Who files Form T4A-NR?

  • 15+Years of cross-border experience
  • 18,000+Clients served
  • 5.0Google rating
  • 4Global offices — India, USA, Canada & UAE
  • Fixed fee agreed before work starts
  • 18,000+ clients served
  • 15+ years of cross-border experience
Answer

Canadian payers engaging non-resident contractors, consultants, speakers and performers who do the work inside Canada. The obligation is decided by facts rather than by tax owing, which is why a nil position does not remove it.

The rule on who files

Canadian payers engaging non-resident contractors, consultants, speakers and performers who do the work inside Canada.

Two of the firm’s advisers and the team in the open-plan office

The exception

Where the work was physically done is the test. Withholding applies to services rendered in Canada even where the contract, the invoice and the bank account are all foreign, and even where a treaty will ultimately relieve the tax.

Who files Form T4A-NR?
ItemAmount
Gross amount receivedC$20,000
Withheld at source (assumed 29% of gross)C$5,800
Deductible costsC$14,800
Net amount actually earnedC$5,200
Tax on the net amount (assumed graduated result)C$1,040
Difference recoverable by filingC$4,760

Filing on a net basis recovers C$4,760 of the C$5,800 withheld. That difference is the entire reason the elective return exists, and it is lost by not filing.

An illustration, not a client file. The sums are chosen for legibility and the thresholds are stated for the example alone — nothing reaches a filing until it has been confirmed at source for your own year.

What to do next

The full treatment — who it binds, the deadline, the penalty and the fixed fee — is on T4A-NR — services rendered in Canada. The first call establishes whether there is work to do. Everything after that is quoted.

Reviewed for the 2025 and 2026 filing seasons by Udit Gupta, Cross-Border Tax Expert, Legal Quotient Consultants. This is general information rather than advice about your file — a short call is the way to get the second.

Where who needs to file FATCA comes into this file

This is the page to read on who needs to file FATCA. It takes Form T4A-NR in order — the test that decides who is affected, the returns and forms that follow from it, and a fee quoted in writing before anything starts.

Files that look like this one

Case study 1

Consultant flown in for site visits and the days that counted

An engineering business engaged a non-resident consultant who travelled to two Canadian sites during the year and worked from his own office between visits. The payer had treated the whole arrangement as foreign because the consultancy and its invoices were. We rebuilt the engagement from flight records, site attendance logs and the consultant's working notes, separated the days performed in Canada from the days performed abroad, and issued the non-resident services slips for the Canadian portion only. The engagement produced a filed set of slips and a written allocation the payer can hand over if the split is ever questioned.

Read how this one runs
Case study 2

Conference fees to overseas speakers reported for the first time

A professional body had run an annual conference for years and had never filed non-resident services slips, on the understanding that speaker fees arranged through agents were the agent's problem. We went through the programme year by year, identified which sessions had been delivered in person in Canada and which had been delivered from abroad, and unbundled the service fees from reimbursed travel. Slips were prepared for the reportable fees. The body's booking paperwork was then changed so the information needed arrives with the contract rather than after the event.

Read how this one runs
Case study 3

Foreign signed contract did not put the work outside Canada

A software company had a development contract signed in another country, invoiced from that country and paid into a foreign account, and had concluded that nothing Canadian arose. The developers, however, had spent long stretches working at the client's premises in Canada. We documented where the work had actually been carried out, explained why the contract's origin does not decide the point, and brought the payer's reporting up to date for the affected periods. The result was a filed position, prepared from the company's own travel and site access records.

Read how this one runs
Case study 4

Treaty relief expected but the slips still had to be filed

A payer had withheld nothing from a non-resident consultant because it was satisfied that a treaty would relieve the tax. That view of the tax turned out to be sound. The view of the reporting did not. We separated the two questions, filed the non-resident services slips due for the payments already made, and set out the treaty analysis in a memorandum the payer keeps with the engagement file. The consultant filed a Canadian return to settle his own position. Nothing about the treaty removed the payer's obligation to report.

Read how this one runs
Case study 5

Non-resident crew across two provinces mapped to their engagements

A production company paid a number of non-resident crew and performers who worked on shoots in two provinces within one season. Payments had been made from several cost centres and some had gone through a foreign production services company. We traced each payment to the engagement it related to and to the place the work was performed, then reported the amounts that belonged to services rendered in Canada. The engagement produced a reconciled schedule running from payments through to slips, which is the document the payer needed when the season's costs were later examined.

Read how this one runs
Case study 6

Revenue enquiry into why no slips had been issued

A payer received an enquiry asking it to support why no non-resident services slips had been filed for a year in which it had paid several foreign suppliers. We assembled the records for each supplier, showed which had performed their work entirely outside Canada and which had not, and filed slips for the payments that were reportable. The answer to the enquiry was a documented position supplier by supplier rather than a general assertion. The fee for that exercise and for the filings was agreed in writing before the work started.

Read how this one runs
Case study 7

Fifteen Per Cent Held Back From a Fee for Services in Canada

A payer must withhold from fees paid to a non-resident for services rendered in Canada, whether or not any tax is ultimately owed. A waiver applied for before the work is invoiced avoids the withholding; after it, the money comes back through a return.

Read how this one runs
Case study 8

One Salary, Two Countries Claiming It

A US citizen resident in Canada, taxed in full on both sides because each return was prepared without the other in view. Deciding which country has the first right to the income, then claiming relief on the second return in the right order, is what stops the same dollar being taxed twice.

Read how this one runs

All case studies — every published engagement in one place.

Core International & Cross-Border Tax Services

International Tax Planning & Advisory

Strategy and compliance for income, assets and families spread across borders.

One coordinating team: filings on every side of the border are sequenced so treaty relief and foreign tax credits are claimed once — and in the right country.

U.S. & Cross-Border Tax Returns

Dual filers: U.S. citizens in Canada and Canadians with U.S. income run two parallel systems — we prepare both, in the right order, every year.

Expat & Emigration Tax

The move year is its own project: the elections and valuations filed that year decide the next decade of both countries’ returns.

Non-Resident Canadian Tax

Default withholding is 25% of gross: elective returns routinely turn over-withheld rent and pensions into refunds.

Transfer Pricing & BEPS

Documentation prepared with the return is the cheapest insurance in international tax; reconstructing it during an audit is the most expensive.

Cross-Border Estates & Trusts

Wills drafted for one country routinely misfire in the other — deemed disposition here, estate tax there, credits in between.

Cross-Border Corporate Tax

Expansion raises the same four questions every time — entity, PE, repatriation, payroll. We answer them before the tax authorities do.

India Tax for NRIs & Returning Residents

The deduction is taken on the sale price, not the gain — which is why an NRI property sale strands cash unless the certificate is applied for before closing.

Canadian Tax with a Foreign Element

Residency is decided on facts, not on a form — and the year you arrive or leave is the one where the largest amounts turn on the smallest details.

UAE Tax for Expats & Their Home Country

A zero-tax country is only half the answer — the question that decides the bill is whether the country you came from still treats you as resident.

Industries & Client Types We Serve Worldwide

Global E-commerce & Marketplaces
Technology & SaaS
Professional Services Firms
Cross-Border Real Estate
Importers, Exporters & Manufacturers
Athletes, Artists & Entertainers
Remote Workers & Digital Nomads
Investment Funds & Holding Companies

Global E-commerce & Marketplaces

  • Foreign VAT / GST / sales tax registrations
  • Marketplace withholding reviews
  • Inventory nexus & PE analysis
  • Multi-currency books reconciled
Explore E-commerce & Marketplaces

Technology & SaaS

  • Cross-border revenue sourcing & withholding
  • IP structuring with real substance
  • Equity for cross-border teams
  • U.S. expansion: entity & PE setup
Explore Technology & SaaS

Importers, Exporters & Manufacturers

  • Transfer pricing documentation (s.247)
  • Customs value vs transfer price
  • Foreign affiliate reporting (T1134)
  • Country-by-country reporting
Explore Trade & Manufacturing

Athletes, Artists & Entertainers

  • Reg 105 & U.S. CWA agreements
  • Multi-state & country calendars
  • Touring income allocation
  • Royalty & image-rights withholding
Explore Athletes & Entertainers

Remote Workers & Digital Nomads

  • Residency analysis before moving
  • Employer payroll exposure
  • Totalization & social security
  • Foreign tax credits
Explore Remote Workers

Investment Funds & Holding Companies

Holding structures live or die on treaty access, beneficial ownership and substance — the MLI's principal-purpose test now sits over every arrangement.

A holding structure is only as good as its reporting. Foreign affiliates, accrued passive income and distributions each carry their own return, and the penalties on those attach to the form rather than to any tax being owed — so a structure that saves tax can still cost money if the information returns are late.

  • Treaty access & PPT reviews
  • FAPI & surplus computations
  • Withholding-efficient routing
  • Governance & substance
Explore Funds & Holdcos

Form T4A-NR: further questions

Do I file a T4A-NR if my contractor lives in the United States?

Residence tells you which slip is the non-resident one. It does not tell you whether a slip is due. The test is where the work was physically done. If your contractor carried out the work inside Canada, the payment is reportable on the non-resident services slip, whether they live in the United States or anywhere else. If the same person did all of the work from their own country, the payment falls outside this reporting. So the first question is not where they live but where they were standing while the work was performed, and your records have to show it.

Does a treaty exemption mean we can skip the slip?

No. A treaty can relieve the tax and still leave the reporting in place. Withholding applies to services rendered in Canada even where the contract, the invoice and the bank account are all foreign, and even where a treaty will ultimately relieve the tax. The obligation is decided by the facts of the engagement rather than by the tax that ends up owing, which is why a nil position does not remove it. Treat the treaty question and the slip question as two separate pieces of work. One decides what tax is finally due. The other decides what you must report as the payer.

The invoice came from abroad in foreign currency, does that matter?

Not to the reporting question. The contract's governing law, the address on the invoice, the currency it is written in and the account the money lands in are all consistent with a reportable payment, because none of them is the test. Where the work was physically done is. What the foreign currency does affect is the mechanics. The amounts you report are Canadian dollar amounts, so you need to record the conversion basis you used and apply it consistently across the year rather than picking a rate at filing time.

Do we report a fee paid to an overseas speaker at our conference?

Yes, if the speaker delivered the session in Canada. Speakers and performers sit inside this reporting alongside contractors and consultants, because the class of payment is fees, commissions and other amounts paid to a non-resident for services performed in Canada. A single engagement is enough. There is no concept of a payment being too small or too occasional to report. The practical difficulty at conferences is usually record-keeping rather than law, because the fee is often arranged by an agent or bundled with travel. Separate the service fee from reimbursed costs before you file, and keep the paperwork that supports the split.

Who is responsible for filing, the payer or the contractor?

The Canadian payer. The reporting sits with the party making the payment. It does not transfer to the non-resident by agreement, by a clause in the contract, or because the contractor says they will look after their own Canadian position. The contractor may well have a filing of their own to make, and often wants to make one, but that is separate from the payer's slip. If the contractor will not give you the identifying details you need, you still have to report the amounts you paid, so record what you asked for and when you asked for it.

Part of the work was done in Canada and part abroad, what then?

Split it. Because the test is where the work was physically done, only the portion performed inside Canada belongs on the slip and the rest does not. That makes the allocation the substance of the filing rather than an afterthought. Build it from something contemporaneous, such as travel dates, site attendance logs, timesheets or the agenda of the visit, rather than from a percentage agreed after the fact. A reasonable split you can evidence is defensible. A round figure with nothing behind it is what fails when the payer is asked to support it years later.

Do I have to file in both countries?

Frequently yes, and the two filings do different jobs. The country where the income arises taxes it at source; the country where you are resident taxes your worldwide income and then gives credit for the tax already paid. Filing only one side is what leaves relief unclaimed — the credit has to be asked for on a return. We prepare both sides so the numbers agree. See dual filing.

Is double taxation illegal?

It is legal. Two countries can each have a valid claim on the same income — one because the income arose there, the other because you live there — and nothing prohibits both from exercising it. What exists instead is relief: tax treaties allocate the claim, and domestic law gives a credit for foreign tax paid. The relief is not automatic, though. It is claimed on a return, and unclaimed relief is simply lost. See how double taxation is relieved.

Our practitioners are alumni of leading accounting and tax institutions

Where our partners studied — CPA Canada (In-Depth Tax Program), AICPA, the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India and the Malaysian Institute of Accountants.

Request a Quote +1 (416) 619-0068