An Indian return is driven by what arises there and by your status under Indian rules, so the answer comes from an inventory rather than from a principle. Rent from a flat, interest credited on deposits, a share of profits from a business, gains on a sale: each of these can require a filing even in a year you never set foot in the country. Tax deducted at source on those amounts does not replace the return; it is provisional, and the return is what settles the liability. That settled figure is also what your US credit is measured against.
Filing in both US and India — what do I file?
- 15+Years of the founder's cross-border experience
- 18,000+Clients served across our offices in India, the USA, Canada and the UAE
- 5.0Google rating
- 4Global offices — India, USA, Canada & UAE
The largest professional-migration corridor in the world, and one where US citizenship-based taxation collides with India's April-to-March year and its deduction at source. Two obligations, one income. A treaty allocates the tax; it does not consolidate the filing.
What has to be filed in each
The largest professional-migration corridor in the world, and one where US citizenship-based taxation collides with India's April-to-March year and its deduction at source.

The exception worth knowing
US persons with Indian income reconcile Indian deduction against Indian liability and claim a US credit across mismatched years; returning Indians work the same machinery with the transitional residency window in play.
What to do next
The full treatment — who it binds, the deadline, the penalty and the fixed fee — is on US ↔ India cross-border tax. Describe the situation in your own words; translating it into forms is our job.
Reviewed for the 2025 and 2026 filing seasons by Udit Gupta, International Tax, Cross-Border Tax & Transfer Pricing Expert, Legal Quotient Consultants. Written as general guidance, not as a recommendation for your situation. Talk it through with us before acting on it.
What these engagements turn on
Indian rental income placed on both returns for the first time
A client in the US had let a flat in India for years, had tax deducted at source by the tenant's agent, and had reported none of it on either side. We rebuilt the rental history from bank credits and the agent's records, prepared the Indian returns so the liability was settled rather than assumed, then reported the same rent on the US side and claimed relief for the Indian tax payable. The engagement produced filed years in both countries, a reconciliation between them, and a disclosed holding for the flat itself.
Read how this one runsUnfiled US years completed for a professional employed in India
A US citizen who had spent a long stretch working in India had assumed that Indian employment taxed in India ended the matter. We identified the years involved, reconstructed earnings and the tax deducted from payslips and Indian certificates, apportioned each Indian year across the two US years it touched, and prepared the outstanding returns along with the separate disclosure of the accounts his salary had been paid into. The engagement produced a complete set of filings brought forward at once, with the computation and the reconciliation attached to them.
Read how this one runsAn account inventory assembled in India for a US reporting obligation
The client believed he had two Indian accounts. The exercise found rather more: a joint account with a parent, a deposit rolling over automatically at renewal, and an account opened by a former employer for salary and never closed. We obtained statements and certificates for each, established which were genuinely his rather than held in name only, and recorded balances and the interest credited in each year. The engagement produced a documented account inventory supporting the US disclosure, and a standing list the client reviews annually instead of reconstructing.
Read how this one runsSale of an Indian flat reported in both systems in order
A property sale in India had tax deducted from the proceeds, which the client took to be the end of it. Deduction on a sale is provisional, and the gain still has to be computed and returned in India, where the cost and the allowable expenses are established on Indian rules. Only then can the US gain be computed on its own basis and relief claimed for the Indian tax payable. The engagement produced an Indian return settling the liability, a US computation consistent with it, and the recovery position for the excess deducted.
Read how this one runsA shareholding in an Indian company disclosed on a US return
An interest in a company run by family members in India had never been mentioned to anyone preparing the client's US returns. We obtained the corporate records and available financial statements, established what the interest was and what it had cost, examined how the company was controlled and what income it earned, and settled whether anything was reportable in years where no distribution was made. The engagement produced the disclosure, a written analysis behind it, and a clear rule for the quiet years as well as the years money comes out.
Read how this one runsAn Indian estate distribution separated into capital and income
Money reached a US resident from a relative's estate in India as a single transfer, described only as an inheritance. What arrived was in fact a mixture: capital representing the estate itself, and income the estate had earned while it was being administered. The two are not treated alike, and the reporting obligations differ. We obtained the administration accounts, separated the components, and established what belonged on the US return and what was a disclosure rather than income. The engagement produced a documented breakdown and filings consistent with it.
Read how this one runsA Second Opinion on a Return Already Filed
A cross-border return prepared on one side only is usually right in isolation and wrong in combination. The review checks residence, source and relief in that order, and says plainly whether an amendment is worth making.
Read how this one runsA Non-Resident Estate Holding US Assets
US situs assets sit inside the US estate tax net regardless of where the owner lived, and the exemption available to a non-resident is not the resident one. The file establishes situs asset by asset before any relief is claimed.
Read how this one runsAll case studies — every published engagement in one place.
Core International & Cross-Border Tax Services
Strategy and compliance for income, assets and families spread across borders.
Industries & Client Types We Serve Worldwide
Cross-border tax for sellers shipping worldwide: marketplace withholding, foreign registrations and inventory nexus handled before they become audits.
Marketplaces withhold, remit and report in their own right, so the tax position of a single sale is decided by where the stock sat, where the buyer was and which platform collected — not by where the company is registered. We reconcile the platform's own filings against the returns before either is submitted.
- Foreign VAT / GST / sales tax registrations
- Marketplace withholding reviews
- Inventory nexus & PE analysis
- Multi-currency books reconciled
- Cross-border revenue sourcing & withholding
- IP structuring with real substance
- Equity for cross-border teams
- U.S. expansion: entity & PE setup
- Reg 105 / 102 waivers
- Permanent establishment risk
- Partner mobility planning
- Cross-border withholding recovery
- Section 216 rental returns
- FIRPTA withholding recovery
- Section 116 clearance
- Treaty credit optimization
- Transfer pricing documentation (s.247)
- Customs value vs transfer price
- Foreign affiliate reporting (T1134)
- Country-by-country reporting
- Reg 105 & U.S. CWA agreements
- Multi-state & country calendars
- Touring income allocation
- Royalty & image-rights withholding
- Residency analysis before moving
- Employer payroll exposure
- Totalization & social security
- Foreign tax credits
- Treaty access & PPT reviews
- FAPI & surplus computations
- Withholding-efficient routing
- Governance & substance
The follow-up questions on US and India
Accounts held abroad are reported separately from the income they earn, and that is the distinction to hold on to. Interest goes into the income computation on your US return; the existence of the accounts, and what is in them, is a disclosure obligation of its own that applies even where the interest is trivial. Joint accounts opened with parents, deposits rolled over automatically and accounts left behind at a former employer's bank all count and are all routinely forgotten. Building the list once, with the bank's own statements behind it, is most of the work.
Start with what the arrangement is rather than what it is called. The US applies its own characterisation to a foreign savings or retirement arrangement, and that characterisation, not the Indian description of it, decides how it is taxed and what has to be disclosed. The consequence is that an arrangement treated as long-term savings in India will not necessarily be left alone in the US until you draw on it. The document establishing the account and its terms is what settles this, so it is worth obtaining before a position is taken and then recorded so it holds for future years.
You file in both, but not for the same year, and that is the trap. India runs April to March and the US reports on a calendar year, so a single Indian year maps onto two US years and no Indian document translates directly onto a US return. Income has to be apportioned to the periods it was earned in and the tax has to be split on the same basis, or the credit ends up in a different year from the income it relates to. Keeping monthly records rather than annual summaries is what makes this straightforward.
The rent is taxed in India because the property is there, and it goes on your US return as well because a US person reports income wherever it arises, with credit for the Indian tax properly payable. Both computations have to be done on their own rules: what is allowed against the rent differs between the systems, so the taxable rent is rarely the same number in each. The property and any local account through which the rent is collected are disclosures in their own right, separate from the income, and the Indian return should be settled first so the credit rests on a real figure.
Yes, and the fix is to do it deliberately and completely rather than to start filing from this year and hope the earlier ones are forgotten. These files usually have two gaps, not one: the returns themselves and the separate disclosure of accounts held in India. Both have to be brought forward together. The work is to establish the years involved, reconstruct income and Indian tax paid for each from payslips, certificates and bank records, and prepare a coherent set of filings with the reconciliation attached, so the position you present is complete on its face.
By furnishing Form 67 with proof of the foreign tax — the certificate or statement from the other country's authority or payer — and by relieving the income under the specific DTAA article rather than generally. The credit is limited to the Indian tax on that income, and it is computed source by source rather than in one pool. The deadline for furnishing Form 67 has been amended more than once, so we confirm it for the year rather than assume. See foreign tax credit in India.
The Reserve Bank of India framework under which a resident individual may remit up to an annual ceiling for permitted purposes — education, medical treatment, travel, maintenance of relatives, investment in shares or property abroad — with gifts and loans to non-residents inside the same ceiling. You declare the purpose to the bank on Form A2. The ceiling and the excluded purposes are set by the RBI and have changed more than once, so the figure to work from is the one current at the date of the transfer. See Form A2 and LRS remittances.



