Who files Form T2062B?

  • 15+Years of cross-border experience
  • 18,000+Clients served
  • 5.0Google rating
  • 4Global offices — India, USA, Canada & UAE
  • 18,000+ clients served
  • 15+ years of cross-border experience
  • Offices in India, the USA, Canada and the UAE
Answer

Non-residents disposing of Canadian life insurance interests, and the insurers processing the disposition. The obligation is decided by facts rather than by tax owing, which is why a nil position does not remove it.

The rule on who files

Non-residents disposing of Canadian life insurance interests, and the insurers processing the disposition.

Two of the firm’s advisers at a desk in the Delhi office

The case that is treated differently

Life policies are their own category of taxable Canadian property with their own computation, and the insurer will not settle without evidence the notification has been made.

Who files Form T2062B?
ItemAmount
Gross amount receivedC$18,000
Withheld at source (assumed 21% of gross)C$3,780
Deductible costsC$14,040
Net amount actually earnedC$3,960
Tax on the net amount (assumed graduated result)C$990
Difference recoverable by filingC$2,790

Filing on a net basis recovers C$2,790 of the C$3,780 withheld. That difference is the entire reason the elective return exists, and it is lost by not filing.

An illustration, not a client file. The sums are chosen for legibility and the thresholds are stated for the example alone — nothing reaches a filing until it has been confirmed at source for your own year.

Where to go from here

The full treatment — who it binds, the deadline, the penalty and the fixed fee — is on T2062B — life insurance disposition. The first call establishes whether there is work to do. Everything after that is quoted.

Reviewed for the 2025 and 2026 filing seasons by Udit Gupta, Cross-Border Tax Expert, Legal Quotient Consultants. This is general information rather than advice about your file — a short call is the way to get the second.

Who has to file US tax return — what this page covers

People reach this page searching for who has to file US tax return. It is covered here as it applies to Form T2062B — who it applies to, what has to be filed, and what it costs, at a fixed fee agreed before the work starts.

What these engagements turn on

Case study 1

Policy surrendered by a non-resident owner with the insurer holding proceeds

The owner had left Canada years earlier, decided to surrender a long-held policy, and discovered the insurer would not settle without evidence that the notification had been made. We obtained the policy contract and the insurer's statement of what it was processing, established the cost history of the interest, and made the notification on that basis. We then supplied the insurer with what its file required. The engagement produced a completed notification, proceeds released without a second round of queries, and a computation the owner could carry into the Canadian return for the year of disposition.

Read how this one runs
Case study 2

Ownership history reconstructed before a notification could be made

The policy had changed hands twice inside a family and the insurer's records did not match the documents the client held. Until the ownership chain was settled there was no answer to whose interest was being disposed of, so that came first: contract, endorsements, assignment paperwork and correspondence, assembled into one chronology. The notification followed from that rather than from an assumption. The work produced a documented ownership history, a notification consistent with the insurer's own records, and a written account of the chain that the insurer accepted without asking for further evidence.

Read how this one runs
Case study 3

Inherited policy disposed of while the estate was still open

An executor abroad was dealing with a Canadian policy interest the estate intended to dispose of rather than hold. Two histories had to meet: the cost basis of the interest as established in the estate, and the terms of the policy itself. We worked from the probate material and the policy file together, made the notification for the disposition, and kept the insurer's requirements and the estate's reporting on one timetable. The engagement produced a notification the insurer accepted, an interest disposed of without proceeds sitting unpaid, and a record the estate's other advisers could use.

Read how this one runs
Case study 4

Assignment of a policy interest treated as a disposition on review

The client had assigned an interest in a Canadian policy and treated the transaction as an administrative change of ownership. Reading the contract and the insurer's processing notes, it looked more like a disposition of an interest than a formality, which put the notification route squarely in play. We set out the analysis, made the notification, and documented the reasoning behind it. The engagement produced a notification filed before any query arrived, a written position on the character of the assignment, and an insurer file that no longer had an unresolved question sitting in it.

Read how this one runs
Case study 5

Insurer's evidence requirements agreed in writing before filing

The delay on this file was never the tax analysis. The insurer's claims department and its head office gave different accounts of what evidence of notification they would accept, and the proceeds stayed where they were. We asked for the requirement in writing, obtained it, and prepared the notification and the supporting material to match it in a single pass. The engagement produced an agreed evidence list before anything was filed, a notification that satisfied it on first submission, and a settlement that did not need a third round of correspondence.

Read how this one runs
Case study 6

Notification prepared alongside the return for the year of disposition

The owner raised the notification and the Canadian return separately, months apart, which is how the same figures end up stated two different ways. We took both together: established the cost history of the policy interest once, made the notification from it, and reported the disposition on the return for the year on the same basis. The engagement produced consistent figures across the two filings, a single supporting file behind both, and no reconciliation exercise later when the insurer's paperwork and the return were read side by side.

Read how this one runs
Case study 7

Paid for Work Done in Canada While Living Elsewhere

Employment carried out in Canada is taxable here even where the employer and the bank account are not. The engagement establishes how many of the days were worked in Canada, applies the treaty employment article, and deals with the withholding the payer has already taken.

Read how this one runs
Case study 8

A US Filer Married to Someone Outside the System

Electing to treat a non-resident spouse as a US filer buys joint rates and brings that spouse's worldwide income and foreign accounts into the return. The election is easy to make and hard to revoke, so both positions are modelled first.

Read how this one runs

All case studies — every published engagement in one place.

Core International & Cross-Border Tax Services

International Tax Planning & Advisory

Strategy and compliance for income, assets and families spread across borders.

One coordinating team: filings on every side of the border are sequenced so treaty relief and foreign tax credits are claimed once — and in the right country.

U.S. & Cross-Border Tax Returns

Dual filers: U.S. citizens in Canada and Canadians with U.S. income run two parallel systems — we prepare both, in the right order, every year.

Expat & Emigration Tax

The move year is its own project: the elections and valuations filed that year decide the next decade of both countries’ returns.

Non-Resident Canadian Tax

Default withholding is 25% of gross: elective returns routinely turn over-withheld rent and pensions into refunds.

Transfer Pricing & BEPS

Documentation prepared with the return is the cheapest insurance in international tax; reconstructing it during an audit is the most expensive.

Cross-Border Estates & Trusts

Wills drafted for one country routinely misfire in the other — deemed disposition here, estate tax there, credits in between.

Cross-Border Corporate Tax

Expansion raises the same four questions every time — entity, PE, repatriation, payroll. We answer them before the tax authorities do.

India Tax for NRIs & Returning Residents

The deduction is taken on the sale price, not the gain — which is why an NRI property sale strands cash unless the certificate is applied for before closing.

Canadian Tax with a Foreign Element

Residency is decided on facts, not on a form — and the year you arrive or leave is the one where the largest amounts turn on the smallest details.

UAE Tax for Expats & Their Home Country

A zero-tax country is only half the answer — the question that decides the bill is whether the country you came from still treats you as resident.

Industries & Client Types We Serve Worldwide

Global E-commerce & Marketplaces
Technology & SaaS
Professional Services Firms
Cross-Border Real Estate
Importers, Exporters & Manufacturers
Athletes, Artists & Entertainers
Remote Workers & Digital Nomads
Investment Funds & Holding Companies

Global E-commerce & Marketplaces

  • Foreign VAT / GST / sales tax registrations
  • Marketplace withholding reviews
  • Inventory nexus & PE analysis
  • Multi-currency books reconciled
Explore E-commerce & Marketplaces

Technology & SaaS

  • Cross-border revenue sourcing & withholding
  • IP structuring with real substance
  • Equity for cross-border teams
  • U.S. expansion: entity & PE setup
Explore Technology & SaaS

Importers, Exporters & Manufacturers

  • Transfer pricing documentation (s.247)
  • Customs value vs transfer price
  • Foreign affiliate reporting (T1134)
  • Country-by-country reporting
Explore Trade & Manufacturing

Athletes, Artists & Entertainers

Performance income is taxed where earned — Regulation 105 in Canada, withholding agreements in the U.S. — with special treaty articles overriding the usual rules.

Performance income is taxed where the performance happens, and the deduction is usually taken at source on the gross fee before expenses. Recovering the difference is a filing exercise in the other country, and it only works if the tour, the residency and the withholding certificates were documented while the work was being done.

  • Reg 105 & U.S. CWA agreements
  • Multi-state & country calendars
  • Touring income allocation
  • Royalty & image-rights withholding
Explore Athletes & Entertainers

Remote Workers & Digital Nomads

  • Residency analysis before moving
  • Employer payroll exposure
  • Totalization & social security
  • Foreign tax credits
Explore Remote Workers

Investment Funds & Holding Companies

  • Treaty access & PPT reviews
  • FAPI & surplus computations
  • Withholding-efficient routing
  • Governance & substance
Explore Funds & Holdcos

More on Form T2062B

I live abroad and want to surrender a Canadian life policy. Who files?

The disposition is yours, so the notification is yours. Form T2062B is the notification and clearance route for a non-resident's disposition of an interest in a Canadian life insurance policy, and the obligation follows the disposition rather than the tax result. The insurer is the other party with a stake in it. It is processing the disposition, and in practice it will not settle the proceeds without evidence that the notification has been made. So there are two tasks that look like one from the outside. You make the notification. The insurer wants to see that you have. Starting the notification before you instruct the insurer usually shortens the whole sequence.

Does a policy loan or a partial surrender count as a disposition?

Ask what the transaction does to the interest, not whether cash arrived. An interest in a Canadian life insurance policy is its own category of taxable Canadian property with its own computation, and that computation does not follow the ordinary capital-property pattern, so intuition transfers badly. Surrenders, assignments and transfers of ownership are all capable of disposing of an interest. A borrowing against a policy may or may not, depending on the terms. The practical route is to obtain the policy contract and the insurer's own statement of what it is processing, and to test the notification question against those, before assuming a transaction falls outside it.

The insurer says it needs my clearance before releasing funds. Why?

Because the insurer is processing the disposition, and settling the proceeds without evidence that the notification has been made leaves it carrying a problem that is not its own. That is a commercial position rather than obstruction, and arguing with the claims department rarely moves it. The sequence that works runs the other way round: make the notification, obtain the evidence of it, and give the insurer what its file needs. Two things speed this up. Have the policy documents and the ownership history to hand, because the computation on a life insurance interest is specific to that kind of property. And ask the insurer in writing what evidence it will accept.

I inherited a Canadian life policy and now live abroad. Do I file?

The test is what you are doing now, not how the interest came to you. If you are a non-resident disposing of an interest in a Canadian life insurance policy, the notification route applies, and inheritance does not remove it. What inheritance does change is the evidence. The cost history of the interest usually has to be established from the estate records rather than from your own, and the insurer will want the ownership chain documented before it will process anything. Gather the probate material and the policy file together. The notification is far easier to support once the history behind the interest is settled.

Do I need to file if the policy paid out less than I put in?

The notification obligation comes from the disposition of the interest, and the tax result does not decide whether it arises. A loss position is a reason to compute carefully, not a reason to skip the filing. There is a second reason to file anyway on this kind of property: the insurer is unlikely to settle without evidence the notification has been made, so skipping it delays the money rather than saving effort. And the computation on a life insurance interest is its own thing, not the premiums-in against proceeds-out arithmetic most people do in their heads, so a position that feels like a loss may not be one.

Which documents does my adviser need to make the notification?

Start with the policy contract and every endorsement to it, then the ownership and assignment history, then the insurer's statement of the transaction it is processing. Those three together establish what interest is being disposed of and by whom, which is the part of the file that takes longest. Add whatever cost history exists, including records held outside Canada, because the computation on a life insurance interest has its own basis and cannot be reconstructed from a payout figure alone. Finally, ask the insurer in writing what evidence of the notification it will accept for its own file, so the last step does not become a fresh negotiation.

How do I report the sale of a foreign property?

On your residence-country return, as a disposition, with proceeds and cost base converted at the rates for their own dates. Separately, the country where the property sits may require its own return and may hold back tax at closing until a clearance or certificate is issued — Canada does this for a non-resident vendor, and the United States withholds on a foreign seller of US real property. Those steps have their own deadlines, often before closing. See clearance certificates on a property sale.

Are US-listed ETFs US-situs property for a non-resident's estate?

Shares issued by a US company are generally US-situs for estate tax purposes, and a fund domiciled in the United States is a US company however global its holdings. A fund domiciled elsewhere that holds the same underlying stocks generally is not. That distinction — the domicile of the wrapper rather than the location of the investments — is why cross-border portfolios get restructured, and it should be confirmed against your own holdings before anything is sold. See US estate tax exposure for Canadians.

Our practitioners are alumni of leading accounting and tax institutions

Where our partners studied — CPA Canada (In-Depth Tax Program), AICPA, the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India and the Malaysian Institute of Accountants.

Request a Quote +1 (416) 619-0068