Non-resident trusts (s.94) — who pays, and where?

  • 15+Years of cross-border experience
  • 18,000+Clients served
  • 5.0Google rating
  • 4Global offices — India, USA, Canada & UAE
  • 18,000+ clients served
  • Offices in India, the USA, Canada and the UAE
  • Fixed fee agreed before work starts
Answer

The deeming rules attribute residence where there is a resident contributor or a resident beneficiary in defined circumstances, bringing the trust's income into the Canadian base. The obligation is decided by facts rather than by tax owing, which is why a nil position does not remove it.

The rule on who files

The deeming rules attribute residence where there is a resident contributor or a resident beneficiary in defined circumstances, bringing the trust's income into the Canadian base. Because a loan can be a contribution, ordinary family arrangements are frequently caught.

Two of the firm’s advisers at the glass desk in the Delhi office

The exception worth knowing

A trust settled and administered entirely outside Canada can still be deemed a Canadian resident trust because a Canadian resident contributed to it.

Non-resident trusts (s.94) — who pays, and where?
ItemAmount
Worldwide estateC$2,591,000
Assets situated in the USC$310,920
Proportion of the estate exposed12%
Relief mechanismTreaty credit, pro-rated by the same proportion

The exposure follows the 12% rather than the whole estate, and the treaty relief available to a Canadian estate is pro-rated on the same ratio. That ratio is the number to manage — through how the US assets are held, not through where the owner lives.

An illustration, not a client file. The sums are chosen for legibility and the thresholds are stated for the example alone — nothing reaches a filing until it has been confirmed at source for your own year.

Your next step

The full treatment — who it binds, the deadline, the penalty and the fixed fee — is on Non-resident trusts (s.94). If you already have an adviser, we will tell you what they should be asking rather than replacing them.

Checked and signed off for the 2025 and 2026 filing seasons by Udit Gupta, Cross-Border Tax Expert, Legal Quotient Consultants. This is general information rather than advice about your file — a short call is the way to get the second.

International tax accountant — what this page covers

The search that brings most people to this page is international tax accountant. It is answered here for non-resident trusts: what creates the obligation, which filings discharge it, and the fee agreed before the work starts.

What these engagements turn on

Case study 1

Testing a family trust abroad after a beneficiary moved to Canada

A new arrival had been named in a trust settled abroad by her parents long before she thought about Canada, and she assumed distance settled the question. It does not. The deeming rules look for a resident contributor or, in defined circumstances, a resident beneficiary. We traced every contribution to the trust, who made it and when, and tested her own position as a beneficiary against the rule. The engagement produced a written conclusion on whether the trust fell inside the Canadian base, the evidence behind it, and a list of the facts that would change the answer if they changed.

Read how this one runs
Case study 2

An interest-free family loan examined as a contribution to a trust

The client had lent money to a trust abroad on family terms and thought of it as a loan and nothing more. Because a loan can be a contribution for these purposes, the arrangement put the whole trust at risk of being deemed resident here. We reconstructed the advances and the repayments from bank records, examined the terms actually agreed as against the terms described to us, and set out where the arrangement sat under the rule. The work produced a position paper for the trustees, a corrected description of the loan, and a plan for the advances still outstanding.

Read how this one runs
Case study 3

Getting trustee records to answer a Canadian residence question

Trustees who had never had a Canadian connection were asked to demonstrate that one did not exist, which is harder than it sounds. We set out precisely which records the question turns on, the contribution history rather than the administration file, and worked with them to produce it in a form that would stand up. The engagement produced a contribution ledger going back to settlement, a note distinguishing the facts that are irrelevant here, the residence of the trustees among them, and a conclusion the trustees could rely on when they next dealt with a Canadian beneficiary.

Read how this one runs
Case study 4

Concluding that a trust abroad was not deemed resident here

Not every trust with a Canadian connection is caught, and this one was not. The family had been told otherwise and were preparing to restructure around it. We examined who had contributed to the trust and in what capacity, and whether any beneficiary's position brought the trust inside the rule, then documented the reasoning in full. The engagement produced a negative conclusion supported by the contribution history, a record kept for the years in which the question may be asked again, and advice on the additions the family should avoid if the answer is to stay the same.

Read how this one runs
Case study 5

Contributions made before and after the contributor left Canada

A contributor had emigrated part-way through the life of a trust, and the family's working assumption was that leaving drew a line under the Canadian question. We separated the contributions by the contributor's residence at the time each was made, examined how the later additions interacted with the rule, and tested whether any beneficiary supplied a Canadian connection of their own. The work produced a dated contribution schedule, a conclusion on the trust's status for each period, and instructions on how any further addition should be documented at the time rather than reconstructed later.

Read how this one runs
Case study 6

Status settled before a distribution to a resident beneficiary

A distribution was about to be made to a beneficiary in Canada while the trust's own status was unresolved, which is the wrong order of work. We deferred the distribution, settled whether the trust was deemed resident here, and only then characterised the amount and its Canadian reporting. The engagement produced a conclusion on the trust's status, a reporting position for the beneficiary that matched it, and a standing note to the trustees on what has to be established before any further amount is sent to Canada.

Read how this one runs
Case study 7

A Canadian Landlord With Property in the United States

Gross withholding on US rents takes no account of mortgage interest, tax or repairs, so a leveraged property can face tax on turnover. An election onto net basis fixes that, and it has its own timing and its own filing.

Read how this one runs
Case study 8

Documentation Built to the US Standard

The US requirements differ from the OECD-aligned ones in what has to exist at the time of filing, and a file prepared for one regime can leave the other unprotected. The engagement builds to whichever governs.

Read how this one runs

All case studies — every published engagement in one place.

Core International & Cross-Border Tax Services

International Tax Planning & Advisory

Strategy and compliance for income, assets and families spread across borders.

One coordinating team: filings on every side of the border are sequenced so treaty relief and foreign tax credits are claimed once — and in the right country.

U.S. & Cross-Border Tax Returns

Dual filers: U.S. citizens in Canada and Canadians with U.S. income run two parallel systems — we prepare both, in the right order, every year.

Expat & Emigration Tax

The move year is its own project: the elections and valuations filed that year decide the next decade of both countries’ returns.

Non-Resident Canadian Tax

Default withholding is 25% of gross: elective returns routinely turn over-withheld rent and pensions into refunds.

Transfer Pricing & BEPS

Documentation prepared with the return is the cheapest insurance in international tax; reconstructing it during an audit is the most expensive.

Cross-Border Estates & Trusts

Wills drafted for one country routinely misfire in the other — deemed disposition here, estate tax there, credits in between.

Cross-Border Corporate Tax

Expansion raises the same four questions every time — entity, PE, repatriation, payroll. We answer them before the tax authorities do.

India Tax for NRIs & Returning Residents

The deduction is taken on the sale price, not the gain — which is why an NRI property sale strands cash unless the certificate is applied for before closing.

Canadian Tax with a Foreign Element

Residency is decided on facts, not on a form — and the year you arrive or leave is the one where the largest amounts turn on the smallest details.

UAE Tax for Expats & Their Home Country

A zero-tax country is only half the answer — the question that decides the bill is whether the country you came from still treats you as resident.

Industries & Client Types We Serve Worldwide

Global E-commerce & Marketplaces
Technology & SaaS
Professional Services Firms
Cross-Border Real Estate
Importers, Exporters & Manufacturers
Athletes, Artists & Entertainers
Remote Workers & Digital Nomads
Investment Funds & Holding Companies

Global E-commerce & Marketplaces

  • Foreign VAT / GST / sales tax registrations
  • Marketplace withholding reviews
  • Inventory nexus & PE analysis
  • Multi-currency books reconciled
Explore E-commerce & Marketplaces

Technology & SaaS

Software revenue crosses borders by default — sourcing rules, withholding on licence-like payments and IP location decide the effective rate.

Software revenue is rarely taxed where the team sits. Licence, subscription and service income are characterised differently by each side, and the answer decides withholding at source, treaty relief and whether a foreign customer creates a taxable presence at all — questions that are cheap to settle before the contract and expensive afterwards.

  • Cross-border revenue sourcing & withholding
  • IP structuring with real substance
  • Equity for cross-border teams
  • U.S. expansion: entity & PE setup
Explore Technology & SaaS

Importers, Exporters & Manufacturers

  • Transfer pricing documentation (s.247)
  • Customs value vs transfer price
  • Foreign affiliate reporting (T1134)
  • Country-by-country reporting
Explore Trade & Manufacturing

Athletes, Artists & Entertainers

  • Reg 105 & U.S. CWA agreements
  • Multi-state & country calendars
  • Touring income allocation
  • Royalty & image-rights withholding
Explore Athletes & Entertainers

Remote Workers & Digital Nomads

  • Residency analysis before moving
  • Employer payroll exposure
  • Totalization & social security
  • Foreign tax credits
Explore Remote Workers

Investment Funds & Holding Companies

  • Treaty access & PPT reviews
  • FAPI & surplus computations
  • Withholding-efficient routing
  • Governance & substance
Explore Funds & Holdcos

Non-resident trusts (s.94): further questions

Can a trust set up entirely overseas still be taxed in Canada?

Yes. A trust can be settled abroad, administered abroad, hold nothing here and still be deemed a resident trust, because the deeming rules do not look at where the trust sits. They look for a resident contributor, or in defined circumstances a resident beneficiary. Where that connection exists, the trust's income comes into the Canadian base. This is why the reassurance a family usually gets from the trustees, that the trust is foreign and none of this applies, is not an answer to the Canadian question at all. The facts that settle it are who put property into the trust and in what capacity, and which beneficiaries are in Canada.

Does lending money to a family trust abroad make me a contributor?

It can, and this is the trap that catches ordinary family arrangements. A loan can be a contribution for these purposes, so money advanced on family terms and thought of as repayable may supply the resident contributor that brings the whole trust inside the Canadian base. The label does not help. Calling it a loan, documenting it as a loan, even repaying it, does not necessarily undo the effect. What matters is the substance of the arrangement and the terms actually agreed, which is why the advances have to be examined as they are rather than as the family describes them. If you have lent to a trust abroad, treat the residence question as open.

Who files for a trust deemed resident in Canada under s.94?

The trust does, and that is the awkward part, because the trustees are abroad and may not accept that they have a Canadian obligation at all. Where s.94 deems the trust resident, its income is brought into the Canadian base and the trust is answerable for it, with resident contributors and resident beneficiaries exposed in defined circumstances as well. In practice the Canadian side of the family ends up driving the work: obtaining the trust's accounts, establishing the contribution history, and getting the trustees to produce records nobody has asked them for before. Settle the status question first. Filing on an unsettled status creates a position that is then hard to move.

My parents' trust is offshore and I now live in Canada, am I caught?

Possibly, and it turns on facts you may not hold. The rules reach a trust where there is a resident contributor, and in defined circumstances where there is a resident beneficiary. Your own arrival does not by itself bring the trust in, but it changes the picture, and it makes the contribution history worth establishing rather than assuming. The questions to answer are who put property into the trust, whether any of them were in Canada at the time or have since moved here, and whether anything described as a loan was in substance a contribution. Ask the trustees for the contribution history early. It is the record that decides the answer, and it gets harder to obtain as years pass.

Does s.94 apply if none of the trustees have ever been to Canada?

Trustee residence is not the test, so the honest answer is that it makes no difference to the question. A trust with foreign trustees, a foreign administration, foreign assets and a foreign governing law can still be deemed resident here, because the rules attribute residence by reference to contributors and beneficiaries rather than to the people running the trust. That is worth knowing before spending money on the wrong evidence. Trustees faced with a Canadian query often assemble minutes, resolutions and proof that decisions were taken abroad, none of which reaches the point. The record that answers it is the history of contributions and the residence of the people who made them.

What income does Canada tax if a trust is deemed resident here?

The trust's income comes into the Canadian base as the income of a resident trust, rather than only the part with a Canadian source. That is the shift families find hardest to accept, because the trust's investments may have nothing to do with Canada. The practical consequences follow from it. The trust's year has to be computed on Canadian principles, the character of each stream matters, and distributions to beneficiaries have to be looked at in that light rather than in the light of the trustee's own accounts. Where tax has already been paid elsewhere on the same income, that is a separate question, answered by the relief mechanisms and not by the residence rule.

How do I get back tax withheld in another country?

By the route that country provides, and it is rarely automatic. Where an elective return is available — on rent or pension income, for instance — filing it recomputes the tax on net income and refunds the difference. Where it is not, you file a refund claim with the withholding authority, supported by evidence of your residence and entitlement to the treaty rate. Both take time, which is why fixing the rate before payment is worth more. See withholding refund and recovery.

What does "received a distribution from a foreign trust" mean on my return?

It is asking whether the trust conferred anything on you during the year — cash, property, or the use of trust property, including rent-free occupation of a house and, in some circumstances, a loan. Answering yes brings an information return, and where the distribution includes income accumulated in earlier years the tax computation can carry an interest charge for the delay. Trust accounts showing the composition of the distribution are what keep that computation from defaulting against you. See Form 3520.

Our practitioners are alumni of leading accounting and tax institutions

Where our partners studied — CPA Canada (In-Depth Tax Program), AICPA, the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India and the Malaysian Institute of Accountants.

Request a Quote +1 (416) 619-0068