Who files Form 13?

  • 15+Years of cross-border experience
  • 18,000+Clients served
  • 5.0Google rating
  • 4Global offices — India, USA, Canada & UAE
  • Google rating 5.0 out of 5
  • 18,000+ clients served
  • Offices in India, the USA, Canada and the UAE
Answer

Non-residents whose Indian income will bear far less tax than the default deduction — most visibly NRIs selling Indian property. The obligation is decided by facts rather than by tax owing, which is why a nil position does not remove it.

The rule on who files

Non-residents whose Indian income will bear far less tax than the default deduction — most visibly NRIs selling Indian property.

Two of the firm’s advisers at a desk in the Delhi office

Where it does not apply

On a property sale the default deduction is computed on the whole sale consideration rather than the gain, so the certificate is the difference between financing a refund for a year and receiving the correct amount at closing.

Who files Form 13?
ItemAmount
Gross amount receivedC$57,000
Withheld at source (assumed 17% of gross)C$9,690
Deductible costsC$38,190
Net amount actually earnedC$18,810
Tax on the net amount (assumed graduated result)C$4,514
Difference recoverable by filingC$5,176

Filing on a net basis recovers C$5,176 of the C$9,690 withheld. That difference is the entire reason the elective return exists, and it is lost by not filing.

The figures here are an illustration, not an engagement: amounts are picked so the mechanism is easy to follow, and every rate or threshold is an assumption of the example. Before anything is filed for you, each one is confirmed with the issuing authority for your own tax year.

How to get this moving

The full treatment — who it binds, the deadline, the penalty and the fixed fee — is on Form 13 — lower or nil TDS certificate in India. If a letter prompted this, bring the letter — it usually contains the answer to half the questions.

Reviewed for the 2025 and 2026 filing seasons by Udit Gupta, Cross-Border Tax Expert, Legal Quotient Consultants. This is general information rather than advice about your file — a short call is the way to get the second.

Who needs to file FATCA, in practice

Readers arrive here searching for who needs to file FATCA, and Form 13 is what the page is about. Below: who it catches, what has to be filed, and what it costs — quoted in writing, before anything is done.

Files that look like this one

Case study 1

Certificate in place before a flat sale completed

An NRI seller had agreed the sale of a flat held since long before emigration, and the buyer's bank was ready to deduct on the full consideration. We assembled the purchase deed, the record of improvement spending and a computation of the gain, and applied for authorisation to deduct at a lower rate. The certificate issued before completion and the buyer deducted against it at closing. The engagement produced an authorisation the buyer could act on, and a documented gain computation that later supported the return for the same year.

Read how this one runs
Case study 2

Application filed after an advance had already been deducted on gross

A seller came to us once the first instalment had been paid and deduction had already been taken on the gross amount. Nothing could be undone for that instalment, so the work split in two. We applied for a certificate covering the payments still to come, which stopped the same over-deduction repeating on the balance, and we set up recovery of the portion already withheld by preparing the return for that year with the cost base fully documented. The engagement produced a certificate for the unpaid instalments and a filed claim for what had gone.

Read how this one runs
Case study 3

Two joint owners, two residence positions, one sale

A couple owned an Indian flat jointly and had left India in different years, so their residence position for the year of sale was not the same. A single application in one name would have left the other owner exposed to deduction on the whole of their share. We presented each owner's share of the consideration and each owner's own acquisition cost separately, and applied for both. The engagement produced two authorisations the buyer could apply to the respective shares, and a written record of how the shares had been divided.

Read how this one runs
Case study 4

Buyer wanted comfort before deducting at a reduced rate

The purchaser of a flat from a non-resident would not deduct at anything below the default rate without something official, and the sale had stalled on it. We acted for the seller and explained in writing to both sides that the buyer's protection is the certificate itself and nothing less than that. The application went in with its supporting computation, and once the authorisation issued the buyer's lawyer released the funds against it. The engagement produced the authorisation and a note of the deduction mechanics that let the completion proceed.

Read how this one runs
Case study 5

Authorisation issued above the rate the computation sought

We applied on a cost base that included substantial renovation spending, and the authorisation came through at a rate above the one we had computed. The buyer was bound by the certificate, so deduction went ahead at that rate. We then prepared the return for the year with the renovation invoices and the contractor records annexed, and claimed the balance. The engagement produced a deduction well below the default one at closing, and a documented claim for the remainder rather than an argument conducted after the money had already left.

Read how this one runs
Case study 6

Recurring Indian receipts brought under one authorisation for the year

A non-resident had a stream of Indian receipts from which the payer deducted at the default rate every month, so each year ended with a refund claim financed out of the client's own cash. We took the year's expected receipts and the deductions that properly belonged against them, and applied for an authorisation covering that payer for the year. The engagement produced a certificate the payer could apply to each remittance, which moved the client from recovering money a year later to receiving the right amount as it was paid.

Read how this one runs
Case study 7

A Certificate Obtained Before the Money Moved

An application for a reduced or nil deduction is made in advance and decided on the computed liability, not on the gross amount. Applying after the payment leaves a refund claim in place of a certificate.

Read how this one runs
Case study 8

Three Account Types, Three Tax Answers

Interest on each is treated differently and the deduction at source follows the account rather than the person. Holding the wrong one for the purpose is a recurring and avoidable cost.

Read how this one runs

All case studies — every published engagement in one place.

Core International & Cross-Border Tax Services

International Tax Planning & Advisory

Strategy and compliance for income, assets and families spread across borders.

One coordinating team: filings on every side of the border are sequenced so treaty relief and foreign tax credits are claimed once — and in the right country.

U.S. & Cross-Border Tax Returns

Dual filers: U.S. citizens in Canada and Canadians with U.S. income run two parallel systems — we prepare both, in the right order, every year.

Expat & Emigration Tax

The move year is its own project: the elections and valuations filed that year decide the next decade of both countries’ returns.

Non-Resident Canadian Tax

Default withholding is 25% of gross: elective returns routinely turn over-withheld rent and pensions into refunds.

Transfer Pricing & BEPS

Documentation prepared with the return is the cheapest insurance in international tax; reconstructing it during an audit is the most expensive.

Cross-Border Estates & Trusts

Wills drafted for one country routinely misfire in the other — deemed disposition here, estate tax there, credits in between.

Cross-Border Corporate Tax

Expansion raises the same four questions every time — entity, PE, repatriation, payroll. We answer them before the tax authorities do.

India Tax for NRIs & Returning Residents

The deduction is taken on the sale price, not the gain — which is why an NRI property sale strands cash unless the certificate is applied for before closing.

Canadian Tax with a Foreign Element

Residency is decided on facts, not on a form — and the year you arrive or leave is the one where the largest amounts turn on the smallest details.

UAE Tax for Expats & Their Home Country

A zero-tax country is only half the answer — the question that decides the bill is whether the country you came from still treats you as resident.

Industries & Client Types We Serve Worldwide

Global E-commerce & Marketplaces
Technology & SaaS
Professional Services Firms
Cross-Border Real Estate
Importers, Exporters & Manufacturers
Athletes, Artists & Entertainers
Remote Workers & Digital Nomads
Investment Funds & Holding Companies

Global E-commerce & Marketplaces

  • Foreign VAT / GST / sales tax registrations
  • Marketplace withholding reviews
  • Inventory nexus & PE analysis
  • Multi-currency books reconciled
Explore E-commerce & Marketplaces

Technology & SaaS

  • Cross-border revenue sourcing & withholding
  • IP structuring with real substance
  • Equity for cross-border teams
  • U.S. expansion: entity & PE setup
Explore Technology & SaaS

Importers, Exporters & Manufacturers

  • Transfer pricing documentation (s.247)
  • Customs value vs transfer price
  • Foreign affiliate reporting (T1134)
  • Country-by-country reporting
Explore Trade & Manufacturing

Athletes, Artists & Entertainers

  • Reg 105 & U.S. CWA agreements
  • Multi-state & country calendars
  • Touring income allocation
  • Royalty & image-rights withholding
Explore Athletes & Entertainers

Remote Workers & Digital Nomads

Working from anywhere doesn't mean taxed nowhere: residency defaults, employer payroll exposure and treaty relief decide where income actually lands.

Working from another country does not by itself end tax residence in the one you left, and it can start one where you are sitting. Day counts, ties, the employer's own exposure and the treaty tie-breaker all point at the same question, and the year you move is the year it has to be answered on paper.

  • Residency analysis before moving
  • Employer payroll exposure
  • Totalization & social security
  • Foreign tax credits
Explore Remote Workers

Investment Funds & Holding Companies

  • Treaty access & PPT reviews
  • FAPI & surplus computations
  • Withholding-efficient routing
  • Governance & substance
Explore Funds & Holdcos

Form 13 — the questions that follow

I'm an NRI selling a flat in India — do I need Form 13?

The application exists for exactly this situation. On a property sale the default deduction is worked out on the whole sale consideration rather than on your gain, so a flat bought long before you emigrated and sold at a modest profit can have far more taken at closing than the tax you actually owe. Form 13 asks for a certificate authorising deduction at a lower rate, or none, before the money moves. Without one the excess is not lost, but you recover it by filing a return and waiting, rather than receiving the correct amount at closing.

Can a resident Indian apply, or is Form 13 only for non-residents?

It is not restricted to non-residents, but non-residents are the people it matters most to, because the default deduction on money leaving India is set without regard to their costs or their treaty position. Residents more often reach the same result through the no-deduction declarations, which non-residents cannot use at all. If you have moved abroad and are unsure which side of the line you fall on for the year in question, settle that first. The route open to you follows from your residence, not from how much tax you expect to pay.

Who actually applies, the buyer or the seller?

The seller, because it is the seller's income being taxed. The buyer has the separate duty of deducting and remitting, and cannot cure an excessive deduction on your behalf; what a buyer can do is act on a certificate once one exists. That division of roles is why timing matters more than paperwork here. If the certificate is in hand before completion, the buyer deducts at the authorised rate and the transaction closes clean. If it is not, the buyer is obliged to deduct at the default rate and you are left recovering the difference yourself.

We are two joint owners — does each of us apply separately?

In substance, yes. The certificate authorises deduction against a particular payee's income, and joint owners have their own shares, their own acquisition costs and often their own residence positions. One application in one name does not cover the other. This catches families regularly, because a flat held jointly by a couple who left India in different years can produce two different answers on the same sale. Each owner's share of the consideration and each owner's own cost have to be presented, so that the buyer receives an authorisation it can apply to each share.

How early before the sale should the application go in?

Before the buyer pays anything, including any advance or booking amount. The deduction duty attaches to payment, so once an instalment has been remitted at the default rate that slice is already in the system and only a return will recover it. Practically, that means starting while the sale agreement is still being negotiated rather than in the week of completion, because the application has to be supported: title, cost of acquisition, improvement spending and the computation of the gain you say will arise. The purchase documentation is usually the slowest of those to find.

What if the certificate comes through at a higher rate than I asked for?

You are bound by what is authorised rather than by what was requested, and the buyer will deduct at the rate on the certificate. That is not the end of the matter. The authorisation is a view taken before the year is over, and the final position is settled on your return, where the actual gain, your costs and any treaty relief are all brought to account. So a certificate above your own computation leaves a recoverable balance rather than a permanent cost. The lesson is that the computation filed with the application should be the one your documents support.

What does Form W-8BEN actually do?

It tells a US payer that you are not a US person and, where you are entitled, claims the treaty rate on the income they are about to pay you — so withholding comes off at the reduced rate rather than the statutory one. It goes to the payer or the broker, never to the IRS, and it expires, so a stale form is a common cause of over-withholding. Getting it in before payment is the difference between a lower rate and a refund claim. See Form W-8BEN.

Do I pay tax twice on a foreign dividend?

Not at full rates if the relief is claimed. The paying country usually withholds at source, capped by treaty where one applies and the paperwork is in place; your residence country then taxes the dividend and credits the foreign withholding against its own charge. Where the withholding exceeded the treaty rate because no declaration was filed, the excess is recovered from the paying country, not credited at home. See the dividends article.

Our practitioners are alumni of leading accounting and tax institutions

Where our partners studied — CPA Canada (In-Depth Tax Program), AICPA, the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India and the Malaysian Institute of Accountants.

Request a Quote +1 (416) 619-0068