Corporate annual compliance calendar
The annual set for a cross-border group, mapped by entity and jurisdiction with an owner for each line.
- 15+Years of cross-border experience
- 18,000+Clients served
- 5.0Google rating
- 4Global offices — India, USA, Canada & UAE
The annual set for a cross-border group, mapped by entity and jurisdiction with an owner for each line.
The document pack
- Every entity in the group, with its jurisdiction and year end
- The corporate return for each entity, with its own deadline
- Information returns that travel with each return — related-party, foreign affiliate, non-resident payments
- Transfer-pricing documentation and any certification requirement
- Withholding returns and recipient slips, with the remittance schedule
- Indirect tax registrations and their filing frequencies
- Regulatory filings — exchange control, investment reporting, annual returns
- The internal owner and the external adviser for each line
Why each of these is asked for
Groups do not miss deadlines because they are unknown; they miss the ones that belong to a country where nobody works. Information returns carry per-form penalties independent of tax, which is what makes this list worth building rather than reconstructing.
How to get this moving
Send what you have and we will tell you what is missing. A complete pack is usually the difference between a filing that takes a fortnight and one that takes a season. One call is usually enough to know whether this is a filing or a project.
Reviewed for the 2025 and 2026 filing seasons by Udit Gupta, Cross-Border Tax Expert, Legal Quotient Consultants. Written as general guidance, not as a recommendation for your situation. Talk it through with us before acting on it.
International tax compliance — what this page covers
Read this page for international tax compliance. It works through corporate annual compliance calendar from the beginning — whether it applies to you at all, what has to be filed if it does, and what the engagement costs, priced up front.
The difference a dedicated cross-border team makes
One team, not two firms billing separately
You are not the go-between for two sets of advisers with two sets of assumptions. One engagement covers each country the file touches.
We say early if it is not our work
If a file needs something this practice does not do, you hear that at the start rather than after a bill.
Filed with the authority, not just prepared
The engagement runs to submission and to the correspondence that follows it, including the queries that arrive months later.
Cross-border is the whole practice
International and cross-border tax is all we do — not a sideline next to domestic work. The edge cases on this page are our ordinary Tuesday.
Cross-border tax case studies
Mapping the filing set for a group after an acquisition
A group acquired a company that brought several subsidiaries with it, in jurisdictions where the buyer had never filed. Nobody could say what was due. We built the calendar from the entity list upwards — jurisdiction, year end, corporate return, the information returns attached to each, withholding and indirect tax registrations, and the regulatory filings each local company owed. The engagement produced a single mapped calendar with an internal owner and an external adviser named against every line, and a short list of entities for which no adviser had ever been appointed.
A dormant entity that still owed an annual return
A holding company had traded nothing for years and had quietly dropped off the group's internal list. It remained incorporated, and its jurisdiction still expected filings from it. We put the entity back on the calendar with its own year end, identified the corporate and regulatory returns it owed regardless of activity, and brought the outstanding years up to date. The engagement produced a filed set for the dormant company and a rule for the calendar — an entity leaves the list when it is wound up, not when it stops trading.
Rebuilding a calendar when the group changed advisers mid-year
A group moved advisers in several countries at once and discovered that the deadline knowledge had lived with the outgoing firms rather than in any document. We reconstructed the annual set from the entities themselves, then compared it against what had actually been filed in the two preceding years to find the returns that appeared in one year and not the other. The engagement produced a calendar the group owns rather than rents, and a written handover position for each jurisdiction showing what the outgoing adviser had been preparing.
Withholding returns and slips that nobody had been preparing
A parent had been paying a foreign affiliate for services for some time. The payments were recorded properly in the accounts, but no withholding return had ever been filed and no recipient slip issued, because the obligation sat between the finance team and the local adviser and belonged to neither. We established what should have been remitted and on what schedule, prepared the outstanding returns and slips, and added the line to the calendar with a named owner. The engagement produced a documented remittance position and an ongoing filing routine.
Indirect tax registrations filed on the wrong frequency
A group had registrations in more than one country and had settled into filing all of them quarterly, which suited the finance calendar but matched only some of the registrations. The mismatch had been generating late filings on a small number of accounts for some time. We listed each registration against its actual required frequency, corrected the filing pattern, and dealt with the accounts that were behind. The engagement produced a registration schedule stating the frequency for each account and the internal owner responsible for it.
Finding the country where nobody owned the filings
A group with entities across four jurisdictions asked for a compliance review after a penalty arrived from a country no one in finance had visited. The calendar exercise showed the pattern immediately. Every jurisdiction with a resident finance employee was current; the one without was behind on both its corporate return and its annual regulatory filing. We brought the filings up to date and appointed a local adviser. The engagement produced a named owner for every line and a standing escalation for any entity in a country with no internal staff.
A Country-by-Country Report and Who Files It
The obligation sits with the group and the filing can fall on a surrogate where the parent's jurisdiction does not exchange. Establishing who files where comes before preparing anything.
Read how this one runsA Family Trust Abroad With Reporting on Both Sides
A trust settled in one country and a beneficiary living in another produces reporting for the trust, the settlor and the beneficiary, on different forms and different dates. The engagement maps who files what before anything is prepared.
Read how this one runsAll case studies — every published engagement in one place.
Core International & Cross-Border Tax Services
International Tax Planning & Advisory
Strategy and compliance for income, assets and families spread across borders.
U.S. & Cross-Border Tax Returns
Expat & Emigration Tax
Non-Resident Canadian Tax
Transfer Pricing & BEPS
Tax Treaties & Withholding
Cross-Border Estates & Trusts
Global Investments & Reporting
Cross-Border Corporate Tax
India Tax for NRIs & Returning Residents
Canadian Tax with a Foreign Element
UAE Tax for Expats & Their Home Country
Industries & Client Types We Serve Worldwide
Global E-commerce & Marketplaces
- Foreign VAT / GST / sales tax registrations
- Marketplace withholding reviews
- Inventory nexus & PE analysis
- Multi-currency books reconciled
Technology & SaaS
- Cross-border revenue sourcing & withholding
- IP structuring with real substance
- Equity for cross-border teams
- U.S. expansion: entity & PE setup
Professional Services Firms
- Reg 105 / 102 waivers
- Permanent establishment risk
- Partner mobility planning
- Cross-border withholding recovery
Cross-Border Real Estate
- Section 216 rental returns
- FIRPTA withholding recovery
- Section 116 clearance
- Treaty credit optimization
Importers, Exporters & Manufacturers
- Transfer pricing documentation (s.247)
- Customs value vs transfer price
- Foreign affiliate reporting (T1134)
- Country-by-country reporting
Athletes, Artists & Entertainers
- Reg 105 & U.S. CWA agreements
- Multi-state & country calendars
- Touring income allocation
- Royalty & image-rights withholding
Remote Workers & Digital Nomads
- Residency analysis before moving
- Employer payroll exposure
- Totalization & social security
- Foreign tax credits
Investment Funds & Holding Companies
Holding structures live or die on treaty access, beneficial ownership and substance — the MLI's principal-purpose test now sits over every arrangement.
A holding structure is only as good as its reporting. Foreign affiliates, accrued passive income and distributions each carry their own return, and the penalties on those attach to the form rather than to any tax being owed — so a structure that saves tax can still cost money if the information returns are late.
- Treaty access & PPT reviews
- FAPI & surplus computations
- Withholding-efficient routing
- Governance & substance
