Split-year income allocator
Split the year you moved into resident and non-resident parts and allocate the income.
Open itA cross-border group pays tax three times on the same profit: in the company, at the border, and in the shareholder. This runs all three layers on one set of numbers and shows the combined rate on the money that actually arrives.
Cash reaching the shareholder
—
Combined rate on the distributed profit —
When a group compares two jurisdictions it usually compares corporate rates. That is one layer of three. The border takes a second bite through dividend withholding, and the shareholder's own country takes a third on the same money. A low corporate rate paired with an uncreditable withholding tax can end up more expensive than a higher corporate rate inside a good treaty.
The readout separates the three so you can see which one is actually driving the total. In most structures the third layer is the largest, and the second is the one that can be reduced with paperwork rather than restructuring.
Untick the credit box and watch the total. Withholding tax that the shareholder's country will not credit is pure cost, and it is the single most common defect in a cross-border holding structure. It happens when the shareholder is in a country with no treaty, when the dividend is routed through an entity the treaty does not see through, or when the residence certificate simply never reached the payer.
The credit is also capped at the personal tax on the dividend, so a high withholding rate paired with a low personal rate strands the difference. That figure is printed separately for exactly that reason.
Worked example
An operating company earns 500,000 and pays corporate tax at 25%, leaving 375,000. The whole of it is distributed to a shareholder abroad, and the treaty caps dividend withholding at 15%.
Untick the credit and the same structure costs 312,500 — a 56,250 swing from one piece of paperwork. That is the whole argument for getting the residence certificate to the payer before the dividend is declared.
An estimate, not advice. This is an estimate built from what you typed, not advice on your file. Nothing here reads your documents, checks your treaty article or looks at the year you are actually in. Where the number matters, we agree a fixed fee in writing before any work starts.
Any figure prefilled in the panel above is stated with the year it belongs to and can be changed. Rates and thresholds move; a calculator that asks you for the current one stays right, and one that hides a guess does not.
A shareholder of a foreign-owned corporate structure wanted to understand the total tax burden as profit moved from the operating subsidiary up to them personally, across corporate tax, withholding on distributions, and personal tax. We modelled each stage of the chain, and the shareholder used the resulting picture to evaluate whether the structure remained tax-efficient.
A group added an intermediate holding company between the operating subsidiary and the individual shareholder, and needed the full tax chain recalculated to understand the effect of the new layer. We modelled the revised chain including the new entity's own tax position, and the group confirmed the restructuring achieved its intended efficiency.
A shareholder was choosing between two possible routes for repatriating profit from a foreign subsidiary and wanted to understand the total tax cost of each. We modelled the full chain under both routes, and the shareholder selected the route with the lower overall tax burden.
A dependent agent habitually concluding contracts can create a permanent establishment where there is no premises at all. The review tests what the person actually does against what the treaty describes.
Read how this one runsUS situs assets sit inside the US estate tax net regardless of where the owner lived, and the exemption available to a non-resident is not the resident one. The file establishes situs asset by asset before any relief is claimed.
Read how this one runsDays in the United States accumulate across three years, and enough of them make you a US resident for tax regardless of immigration status. The file counts the days properly and files the statement that keeps the position closer connection rather than residence.
Read how this one runsA move part-way through a year produces two part-year positions, not two full ones. The engagement establishes the date residence actually changed, allocates income either side of it, and amends whichever return was filed on the wrong footing.
Read how this one runsShort visits are tracked against a treaty threshold that is measured over a moving window rather than a calendar year. Where the threshold is passed, the obligation reaches back over the whole period.
Read how this one runsAll case studies — every published engagement in one place.
Strategy and compliance for income, assets and families spread across borders.
Cross-border tax for sellers shipping worldwide: marketplace withholding, foreign registrations and inventory nexus handled before they become audits.
Marketplaces withhold, remit and report in their own right, so the tax position of a single sale is decided by where the stock sat, where the buyer was and which platform collected — not by where the company is registered. We reconcile the platform's own filings against the returns before either is submitted.
Split the year you moved into resident and non-resident parts and allocate the income.
Open itWork down the tie-breaker ladder and see which rung decides your residence.
Open itWork out how much foreign tax is creditable this year and how much carries forward.
Open itCheck headroom under the annual remittance limit and the forms the bank needs.
Open itHow this desk handles the work behind the numbers, at a fixed fee agreed before it starts.
Read the pageHow this desk handles the work behind the numbers, at a fixed fee agreed before it starts.
Read the page



Where our partners studied — CPA Canada (In-Depth Tax Program), AICPA, the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India and the Malaysian Institute of Accountants.