India does not levy an inheritance tax, so the succession itself does not produce a tax bill there. That is exactly why heirs living abroad get caught out. The tax arrives later, and in three places: on the rent while you hold the property, on the gain when you sell it, and at the point you try to move the money out of the country. Each of those has its own paperwork and its own deduction at source. So treat a clean succession as the start of the compliance work rather than the end of it, and get the ownership records and succession documents in order while the family paperwork is still to hand.
Inheriting property in India — who pays, and where?
- 15+Years of the founder's cross-border experience
- 18,000+Clients served across our offices in India, the USA, Canada and the UAE
- 5.0Google rating
- 4Global offices — India, USA, Canada & UAE
Inherited Indian property carries forward the original holding period and cost for gains purposes, rent is taxable in India with deduction at source, and moving the proceeds abroad needs a remitter declaration and usually an accountant's certificate. The obligation is decided by facts rather than by tax owing, which is why a nil position does not remove it.
The rule on who files
Inherited Indian property carries forward the original holding period and cost for gains purposes, rent is taxable in India with deduction at source, and moving the proceeds abroad needs a remitter declaration and usually an accountant's certificate.

Where it does not apply
India does not levy an inheritance tax, and that is precisely why heirs abroad get caught: the tax arrives later, on the rent, on the sale, and on the remittance out.
Your next step
The full treatment — who it binds, the deadline, the penalty and the fixed fee — is on Inheriting property in India. If that describes your position, the next step is a short call — not a form.
Read and approved for the 2025 and 2026 filing seasons by Udit Gupta, International Tax, Cross-Border Tax & Transfer Pricing Expert, Legal Quotient Consultants. Written as general guidance, not as a recommendation for your situation. Talk it through with us before acting on it.
Files that look like this one
Reconstructing the cost of a flat bought decades ago
An heir sold an inherited flat in India and could not evidence what her father had paid for it many years earlier. Because an inherited holding carries the original cost forward, that figure decides the gain. We worked from the registered deed, the society's records and the succession papers to establish the acquisition and the improvements made since, and prepared the gains computation on that basis. The engagement produced a documented cost history, the Indian computation and the matching Canadian one, so that one sale could be reported on both sides from a single evidenced set of facts.
Read how this one runsA remittance that stalled for want of a certificate
A client had sold inherited property in India, had the proceeds sitting in a local account, and had been told by his bank that the transfer could not proceed. Nothing was wrong with the sale. What was missing was the remitter declaration and the accountant's certificate, neither of which could be prepared while the cost history was undocumented and the Indian return unfiled. We assembled the succession and purchase records, settled the gains position, filed, and had the certificate issued. The engagement produced a completed remittance and a file the client can reuse for the remaining co-owned property.
Read how this one runsIndian rent taxed at source and never reported here
Tax had been deducted from the rent on an inherited property in India for several years, and the client took that as the end of the matter. The rent is taxable in Canada as well, with credit for the Indian tax. We restated the rental results under Canadian rules, matched them to the Indian tax years and the deductions at source, and prepared amended Canadian returns claiming the credit on an evidenced basis. The engagement produced corrected filings for the open years, and one schedule that reconciles the two tax years and currencies for future returns.
Read how this one runsCo-heirs with separate positions in one inherited property
A property in India passed to four siblings, two of them resident in Canada and two elsewhere. They wanted a single computation. Their positions were not the same, because the gain, the deduction at source and the remittance mechanics each apply to a share rather than to the building. We established the shares from the succession documents, computed each person's gain on their own share, and prepared the remittance documentation separately for those taking money out. The engagement produced per-share computations and a sale timetable the family could act on together.
Read how this one runsAn heir who assumed no inheritance tax meant no filings
A client had inherited a flat in India several years earlier and had done nothing about it anywhere, on the correct understanding that India charges no inheritance tax. The absence of a tax is not the absence of an obligation. We established the value at death for Canadian purposes, brought the foreign-property reporting up to date, and set the Indian position in order for the years the flat had been let. The engagement produced a filing history on both sides and a written note of which country measures what, so the eventual sale is a computation rather than an investigation.
Read how this one runsTracing cost through two successive deaths
The property our client inherited had itself been inherited by his mother from her father, so the cost carried forward for Indian gains purposes sat two generations back. Each step had to be evidenced. We traced the registered transfers, the succession records and the improvement expenditure across the whole chain, then set out the cost and holding position for the current sale. The engagement produced a documented chain of title and cost, the gains computation that follows from it, and the material the remittance certificate would later be issued against.
Read how this one runsTax Deducted When Buying From an NRI
Withholding on a sale by a non-resident is applied to the sale value rather than to the gain, so it routinely exceeds the tax due. A lower-deduction certificate obtained before completion avoids locking the difference up.
Read how this one runsThe Year of Leaving India
The departure year carries a transition status with its own treatment of foreign income, and the position for the following years follows from how it is set. Getting the first year right saves arguing about the rest.
Read how this one runsAll case studies — every published engagement in one place.
Core International & Cross-Border Tax Services
Strategy and compliance for income, assets and families spread across borders.
Industries & Client Types We Serve Worldwide
- Foreign VAT / GST / sales tax registrations
- Marketplace withholding reviews
- Inventory nexus & PE analysis
- Multi-currency books reconciled
- Cross-border revenue sourcing & withholding
- IP structuring with real substance
- Equity for cross-border teams
- U.S. expansion: entity & PE setup
- Reg 105 / 102 waivers
- Permanent establishment risk
- Partner mobility planning
- Cross-border withholding recovery
- Section 216 rental returns
- FIRPTA withholding recovery
- Section 116 clearance
- Treaty credit optimization
- Transfer pricing documentation (s.247)
- Customs value vs transfer price
- Foreign affiliate reporting (T1134)
- Country-by-country reporting
- Reg 105 & U.S. CWA agreements
- Multi-state & country calendars
- Touring income allocation
- Royalty & image-rights withholding
Working from anywhere doesn't mean taxed nowhere: residency defaults, employer payroll exposure and treaty relief decide where income actually lands.
Working from another country does not by itself end tax residence in the one you left, and it can start one where you are sitting. Day counts, ties, the employer's own exposure and the treaty tie-breaker all point at the same question, and the year you move is the year it has to be answered on paper.
- Residency analysis before moving
- Employer payroll exposure
- Totalization & social security
- Foreign tax credits
- Treaty access & PPT reviews
- FAPI & surplus computations
- Withholding-efficient routing
- Governance & substance
What people ask us about Inheriting property in India
For Indian gains purposes you step into the previous owner's position rather than starting fresh. The original cost carried forward is what the gain is measured against, which means the deceased's purchase documents matter to you long after their death. Where the property was bought many years ago, or was inherited by them in turn, that chain has to be traced back. Note that this is the opposite of the Canadian treatment, where the asset is taken at its value at death. The same sale is therefore measured from two different starting points, and both computations have to be prepared together if the credit for Indian tax is going to hold up.
It does. The holding period runs from when the property was originally acquired rather than from the date you inherited it, so a flat your father held for many years does not become a fresh short holding in your hands. That matters because the character of the gain, and the mechanics available on it, turn on how long the property has been held rather than on who held it. Keep the original purchase deed, any improvement records and the succession documents together as one file. Reconstructing a holding period from memory while a buyer is already waiting is the expensive way to do this.
The rent is Indian-source income and is taxable in India, with tax deducted at source before it reaches you where the tenant or paying agent is obliged to deduct. It is also taxable in Canada, because you are taxable here on your worldwide income, with credit for the Indian tax on the same income. The two computations do not match: the deductions allowed against rent differ, the tax years differ, and the currency has to be translated. Filing in India is what turns the deduction at source into a settled liability and gives you the evidence the Canadian credit claim rests on.
Generally yes, through the banking channel, but the bank will not move the money on your word that the tax has been dealt with. A remittance out of India needs a declaration from the remitter and, in most cases, a certificate from an accountant confirming the nature of the sum and the tax position behind it. That certificate is the bottleneck. It cannot be produced without the succession documents, the cost history and evidence of the tax on the gain, which is why remittances stall for weeks after an otherwise clean sale. Assemble that file before the sale closes, not once the buyer's funds have landed.
Because the bank is the point at which India checks that money leaving the country has been taxed. It is not making a judgement about your sale. It is relying on a certificate that states what the sum is and what has been withheld or paid on it, together with your own declaration as remitter. If the underlying position is not documented, through an unclear cost, a missing succession record or an unfiled Indian return, the certificate cannot be issued and the transfer does not happen. The practical consequence is that the tax work and the remittance work are one job, done in that order.
Twice over, then relieved. The country where the property sits taxes the rent — often by withholding on the gross amount, with an election available to file on the net result instead. Your residence country also taxes it, generally on net income under its own rules, and credits the foreign tax. Because the two countries compute "net" differently, the numbers rarely match without work. See the section 216 election.
Double Taxation Avoidance Agreement — India's name for a tax treaty. It does the same work as any treaty: allocates taxing rights between India and the other country, caps Indian withholding on payments abroad, and sets out whether relief comes by exemption or by credit. To use one you generally need a tax residency certificate from the other country, Form 10F, and a PAN in the deductor's records. See DTAA relief between India and Canada.



