Crypto and the FBAR question — what should I check first?

  • 15+Years of cross-border experience
  • 18,000+Clients served
  • 5.0Google rating
  • 4Global offices — India, USA, Canada & UAE
  • Offices in India, the USA, Canada and the UAE
  • 24-hour helpline: +1 (416) 619-0068
  • Google rating 5.0 out of 5
Answer

The account report covers foreign financial accounts; the asset report covers specified foreign financial assets, and a crypto holding can fall inside one and not the other. One question decides whether this is a filing or a project.

What to check first

The account report covers foreign financial accounts; the asset report covers specified foreign financial assets, and a crypto holding can fall inside one and not the other. Documenting the position taken for each year is part of the file.

The firm’s founder at his desk in the Delhi office

Where the general answer is wrong

Whether a foreign crypto account is reportable on the US account report has been treated differently over time, which means the answer depends on the year — and the asset report is a separate question again.

Crypto and the FBAR question — what should I check first?
ItemAmount
Cost of the propertyC$219,000
Value on the departure dayC$400,770
Accrued gain treated as realisedC$181,770
Amount assumed to enter incomeC$90,885
Tax at an assumed 35%C$31,810

C$31,810 becomes payable in a year with no sale and no cash. That is what makes the departure date a planning variable: losses realised before it, an election to defer payment against security, and defensible valuations for anything private all change this number.

Example figures throughout, selected to make the rule visible, with rates and thresholds assumed for the demonstration. Your actual filing uses figures confirmed with the issuing authority for your tax year.

Where to go from here

The full treatment — who it binds, the deadline, the penalty and the fixed fee — is on Crypto and the FBAR question. Bring last year's returns and we will tell you what is missing.

Read and approved for the 2025 and 2026 filing seasons by Udit Gupta, Cross-Border Tax Expert, Legal Quotient Consultants. General information, not advice for your circumstances — call our 24-hour helpline to discuss your own position.

Crypto FBAR, in practice

If you came here for crypto FBAR, this is where it is dealt with. The subject is crypto and the FBAR question, and the page covers who it reaches, what then has to be filed, and what we charge to do the work.

People also search for: foreign financial account.

Cross-border tax case studies

Case study 1

Setting a year-by-year position for one platform account

The account had been open for several years and the client wanted a single answer covering all of them. There was not one to give: the treatment of accounts of this kind had shifted across the period. We worked each year against what applied to it, and the conclusions were not uniform. The engagement produced a year-by-year table of positions with the basis recorded against each, the filings that followed from those conclusions, and a file note written at the time rather than reconstructed later if a year is ever examined.

Read how this one runs
Case study 2

An account that held both currency and tokens

The client's argument turned entirely on how the tokens should be characterised, and the account also carried an ordinary currency balance left sitting there between trades. That balance was the answer. On its own it brought the account into the account-reporting question without any need to resolve the token point. We established the highest value of the currency balance for each year from the platform's own statements. The engagement produced the account reports for those years and a shorter, sturdier position than the one the client had been trying to build.

Read how this one runs
Case study 3

Protective reports filed while the characterisation stayed open

The client faced a genuinely unsettled question for two of the years in scope and wanted to stop carrying the exposure. We set out both readings, the consequences of each, and what filing on a protective basis would and would not resolve, then made sure the statement in the report sat consistently with the position taken elsewhere in the return file. The engagement produced the reports, a written explanation of the basis on which they were filed, and a rule for applying the same approach to later years.

Read how this one runs
Case study 4

The asset report applied where the account report did not

Having worked the account question and reached a negative answer for the year, the client considered the matter closed. The two regimes are drawn differently, and the wider asset category reached the same holding. We applied that test on its own facts rather than treating it as a consequence of the first conclusion, and the answers diverged. The engagement produced the asset-side filing for the years concerned, both analyses side by side in one memorandum, and a checklist that puts the two questions to every year separately.

Read how this one runs
Case study 5

Aggregating several small accounts to test the threshold

The client held modest balances across a number of foreign platforms and had assessed each one on its own, concluding that each was too small to matter. The test does not work that way: it looks at the accounts together. We built a schedule of every foreign account, its platform and its highest value during each year, then applied the test to the combined figure. The engagement produced that schedule, the filings that followed, and a standing list of accounts that makes the same test a short exercise in future years.

Read how this one runs
Case study 6

Rebuilding the highest value for an account closed mid-year

The account had been closed and the closing balance was nil, which the client had taken as the end of the matter. The test uses the highest value reached while the account existed, so a closed account still had to be measured, and the platform's statement history was gone. We rebuilt the peak from transfer records, trade confirmations and bank entries, stated the method and its limits in writing, and reported on that basis. The engagement produced a documented highest value for each year the account was open.

Read how this one runs
Case study 7

Never Filed a US Return — and Only Just Found Out

Born in the United States, left as an infant, and told by a bank that the returns were owed all along. The work is sequencing: establish which years are actually open, choose the catch-up route on the facts rather than filing quietly, and claim the exclusions and credits that were never taken.

Read how this one runs
Case study 8

Accounts Reported Late When the Income Already Was

Where the income was on the return and only the account report was missed, a narrow route allows late filing with a reason attached. It is open only while no income is unreported and no examination has begun, which is why it is checked first.

Read how this one runs

All case studies — every published engagement in one place.

Core International & Cross-Border Tax Services

International Tax Planning & Advisory

Strategy and compliance for income, assets and families spread across borders.

One coordinating team: filings on every side of the border are sequenced so treaty relief and foreign tax credits are claimed once — and in the right country.

U.S. & Cross-Border Tax Returns

Dual filers: U.S. citizens in Canada and Canadians with U.S. income run two parallel systems — we prepare both, in the right order, every year.

Expat & Emigration Tax

The move year is its own project: the elections and valuations filed that year decide the next decade of both countries’ returns.

Non-Resident Canadian Tax

Default withholding is 25% of gross: elective returns routinely turn over-withheld rent and pensions into refunds.

Transfer Pricing & BEPS

Documentation prepared with the return is the cheapest insurance in international tax; reconstructing it during an audit is the most expensive.

Cross-Border Estates & Trusts

Wills drafted for one country routinely misfire in the other — deemed disposition here, estate tax there, credits in between.

Cross-Border Corporate Tax

Expansion raises the same four questions every time — entity, PE, repatriation, payroll. We answer them before the tax authorities do.

India Tax for NRIs & Returning Residents

The deduction is taken on the sale price, not the gain — which is why an NRI property sale strands cash unless the certificate is applied for before closing.

Canadian Tax with a Foreign Element

Residency is decided on facts, not on a form — and the year you arrive or leave is the one where the largest amounts turn on the smallest details.

UAE Tax for Expats & Their Home Country

A zero-tax country is only half the answer — the question that decides the bill is whether the country you came from still treats you as resident.

Industries & Client Types We Serve Worldwide

Global E-commerce & Marketplaces
Technology & SaaS
Professional Services Firms
Cross-Border Real Estate
Importers, Exporters & Manufacturers
Athletes, Artists & Entertainers
Remote Workers & Digital Nomads
Investment Funds & Holding Companies

Global E-commerce & Marketplaces

  • Foreign VAT / GST / sales tax registrations
  • Marketplace withholding reviews
  • Inventory nexus & PE analysis
  • Multi-currency books reconciled
Explore E-commerce & Marketplaces

Technology & SaaS

  • Cross-border revenue sourcing & withholding
  • IP structuring with real substance
  • Equity for cross-border teams
  • U.S. expansion: entity & PE setup
Explore Technology & SaaS

Professional Services Firms

Firms and partners working across borders meet Regulation 105 withholding, PE risk on long engagements and per-country payroll for travelling staff.

A partnership is taxed in the hands of its partners, so one engagement abroad can reach every partner's personal return. The order matters: the waiver is applied for before the invoice, the presence is tracked before it becomes an establishment, and the payroll is registered before the first day worked in the other country.

  • Reg 105 / 102 waivers
  • Permanent establishment risk
  • Partner mobility planning
  • Cross-border withholding recovery
Explore Professional Services

Importers, Exporters & Manufacturers

  • Transfer pricing documentation (s.247)
  • Customs value vs transfer price
  • Foreign affiliate reporting (T1134)
  • Country-by-country reporting
Explore Trade & Manufacturing

Athletes, Artists & Entertainers

  • Reg 105 & U.S. CWA agreements
  • Multi-state & country calendars
  • Touring income allocation
  • Royalty & image-rights withholding
Explore Athletes & Entertainers

Remote Workers & Digital Nomads

  • Residency analysis before moving
  • Employer payroll exposure
  • Totalization & social security
  • Foreign tax credits
Explore Remote Workers

Investment Funds & Holding Companies

  • Treaty access & PPT reviews
  • FAPI & surplus computations
  • Withholding-efficient routing
  • Governance & substance
Explore Funds & Holdcos

What people ask us about Crypto and the FBAR question

Do I have to put my crypto exchange account on an FBAR?

It depends on the year, which is unsatisfying but correct. Whether a foreign account holding crypto is a foreign financial account for account-reporting purposes has been treated differently over time, so the position for one year is not automatically the position for another. Work through it year by year against what applied to that year, and write down the conclusion and the reason. Where the account also held ordinary currency, that part of the balance can bring the account into the report regardless of how the tokens are characterised. And the asset report is a separate question again.

Is the FBAR filed with my tax return?

No. It goes to FinCEN rather than being attached to the return, so it has its own filing channel, and a return prepared and filed correctly tells you nothing about whether the account report was dealt with. In practice that separation is how the obligation gets overlooked: the person preparing the return may never see the account, and the person watching the account may not know a report exists. Treat it as its own item on the list for each year, with its own evidence of filing retained alongside the return papers.

Does the FBAR answer change depending on the year?

It can, and that is the most useful thing to understand about this question. The treatment of foreign accounts holding crypto has moved over time, so a taxpayer with the same account at the same platform across several years may have a different answer for different years. Do not settle it once and apply that conclusion backwards. Take each year separately, against what applied to it, and keep a note of the position and the reason. If a year is later examined, a note made at the time is what shows a considered position was taken rather than an assumption.

What is the difference between the account report and the asset report?

They are aimed at different things. The account report covers foreign financial accounts, so it asks who holds the account and where. The asset report, Form 8938, covers specified foreign financial assets, which is a wider and differently drawn category. A crypto holding can fall inside one and outside the other, and the tests are applied separately rather than one following from the other. Answering only the more familiar question leaves half the analysis undone. Work both, for each year, and record each conclusion with the facts it rested on.

Should I file an FBAR anyway if I am unsure?

Protective filing is a real option and often worth weighing where the characterisation is genuinely open, because a report that turns out not to have been required is a different kind of problem from a missing one. It is not automatic. File, and you have made a statement about the account that should sit consistently with the position taken elsewhere in the file. Decide it deliberately, note why, and keep the reasoning with that year's papers so the same logic can be applied to the years that follow.

Which accounts count towards the FBAR reporting threshold?

The test looks across all your foreign financial accounts together rather than at any single one, and it uses the highest value each reached during the year rather than the balance on the closing day. Two consequences follow. Small accounts matter, because they are added in. And an account closed mid-year still counts for the period it existed, at its high point. So what you need is a highest value for each account for each year, in one schedule, which is also the hardest thing to rebuild once the platform has gone.

What is a foreign trust for US tax purposes?

A trust that is not a domestic trust — broadly, one that fails the tests looking at whether a US court can exercise primary supervision and whether US persons control the substantial decisions. The classification decides everything downstream: whether the settlor is taxed on the income as owner, how distributions to US beneficiaries are taxed, and which annual information returns are due. Many ordinary foreign arrangements, including some pension and education savings vehicles, land inside the definition. See Form 3520-A.

Do I pay US tax on an inheritance from abroad?

A bequest is not income, so the receipt itself is not taxed. Reporting is a different matter: a US person who receives large gifts or bequests from a foreign person or estate files an information return for the year, and inheriting a foreign account or an interest in a foreign trust brings the account and asset reports with it. The penalties here attach to the information return, not to tax — which is why people who owed nothing still get letters. See Form 3520.

Our practitioners are alumni of leading accounting and tax institutions

Where our partners studied — CPA Canada (In-Depth Tax Program), AICPA, the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India and the Malaysian Institute of Accountants.

Request a Quote +1 (416) 619-0068