Who files Section 195?

  • 15+Years of cross-border experience
  • 18,000+Clients served
  • 5.0Google rating
  • 4Global offices — India, USA, Canada & UAE
  • Fixed fee agreed before work starts
  • 24-hour helpline: +1 (416) 619-0068
  • Offices in India, the USA, Canada and the UAE
Answer

Any Indian payer remitting a sum chargeable to tax to a non-resident, including individuals buying property from an NRI. The obligation is decided by facts rather than by tax owing, which is why a nil position does not remove it.

The rule on who files

Any Indian payer remitting a sum chargeable to tax to a non-resident, including individuals buying property from an NRI.

The firm’s founder at his desk in the Delhi office

The case that is treated differently

The duty to determine taxability sits on the payer, and the consequence of getting it wrong is the payer's own liability plus disallowance. Individuals buying a flat from an NRI are payers under this section and almost never know it.

Who files Section 195?
ItemAmount
Gross amount receivedC$39,000
Withheld at source (assumed 30% of gross)C$11,700
Deductible costsC$31,200
Net amount actually earnedC$7,800
Tax on the net amount (assumed graduated result)C$1,716
Difference recoverable by filingC$9,984

Filing on a net basis recovers C$9,984 of the C$11,700 withheld. That difference is the entire reason the elective return exists, and it is lost by not filing.

Example figures throughout, selected to make the rule visible, with rates and thresholds assumed for the demonstration. Your actual filing uses figures confirmed with the issuing authority for your tax year.

What to do next

The full treatment — who it binds, the deadline, the penalty and the fixed fee — is on Section 195 — TDS on payments abroad in India. One call is usually enough to know whether this is a filing or a project.

Reviewed against current guidance for the 2025 and 2026 filing seasons by Udit Gupta, Cross-Border Tax Expert, Legal Quotient Consultants. General information, not advice for your circumstances — call our 24-hour helpline to discuss your own position.

Who needs to file FATCA, in practice

Readers arrive here searching for who needs to file FATCA, and Section 195 is what the page is about. Below: who it catches, what has to be filed, and what it costs — quoted in writing, before anything is done.

Files that look like this one

Case study 1

Individual buyer told days before completion that the seller was non-resident

The purchase was close to completion when the buyer learned the seller had been living abroad for years. No deduction had been planned and the buyer's funds were committed. We set out the buyer's own exposure in writing, established the seller's residence position for the year from the seller's own records, and worked out the deduction the buyer was obliged to make against the payment still outstanding. The engagement produced a deduction the buyer could rely on, remitted and reported under the buyer's own details, and a completion file showing the basis for it.

Read how this one runs
Case study 2

Payer deducted nothing on software payments and faced disallowance

An Indian company had paid a foreign supplier for years on the supplier's assurance that nothing was taxable in India, and had deducted nothing. The exposure was the tax itself plus the loss of the expense. We reviewed what the payments were actually for, separated the elements on a defensible basis, and documented the treaty analysis for the recipient's country. The engagement produced a written determination for each class of payment going forward, and a corrected position for the open years with the withholding brought to account and reported.

Read how this one runs
Case study 3

Advance remitted before anyone had considered withholding

A booking amount had gone to the seller's overseas account before the buyer knew a withholding duty existed. That slice could not be deducted after the event. We treated the shortfall as the buyer's own liability, quantified it and paid it over with interest as part of putting the file straight, then recalculated the deduction on the balance of the consideration so the remainder was correct. The engagement produced a remitted shortfall, a compliant deduction on every later payment, and a change to the price mechanics so the buyer did not fund the seller's tax twice.

Read how this one runs
Case study 4

Buyer and seller deadlocked over the rate to deduct

The seller wanted deduction on the gain, the buyer would deduct only on the gross consideration, and the sale had stopped. We acted for the buyer and explained the asymmetry. The buyer carries the risk of under-deduction and gains nothing by accepting the seller's computation, while the seller has a route of their own to an authorised lower rate. The engagement produced a written position the buyer's lawyer could rely on, and a timetable that let the seller apply for a certificate without either side deducting on the other's word.

Read how this one runs
Case study 5

Group payments abroad reviewed stream by stream

An Indian subsidiary made several kinds of payment to entities in its own group and treated them all the same way for withholding. The classification was doing the work and nobody had tested it. We took each stream separately, identified what the non-resident was actually being paid for, and set out for each one whether a chargeable sum arose and on what basis. The engagement produced a determination the finance team now applies at source, with the reasoning recorded so that a later query is answered from the file.

Read how this one runs
Case study 6

Bank refused a remittance and the file had to be built

A payer discovered the section existed when its bank declined to send a payment abroad without the withholding paperwork. The payment was already overdue to the supplier. We worked back from the bank's requirement to the question behind it, made the chargeability determination, computed the deduction and prepared the certification the remittance needed. The engagement produced a remittance the bank released, a deduction reported under the payer's own details, and a standing note so that the next payment in the same series did not stall in the same place.

Read how this one runs
Case study 7

An Indian Company Paying a Foreign Supplier

Payments abroad carry deduction at source and a certification filed before the money moves. Whether the treaty reduces the rate depends on what is being bought, and the classification is the decision the whole filing rests on.

Read how this one runs
Case study 8

Gains on Indian Shares Held From Abroad

Holding period and instrument decide the character of the gain, and the deduction at source applies before any of that is considered. The return is where the position is corrected.

Read how this one runs

All case studies — every published engagement in one place.

Core International & Cross-Border Tax Services

International Tax Planning & Advisory

Strategy and compliance for income, assets and families spread across borders.

One coordinating team: filings on every side of the border are sequenced so treaty relief and foreign tax credits are claimed once — and in the right country.

U.S. & Cross-Border Tax Returns

Dual filers: U.S. citizens in Canada and Canadians with U.S. income run two parallel systems — we prepare both, in the right order, every year.

Expat & Emigration Tax

The move year is its own project: the elections and valuations filed that year decide the next decade of both countries’ returns.

Non-Resident Canadian Tax

Default withholding is 25% of gross: elective returns routinely turn over-withheld rent and pensions into refunds.

Transfer Pricing & BEPS

Documentation prepared with the return is the cheapest insurance in international tax; reconstructing it during an audit is the most expensive.

Cross-Border Estates & Trusts

Wills drafted for one country routinely misfire in the other — deemed disposition here, estate tax there, credits in between.

Cross-Border Corporate Tax

Expansion raises the same four questions every time — entity, PE, repatriation, payroll. We answer them before the tax authorities do.

India Tax for NRIs & Returning Residents

The deduction is taken on the sale price, not the gain — which is why an NRI property sale strands cash unless the certificate is applied for before closing.

Canadian Tax with a Foreign Element

Residency is decided on facts, not on a form — and the year you arrive or leave is the one where the largest amounts turn on the smallest details.

UAE Tax for Expats & Their Home Country

A zero-tax country is only half the answer — the question that decides the bill is whether the country you came from still treats you as resident.

Industries & Client Types We Serve Worldwide

Global E-commerce & Marketplaces
Technology & SaaS
Professional Services Firms
Cross-Border Real Estate
Importers, Exporters & Manufacturers
Athletes, Artists & Entertainers
Remote Workers & Digital Nomads
Investment Funds & Holding Companies

Global E-commerce & Marketplaces

  • Foreign VAT / GST / sales tax registrations
  • Marketplace withholding reviews
  • Inventory nexus & PE analysis
  • Multi-currency books reconciled
Explore E-commerce & Marketplaces

Technology & SaaS

Software revenue crosses borders by default — sourcing rules, withholding on licence-like payments and IP location decide the effective rate.

Software revenue is rarely taxed where the team sits. Licence, subscription and service income are characterised differently by each side, and the answer decides withholding at source, treaty relief and whether a foreign customer creates a taxable presence at all — questions that are cheap to settle before the contract and expensive afterwards.

  • Cross-border revenue sourcing & withholding
  • IP structuring with real substance
  • Equity for cross-border teams
  • U.S. expansion: entity & PE setup
Explore Technology & SaaS

Importers, Exporters & Manufacturers

  • Transfer pricing documentation (s.247)
  • Customs value vs transfer price
  • Foreign affiliate reporting (T1134)
  • Country-by-country reporting
Explore Trade & Manufacturing

Athletes, Artists & Entertainers

  • Reg 105 & U.S. CWA agreements
  • Multi-state & country calendars
  • Touring income allocation
  • Royalty & image-rights withholding
Explore Athletes & Entertainers

Remote Workers & Digital Nomads

  • Residency analysis before moving
  • Employer payroll exposure
  • Totalization & social security
  • Foreign tax credits
Explore Remote Workers

Investment Funds & Holding Companies

  • Treaty access & PPT reviews
  • FAPI & surplus computations
  • Withholding-efficient routing
  • Governance & substance
Explore Funds & Holdcos

Questions that come up on Section 195

I am buying a flat from an NRI — do I have to deduct tax?

Yes. A buyer paying a non-resident seller is a payer for these purposes, and the obligation sits on you rather than on the seller or on either side's agent. This surprises almost every individual purchaser, because nothing else in a flat purchase asks a private buyer to act as a collector of someone else's tax. The duty is to determine whether the sum is chargeable and to deduct accordingly before remitting. Get it wrong and the shortfall becomes your own liability, so it is worth settling before any advance changes hands.

Does this apply if I pay a foreign company for software or services?

If you are in India and the sum is chargeable to tax in the hands of the non-resident, the obligation attaches whatever the payment is called. The hard part is rarely the mechanics of remitting. It is the determination of whether a chargeable sum arises and how much, which can turn on what right is actually being paid for and on the treaty with the recipient's country. That determination is yours to make as payer, and a supplier's assurance that their income is not taxable in India is no substitute for it.

What happens to me as the buyer if I deduct nothing?

Two things, and they compound. The tax that should have been deducted becomes recoverable from you, so you can end up paying the seller's tax out of your own funds with no practical route to recover it from someone who has left the country. And where the payment is a business expense, the deduction for that expense can be disallowed, so you lose the expense as well. That combination is why a payer who is unsure should document the basis on which it concluded a payment was not chargeable, rather than simply not deducting.

The seller says they have a certificate — is that enough for me?

A certificate authorising deduction at a lower rate, or none, is exactly what protects you, and it is the only thing that does. Deducting below the default rate on the strength of the seller's own computation, or their advocate's opinion, leaves the shortfall with you. So the working rule for a buyer is simple. No certificate, deduct at the default rate. Certificate, deduct at the rate it authorises and keep a copy with the completion papers. If the seller wants a reduced deduction, the application is theirs to make, not yours.

Who is responsible, me or the bank making the remittance?

The obligation is the payer's. A bank handling the remittance will ask for the paperwork it needs before it moves money abroad, and that requirement is often the first moment a payer discovers the section applies to them at all. But the bank is not standing in your shoes. It will not make the chargeability determination for you and it takes no share of the liability if the determination turns out to be wrong. Treat the bank's checklist as a document requirement and the judgement behind it as your own responsibility.

Do I deduct on an advance, or only at completion?

The obligation attaches to the payment, so an advance is within it. This is the commonest way an individual buyer falls into default. A token or booking amount goes across early, before anyone has considered withholding, and the deduction is then permanently missing on that slice. If you know or suspect the seller is a non-resident, settle the position before any money moves, including anything paid into an escrow arrangement or sent directly to an account the seller holds outside India.

What is FIRPTA withholding?

FIRPTA is the US regime that treats a foreign person's disposition of a US real property interest as taxable and makes the buyer withhold on the gross proceeds to secure it. Because the deduction is on the price rather than the profit, it routinely exceeds the real tax — sometimes on a sale made at a loss. A withholding certificate applied for before closing can reduce it to something closer to the actual liability. See the FIRPTA withholding certificate.

Who qualifies for the Foreign Earned Income Exclusion?

A US citizen or resident with a tax home outside the United States who meets one of two tests: bona fide residence in a foreign country for an uninterrupted period including a full tax year, or physical presence abroad for a qualifying number of days in a twelve-month window. The day count and the exclusion cap both come off Form 2555 for the year in question. Failing both tests does not end relief — the foreign tax credit is the alternative. See Form 2555.

Our practitioners are alumni of leading accounting and tax institutions

Where our partners studied — CPA Canada (In-Depth Tax Program), AICPA, the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India and the Malaysian Institute of Accountants.

Request a Quote +1 (416) 619-0068