Do I need a management fee study for charges from our parent?
A management charge is tested on whether there was a service before anyone discusses its rate. Three questions come first: was a service actually provided, did the recipient benefit from it, and would an independent party have paid for it. A study is what answers them on paper, evidencing the services with time records and deliverables, excluding shareholder costs, allocating on a key that can be defended, and testing the mark-up. If the charge matters to the Canadian company's deduction and none of that exists in writing, the exposure is the whole deduction rather than part of it.
Why was our management fee deduction denied?
Usually because the file could not show what was received. The benefit test looks at the recipient: not what head office spent, but what this company got that it needed. Charges fail when they are an allocation of the parent's entire overhead, when the deliverables cannot be identified, or when the service duplicates something the local team already does. The consequence is asymmetric and worth stating plainly. Failing the benefit test means the deduction is denied in the paying country while the income remains taxable in the receiving one, so the group pays twice on one amount.
What evidence proves a management fee service was actually provided?
Contemporaneous records of the work, not a description of the department that did it. Time records showing who worked on what, for which entity. Deliverables: the report, the policy, the system, the negotiated contract. Correspondence between the service provider and the local team. Board or management minutes referring to advice received. The test a reviewer applies is whether an outsider could identify the service from your own records. If the only evidence is an invoice and an agreement, the service exists on paper and not in the file, and the file is what the deduction rests on.
Can shareholder costs be included in a management fee?
No, and separating them out is one of the main jobs a study does. Shareholder costs are incurred because the parent is an owner: preparing group consolidated accounts, reporting to its own investors, the cost of its board, financing its own shareholding, and compliance that exists for the parent's benefit rather than the subsidiary's. The subsidiary receives nothing it would have gone out and bought, so those costs fail the benefit test. The practical approach is to review the cost pool line by line before any allocation, and to record the exclusions, because a reviewer looks for them early.
How do we choose an allocation key for management charges?
Pick the measure that tracks the way the service is actually consumed, and be ready to show why. Headcount suits personnel support; transaction volumes suit a shared finance function; revenue is the common default and a poor one, because it correlates with size rather than with use. Where several different services sit inside one charge, several keys may be needed. Whichever you choose, take it from records you already keep and can reproduce, and document the alternatives you rejected. The derivation is the part that gets asked about, not the key itself.
Does a management fee need a mark-up on cost?
It depends what is being supplied. Routine support services are commonly priced at cost plus a mark-up, and the study's job is to test what independent providers of comparable services earn. Some costs are passed on without one, typically where the provider is procuring something on the recipient's behalf and adds nothing to it. The order matters: establish the service and the benefit, clean the cost pool, allocate it defensibly, and only then argue about the mark-up. A study that opens with the mark-up has skipped the tests that decide whether there is a deduction at all.
How do families with assets in two countries handle inheritance?
With paperwork built for both systems rather than one. In practice that means wills that work where each asset actually sits, an executor with authority a foreign bank or land registry will accept, clearance certificates before the estate distributes so the executor is not left personally exposed, and an estate tax exposure calculation done while the person is alive and can still act on it. Doing it afterwards costs more and forecloses most of the options. See cross-border wills and trusts.
Can an accountant in one country file my return in another?
Yes, where they are authorised to represent you with that tax authority and the filing is done electronically. What matters is not where the adviser sits but whether they can lawfully act for you and are competent in both systems — a return prepared with no knowledge of the other country is where the relief gets missed. We file on both sides, from offices in India, the USA, Canada and the UAE. See how we work.
