What is the late filing penalty for Form T1135?

  • 15+Years of cross-border experience
  • 18,000+Clients served
  • 5.0Google rating
  • 4Global offices — India, USA, Canada & UAE
  • 24-hour helpline: +1 (416) 619-0068
  • Google rating 5.0 out of 5
  • 18,000+ clients served
Answer

The foreign income verification statement, reporting specified foreign property held by a Canadian resident. The exposure on this kind of filing is charged by reference to the form and the delay rather than to the tax, which is why an unfiled year with no tax can still be expensive.

What a late filing costs

The foreign income verification statement, reporting specified foreign property held by a Canadian resident.

Two of the firm’s advisers and the team in the open-plan office

Where the general answer is wrong

Cost amount, not current value, and the aggregate of everything: a paid-off apartment abroad, foreign shares held in a foreign brokerage, and a foreign business interest are all in the same total, while foreign shares held inside a Canadian registered plan or a Canadian brokerage are treated differently again.

What is the late filing penalty for Form T1135?
ItemAmount
Cost of the propertyC$236,000
Value on the departure dayC$368,160
Accrued gain treated as realisedC$132,160
Amount assumed to enter incomeC$66,080
Tax at an assumed 37%C$24,450

C$24,450 becomes payable in a year with no sale and no cash. That is what makes the departure date a planning variable: losses realised before it, an election to defer payment against security, and defensible valuations for anything private all change this number.

Illustrative figures, not a client engagement: the amounts are chosen to make the mechanism legible, and the rates and thresholds are assumptions stated for the example only. We confirm every one of them against the issuing authority for your own tax year before anything is filed.

Where to go from here

The full treatment — who it binds, the deadline, the penalty and the fixed fee — is on T1135 — foreign income verification statement. If that describes your position, the next step is a short call — not a form.

Reviewed for accuracy for the 2025 and 2026 filing seasons by Udit Gupta, Cross-Border Tax Expert, Legal Quotient Consultants. General information, not advice for your circumstances — call our 24-hour helpline to discuss your own position.

Foreign income verification statement — what this page covers

This is the page to read on foreign income verification statement. It takes Form T1135 in order — the test that decides who is affected, the returns and forms that follow from it, and a fee quoted in writing before anything starts.

People also search for: foreign income verification.

What these engagements turn on

Case study 1

Bringing a decade of unfiled statements up to date

A client had held foreign property for many years and had never filed the form. We began with the cost records rather than the forms, because only a cost schedule shows which years were filing years. Several years in the range turned out to be below the threshold. For the remainder we prepared the filings together with a written account of how the obligation arose and when it was discovered, and submitted a request for relief alongside them. The engagement produced the filed years, the cost schedule behind them, and the record supporting the request.

Read how this one runs
Case study 2

The return was on time and the form was missing

A taxpayer had filed every income tax return by its due date but had omitted the foreign property form in three of them. Because the two filings carry separate consequences, the question was whether to amend or to file the outstanding schedules late, and what to say about the gap. We tested each of those years against the reporting threshold on cost, filed what was due, and set out the sequence of events in a covering explanation. The outcome was three years closed and a documented point at which the obligation was first triggered.

Read how this one runs
Case study 3

Checking the file for a demand before conceding higher rates

A corporation had been told by an adviser that a repeat late filing automatically attracts the harsher figures. It does not. The higher rates depend on a demand to file having been issued and a late-filing penalty charged in one of the three preceding tax years. We went through the correspondence file year by year, established that no demand had been issued, and made that the opening point of the response. The engagement produced a documented chronology of the CRA correspondence and a position on which set of rates could properly apply.

Read how this one runs
Case study 4

A relief request built on the documentary record

A penalty had already been assessed on a late foreign property form, and the client's instinct was to explain the situation in a letter and hope. Relief is discretionary, so the letter is only as good as what sits behind it. We assembled the acquisition documents, the correspondence with the overseas institution, the dates on which information became available and the steps taken once the obligation was understood, then wrote the request around that chronology. The work produced a submission with its evidence attached rather than an assertion standing on its own.

Read how this one runs
Case study 5

Separating penalty from interest on a long-standing balance

A client had settled what they believed was the whole charge on several late years and could not understand why the balance kept moving. Penalty and interest behave differently: the penalty does not compound, while interest is charged daily on what remains unpaid. We reconciled the statement of account line by line, identified which entries were penalty and which were interest, and set out what clearing the balance first would stop. The engagement produced a reconciled account, a sensible order in which to clear it, and a clear view of what was still open to argument.

Read how this one runs
Case study 6

Showing that a proposed penalty year was never a filing year

The CRA proposed a penalty for a year in which, on the client's own understanding, the foreign holdings had been modest. The reporting test is the cost amount at its high point during the year, so the answer lay in the acquisition records rather than in the year-end statements the client had sent in. We rebuilt the aggregate on cost, showed where the high point fell and that it stayed under the threshold, and filed the response. The outcome was a documented position that the year carried no filing obligation at all.

Read how this one runs
Case study 7

Ten Years of Missed Returns Filed as One Engagement

Filing many years at once is a sequencing problem: carry-forwards, instalments and credits from the earliest year feed the latest. Filing them out of order is what turns a recoverable position into an assessed one.

Read how this one runs
Case study 8

A Penalty Argued on the Facts Rather Than the Form

Reasonable cause is a documented story with dates, not an assertion of good intent. The engagement assembles what the client actually knew and when, and puts the sequence in writing alongside the filings it explains.

Read how this one runs

All case studies — every published engagement in one place.

Core International & Cross-Border Tax Services

International Tax Planning & Advisory

Strategy and compliance for income, assets and families spread across borders.

One coordinating team: filings on every side of the border are sequenced so treaty relief and foreign tax credits are claimed once — and in the right country.

U.S. & Cross-Border Tax Returns

Dual filers: U.S. citizens in Canada and Canadians with U.S. income run two parallel systems — we prepare both, in the right order, every year.

Expat & Emigration Tax

The move year is its own project: the elections and valuations filed that year decide the next decade of both countries’ returns.

Non-Resident Canadian Tax

Default withholding is 25% of gross: elective returns routinely turn over-withheld rent and pensions into refunds.

Transfer Pricing & BEPS

Documentation prepared with the return is the cheapest insurance in international tax; reconstructing it during an audit is the most expensive.

Cross-Border Estates & Trusts

Wills drafted for one country routinely misfire in the other — deemed disposition here, estate tax there, credits in between.

Cross-Border Corporate Tax

Expansion raises the same four questions every time — entity, PE, repatriation, payroll. We answer them before the tax authorities do.

India Tax for NRIs & Returning Residents

The deduction is taken on the sale price, not the gain — which is why an NRI property sale strands cash unless the certificate is applied for before closing.

Canadian Tax with a Foreign Element

Residency is decided on facts, not on a form — and the year you arrive or leave is the one where the largest amounts turn on the smallest details.

UAE Tax for Expats & Their Home Country

A zero-tax country is only half the answer — the question that decides the bill is whether the country you came from still treats you as resident.

Industries & Client Types We Serve Worldwide

Global E-commerce & Marketplaces
Technology & SaaS
Professional Services Firms
Cross-Border Real Estate
Importers, Exporters & Manufacturers
Athletes, Artists & Entertainers
Remote Workers & Digital Nomads
Investment Funds & Holding Companies

Global E-commerce & Marketplaces

  • Foreign VAT / GST / sales tax registrations
  • Marketplace withholding reviews
  • Inventory nexus & PE analysis
  • Multi-currency books reconciled
Explore E-commerce & Marketplaces

Technology & SaaS

  • Cross-border revenue sourcing & withholding
  • IP structuring with real substance
  • Equity for cross-border teams
  • U.S. expansion: entity & PE setup
Explore Technology & SaaS

Professional Services Firms

Firms and partners working across borders meet Regulation 105 withholding, PE risk on long engagements and per-country payroll for travelling staff.

A partnership is taxed in the hands of its partners, so one engagement abroad can reach every partner's personal return. The order matters: the waiver is applied for before the invoice, the presence is tracked before it becomes an establishment, and the payroll is registered before the first day worked in the other country.

  • Reg 105 / 102 waivers
  • Permanent establishment risk
  • Partner mobility planning
  • Cross-border withholding recovery
Explore Professional Services

Importers, Exporters & Manufacturers

  • Transfer pricing documentation (s.247)
  • Customs value vs transfer price
  • Foreign affiliate reporting (T1134)
  • Country-by-country reporting
Explore Trade & Manufacturing

Athletes, Artists & Entertainers

  • Reg 105 & U.S. CWA agreements
  • Multi-state & country calendars
  • Touring income allocation
  • Royalty & image-rights withholding
Explore Athletes & Entertainers

Remote Workers & Digital Nomads

  • Residency analysis before moving
  • Employer payroll exposure
  • Totalization & social security
  • Foreign tax credits
Explore Remote Workers

Investment Funds & Holding Companies

  • Treaty access & PPT reviews
  • FAPI & surplus computations
  • Withholding-efficient routing
  • Governance & substance
Explore Funds & Holdcos

Form T1135 — the questions that follow

How much is the penalty if I file T1135 late?

Two different charges get confused here. The charge on a late information return is worked out by reference to the form and the length of the delay, so it does not depend on tax being owed. The late-filing penalty on the income tax return itself is a separate charge that does depend on a balance owing: for the 2025 tax year it is 5% of the unpaid amount plus 1% for each full month the return is late, to a maximum of twelve months. Establish which charge has actually been applied before working out what is payable, because the two answer to different arguments.

Is there a penalty if I owed no tax that year?

There can be. The foreign income verification statement reports property, not income, so a year in which the property earned nothing and no Canadian tax was payable is still a year the form was due if the threshold was crossed on cost. The charge for filing it late is not calculated from tax, which is exactly why an unfiled nil year can be expensive. The practical consequence is that you cannot sort unfiled years by how much tax was at stake. Each year has to be tested against the reporting threshold on its own facts.

Does the T1135 penalty keep compounding until I file?

The penalty itself does not compound. What compounds is interest, charged daily on an unpaid balance, and that distinction changes how a long-standing file should be handled. On the income tax return the 2025 late-filing penalty is also limited in time: 5% of the unpaid amount plus 1% for each full month, to a maximum of twelve months. So an old year does not grow without limit on the penalty side, while the interest side keeps running until the balance is cleared. Clearing the balance and arguing the penalty are two separate exercises, and in that order.

Can I just file the missing T1135 years and say nothing?

You can file them, but that is a decision rather than a default. Coming forward before the CRA raises the point is treated differently from filing after a letter arrives, and relief from a penalty is discretionary in either case, not automatic. What tends to matter is the record: when the property was acquired, when the obligation was first triggered, what the taxpayer was told at the time, and what was done once the position became clear. Assemble that before filing, because the explanation is much harder to build after the forms have gone in unaccompanied.

Does a second late T1135 cost more than the first?

Not simply because it is the second. On the income tax return the higher rates for the 2025 tax year, 10% of the unpaid amount plus 2% for each full month to a maximum of twenty months, apply only where the CRA both issued a demand to file and charged a late-filing penalty in any of the three preceding tax years. Repetition on its own does not trigger them, and the higher figures are not a doubling of the ordinary ones. Check the file for a demand letter before assuming the worse rates apply.

Which years do I actually have to go back and file?

Each year stands alone. A year is a filing year if the cost amount of the specified foreign property crossed the reporting threshold at any time during it, so a run of years can include some that need a form and some that do not. That means the first piece of work on a late file is not the forms, it is a cost schedule for each property and a year-by-year aggregate. Filing every year in the range to be safe is not harmless either: it puts returns on record for years where the position can be shown to be nil.

I have not filed for several years while living abroad — what are my options?

Both countries have routes back, and using one before they contact you is what preserves the relief. On the US side there are procedures aimed at taxpayers whose failure was not wilful, including one designed for people living outside the country, and separate procedures for late account reports and information returns alone. Canada has its voluntary disclosures programme and taxpayer relief for penalties and interest. Filing quietly and hoping is the one approach with no protection attached to it. See catch-up filing.

What happens if I have not filed for several years?

Missed years are handled as one package, not one at a time, because the route chosen for the first year determines the relief available for the rest. Each country has a disclosure or relief programme with its own conditions, and entering the right one — before the authority contacts you — is usually what keeps penalties down. Filing quietly outside a programme forfeits that protection. See catching up on missed returns.

Our practitioners are alumni of leading accounting and tax institutions

Where our partners studied — CPA Canada (In-Depth Tax Program), AICPA, the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India and the Malaysian Institute of Accountants.

Request a Quote +1 (416) 619-0068