If your deductions and credits reliably produce a refund, that is exactly what Form T1213 asks for. It is a request to the CRA to authorise your employer, or the payer of your pension, to withhold less at source because the year's deductions and credits will bring the tax back to you anyway. It does not change what you owe for the year. It changes when you hold the money. For someone whose refund arrives every spring without fail, the form is the difference between financing the CRA all year and being paid properly as you go. The request has to be supported, so the deductions need to be predictable rather than hoped for.
Who files Form T1213?
- 15+Years of the founder's cross-border experience
- 18,000+Clients served across our offices in India, the USA, Canada and the UAE
- 5.0Google rating
- 4Global offices — India, USA, Canada & UAE
Canadian residents with predictable deductions — including foreign tax credits and treaty-based deductions — that guarantee an annual refund. The obligation is decided by facts rather than by tax owing, which is why a nil position does not remove it.
The rule on who files
Canadian residents with predictable deductions — including foreign tax credits and treaty-based deductions — that guarantee an annual refund.

Where the general answer is wrong
It converts next year's refund into this year's cash flow. For cross-border employees whose foreign tax credit is large and certain, it is the difference between financing the CRA and not.
Your next step
The full treatment — who it binds, the deadline, the penalty and the fixed fee — is on T1213 — request to reduce tax at source. If a letter prompted this, bring the letter — it usually contains the answer to half the questions.
Checked and signed off for the 2025 and 2026 filing seasons by Udit Gupta, International Tax, Cross-Border Tax & Transfer Pricing Expert, Legal Quotient Consultants. General information, not advice for your circumstances — call our 24-hour helpline to discuss your own position.
What these engagements turn on
A cross border employee whose foreign tax credit was large and certain
The client worked in another country and was taxed there, while remaining a Canadian resident with Canadian payroll deductions running at the full rate. Every year produced a substantial refund months after the fact. The work was to build a supported estimate of the year's foreign tax credit, document the employment and the foreign tax being paid, and submit the request to reduce tax at source. The engagement produced an authorisation that the employer's payroll applied to the remaining pay periods, and a template estimate to be refreshed and resubmitted each year.
Read how this one runsA request refused for want of evidence and then rebuilt
The client had made the request themselves and had it turned down, with no clear sense of what had been missing. The estimate had been asserted rather than supported. The work was to reconstruct it from documents: the contract, the foreign tax being withheld, and a calculation showing where the Canadian liability landed once the credits were taken into account. The engagement produced a fresh request with the supporting schedule attached and a record of the assumptions behind it, so the following year's request can be updated rather than rebuilt from nothing.
Read how this one runsA pensioner whose treaty deductions exceeded the tax being withheld
The client had retired and drew a Canadian pension, while treaty based deductions reduced the Canadian liability on it. Withholding carried on as though the deductions did not exist. The work was to establish the deductions for the coming year, document the treaty basis for them, and request that the payer withhold on a reduced basis. The engagement produced an authorisation directed to the pension payer and a note explaining that the reduction applies only to payments still to come, which is what determines the value of making the request early.
Read how this one runsA request made mid year with only part of the payroll left
The client came to us after most of the year's pay had already been processed, with withholding running at the full rate throughout. The request could still be made, but it could only affect the pay periods that remained. The work was to submit it for what was left and to prepare the following year's request in advance, so the same thing did not happen twice. The engagement produced an authorisation for the balance of the year and a diarised date for the next request, before the new year's payroll begins.
Read how this one runsCircumstances that changed after the reduction was authorised
The reduction had been authorised on an estimate of deductions that a change of assignment partway through the year made too generous. Left alone, the year would have ended with a balance owing rather than a refund. The work was to recalculate the position as soon as the change was known, decide how much of the remaining year's withholding needed to be restored, and plan for any balance. The engagement produced a revised calculation, an instruction to correct the position for the rest of the year, and no surprise at assessment.
Read how this one runsPayroll that would not act without the authorisation in hand
The client had asked payroll directly to reduce the tax taken off and had been told no, which was the right answer. Only the CRA can authorise it. The work was to explain the sequence, prepare and submit the request with a supporting estimate, and then take the authorisation to payroll with a covering note setting out what it permitted and from which pay period. The engagement produced the authorisation and a payroll instruction the department could act on without further correspondence.
Read how this one runsTax Deducted When Buying From an NRI
Withholding on a sale by a non-resident is applied to the sale value rather than to the gain, so it routinely exceeds the tax due. A lower-deduction certificate obtained before completion avoids locking the difference up.
Read how this one runsThe Deemed Sale That Happens on Death
Canada treats most capital property as sold at fair market value on death, so a terminal return can carry tax on gains nobody realised. Valuations and the order of the returns are what decide the figure.
Read how this one runsAll case studies — every published engagement in one place.
Core International & Cross-Border Tax Services
Strategy and compliance for income, assets and families spread across borders.
Industries & Client Types We Serve Worldwide
- Foreign VAT / GST / sales tax registrations
- Marketplace withholding reviews
- Inventory nexus & PE analysis
- Multi-currency books reconciled
Software revenue crosses borders by default — sourcing rules, withholding on licence-like payments and IP location decide the effective rate.
Software revenue is rarely taxed where the team sits. Licence, subscription and service income are characterised differently by each side, and the answer decides withholding at source, treaty relief and whether a foreign customer creates a taxable presence at all — questions that are cheap to settle before the contract and expensive afterwards.
- Cross-border revenue sourcing & withholding
- IP structuring with real substance
- Equity for cross-border teams
- U.S. expansion: entity & PE setup
- Reg 105 / 102 waivers
- Permanent establishment risk
- Partner mobility planning
- Cross-border withholding recovery
- Section 216 rental returns
- FIRPTA withholding recovery
- Section 116 clearance
- Treaty credit optimization
- Transfer pricing documentation (s.247)
- Customs value vs transfer price
- Foreign affiliate reporting (T1134)
- Country-by-country reporting
- Reg 105 & U.S. CWA agreements
- Multi-state & country calendars
- Touring income allocation
- Royalty & image-rights withholding
- Residency analysis before moving
- Employer payroll exposure
- Totalization & social security
- Foreign tax credits
- Treaty access & PPT reviews
- FAPI & surplus computations
- Withholding-efficient routing
- Governance & substance
Asked next about Form T1213
The CRA does. The form is a request, not an election, and the authorisation is issued to your employer or pension payer rather than to you. Your employer cannot reduce withholding on your say so, and asking payroll first usually wastes a pay cycle. The practical points are sequence and timing. Make the request before the year's pay periods run, because a reduction only affects the pay that is still to come, and a request made late in the year has very little left to work on. Support it properly as well: the CRA is being asked to accept an estimate of deductions that have not happened yet.
It is among the clearest reasons there is, provided it is predictable. The form is aimed at Canadian residents whose deductions and credits, including foreign tax credits and treaty based deductions, will produce a refund in any event. For a cross border employee whose foreign tax is large and certain, Canadian withholding on the same income is money going out and coming back for no purpose. What the request needs is evidence that the credit is reliable rather than merely possible: the foreign employment, the foreign tax being paid through the year, and a calculation showing where the Canadian liability lands once the credit is taken into account.
It is not a mistake on your return, but it is a cash flow choice you probably did not make deliberately. A large refund means tax was withheld through the year against deductions and credits that were always going to reduce it, and the money sat with the CRA until the return was assessed. Where the deductions are predictable, and cross border deductions and foreign tax credits often are, a request to reduce tax at source puts that money into your pay instead. Nothing about the final position changes. If you would rather take the refund as a lump sum, that is a legitimate preference too.
No. It changes the timing only. The year's deductions and credits are what they are, and the return still settles the position. What the request does is stop money being withheld that was always going to come back to you. That cuts both ways, which is the thing to be careful about. If the deductions turn out smaller than the estimate the request was based on, the reduced withholding leaves a balance at the end of the year instead of a refund. So the estimate should be conservative, and if circumstances change partway through the year the position should be revisited rather than left running.
Yes. The request covers Canadian employment income and pension income alike, which matters to people whose deductions are predictable but whose income no longer comes from an employer. The test is the same: deductions and credits that will produce a refund anyway, evidenced rather than assumed. For someone drawing a Canadian pension while treaty based deductions or foreign tax credits reduce the Canadian liability, withholding at source can run well ahead of the tax actually due for the year. The authorisation, if it is given, goes to the payer of the pension, who applies it to the payments still to be made.
Foreign income is income sourced outside the country you are filing in — where the work was done, where the property sits, where the payer is resident, depending on the type. A foreign tax, for credit purposes, is a levy imposed by another country that functions as an income tax and that you were legally required to pay. Consumption taxes, property taxes and most social contributions are not, however real the cost. Sourcing is decided by rule, not by which bank received it. See the foreign tax credit.
American expats and green card holders need to file US returns for life, and many of them pay little or no US tax once the relief is applied — but the filing is what unlocks the relief, so the two questions have different answers. The exclusion for foreign earned income, the credit for foreign tax already paid and the treaty between the two countries between them usually leave the total at roughly the higher of the two countries' tax rather than the sum. Skip the return and none of it applies. See Americans abroad.



