What is the late filing penalty for Form RC199?

  • 15+Years of cross-border experience
  • 18,000+Clients served
  • 5.0Google rating
  • 4Global offices — India, USA, Canada & UAE
  • 18,000+ clients served
  • Fixed fee agreed before work starts
  • 15+ years of cross-border experience
Answer

The application under the CRA's voluntary disclosures programme to correct unreported income or unfiled information returns. The exposure on this kind of filing is charged by reference to the form and the delay rather than to the tax, which is why an unfiled year with no tax can still be expensive.

What a late filing costs

The application under the CRA's voluntary disclosures programme to correct unreported income or unfiled information returns.

Two of the firm’s advisers at the glass desk in the Delhi office

The case that is treated differently

It only works while the disclosure is still voluntary. Once the CRA has begun to act, relief narrows, and the programme distinguishes between limited and general relief on the basis of how the failure came about.

What is the late filing penalty for Form RC199?
ItemAmount
Years unfiled7
Forms due per year1
Assumed penalty per formUS$3,000
Exposure before any reliefUS$21,000
Tax actually owed on the incomeUS$0

US$21,000 of exposure against nil tax. That asymmetry is why the disclosure routes exist and why the sequence of filings matters more than the arithmetic — filed in the right order under the right route, the penalty position can be very different from this.

An illustration, not a client file. The sums are chosen for legibility and the thresholds are stated for the example alone — nothing reaches a filing until it has been confirmed at source for your own year.

Where to go from here

The full treatment — who it binds, the deadline, the penalty and the fixed fee — is on RC199 — voluntary disclosure application. If a letter prompted this, bring the letter — it usually contains the answer to half the questions.

Reviewed for the 2025 and 2026 filing seasons by Udit Gupta, Cross-Border Tax Expert, Legal Quotient Consultants. Published as general information. For a position on your own file, call the 24-hour helpline.

Penalty for not declaring foreign bank account — what this page covers

People reach this page searching for penalty for not declaring foreign bank account. It is covered here as it applies to Form RC199 — who it applies to, what has to be filed, and what it costs, at a fixed fee agreed before the work starts.

Cross-border situations we are engaged for

Case study 1

Several unfiled years assembled into one disclosure application

Filing had lapsed across a long run of years with foreign income arising throughout. Rather than filing year by year as records emerged, we built one schedule covering the whole period, identified the obligations that sat with each party, and drafted a single application against it. The engagement produced the complete schedule, the outstanding returns prepared in date order, and one application setting out the chronology, so the CRA received the whole position at once instead of a sequence of partial corrections.

Read how this one runs
Case study 2

Deciding the order of the application and the returns

A client had prepared the overdue returns themselves and was about to submit them, intending to raise the penalties afterwards. We stopped the filing and set out what each order of events changes about how the matter is treated, then recorded the reasoning and the chosen sequence in writing before anything was sent. The engagement produced a written sequencing decision, the application and the returns submitted in the order that decision called for, and a file that shows why the order was chosen.

Read how this one runs
Case study 3

A demand letter that arrived while the application was in preparation

Work on a disclosure was well advanced when correspondence from the CRA arrived about one of the years involved. We compared what the Agency had begun to act on against the matters the draft application covered, and split the position accordingly. The engagement produced an analysis of which matters the contact reached and which it did not, a response to the correspondence, and a revised application confined to the part of the position where the disclosure was still voluntary.

Read how this one runs
Case study 4

Unreported foreign rental income across a long gap

A property abroad had been let for years without the income appearing in any Canadian return, and expenses had never been tracked in a form the returns could use. Work consisted of rebuilding gross rents and allowable expenses from bank records and the managing agent's statements, recomputing each year, and quantifying the penalty and interest position before drafting. The engagement produced recomputed years, a reconstruction note explaining the sources, and an application supported by the underlying documents rather than by summaries.

Read how this one runs
Case study 5

Interest quantified before the balance was paid down

A client wanted to know whether to pay before the application was resolved or wait for the outcome. We separated the exposure into the tax, the penalties attached to each outstanding form, and the interest compounding on the unpaid balance, and showed which element grows with time and which does not. The engagement produced that breakdown, a payment made against the identified tax while the relief question remained open, and an application that records the payment and its date.

Read how this one runs
Case study 6

An earlier attempt at correction rebuilt from the underlying records

A previous adviser had submitted corrections for some years with no supporting documents and no chronology, and the matter had stalled. We went back to the source records, rebuilt each year from them, and reconciled the earlier submissions against what the documents actually showed, noting where they diverged. The engagement produced a reconciled set of years, a written account of what the earlier filings said and where they were wrong, and a fresh application resting on documents a reviewer can follow.

Read how this one runs
Case study 7

Catching Up From Inside the United States

The domestic route suits a filer who was resident in the US through the missed years, and it differs from the offshore one in what it asks for and what it costs. Choosing between them before anything is filed is the whole engagement.

Read how this one runs
Case study 8

A Penalty Argued on the Facts Rather Than the Form

Reasonable cause is a documented story with dates, not an assertion of good intent. The engagement assembles what the client actually knew and when, and puts the sequence in writing alongside the filings it explains.

Read how this one runs

All case studies — every published engagement in one place.

Core International & Cross-Border Tax Services

International Tax Planning & Advisory

Strategy and compliance for income, assets and families spread across borders.

One coordinating team: filings on every side of the border are sequenced so treaty relief and foreign tax credits are claimed once — and in the right country.

U.S. & Cross-Border Tax Returns

Dual filers: U.S. citizens in Canada and Canadians with U.S. income run two parallel systems — we prepare both, in the right order, every year.

Expat & Emigration Tax

The move year is its own project: the elections and valuations filed that year decide the next decade of both countries’ returns.

Non-Resident Canadian Tax

Default withholding is 25% of gross: elective returns routinely turn over-withheld rent and pensions into refunds.

Transfer Pricing & BEPS

Documentation prepared with the return is the cheapest insurance in international tax; reconstructing it during an audit is the most expensive.

Cross-Border Estates & Trusts

Wills drafted for one country routinely misfire in the other — deemed disposition here, estate tax there, credits in between.

Cross-Border Corporate Tax

Expansion raises the same four questions every time — entity, PE, repatriation, payroll. We answer them before the tax authorities do.

India Tax for NRIs & Returning Residents

The deduction is taken on the sale price, not the gain — which is why an NRI property sale strands cash unless the certificate is applied for before closing.

Canadian Tax with a Foreign Element

Residency is decided on facts, not on a form — and the year you arrive or leave is the one where the largest amounts turn on the smallest details.

UAE Tax for Expats & Their Home Country

A zero-tax country is only half the answer — the question that decides the bill is whether the country you came from still treats you as resident.

Industries & Client Types We Serve Worldwide

Global E-commerce & Marketplaces
Technology & SaaS
Professional Services Firms
Cross-Border Real Estate
Importers, Exporters & Manufacturers
Athletes, Artists & Entertainers
Remote Workers & Digital Nomads
Investment Funds & Holding Companies

Global E-commerce & Marketplaces

  • Foreign VAT / GST / sales tax registrations
  • Marketplace withholding reviews
  • Inventory nexus & PE analysis
  • Multi-currency books reconciled
Explore E-commerce & Marketplaces

Technology & SaaS

  • Cross-border revenue sourcing & withholding
  • IP structuring with real substance
  • Equity for cross-border teams
  • U.S. expansion: entity & PE setup
Explore Technology & SaaS

Importers, Exporters & Manufacturers

  • Transfer pricing documentation (s.247)
  • Customs value vs transfer price
  • Foreign affiliate reporting (T1134)
  • Country-by-country reporting
Explore Trade & Manufacturing

Athletes, Artists & Entertainers

Performance income is taxed where earned — Regulation 105 in Canada, withholding agreements in the U.S. — with special treaty articles overriding the usual rules.

Performance income is taxed where the performance happens, and the deduction is usually taken at source on the gross fee before expenses. Recovering the difference is a filing exercise in the other country, and it only works if the tour, the residency and the withholding certificates were documented while the work was being done.

  • Reg 105 & U.S. CWA agreements
  • Multi-state & country calendars
  • Touring income allocation
  • Royalty & image-rights withholding
Explore Athletes & Entertainers

Remote Workers & Digital Nomads

  • Residency analysis before moving
  • Employer payroll exposure
  • Totalization & social security
  • Foreign tax credits
Explore Remote Workers

Investment Funds & Holding Companies

  • Treaty access & PPT reviews
  • FAPI & surplus computations
  • Withholding-efficient routing
  • Governance & substance
Explore Funds & Holdcos

Form RC199 — the questions that follow

What penalties can a voluntary disclosure actually get cancelled?

The application is aimed at penalties and at interest rather than at the arithmetic of the tax itself. For the 2025 tax year the CRA's late-filing penalty on an income tax return is 5 per cent of the balance owing plus 1 per cent of that balance for each full month the return is late, to a maximum of 12 months. Where the CRA had issued a demand to file and had charged a late-filing penalty in any of the three preceding tax years, it is 10 per cent plus 2 per cent for each full month, to a maximum of 20 months. The penalty does not compound. Interest does, daily, on the unpaid balance.

Am I too late to use the voluntary disclosures programme?

Lateness in years is not what closes the door. What closes it is the CRA beginning to act: the programme works while the disclosure is still voluntary, and once the Agency has started on a matter the relief available on that matter narrows. So a taxpayer who left it a decade and has heard nothing may be in a better position than one who left it two years and has a letter in hand. Read the correspondence first, decide the route second, and file third.

Does interest keep running while my disclosure is being processed?

The part of the exposure that grows is the interest, and it compounds daily on the unpaid balance. The penalty does not compound. That has a practical consequence for sequencing: once you can identify the tax with reasonable confidence, paying it down stops the compounding element from accumulating while the application is dealt with, even though the relief question is still open. It also means the cost of a slow, thorough application is not the same as the cost of a slow, idle one.

Which years do I have to include if I stopped filing years ago?

The scope is set by the failure, not by a number of years you pick. The application has to describe what went unreported and when the omission began, so the years follow from that: the income that was not reported, the information returns that were not filed, and the parties who held each obligation. Trimming the earliest years to make the application smaller is the common instinct and the wrong one, because an application that is later found incomplete puts the whole position back in question.

Will filing the late returns first spoil my disclosure?

The order in which the returns and the application are submitted is a decision to take deliberately, before anything goes in, not something to sort out afterwards. The programme is about a failure you are bringing forward voluntarily, and how a set of filings arriving on their own is treated is not the same question as how an application is treated. Settle the route and the sequence together, get both in writing internally, then file. Reversing the order later is not possible.

How much of the penalty is left after relief is granted?

It depends on which of the programme's two tracks the application falls into, and the allocation between them turns on how the failure came about rather than on the amount involved. So the narrative is doing more work than the arithmetic. What you can quantify in advance is the exposure you are trying to reduce: the penalties attached to each unfiled form or return, and the interest that has compounded on any unpaid tax. Quantify that first, because it tells you whether the application is worth the work.

What has to be reported on a T1135?

Specified foreign property held by a Canadian resident where the total cost exceeds the threshold at any time in the year: funds in foreign bank accounts, shares of non-resident corporations — including those held in a Canadian brokerage account — foreign real estate other than personal-use property, debts owed by non-residents, interests in foreign trusts, and foreign life insurance. Property inside a registered plan is excluded, as is property used in an active business. It reports property, not income. See the T1135.

My T3 or T5 shows foreign income — does that go on the T1135 too?

They answer different questions. The slip reports income you received; the T1135 reports property you held. Foreign income earned inside a Canadian mutual fund or ETF is reported on the slip, but the underlying foreign securities belong to the fund, not to you, so they are not your specified foreign property. Foreign shares held directly in your brokerage account are — even though the broker is Canadian and the account statement is in dollars. See the T1135.

Our practitioners are alumni of leading accounting and tax institutions

Where our partners studied — CPA Canada (In-Depth Tax Program), AICPA, the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India and the Malaysian Institute of Accountants.

Request a Quote +1 (416) 619-0068