Who files Form RC268?

  • 15+Years of cross-border experience
  • 18,000+Clients served
  • 5.0Google rating
  • 4Global offices — India, USA, Canada & UAE
  • Offices in India, the USA, Canada and the UAE
  • Google rating 5.0 out of 5
  • 18,000+ clients served
Answer

Canadian residents working in the United States on assignment or part of the year who contributed to a US plan. The obligation is decided by facts rather than by tax owing, which is why a nil position does not remove it.

The rule on who files

Canadian residents working in the United States on assignment or part of the year who contributed to a US plan.

The team at work in the open-plan office

The exception worth knowing

The deduction is treaty-based and interacts with Canadian registered-plan room, so claiming it correctly protects both this year's deduction and next year's contribution space.

Who files Form RC268?
ItemAmount
Income taxed in both countriesC$105,000
Tax paid abroad (assumed 32%)C$33,600
Home tax on the same income (assumed 30%)C$31,500
Credit available (lesser of the two)C$31,500
Home tax still payableC$0

The credit fully absorbs the home liability on this income, so nothing further is payable at home — but the return still has to be filed and the credit still has to be claimed, by category and by country.

Treat these numbers as a worked example rather than advice — they exist to make the mechanics visible, and the rates and thresholds are assumed for the illustration. For a real filing, we verify each figure with the authority that publishes it, for your year.

Your next step

The full treatment — who it binds, the deadline, the penalty and the fixed fee — is on RC268 — US plan contributions (cross-border). Whatever you have is enough to start the conversation, including nothing but the dates.

Reviewed for the 2025 and 2026 filing seasons by Udit Gupta, Cross-Border Tax Expert, Legal Quotient Consultants. General guidance only. Your own facts decide the answer, so bring them to a call before relying on this.

Who has to file US tax return — what this page covers

This is the page to read on who has to file US tax return. It takes Form RC268 in order — the test that decides who is affected, the returns and forms that follow from it, and a fee quoted in writing before anything starts.

What these engagements turn on

Case study 1

Assignment to the United States with plan contributions continuing throughout

A Canadian resident was posted to a United States employer across consecutive tax years and stayed in that employer's retirement plan for the whole posting. Payroll ran in the United States and the Canadian returns had been prepared without reference to it. The work was to establish the treaty basis for the deduction, obtain the plan statements covering the assignment, and tie the contributions to the assignment period. The engagement produced a claim on each affected return and a file note recording the plan, the employment and the dates, so the position can be explained if it is ever queried.

Read how this one runs
Case study 2

Split year where only some contributions belonged to the claim

The client spent the earlier months of the year employed in Canada and the balance on assignment in the United States, contributing to a plan there. The year end statement from the plan showed a single total with no split. The work consisted of reconstructing the contribution dates from payroll records, matching them to the assignment period, and then deciding what the return could properly claim. What the engagement produced was a supported allocation rather than an estimate, together with a short memorandum setting out how it was arrived at and which documents it rests on.

Read how this one runs
Case study 3

A daily commuter who had been claiming the deduction in error

The client crossed the border to work each day and had been claiming a deduction for contributions to a United States plan for several years. The form does not reach a daily commuter, so the claims had been wrong from the start. The work was to confirm the travel pattern from records rather than recollection, identify the affected years, and correct them through adjustment requests before the CRA raised the point. The engagement produced corrected returns and a written explanation of the commuting pattern, which is the document that matters when a long standing claim is withdrawn.

Read how this one runs
Case study 4

Sequencing a plan claim against Canadian registered contribution room

The client contributed to a United States plan while on assignment and had also been making Canadian registered contributions on a standing instruction. The two had never been considered in the same conversation. The work was to set them side by side for the year, take the treaty deduction into account, and only then decide what the Canadian contributions should be. The engagement produced a contribution plan for the following year and a claim for the current one that does not quietly cost the client space later. It is a sequencing problem, and sequencing has to happen before the money moves.

Read how this one runs
Case study 5

Payroll records that did not separate employee and employer amounts

The employer's United States payroll reported plan contributions as a single line, with nothing to show what the employee had paid in and what the employer had added. The deduction does not follow that presentation. The work was to obtain the plan statements and the underlying payroll detail, reconcile them, and establish the amounts attributable to the employee before anything went on a return. The engagement produced a reconciliation the client can repeat each year and a request to the employer to report the split going forward, which removes the problem at source.

Read how this one runs
Case study 6

Reviewing earlier years where the deduction had never been claimed

A client arrived with completed returns covering an assignment in the United States, none of which mentioned contributions to the plan there. Nothing was wrong on the face of them. A deduction had simply been missed. The work was to review the years still open to adjustment, confirm the plan and the assignment period for each, and prepare adjustment requests supported by the plan statements. The engagement produced a set of filed adjustment requests and a note of which years were out of reach, so the client knows where the line falls and why.

Read how this one runs
Case study 7

A Penalty Argued on the Facts Rather Than the Form

Reasonable cause is a documented story with dates, not an assertion of good intent. The engagement assembles what the client actually knew and when, and puts the sequence in writing alongside the filings it explains.

Read how this one runs
Case study 8

Wintering in the US Long Enough to Become a US Filer

Days in the United States accumulate across three years, and enough of them make you a US resident for tax regardless of immigration status. The file counts the days properly and files the statement that keeps the position closer connection rather than residence.

Read how this one runs

All case studies — every published engagement in one place.

Core International & Cross-Border Tax Services

International Tax Planning & Advisory

Strategy and compliance for income, assets and families spread across borders.

One coordinating team: filings on every side of the border are sequenced so treaty relief and foreign tax credits are claimed once — and in the right country.

U.S. & Cross-Border Tax Returns

Dual filers: U.S. citizens in Canada and Canadians with U.S. income run two parallel systems — we prepare both, in the right order, every year.

Expat & Emigration Tax

The move year is its own project: the elections and valuations filed that year decide the next decade of both countries’ returns.

Non-Resident Canadian Tax

Default withholding is 25% of gross: elective returns routinely turn over-withheld rent and pensions into refunds.

Transfer Pricing & BEPS

Documentation prepared with the return is the cheapest insurance in international tax; reconstructing it during an audit is the most expensive.

Cross-Border Estates & Trusts

Wills drafted for one country routinely misfire in the other — deemed disposition here, estate tax there, credits in between.

Cross-Border Corporate Tax

Expansion raises the same four questions every time — entity, PE, repatriation, payroll. We answer them before the tax authorities do.

India Tax for NRIs & Returning Residents

The deduction is taken on the sale price, not the gain — which is why an NRI property sale strands cash unless the certificate is applied for before closing.

Canadian Tax with a Foreign Element

Residency is decided on facts, not on a form — and the year you arrive or leave is the one where the largest amounts turn on the smallest details.

UAE Tax for Expats & Their Home Country

A zero-tax country is only half the answer — the question that decides the bill is whether the country you came from still treats you as resident.

Industries & Client Types We Serve Worldwide

Global E-commerce & Marketplaces
Technology & SaaS
Professional Services Firms
Cross-Border Real Estate
Importers, Exporters & Manufacturers
Athletes, Artists & Entertainers
Remote Workers & Digital Nomads
Investment Funds & Holding Companies

Global E-commerce & Marketplaces

  • Foreign VAT / GST / sales tax registrations
  • Marketplace withholding reviews
  • Inventory nexus & PE analysis
  • Multi-currency books reconciled
Explore E-commerce & Marketplaces

Technology & SaaS

Software revenue crosses borders by default — sourcing rules, withholding on licence-like payments and IP location decide the effective rate.

Software revenue is rarely taxed where the team sits. Licence, subscription and service income are characterised differently by each side, and the answer decides withholding at source, treaty relief and whether a foreign customer creates a taxable presence at all — questions that are cheap to settle before the contract and expensive afterwards.

  • Cross-border revenue sourcing & withholding
  • IP structuring with real substance
  • Equity for cross-border teams
  • U.S. expansion: entity & PE setup
Explore Technology & SaaS

Importers, Exporters & Manufacturers

  • Transfer pricing documentation (s.247)
  • Customs value vs transfer price
  • Foreign affiliate reporting (T1134)
  • Country-by-country reporting
Explore Trade & Manufacturing

Athletes, Artists & Entertainers

  • Reg 105 & U.S. CWA agreements
  • Multi-state & country calendars
  • Touring income allocation
  • Royalty & image-rights withholding
Explore Athletes & Entertainers

Remote Workers & Digital Nomads

  • Residency analysis before moving
  • Employer payroll exposure
  • Totalization & social security
  • Foreign tax credits
Explore Remote Workers

Investment Funds & Holding Companies

  • Treaty access & PPT reviews
  • FAPI & surplus computations
  • Withholding-efficient routing
  • Governance & substance
Explore Funds & Holdcos

What people ask us about Form RC268

Can I deduct US retirement plan contributions if I live in Canada?

That is the situation Form RC268 is built for. A Canadian resident who works in the United States, on assignment or for part of the year, and who contributes to a United States retirement plan through that work, claims the deduction on this form. The claim rests on the treaty rather than on ordinary deduction rules, so the plan has to be a United States plan and the contributions have to relate to your work there. One group sits outside it: a person who commutes across the border to work each day is not covered. Keep the plan statements and the payroll records that show what went in and when, because the claim is only as good as the evidence behind it.

Does commuting across the border each day stop me claiming RC268?

Yes. The form is written for a Canadian resident who is not a daily commuter, so the daily cross border commuter is the one worker it does not reach, even where the plan and the contributions look identical to a colleague's. This catches people who change pattern partway through a year. If you spent some of the year on assignment and the rest of it commuting, the two periods are not the same for this purpose, and the file should show which contributions belong to which. Work out the pattern first, from travel records and the employer's own account of the posting, and only then decide what the return claims.

Will an RC268 claim affect my Canadian registered plan room?

It interacts with it, and that is the reason to get the claim right rather than approximately. The deduction is treaty based, and it sits alongside the room you have for Canadian registered contributions. A claim made carelessly can cost you contribution space in the following year as well as accuracy in this one. Practically, that means the United States plan contributions and any Canadian registered contributions for the same year should be looked at together before either is finalised, not in two separate conversations months apart. If you are contributing to both, say so at the start of the engagement rather than when the return is being drafted.

Does Form RC268 apply if I worked in the United States for part of the year?

Yes. The form contemplates a Canadian resident who works in the United States on assignment or for part of the year, so a partial year is ordinary rather than exceptional. What matters is matching contributions to the period they relate to. Payroll for a split year often runs on two systems, and the year end statement may show a single total with no breakdown. The work is usually reconciliation: establish the dates of the assignment, obtain the plan statements that cover them, and then decide what the return claims. Do that before the return is drafted, because unpicking it afterwards means an adjustment instead of a filing.

Is the RC268 deduction a treaty claim or an ordinary deduction?

It is treaty based, and the distinction is not academic. An ordinary deduction stands on the domestic rules alone. A treaty based one stands on the agreement between the two countries, which is why the plan has to be a United States plan and why your own status as a Canadian resident forms part of the test rather than the background to it. In practice this changes what the file has to contain. You are supporting a position, not simply entering a figure, so the working papers should record the plan, the employment that generated the contributions, and the period of the assignment. If the CRA asks later, that record is the answer.

What paperwork is needed before Form RC268 can be completed?

Plan statements for the year, showing the contributions and the dates they were made. Payroll records from the United States employment, so the contributions can be tied to that work. Something that fixes the period of the assignment, which can be the assignment letter itself. And the details of any Canadian registered contributions for the same year, because the two have to be considered together. Gather all of it before the return is drafted. The usual delay is a plan administrator in another country taking weeks to produce a statement, and that is worth starting early rather than discovering during filing season.

Do Canada and the United States share tax information?

Yes, through more than one channel. The treaty has an exchange-of-information article that supports both routine and on-request exchange. Separately, an intergovernmental agreement has Canadian financial institutions identify US-reportable accounts and report them to the CRA, which passes them to the IRS, with the reverse flow for Canadian residents. Most other country pairs use the Common Reporting Standard for the same purpose. See FATCA reporting.

What happens if I have not filed for several years?

Missed years are handled as one package, not one at a time, because the route chosen for the first year determines the relief available for the rest. Each country has a disclosure or relief programme with its own conditions, and entering the right one — before the authority contacts you — is usually what keeps penalties down. Filing quietly outside a programme forfeits that protection. See catching up on missed returns.

Our practitioners are alumni of leading accounting and tax institutions

Where our partners studied — CPA Canada (In-Depth Tax Program), AICPA, the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India and the Malaysian Institute of Accountants.

Request a Quote +1 (416) 619-0068