How are individual athletes — tennis, golf taxed across borders?

  • 15+Years of the founder's cross-border experience
  • 18,000+Clients served across our offices in India, the USA, Canada and the UAE
  • 5.0Google rating
  • 4Global offices — India, USA, Canada & UAE
  • 15+ years of cross-border experience
  • 24-hour helpline: +1 (416) 619-0068
  • Google rating 5.0 out of 5
Answer

For individual competitors the performance article reaches prize money and appearance fees in each country played, and expenses are often deductible only through a return that most players never file. A provision that applies to this occupation and not the one beside it is what changes the answer.

The rule for this group

For individual competitors the performance article reaches prize money and appearance fees in each country played, and expenses are often deductible only through a return that most players never file.

The team at work in the open-plan office

The exception that catches people

Tournament withholding is taken at gross before my expenses.

How to get this moving

The full treatment — who it binds, the deadline, the penalty and the fixed fee — is on Cross-border tax for individual athletes — tennis, golf. Ask before the move rather than after it, because most of the useful options expire on the date.

Checked and signed off for the 2025 and 2026 filing seasons by Udit Gupta, International Tax, Cross-Border Tax & Transfer Pricing Expert, Legal Quotient Consultants. This is general information rather than advice about your file — a short call is the way to get the second.

Files that look like this one

Case study 1

Recovering gross tournament deductions by filing on a net basis

A player's prize money had been deducted at source at each event, with no account taken of the cost of getting there or of competing. We took one country's season, assembled the entry fees, travel, accommodation and equipment costs event by event, and filed the net-basis return that country allows. The engagement produced a recomputation of the tax on what the player had actually earned there, a repayment of the excess deduction, and a schedule of deadlines for the other countries on the schedule where the same claim is available.

Read how this one runs
Case study 2

Apportioning a coach's retainer across a season of events

A player paid a coach and a physiotherapist by the year while competing in several countries, and neither cost had ever been claimed anywhere. We built a method that divides season-long costs across events by reference to the days worked and the income earned at each, documented the basis of it, and applied it consistently in each country's return. The engagement produced relief for costs that had previously gone unclaimed, a written apportionment method the player reuses each year, and a record-keeping format the coach now invoices against.

Read how this one runs
Case study 3

A season schedule turned into a filing plan country by country

A competitor played in more countries than she could keep track of and filed only where she lived. We listed every event of the season with its country, dates, gross receipt and amount deducted, then tested each country for whether a return was required, whether a net-basis claim was available, and what that claim was likely to be worth. Several were worth filing and several were not. The engagement produced a filing plan with deadlines, returns in the countries where the claim justified the work, and a reasoned note on why the rest were left alone.

Read how this one runs
Case study 4

Reducing a promoter's deduction on an appearance fee before payment

A player had agreed an appearance fee with a promoter who intended to deduct at the domestic rate. We identified what that country requires before a payer may apply a treaty rate or a reduced deduction, obtained the residency documentation in the form its administration accepts, and lodged it with the promoter ahead of the payment date. The engagement produced a deduction at the lower rate on payment rather than a reclaim months afterwards, and a checklist the player's agent now works through before signing an appearance contract.

Read how this one runs
Case study 5

Separating appearance obligations from image rights in one sponsorship

A single sponsorship agreement covered logo placement at events, promotional days and the general use of the player's name, and a country where he had competed sought to tax the whole of it. We read the agreement against the obligations it actually imposed, recorded the promotional days by country, and set out which part of the payment was connected with performing there. The engagement produced a documented allocation, a filed position in the country that had raised the question, and drafting for the next agreement that separates the two elements.

Read how this one runs
Case study 6

Years of unfiled returns in countries a player had competed in

A player who had competed abroad for several seasons had never filed outside his own country, and one of the others had begun asking questions. We reconstructed each season from event records, prize statements and deduction certificates, established which years remained open in each country, and put the position right country by country, in the order that put the player on the firmest footing with each authority. The engagement produced filed years, deductions recomputed where a net basis was available, and a residence-country credit claim rebuilt on the final figures rather than on the amounts originally withheld.

Read how this one runs
Case study 7

A Canadian Working in the US on a Work Visa

Immigration status and tax residence are different tests, and a visa says nothing about which country taxes the salary. The file fixes residence, applies the employment article, and sequences the two returns so the credit lands where it is usable.

Read how this one runs
Case study 8

A US Filer Married to Someone Outside the System

Electing to treat a non-resident spouse as a US filer buys joint rates and brings that spouse's worldwide income and foreign accounts into the return. The election is easy to make and hard to revoke, so both positions are modelled first.

Read how this one runs

All case studies — every published engagement in one place.

Core International & Cross-Border Tax Services

International Tax Planning & Advisory

Strategy and compliance for income, assets and families spread across borders.

One coordinating team: filings on every side of the border are sequenced so treaty relief and foreign tax credits are claimed once — and in the right country.
U.S. & Cross-Border Tax Returns
Dual filers: U.S. citizens in Canada and Canadians with U.S. income run two parallel systems — we prepare both, in the right order, every year.
Expat & Emigration Tax
The move year is its own project: the elections and valuations filed that year decide the next decade of both countries’ returns.
Non-Resident Canadian Tax
Default withholding is 25% of gross: elective returns routinely turn over-withheld rent and pensions into refunds.
Transfer Pricing & BEPS
Documentation prepared with the return is the cheapest insurance in international tax; reconstructing it during an audit is the most expensive.
Cross-Border Estates & Trusts
Wills drafted for one country routinely misfire in the other — deemed disposition here, estate tax there, credits in between.
Cross-Border Corporate Tax
Expansion raises the same four questions every time — entity, PE, repatriation, payroll. We answer them before the tax authorities do.
India Tax for NRIs & Returning Residents
The deduction is taken on the sale price, not the gain — which is why an NRI property sale strands cash unless the certificate is applied for before closing.
Canadian Tax with a Foreign Element
Residency is decided on facts, not on a form — and the year you arrive or leave is the one where the largest amounts turn on the smallest details.
UAE Tax for Expats & Their Home Country
A zero-tax country is only half the answer — the question that decides the bill is whether the country you came from still treats you as resident.

Industries & Client Types We Serve Worldwide

Global E-commerce & Marketplaces
Technology & SaaS
Professional Services Firms
Cross-Border Real Estate
Importers, Exporters & Manufacturers
Athletes, Artists & Entertainers
Remote Workers & Digital Nomads
Investment Funds & Holding Companies
Global E-commerce & Marketplaces
  • Foreign VAT / GST / sales tax registrations
  • Marketplace withholding reviews
  • Inventory nexus & PE analysis
  • Multi-currency books reconciled
Explore E-commerce & Marketplaces
Technology & SaaS
  • Cross-border revenue sourcing & withholding
  • IP structuring with real substance
  • Equity for cross-border teams
  • U.S. expansion: entity & PE setup
Explore Technology & SaaS
Importers, Exporters & Manufacturers
  • Transfer pricing documentation (s.247)
  • Customs value vs transfer price
  • Foreign affiliate reporting (T1134)
  • Country-by-country reporting
Explore Trade & Manufacturing
Athletes, Artists & Entertainers

Performance income is taxed where earned — Regulation 105 in Canada, withholding agreements in the U.S. — with special treaty articles overriding the usual rules.

Performance income is taxed where the performance happens, and the deduction is usually taken at source on the gross fee before expenses. Recovering the difference is a filing exercise in the other country, and it only works if the tour, the residency and the withholding certificates were documented while the work was being done.

  • Reg 105 & U.S. CWA agreements
  • Multi-state & country calendars
  • Touring income allocation
  • Royalty & image-rights withholding
Explore Athletes & Entertainers
Remote Workers & Digital Nomads
  • Residency analysis before moving
  • Employer payroll exposure
  • Totalization & social security
  • Foreign tax credits
Explore Remote Workers
Investment Funds & Holding Companies
  • Treaty access & PPT reviews
  • FAPI & surplus computations
  • Withholding-efficient routing
  • Governance & substance
Explore Funds & Holdcos

Individual athletes — tennis, golf: further questions

Is my prize money taxed in the country where the tournament was held?

Usually it can be. The performance article in most treaties lets the country where you compete tax the income from competing there, and prize money and appearance fees are the clearest examples. That is why organisers deduct tax before paying out. Whether the deduction is the end of the matter depends on the country: some treat it as a final tax, others as a payment on account that a return then adjusts. So the practical question for a player is not whether the country may tax the win, but whether filing there would reduce what has already been taken.

Tournament withholding is taken before my expenses — can I claim them back?

In many countries yes, but only by filing a return there. The deduction at the event is normally applied to the gross prize or fee, which takes no account of the entry costs, the flights, the accommodation, the coaching or the equipment. Where the country allows a net-basis return, the tax is recomputed on what you actually earned from competing there and the excess is repaid. It is a claim rather than an automatic refund, and it has a deadline. For a player whose costs take a large share of the purse, the difference can be substantial.

I compete in many countries and file in one — is that a problem?

It is at least an incomplete picture, and it usually costs money in both directions. Filing only at home means the deductions taken at events abroad are never recomputed on a net basis, so expenses go unrelieved in the countries that would have allowed them. It can also mean income a country had a right to tax was never declared there. The useful first step is a season schedule: every event, the country, the dates, the gross received and the amount deducted. From that list it becomes clear which countries are worth filing in and which are not.

Which of my costs count as expenses of competing abroad?

The test in most systems is a connection between the cost and the income being taxed, so the cost of getting to and competing at that event is the strongest case: entry fees, flights, accommodation for the tournament, transport on the ground, stringing and equipment used there. Costs that support the whole season — a coach on a retainer, a physiotherapist, pre-season training — usually have to be apportioned rather than assigned to one country. Keep the evidence by event as the season runs. A shoebox reconciled in the winter loses the detail that makes an apportionment credible.

Is my appearance fee treated the same as prize money?

For the country where you play, usually yes: the performance article reaches income from appearing there, whether it is paid as a purse or as a fee for turning up. The differences show up elsewhere. An appearance fee is contracted in advance and often paid by a promoter with deduction obligations of its own, while prize money depends on the result and is paid by the event. Read each contract for who deducts, at what rate and against what paperwork, because the answer decides whether you can reduce the deduction rather than reclaim it afterwards.

Where do my sponsorship and equipment deals get taxed?

Part of it can be pulled into the countries where you compete, and part stays where you are resident. Where a sponsor pays you for appearing, for wearing a logo at an event, or for promotional days in a country, that part is connected with performing there. Where the payment is for the use of your name and likeness generally, it is easier to keep at home. An agreement that says only sponsorship invites an allocation you did not choose. Have it separate the appearance obligations from the rights granted, and keep a record of the days worked under each.

What counts as foreign income, and what is a foreign tax?

Foreign income is income sourced outside the country you are filing in — where the work was done, where the property sits, where the payer is resident, depending on the type. A foreign tax, for credit purposes, is a levy imposed by another country that functions as an income tax and that you were legally required to pay. Consumption taxes, property taxes and most social contributions are not, however real the cost. Sourcing is decided by rule, not by which bank received it. See the foreign tax credit.

Branch or subsidiary — which should we use to expand?

A branch keeps one taxpayer: results consolidate at home, losses are usable sooner, and the exposure is that the branch is a permanent establishment whose profit the host country taxes, sometimes with a branch tax on repatriation. A subsidiary is a separate taxpayer with limited liability and local rates, at the cost of withholding on dividends home and transfer pricing on everything between them. The deciding facts are usually expected losses, liability and exit plans. See branch against subsidiary.

Our practitioners are alumni of leading accounting and tax institutions

Where our partners studied — CPA Canada (In-Depth Tax Program), AICPA, the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India and the Malaysian Institute of Accountants.

Request a Quote +1 (416) 619-0068