from still treats you as resident.

Industries & Client Types We Serve Worldwide

Global E-commerce & Marketplaces
Technology & SaaS
Professional Services Firms
Cross-Border Real Estate
Importers, Exporters & Manufacturers
Athletes, Artists & Entertainers
Remote Workers & Digital Nomads
Investment Funds & Holding Companies

Global E-commerce & Marketplaces

  • Foreign VAT / GST / sales tax registrations
  • Marketplace withholding reviews
  • Inventory nexus & PE analysis
  • Multi-currency books reconciled
Explore E-commerce & Marketplaces

Technology & SaaS

  • Cross-border revenue sourcing & withholding
  • IP structuring with real substance
  • Equity for cross-border teams
  • U.S. expansion: entity & PE setup
Explore Technology & SaaS

Importers, Exporters & Manufacturers

  • Transfer pricing documentation (s.247)
  • Customs value vs transfer price
  • Foreign affiliate reporting (T1134)
  • Country-by-country reporting
Explore Trade & Manufacturing

Athletes, Artists & Entertainers

  • Reg 105 & U.S. CWA agreements
  • Multi-state & country calendars
  • Touring income allocation
  • Royalty & image-rights withholding
Explore Athletes & Entertainers

Remote Workers & Digital Nomads

  • Residency analysis before moving
  • Employer payroll exposure
  • Totalization & social security
  • Foreign tax credits
Explore Remote Workers

Investment Funds & Holding Companies

Holding structures live or die on treaty access, beneficial ownership and substance — the MLI's principal-purpose test now sits over every arrangement.

A holding structure is only as good as its reporting. Foreign affiliates, accrued passive income and distributions each carry their own return, and the penalties on those attach to the form rather than to any tax being owed — so a structure that saves tax can still cost money if the information returns are late.

  • Treaty access & PPT reviews
  • FAPI & surplus computations
  • Withholding-efficient routing
  • Governance & substance
Explore Funds & Holdcos

Form 24Q — the questions that follow

Does a foreign employer have to file Form 24Q in India?

It can. The test is whether the salary is taxable in India, not where the employer sits or where the payroll is run. An overseas company with staff working in India on its own payroll can fall within this return, and the absence of an Indian entity paying them does not take the salary out of Indian tax. What we look at is where the duties are performed, the individual's own position in India, and what the salary is paid for. Answer that before deciding who reports, because the reporting follows the taxability of the salary rather than the structure of the group.

How does split payroll get reported when part of the salary is paid abroad?

Both components have to be reflected, and that is the part routinely missed. Where an assignee draws part of their salary from a home-country payroll and part locally, the return has to show the salary taxable in India rather than the amount that happened to pass through the Indian bank account. Reporting only the local element understates the pay, and the employee's Indian return is built from what this return reports, so the understatement travels into their own filing. Getting it right means holding the home payroll's figures for the period in a form that reconciles to the Indian reporting cycle.

Our staff are seconded from the parent company — who reports the salary?

Work out who bears the employment and what the Indian entity is actually paying for. A secondment where the individual works under the Indian entity's direction, and the entity is charged for their time, is a different arrangement from one where a foreign parent supplies a service performed by its own staff. That answer decides whether the salary is reported through the Indian entity's salary return, and it also decides the character of the charge from the parent. Secondments documented loosely, by an email and an intercompany invoice with no agreement behind them, are the ones that get challenged, so the documentation is part of the work.

Does treaty-exempt salary still go in the return?

Treat exemption as something the return has to show rather than something that removes the salary from the reporting. A portion of an assignee's pay relieved under a treaty is still salary the employer has paid, and the position taken on it belongs in the return that the employee's own filing is built from. Leaving it out silently means their return and their employer's reporting describe different pay. Establish the basis for the treaty position, apply it in the reporting, and keep the working alongside the payroll records for the period so that the same answer comes out if anyone asks later.

We have one employee in India and no entity there — is reporting needed?

Possibly, and it is worth resolving early, because a single person is the situation most often left alone. The absence of an Indian company does not settle it. The question is whether the salary is taxable in India, and that turns on the individual's presence and duties rather than on the employer's structure. A lone assignee also tends to be paid entirely from a home payroll, so nothing in any Indian accounts prompts anybody to ask the question. Establish the salary's Indian position first, then work out what reporting follows and the practical mechanics of meeting it.

Who reports for an employee who left India mid-year?

The employer that paid the salary reports what it deducted for the periods it paid, and the departure does not shift that to the employee. What changes is the accuracy of the annual picture: a leaver's Indian salary for the year is usually lower than the full-year figure the payroll had been deducting against, and the part-year position has to be reflected in the reporting rather than settled quietly at the employee's end. Deal with the leaver's figures for the quarter of departure while the payroll records and the dates of presence are still easy to obtain.

What are Forms 15CA and 15CB for?

They clear a payment out of India. Form 15CA is the remitter's declaration of the payment and the tax withheld on it; Form 15CB is an accountant's certificate on the taxability of the amount, the treaty article relied on and the correct withholding rate. The bank generally will not execute the transfer without them, in the categories where they are required. The work is deciding the rate correctly, because the certificate is the record of that decision. See 15CA and 15CB certification.

What is FIRPTA withholding?

FIRPTA is the US regime that treats a foreign person's disposition of a US real property interest as taxable and makes the buyer withhold on the gross proceeds to secure it. Because the deduction is on the price rather than the profit, it routinely exceeds the real tax — sometimes on a sale made at a loss. A withholding certificate applied for before closing can reduce it to something closer to the actual liability. See the FIRPTA withholding certificate.

Our practitioners are alumni of leading accounting and tax institutions

Where our partners studied — CPA Canada (In-Depth Tax Program), AICPA, the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India and the Malaysian Institute of Accountants.

Request a Quote +1 (416) 619-0068