The estate's representative applies; the custodian does not. The bank or broker holding the US-situs assets is the party that wants the certificate, but it is a bystander in the process — it freezes the account and waits. The application belongs to whoever is administering the estate of the non-resident who died, and in practice that is the executor, or an heir where no executor has been appointed. That matters for planning, because the institution cannot be pushed into releasing the holding and the family cannot hand the filing to it. Expect the custodian to state its requirement and then hold that position until IRS clearance reaches it.
Who files Form 5173?
- 15+Years of the founder's cross-border experience
- 18,000+Clients served across our offices in India, the USA, Canada and the UAE
- 5.0Google rating
- 4Global offices — India, USA, Canada & UAE
Executors and heirs of non-resident decedents whose US brokerage or bank assets are frozen pending IRS clearance. The obligation is decided by facts rather than by tax owing, which is why a nil position does not remove it.
The rule on who files
Executors and heirs of non-resident decedents whose US brokerage or bank assets are frozen pending IRS clearance.

When the rule breaks
This is the practical bottleneck in a cross-border estate. The custodian will not release the assets without it, the certificate follows the estate tax filing, and the whole sequence runs on the IRS's timetable rather than the family's.
Where to go from here
The full treatment — who it binds, the deadline, the penalty and the fixed fee — is on 5173 — transfer certificate. Ask before the move rather than after it, because most of the useful options expire on the date.
Read and approved for the 2025 and 2026 filing seasons by Udit Gupta, International Tax, Cross-Border Tax & Transfer Pricing Expert, Legal Quotient Consultants. This is general information rather than advice about your file — a short call is the way to get the second.
Cross-border tax case studies
Frozen brokerage account after a Canadian resident died holding US shares
The deceased had lived in Ontario for decades and held a single US brokerage account. The family learned of the problem when the institution refused to move anything without IRS clearance. We built the US-situs inventory from the custodian's own statements, valued the holdings at the date of death, prepared and filed the estate tax return, and then applied for the transfer certificate on that record. The engagement produced a filed return, a documented valuation the family keeps, and the certificate the custodian had been waiting for.
Read how this one runsHeirs dealing with a custodian where no executor had been appointed
The estate was being administered abroad under local succession law, so nobody held a US-facing appointment and the custodian had no one it recognised. Our first task was documentary: establishing who had died, who was entitled, and under which law, in a form both the institution and the IRS would accept. Only then did the fiscal work begin. The engagement produced an evidenced entitlement, a completed estate tax filing, and a certificate request the custodian accepted without a further round of correspondence.
Read how this one runsTwo custodians with different demands on one non-resident estate
The deceased had holdings with two separate institutions, each asking for something different before it would move. Rather than run two conversations, we prepared one estate tax filing covering the whole US-situs inventory and used it to support both requests in parallel, keeping a single chronology of correspondence. The engagement produced one filed return, a certificate request per institution resting on the same evidence, and a written record of what each custodian had asked for and when.
Read how this one runsNil estate tax position that still needed IRS clearance
The US-situs holdings were modest and the computation ended with nothing to pay, which had persuaded the family that no filing was needed. The account stayed frozen regardless. We documented the situs inventory and the date-of-death values, took and recorded the position on the estate tax filing, and filed it so that the clearance request rested on a complete record. The engagement produced a filed nil position, the certificate, and a file the executor can hand to any beneficiary who asks why the exercise was necessary.
Read how this one runsAccount discovered years after the rest of the estate was distributed
The executor had wound up everything else and only later found a dormant US holding in the deceased's papers. The difficulty was evidential rather than technical: date-of-death values had to be reconstructed from institutional records long after the event, and the administration had to be reopened in practical terms. We assembled the valuation evidence, prepared the estate tax filing on it, and requested the certificate. The engagement produced a documented valuation, a filed return, and a released holding.
Read how this one runsSecond death in the family before the first clearance arrived
A surviving spouse died while the first estate's certificate was still outstanding, which left two administrations pointing at the same US holding. We mapped what each estate had to file and in what order, so that the first clearance was obtained on the original facts before the second request was made rather than merging the two. The engagement produced two filed positions in sequence, two certificate requests resting on the correct facts, and a chronology the beneficiaries could follow.
Read how this one runsSocial Security Paid Twice Until a Certificate Arrived
Income tax relief does not reach a social security charge; only an agreement does, and only against a certificate from the system actually being paid into. Obtaining it is the work, and it is often retrospective.
Read how this one runsA Certificate Obtained Before the Money Moved
An application for a reduced or nil deduction is made in advance and decided on the computed liability, not on the gross amount. Applying after the payment leaves a refund claim in place of a certificate.
Read how this one runsAll case studies — every published engagement in one place.
Core International & Cross-Border Tax Services
Strategy and compliance for income, assets and families spread across borders.
Industries & Client Types We Serve Worldwide
- Foreign VAT / GST / sales tax registrations
- Marketplace withholding reviews
- Inventory nexus & PE analysis
- Multi-currency books reconciled
- Cross-border revenue sourcing & withholding
- IP structuring with real substance
- Equity for cross-border teams
- U.S. expansion: entity & PE setup
- Reg 105 / 102 waivers
- Permanent establishment risk
- Partner mobility planning
- Cross-border withholding recovery
- Section 216 rental returns
- FIRPTA withholding recovery
- Section 116 clearance
- Treaty credit optimization
Related-party purchasing, customs value versus transfer price, and foreign-affiliate structures put trading businesses inside the s.247 documentation rules.
Goods crossing a border move the tax question from income to indirect: registration thresholds, place of supply, the customs value and the transfer price between related entities all have to agree with each other. When they do not, the adjustment arrives from two authorities at once and each one uses the other's number.
- Transfer pricing documentation (s.247)
- Customs value vs transfer price
- Foreign affiliate reporting (T1134)
- Country-by-country reporting
- Reg 105 & U.S. CWA agreements
- Multi-state & country calendars
- Touring income allocation
- Royalty & image-rights withholding
- Residency analysis before moving
- Employer payroll exposure
- Totalization & social security
- Foreign tax credits
- Treaty access & PPT reviews
- FAPI & surplus computations
- Withholding-efficient routing
- Governance & substance
Asked next about Form 5173
Usually yes, because the release is not conditional on the arithmetic. The certificate is what the institution has been told to wait for, and a computation that ends at nil is still a computation that has to be shown. So an estate with modest US-situs holdings and nothing to pay can find the assets frozen on the same footing as a large one. The work in that situation is mostly evidential: identifying the US-situs assets, valuing them at the date of death, and supporting the position taken on the estate tax filing so that the request for the certificate rests on a complete record.
Heirs of a non-resident decedent do appear in this process, not only executors, which matters where nobody was formally appointed — common when the estate is being administered under the law of another country and no US-facing representative exists. The person entitled to the frozen asset then has to establish that entitlement before the request will carry any weight. Practically, the first piece of work is documentary rather than fiscal: proving who died, who inherits, and under which law, in a form the IRS and the custodian will both accept. Skipping that step is a common reason a family's correspondence goes round in circles.
Because the custodian is holding them pending IRS clearance, and the transfer certificate is that clearance. This is the practical bottleneck in a cross-border estate: the institution has no discretion it is willing to exercise, so the holding stays where it is until the certificate arrives. The sequence also runs the other way from what most families expect. The estate tax filing comes first, the certificate follows it, and only then does the account move. Understanding that order early usually shortens the whole exercise, because the effort goes into the filing that unlocks the certificate rather than into further letters to the brokerage.
The honest answer is that the timetable belongs to the IRS rather than to the family, and no custodian or adviser can compress it. What can be controlled is everything before the clock starts: whether the estate tax filing is complete when it goes in, whether the US-situs assets have been identified and valued properly, and whether the authority of the person making the request is documented. An incomplete submission is a common avoidable cause of delay, because it restarts correspondence rather than advancing it. Families administering an estate in this position are usually better served by planning around the wait than by chasing it.
Yes — the certificate follows the estate tax filing rather than standing on its own, and that ordering is worth knowing at the outset. Requests made ahead of the filing tend to produce correspondence instead of a certificate. So the work is sequenced backwards from the custodian's requirement: inventory the US-situs assets, value them at the date of death, settle the position on the estate tax filing, file it, and then apply. Where beneficiaries are pressing for distribution, setting that sequence out in writing at the start tends to take the heat out of the wait.
As a sequence, stopping at the first test that gives an answer: where you have a permanent home available; if in both or neither, where your centre of vital interests is; then habitual abode; then nationality; and if all of those tie, the two tax authorities decide by agreement. It is evidential rather than elective — you do not choose your treaty residence, you demonstrate it, which makes the record of homes, family and time the substance of the claim. See tie-breaking dual residency.
The inheritance itself is often not income to you, but three other things can create tax: the estate may owe tax where the deceased or the property was situated, some countries tax the recipient directly, and the gain from the date you inherit to the date you sell is yours. Reporting obligations can also attach to holding the asset. See inheriting property abroad.



