Work permit holders — what should I check first?

  • 15+Years of cross-border experience
  • 18,000+Clients served
  • 5.0Google rating
  • 4Global offices — India, USA, Canada & UAE
  • Google rating 5.0 out of 5
  • Offices in India, the USA, Canada and the UAE
  • 15+ years of cross-border experience
Answer

Residency follows ties and day-counts, treaty exemptions depend on the employment article's conditions, and payroll withholding starts with the work regardless. One question decides whether this is a filing or a project.

What to check first

Residency follows ties and day-counts, treaty exemptions depend on the employment article's conditions, and payroll withholding starts with the work regardless. The first-year return is where all three are reconciled.

Two of the firm’s advisers at a desk in the Delhi office

The exception that catches people

A work permit says nothing about tax residency. A permit holder can be resident from arrival, non-resident throughout, or resident for part of a year on the same document.

Work permit holders — what should I check first?
ItemAmount
Cost of the propertyC$221,000
Value on the departure dayC$472,940
Accrued gain treated as realisedC$251,940
Amount assumed to enter incomeC$125,970
Tax at an assumed 45%C$56,687

C$56,687 becomes payable in a year with no sale and no cash. That is what makes the departure date a planning variable: losses realised before it, an election to defer payment against security, and defensible valuations for anything private all change this number.

Illustrative figures, not a client engagement: the amounts are chosen to make the mechanism legible, and the rates and thresholds are assumptions stated for the example only. We confirm every one of them against the issuing authority for your own tax year before anything is filed.

Where to go from here

The full treatment — who it binds, the deadline, the penalty and the fixed fee — is on Work permit holders. Whatever you have is enough to start the conversation, including nothing but the dates.

Read and approved for the 2025 and 2026 filing seasons by Udit Gupta, Cross-Border Tax Expert, Legal Quotient Consultants. Published as general information. For a position on your own file, call the 24-hour helpline.

Where how does expat tax work comes into this file

The subject here is work permit holders, which is what people mean when they search for how does expat tax work. This page covers who it applies to, the filings it produces, and the fixed fee agreed before work begins.

Files that look like this one

Case study 1

Assignment cut short and the withholding reclaimed by filing

The client came for a project expected to run well over a year, went home early, and had been taxed from the first pay run as a resident. We rebuilt the calendar, established that the ties needed for residency had never formed, since the home abroad stayed available and the family did not move, and filed on a non-resident footing. The engagement produced a recovered withholding, a documented residency conclusion for the year, and correspondence on file setting out the facts relied on if the position is queried.

Read how this one runs
Case study 2

Arrival ahead of the family and a year split at the right date

A permit holder moved before a spouse and children and treated the whole year as resident because that is what the payroll had assumed. We tested when the ties actually formed, fixed the date residency began, and prepared a part-year return with the two periods computed separately. Income earned before the date was reported on the footing that applied then. The engagement produced a filed part-year position, a corrected set of source deductions for the rest of the year, and a dated record of which ties arrived when.

Read how this one runs
Case study 3

Reading the employment article against an actual secondment contract

The client had been told by a home-country adviser that the treaty would exempt the salary outright. We worked through the conditions the employment article imposes and matched each against the secondment agreement, the recharge arrangements between the two group companies and the client's real calendar. One condition failed on the way the cost of the remuneration was borne. The engagement produced a written conclusion that the exemption was not available, a return filed on that basis, and a note on how the next assignment could be arranged differently.

Read how this one runs
Case study 4

Payroll set up on the wrong residency assumption for a full year

A local payroll had been told the new joiner was non-resident and deducted on that footing throughout, while the client's family had in fact moved and a home had been taken. We settled the residency question on the facts, brought the shortfall into the return rather than letting it accumulate further, and worked with the employer to correct the deduction basis going forward. The engagement produced a filed return reconciling the deductions actually taken with the position that was due, and a payroll instruction that now matches it.

Read how this one runs
Case study 5

Two permits in one year with a gap spent outside the country

The client held one permit, left when a contract ended, and returned later on a second permit with a different employer. Two payrolls, neither aware of the other, each treated its own period in isolation. We rebuilt the whole year's day-count from travel records, established whether residency had been continuous or interrupted, and filed one return covering both engagements. The engagement produced a single reconciled year, a documented view of the gap period, and slips from both employers tied into one computation.

Read how this one runs
Case study 6

Treated as resident by an employer with no ties to support it

A specialist came for recurring short visits under a permit, kept a home and family abroad throughout, and was nevertheless coded as resident because the visits repeated. We applied the residency test to the pattern rather than to the permit, used the treaty tie-breaker where both systems had a claim, and concluded that the client had remained non-resident. The engagement produced a filed non-resident return for each affected year, a tie-breaker analysis on file, and a schedule of arrival and departure dates the client now keeps as a matter of routine.

Read how this one runs
Case study 7

One Salesperson Abroad, and a Corporate Filing Obligation

A single employee with authority to conclude contracts can create a taxable presence for the whole company. The review tests what the person actually does against the treaty article, and where a presence exists, works out what profit is attributable to it.

Read how this one runs
Case study 8

Two Passports, Two Returns, One Income

Dual citizenship does not let you choose which country taxes you. The work is establishing residence, applying the treaty article that governs each income type, and preparing both returns from one set of figures so they agree line for line.

Read how this one runs

All case studies — every published engagement in one place.

Core International & Cross-Border Tax Services

International Tax Planning & Advisory

Strategy and compliance for income, assets and families spread across borders.

One coordinating team: filings on every side of the border are sequenced so treaty relief and foreign tax credits are claimed once — and in the right country.

U.S. & Cross-Border Tax Returns

Dual filers: U.S. citizens in Canada and Canadians with U.S. income run two parallel systems — we prepare both, in the right order, every year.

Expat & Emigration Tax

The move year is its own project: the elections and valuations filed that year decide the next decade of both countries’ returns.

Non-Resident Canadian Tax

Default withholding is 25% of gross: elective returns routinely turn over-withheld rent and pensions into refunds.

Transfer Pricing & BEPS

Documentation prepared with the return is the cheapest insurance in international tax; reconstructing it during an audit is the most expensive.

Cross-Border Estates & Trusts

Wills drafted for one country routinely misfire in the other — deemed disposition here, estate tax there, credits in between.

Cross-Border Corporate Tax

Expansion raises the same four questions every time — entity, PE, repatriation, payroll. We answer them before the tax authorities do.

India Tax for NRIs & Returning Residents

The deduction is taken on the sale price, not the gain — which is why an NRI property sale strands cash unless the certificate is applied for before closing.

Canadian Tax with a Foreign Element

Residency is decided on facts, not on a form — and the year you arrive or leave is the one where the largest amounts turn on the smallest details.

UAE Tax for Expats & Their Home Country

A zero-tax country is only half the answer — the question that decides the bill is whether the country you came from still treats you as resident.

Industries & Client Types We Serve Worldwide

Global E-commerce & Marketplaces
Technology & SaaS
Professional Services Firms
Cross-Border Real Estate
Importers, Exporters & Manufacturers
Athletes, Artists & Entertainers
Remote Workers & Digital Nomads
Investment Funds & Holding Companies

Global E-commerce & Marketplaces

  • Foreign VAT / GST / sales tax registrations
  • Marketplace withholding reviews
  • Inventory nexus & PE analysis
  • Multi-currency books reconciled
Explore E-commerce & Marketplaces

Technology & SaaS

Software revenue crosses borders by default — sourcing rules, withholding on licence-like payments and IP location decide the effective rate.

Software revenue is rarely taxed where the team sits. Licence, subscription and service income are characterised differently by each side, and the answer decides withholding at source, treaty relief and whether a foreign customer creates a taxable presence at all — questions that are cheap to settle before the contract and expensive afterwards.

  • Cross-border revenue sourcing & withholding
  • IP structuring with real substance
  • Equity for cross-border teams
  • U.S. expansion: entity & PE setup
Explore Technology & SaaS

Importers, Exporters & Manufacturers

  • Transfer pricing documentation (s.247)
  • Customs value vs transfer price
  • Foreign affiliate reporting (T1134)
  • Country-by-country reporting
Explore Trade & Manufacturing

Athletes, Artists & Entertainers

  • Reg 105 & U.S. CWA agreements
  • Multi-state & country calendars
  • Touring income allocation
  • Royalty & image-rights withholding
Explore Athletes & Entertainers

Remote Workers & Digital Nomads

  • Residency analysis before moving
  • Employer payroll exposure
  • Totalization & social security
  • Foreign tax credits
Explore Remote Workers

Investment Funds & Holding Companies

  • Treaty access & PPT reviews
  • FAPI & surplus computations
  • Withholding-efficient routing
  • Governance & substance
Explore Funds & Holdcos

Work permit holders: further questions

Does a work permit make me a tax resident?

No. The permit is an immigration document and the tax test is separate: residency follows your ties and your day-counts, so the same permit can leave you resident from arrival, non-resident for the whole period, or resident for part of a year. Payroll will often assume one answer and apply it from the first pay run, which is not the same as that answer being correct. The first-year return is where the assumption is tested against the facts, and it is worth settling your position before payroll settles it for you.

Why is tax deducted when I am not resident here?

Because withholding attaches to the work, not to your status. An employer with an obligation to deduct will deduct from the first pay run, whatever conclusion you or a treaty later reach about residency. That is not an error to argue about at the payroll desk; it is a position to reconcile on the return, where the deduction is set against the tax actually due and any exemption you are entitled to is claimed. Keep every pay statement, because the reconciliation is only as good as the record of what was taken.

Can a tax treaty stop tax on my salary?

Sometimes, but never automatically. The employment article carries conditions covering the nature of the presence, who the employer is and where the cost of the remuneration is borne, and it exempts only where every condition is met on your facts. Meeting most of them has the same effect as meeting none. So the work is to read the article against your contract, your assignment letter and your actual calendar, then claim the exemption on a return with those facts recorded. An exemption assumed and never claimed does nothing for you.

Which return do I file in my first year on assignment?

Usually the one that reconciles three separate things: where your residency landed, whether the employment article exempts any of the salary, and what your employer has already deducted. Those three can each point in a different direction, and the first-year return is the only document that has to make them agree. It also sets the record that later years are read against, so a rushed first filing tends to be corrected later. Settle the residency question first, because the rest of the return is shaped by that answer.

My assignment ended early, was I resident at all?

Possibly not, and the question is worth asking before the return is filed rather than after. Residency turns on ties and day-counts, and an assignment cut short can leave both below the point at which they matter, particularly where a home abroad remained available and a family never moved. The consequence is often a filing that reports the employment income on a non-resident footing and deals there with the withholding taken on the resident assumption. Reconstruct the calendar from boarding passes and the assignment letter before deciding.

Do I have to file in both countries on a work permit?

Frequently, yes, and the two filings have to tell the same story. One country taxes on the basis of your residency there, the other on the source of the employment income, and a treaty decides which of them yields. Where both returns are prepared from one set of facts, the relief claimed in one matches the income reported in the other. Where they are prepared separately by two firms working from two sets of assumptions, they contradict each other, and the contradiction is what draws an examination.

How does the treaty tie-breaker work when both countries say I am resident?

As a sequence, stopping at the first test that gives an answer: where you have a permanent home available; if in both or neither, where your centre of vital interests is; then habitual abode; then nationality; and if all of those tie, the two tax authorities decide by agreement. It is evidential rather than elective — you do not choose your treaty residence, you demonstrate it, which makes the record of homes, family and time the substance of the claim. See tie-breaking dual residency.

How would a foreign tax authority know I am resident there?

Mostly from information you or your bank already provided. Account-opening forms ask you to self-certify tax residence, and that certification is reported between authorities under the Common Reporting Standard or, for US accounts, under the FATCA framework. Beyond that: employer and payroll filings, property registries, immigration records and the tax filings of anyone who paid you. The realistic planning assumption is that the data arrives. See FATCA and information reporting.

Our practitioners are alumni of leading accounting and tax institutions

Where our partners studied — CPA Canada (In-Depth Tax Program), AICPA, the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India and the Malaysian Institute of Accountants.

Request a Quote +1 (416) 619-0068