Reg 105 vs Reg 102

Both are Canadian withholding on work done in Canada by a non-resident, but one applies to fees for services and the other to employment income.

  • 15+Years of the founder's cross-border experience
  • 18,000+Clients served across our offices in India, the USA, Canada and the UAE
  • 5.0Google rating
  • 4Global offices — India, USA, Canada & UAE
  • Fixed fee agreed before work starts
  • 15+ years of cross-border experience
  • 18,000+ clients served
The difference in one line

Both are Canadian withholding on work done in Canada by a non-resident, but one applies to fees for services and the other to employment income.

Side by side

Reg 105 vs Reg 102
 Regulation 105Regulation 102
Applies toFees paid to a non-resident service providerEmployment income of a non-resident employee
Withheld onGross feesEmployment remuneration for Canadian workdays
Waiver basisTreaty, or an income-and-expense computationTreaty exemption, or a qualifying-employer certification
Who appliesThe non-resident providerThe employer, or the employee
TimingBefore the fee is paidBefore the assignment, or at its start
Two of the firm’s advisers and the team in the open-plan office

Which one applies to you

Look at the relationship, not the invoice. A contractor's fee goes down the services route; an employee's salary goes down the payroll route. Companies that get this wrong usually treat an employee as a contractor and inherit both problems.

Your next step

One call now is worth more than a filing season of guessing.

Reviewed for accuracy for the 2025 and 2026 filing seasons by Udit Gupta, International Tax, Cross-Border Tax & Transfer Pricing Expert, Legal Quotient Consultants. This is general information rather than advice about your file — a short call is the way to get the second.

Where international tax accountant comes into this file

If you came here for international tax accountant, this is where it is dealt with. The subject is reg 105 vs Reg 102, and the page covers who it reaches, what then has to be filed, and what we charge to do the work.

Why choose Legal Quotient for Reg 105 vs Reg 102

Residence is tested, not assumed

Where you are resident for treaty purposes is a question with a method. We work through it and write down the answer, with the facts it rests on.

The fee is fixed before we start

Quoted from your documents and agreed in writing. The number you accept is the number you pay.

18,000+ clients served

Individuals, expats and corporations across India, the USA, Canada and the UAE have filed with us — 15+ years of cross-border work.

Both sides prepared together

Two returns built against each other by one team, so relief is claimed exactly once and nothing falls between the two systems.

The team reviewing a file together at a desk

Cross-border tax case studies

Case study 1

Withholding on a consultant invoice reduced by a waiver

A non-resident consultant had a contract to deliver work at a Canadian client site and would have had tax taken from the gross fee, despite subcontractor costs and travel absorbing much of it. We prepared the waiver application on the income and expense basis, assembled the supporting contracts and cost estimates, and lodged it in time for the payer to act on before the first invoice fell due. The engagement produced an approved waiver, a payment released on the reduced basis, and a filing record that supported the position when the Canadian return was later prepared.

Case study 2

An assignment to Canada planned before the employees travelled

An employer was sending staff to a Canadian site for a project and had assumed that because the workers remained on a foreign payroll, nothing Canadian arose. Employment income for Canadian workdays is exactly what the payroll route captures. We reviewed the treaty position for each employee and the employer's own standing, applied for the relief that was open at the start of the assignment, and set up the tracking of Canadian workdays. The engagement produced authorised relief before the first payroll run and a day-by-day record supporting it.

Case study 3

A contractor who was really an employee all along

A company had engaged a non-resident on a contract for services, treated the payments as fees, and withheld on that footing. The working relationship, on examination, had every feature of employment: set hours, supervision, tools provided and no other clients. We set out the analysis, quantified what the payroll route would have required for the Canadian workdays, and approached the authority with the position rather than waiting to be asked. The engagement produced a corrected classification, the payroll obligations brought up to date, and a documented basis on which the relationship continued.

Case study 4

Gross fee withholding recovered through a non-resident return

A non-resident supplier learned about the withholding requirement only when the first payment arrived short, by which point a waiver could do nothing. We collected the withholding documentation from each Canadian payer, prepared the accounts of the Canadian engagement so that the costs of earning the fees could be deducted, and filed the non-resident return. The engagement produced a filed return claiming credit for every amount withheld, a refund of the excess over the tax actually due, and a waiver plan for the following contract so the same money did not sit with the authority again.

Case study 5

A treaty exemption documented before the first payment fell due

A non-resident company with a short Canadian engagement had a clear treaty position but no way to stop its Canadian customer withholding. We prepared the waiver application on the treaty basis, with the certificate of residence and the contract terms that established why the relief applied, and dealt with the queries that came back. The engagement produced an approved waiver in the payer's hands ahead of the payment date, and a written file explaining the basis, which the customer kept for its own records of why it had paid gross.

Case study 6

A payer left holding the liability after paying gross

A Canadian company had paid a non-resident supplier in full without withholding, on the supplier's assurance that no Canadian tax arose. The obligation, and the exposure, sat with the payer. We reviewed the contracts and the work actually performed in Canada, established the amounts that should have been withheld, and set out the options for regularising them. The engagement produced a quantified position, an approach to the authority made by the company rather than prompted by an audit, and a procedure for checking non-resident payments before they were released.

Case study 7

Which Country Taxes the Salary

The employment article turns on where the work is done, who pays, and who bears the cost — three tests that can point in different directions. The file establishes all three before either return is drafted.

Read how this one runs
Case study 8

A Home Kept in Canada After the Move Abroad

A dwelling left available is the tie the CRA weighs most heavily, and its treatment differs depending on whether it is rented at arm's length. The file settles the residence position first and the rental reporting second.

Read how this one runs

All case studies — every published engagement in one place.

Core International & Cross-Border Tax Services

International Tax Planning & Advisory

Strategy and compliance for income, assets and families spread across borders.

One coordinating team: filings on every side of the border are sequenced so treaty relief and foreign tax credits are claimed once — and in the right country.
U.S. & Cross-Border Tax Returns
Dual filers: U.S. citizens in Canada and Canadians with U.S. income run two parallel systems — we prepare both, in the right order, every year.
Expat & Emigration Tax
The move year is its own project: the elections and valuations filed that year decide the next decade of both countries’ returns.
Non-Resident Canadian Tax
Default withholding is 25% of gross: elective returns routinely turn over-withheld rent and pensions into refunds.
Transfer Pricing & BEPS
Documentation prepared with the return is the cheapest insurance in international tax; reconstructing it during an audit is the most expensive.
Cross-Border Estates & Trusts
Wills drafted for one country routinely misfire in the other — deemed disposition here, estate tax there, credits in between.
Cross-Border Corporate Tax
Expansion raises the same four questions every time — entity, PE, repatriation, payroll. We answer them before the tax authorities do.
India Tax for NRIs & Returning Residents
The deduction is taken on the sale price, not the gain — which is why an NRI property sale strands cash unless the certificate is applied for before closing.
Canadian Tax with a Foreign Element
Residency is decided on facts, not on a form — and the year you arrive or leave is the one where the largest amounts turn on the smallest details.
UAE Tax for Expats & Their Home Country
A zero-tax country is only half the answer — the question that decides the bill is whether the country you came from still treats you as resident.

Industries & Client Types We Serve Worldwide

Global E-commerce & Marketplaces
Technology & SaaS
Professional Services Firms
Cross-Border Real Estate
Importers, Exporters & Manufacturers
Athletes, Artists & Entertainers
Remote Workers & Digital Nomads
Investment Funds & Holding Companies
Global E-commerce & Marketplaces
  • Foreign VAT / GST / sales tax registrations
  • Marketplace withholding reviews
  • Inventory nexus & PE analysis
  • Multi-currency books reconciled
Explore E-commerce & Marketplaces
Technology & SaaS
  • Cross-border revenue sourcing & withholding
  • IP structuring with real substance
  • Equity for cross-border teams
  • U.S. expansion: entity & PE setup
Explore Technology & SaaS
Importers, Exporters & Manufacturers
  • Transfer pricing documentation (s.247)
  • Customs value vs transfer price
  • Foreign affiliate reporting (T1134)
  • Country-by-country reporting
Explore Trade & Manufacturing
Athletes, Artists & Entertainers

Performance income is taxed where earned — Regulation 105 in Canada, withholding agreements in the U.S. — with special treaty articles overriding the usual rules.

Performance income is taxed where the performance happens, and the deduction is usually taken at source on the gross fee before expenses. Recovering the difference is a filing exercise in the other country, and it only works if the tour, the residency and the withholding certificates were documented while the work was being done.

  • Reg 105 & U.S. CWA agreements
  • Multi-state & country calendars
  • Touring income allocation
  • Royalty & image-rights withholding
Explore Athletes & Entertainers
Remote Workers & Digital Nomads
  • Residency analysis before moving
  • Employer payroll exposure
  • Totalization & social security
  • Foreign tax credits
Explore Remote Workers
Investment Funds & Holding Companies
  • Treaty access & PPT reviews
  • FAPI & surplus computations
  • Withholding-efficient routing
  • Governance & substance
Explore Funds & Holdcos

Reg 105 vs Reg 102 — questions we are asked

Can the same non-resident face both Reg 105 and Reg 102 withholding?

It is possible if the non-resident receives both a fee for services and separate employment income from work performed in Canada, since the two withholding regimes apply to different payment types rather than to the person as a whole. Each payment needs to be assessed on its own character before deciding which regime applies to it. Review each payment stream separately rather than assuming one regime covers everything paid to that person.

Can a non-resident apply for a waiver to reduce either withholding?

A waiver application is available under both regimes in appropriate circumstances, typically where the non-resident expects little or no Canadian tax liability once treaty relief and expenses are considered. The application needs to be filed in advance of the payment, since a waiver does not apply retroactively to withholding already made. Confirm the waiver process and timing before payments begin rather than after withholding has occurred.

Does the payer or the non-resident bear responsibility for correct withholding?

The Canadian payer is generally responsible for withholding and remitting the correct amount under either regime, and can face exposure if the wrong regime is applied or withholding is missed entirely. The non-resident still needs the withholding information to file their own Canadian return afterward. Confirm which regime applies before the first payment is made, not after the fact.

Does withholding under either regulation settle the non-resident's final tax?

No, withholding under either regime is generally an amount on account of tax, not a final settlement, and the non-resident typically still needs to file a Canadian return to report the actual income and reconcile against what was withheld. Filing afterward can also result in a refund if the withholding exceeded the actual tax owed. Confirm your filing obligation after withholding rather than assuming the withheld amount is the end of it.

24-hour helpline: +1 (416) 619-0068

Ready to deal with reg 105 vs reg 102?

Tell us the situation and we quote in writing before any work starts. You approve the result before it is filed.

  • Rated 5.0 out of 5 stars on Google
  • Your existing accountant keeps the domestic file
  • Offices in India, the USA, Canada and the UAE

Our practitioners are alumni of leading accounting and tax institutions

Where our partners studied — CPA Canada (In-Depth Tax Program), AICPA, the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India and the Malaysian Institute of Accountants.

Request a Quote +1 (416) 619-0068