US person with a foreign business — where do I start?

  • 15+Years of cross-border experience
  • 18,000+Clients served
  • 5.0Google rating
  • 4Global offices — India, USA, Canada & UAE
  • 15+ years of cross-border experience
  • 18,000+ clients served
  • Fixed fee agreed before work starts
Answer

Classification comes first: whether the entity is a corporation, a partnership or disregarded for US purposes changes which forms apply and whether the profits are taxed currently. Almost every one of these files is decided by a date and a document, so the sequence is the work.

Where to start

Classification comes first: whether the entity is a corporation, a partnership or disregarded for US purposes changes which forms apply and whether the profits are taxed currently. An election made on time can align the two countries; the same election made late leaves credits stranded.

Two of the firm’s advisers at the glass desk in the Delhi office

The case that is treated differently

The company you incorporated in the country you moved to is, to the IRS, a foreign corporation with a US shareholder — with a reporting package attached and rules that can tax its profits before you take them out.

US person with a foreign business — where do I start?
ItemAmount
Income taxed in both countriesC$177,000
Tax paid abroad (assumed 18%)C$31,860
Home tax on the same income (assumed 44%)C$77,880
Credit available (lesser of the two)C$31,860
Home tax still payableC$46,020

The credit absorbs C$31,860 and leaves C$46,020 payable at home, because the home rate on this income is the higher of the two. The balance is real cash and it is due on the home timetable, which is why instalments get raised in the first meeting.

Treat these numbers as a worked example rather than advice — they exist to make the mechanics visible, and the rates and thresholds are assumed for the illustration. For a real filing, we verify each figure with the authority that publishes it, for your year.

How to get this moving

The full treatment — who it binds, the deadline, the penalty and the fixed fee — is on US person with a foreign business. One call now is worth more than a filing season of guessing.

Reviewed for accuracy for the 2025 and 2026 filing seasons by Udit Gupta, Cross-Border Tax Expert, Legal Quotient Consultants. General information, not advice for your circumstances — call our 24-hour helpline to discuss your own position.

International tax planning for technology businesses, in practice

People reach this page searching for international tax planning for technology businesses. It is covered here as it applies to US person with a foreign business — who it applies to, what has to be filed, and what it costs, at a fixed fee agreed before the work starts.

Files that look like this one

Case study 1

Reading the constitution before reaching any conclusion

A client wanted to know which forms applied. We asked instead for the company's constitutional documents and its ownership register, because the answer to the forms question is downstream of them. The documents showed a liability position that produced a different classification from the one assumed, which changed both the reporting and whether the profits were taxed to the owner as they arose. The engagement produced a classification memorandum citing the specific provisions relied on, and a filing plan that followed from it rather than from the client's expectation.

Read how this one runs
Case study 2

Fixing the years at issue for a long-standing company

A business had been running for many years with nothing reported on the US side. We began with the ownership register to establish when the client's interest first reached a reportable level, then built a year-by-year schedule of what a filing would have contained. Several of the earliest years produced no US tax once the credits were properly constructed. The engagement produced that schedule, a recommendation on the route for bringing the years in, and a decision taken with the size of the exposure known rather than feared.

Read how this one runs
Case study 3

Shaping a year before it closed rather than reporting it after

An owner came to us in mid-year, which made the work planning rather than compliance. We set out how each way of drawing money from the company would be treated on both sides, and which decisions had to be taken before the year end to be effective at all. The engagement produced a written plan for the remainder of the year, the classification position confirmed in advance, and instructions the company's own bookkeeper could follow, so the next year's reporting described a set of transactions that had been chosen deliberately.

Read how this one runs
Case study 4

Pricing the cost of closing against the cost of staying

A client with a small consulting company abroad wanted to wind it up and bill clients in their own name instead. We priced both paths: the tax the wind-up would trigger in each country, the treatment of the assets coming out, and the ongoing reporting the company would otherwise carry. We also collected the non-tax reasons the company existed, which included a licence that could not be transferred. The engagement produced a side-by-side comparison of keeping and closing, and the client's decision recorded with the reasons behind it.

Read how this one runs
Case study 5

Starting from a local accountant's file rather than the client's memory

The owner's recollection of how the company had been set up did not match its documents. We worked from the file held by the company's own accountant: the filings made locally, the assessments issued, and the entries recording loans between owner and company. Two of those loans had never been treated as anything in particular. The engagement produced a reconciled history of the owner's dealings with the company, the classification conclusion that history supported, and a list of the items still needing a position taken on them.

Read how this one runs
Case study 6

A second shareholder discovered in the ownership register

A client believed they owned the company outright. The register showed a family member holding a minority interest, recorded years earlier for a reason nobody could now explain. Because ownership levels determine what reporting applies and whose income the profits are, the discovery changed the starting point entirely. The engagement produced a corrected ownership history, the client's reporting position based on their actual interest, and a note of the questions the other shareholder's own position raises, which were for that person's adviser rather than ours.

Read how this one runs
Case study 7

A US LLC Owned by a Canadian, Taxed Twice by Design

The two countries classify an LLC differently, so the credit relief that ought to apply frequently does not. The engagement looks at whether the structure can be changed, and where it cannot, at how to make the credit work.

Read how this one runs
Case study 8

A Shareholder Loan Across a Border at No Interest

An interest-free loan between related companies is priced as if it carried interest, and in some cases a deemed benefit follows as well. The file sets a rate against the borrower's own credit profile and documents the terms that support it.

Read how this one runs

All case studies — every published engagement in one place.

Core International & Cross-Border Tax Services

International Tax Planning & Advisory

Strategy and compliance for income, assets and families spread across borders.

One coordinating team: filings on every side of the border are sequenced so treaty relief and foreign tax credits are claimed once — and in the right country.

U.S. & Cross-Border Tax Returns

Dual filers: U.S. citizens in Canada and Canadians with U.S. income run two parallel systems — we prepare both, in the right order, every year.

Expat & Emigration Tax

The move year is its own project: the elections and valuations filed that year decide the next decade of both countries’ returns.

Non-Resident Canadian Tax

Default withholding is 25% of gross: elective returns routinely turn over-withheld rent and pensions into refunds.

Transfer Pricing & BEPS

Documentation prepared with the return is the cheapest insurance in international tax; reconstructing it during an audit is the most expensive.

Cross-Border Estates & Trusts

Wills drafted for one country routinely misfire in the other — deemed disposition here, estate tax there, credits in between.

Cross-Border Corporate Tax

Expansion raises the same four questions every time — entity, PE, repatriation, payroll. We answer them before the tax authorities do.

India Tax for NRIs & Returning Residents

The deduction is taken on the sale price, not the gain — which is why an NRI property sale strands cash unless the certificate is applied for before closing.

Canadian Tax with a Foreign Element

Residency is decided on facts, not on a form — and the year you arrive or leave is the one where the largest amounts turn on the smallest details.

UAE Tax for Expats & Their Home Country

A zero-tax country is only half the answer — the question that decides the bill is whether the country you came from still treats you as resident.

Industries & Client Types We Serve Worldwide

Global E-commerce & Marketplaces
Technology & SaaS
Professional Services Firms
Cross-Border Real Estate
Importers, Exporters & Manufacturers
Athletes, Artists & Entertainers
Remote Workers & Digital Nomads
Investment Funds & Holding Companies

Global E-commerce & Marketplaces

  • Foreign VAT / GST / sales tax registrations
  • Marketplace withholding reviews
  • Inventory nexus & PE analysis
  • Multi-currency books reconciled
Explore E-commerce & Marketplaces

Technology & SaaS

Software revenue crosses borders by default — sourcing rules, withholding on licence-like payments and IP location decide the effective rate.

Software revenue is rarely taxed where the team sits. Licence, subscription and service income are characterised differently by each side, and the answer decides withholding at source, treaty relief and whether a foreign customer creates a taxable presence at all — questions that are cheap to settle before the contract and expensive afterwards.

  • Cross-border revenue sourcing & withholding
  • IP structuring with real substance
  • Equity for cross-border teams
  • U.S. expansion: entity & PE setup
Explore Technology & SaaS

Importers, Exporters & Manufacturers

  • Transfer pricing documentation (s.247)
  • Customs value vs transfer price
  • Foreign affiliate reporting (T1134)
  • Country-by-country reporting
Explore Trade & Manufacturing

Athletes, Artists & Entertainers

  • Reg 105 & U.S. CWA agreements
  • Multi-state & country calendars
  • Touring income allocation
  • Royalty & image-rights withholding
Explore Athletes & Entertainers

Remote Workers & Digital Nomads

  • Residency analysis before moving
  • Employer payroll exposure
  • Totalization & social security
  • Foreign tax credits
Explore Remote Workers

Investment Funds & Holding Companies

  • Treaty access & PPT reviews
  • FAPI & surplus computations
  • Withholding-efficient routing
  • Governance & substance
Explore Funds & Holdcos

More on US person with a foreign business

Where do I start with a company I own in another country?

With the entity, not the income. Before any figure is useful you need to know what the company is treated as for US purposes, because a corporation, a partnership and a disregarded entity produce different reporting and different timing on the very same profit. That conclusion comes out of the constitutional documents, the ownership register and the liability position of the owners. Everything else follows from it: the reporting package, whether profits are taxed to you as they arise, whether foreign tax can be credited. Starting with last year's profit and working backwards is how owners end up filing on the wrong basis.

What documents do I need before anyone can advise me?

The incorporation documents and constitution, the ownership register with the date of every change, the statutory financial statements for the years in question, the company's own returns and assessments, and a list of every dealing between you and the company: salary, dividends, loans in either direction, rent, anything at all. Dates matter more than amounts at this stage, because classification and the timing rules both turn on when things happened. If the company has had other owners, or has changed its legal form, bring that history too. It often explains why the current treatment is not the obvious one.

Should I sort the company out before or after my personal return?

Before, because the personal return depends on it. The company's classification decides what your return has to show and when, so a personal filing prepared first is a guess that may have to be corrected. Where time is short, the order that causes least damage is to establish the classification, file on that basis, and leave refinements for later. What does not work is filing the personal return on the assumption that nothing is reportable until money comes out, then discovering the company should have been in the return from the year it was incorporated.

I set the company up years ago and reported nothing, what now?

Establish the years first. Work out from the ownership register when your interest reached the level that brings reporting, then identify for each year since whether a filing was required and what it would have shown. That schedule is the whole basis of what follows, including which route to use for bringing the years in. The other half is the tax, and often the company's profits produce little or no US tax once the credits are constructed properly, which changes what you are dealing with. Fix the years and the figures before choosing how to file them.

Do I need to do anything before the company's next year end?

Often yes, and that is the main argument for starting early. An election about classification is time-sensitive, and how profits are taken out, whether as salary, dividend or loan repayment, is a decision made during the year rather than repaired afterwards. Once a year end has passed the facts are fixed and the work becomes reporting what happened. So the first conversation is worth having while there is still a year to shape: the same arrangement that is straightforward if settled in advance can be expensive to replicate once the transactions have gone through the books.

Is it simpler to just close the company and bill clients personally?

Sometimes, and it is a fair question to ask early rather than after years of reporting. But closing a company is itself a taxable event in its own country and usually on the US side as well, and the two may treat the wind-up differently, so the cost of leaving has to be set against the cost of staying. There are also non-tax reasons the company exists: contracts, licences, local clients. The right order is to price both paths, including the reporting each involves, before assuming the simpler structure is the cheaper one.

How many days can I spend in a country before I become tax resident?

It depends on the country, and a day count is only ever the start. Many use a threshold in a tax year, some also look at averages across several years, and some have no day test at all and decide on where your home and life are. Two countries can both conclude you are resident, which is what the treaty tie-breaker exists to settle. Counting days without checking the tie-breaker is how people end up filing as resident nowhere. See the residency tie-breaker.

Can an accountant in one country file my return in another?

Yes, where they are authorised to represent you with that tax authority and the filing is done electronically. What matters is not where the adviser sits but whether they can lawfully act for you and are competent in both systems — a return prepared with no knowledge of the other country is where the relief gets missed. We file on both sides, from offices in India, the USA, Canada and the UAE. See how we work.

Our practitioners are alumni of leading accounting and tax institutions

Where our partners studied — CPA Canada (In-Depth Tax Program), AICPA, the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India and the Malaysian Institute of Accountants.

Request a Quote +1 (416) 619-0068