Why a Canadian should rarely own an LLC

Canada generally treats a US limited liability company as a corporation while the US treats it as transparent.

  • 15+Years of cross-border experience
  • 18,000+Clients served
  • 5.0Google rating
  • 4Global offices — India, USA, Canada & UAE

Secure a fixed quote

Begin with the papers you already have. The engagement is priced from them, in writing, before the work.

24-hour helpline: +1 (416) 619-0068
  • 24-hour helpline: +1 (416) 619-0068
  • 18,000+ clients served
  • Fixed fee agreed before work starts
The short answer

Canada generally treats a US limited liability company as a corporation while the US treats it as transparent. The alternatives — a US corporation, a partnership, a branch, or a different entity entirely — all resolve the mismatch in different ways with different withholding outcomes.

Do you need this?

  • Money moves between group companies as fees, interest or dividends
  • Your entity is treated differently by each of the two countries
  • You are planning a reorganisation, a sale or a wind-up
  • The structure was built one decision at a time and never reviewed
  • A dormant entity is still generating filing obligations

That list is deliberately concrete. If you recognise yourself in it, this page is the right starting point; if you do not, tell us and we will point you elsewhere without charging for it.

Two of the firm’s advisers at the glass desk in the Delhi office

What why Canadian should not own LLC costs here

The fee on an LLC question turns on whether the company exists yet. Advising a Canadian on the entity to use before anything is formed is one piece of work; untangling an LLC already owned, where Canada has treated it as a corporation and the US as transparent, means examining the returns already filed on both sides. Fixed fee agreed in writing first.

1120-F / 5472 filing — fixed-fee price

From $999

fixed, quoted before work starts

The foreign corporation's US return with the related-party information reporting, filed on time so deductions and treaty positions are preserved rather than argued for.
See the full fee page

US state nexus review — fixed-fee price

From $999

fixed, quoted before work starts

A state-by-state review of sales, transactions, employees and inventory against each state's own tests, with the registration and collection start dates identified.
See the full fee page

Corporate cross-border filing

From $999

fixed, quoted before work starts

Corporate returns with foreign income, related-party reporting and cross-border structures, for companies of any size.
See the fee schedule

Transfer pricing documentation

From $2,500

fixed, quoted before work starts

Benchmarking and documentation for related-party dealings, prepared to the standard the reviewing authority applies.
See the fee schedule

Payroll & mobility setup

From $999

fixed, quoted before work starts

Employer registration and withholding for staff on assignment, arranged before the first pay run rather than corrected after it.
See the fee schedule

Foreign asset & information reporting

From $349

fixed, quoted before work starts

Disclosure of assets and interests held abroad, built once from a single asset list and filed on every side that asks for it.
See the fee schedule

Individual tax filing

From $349

fixed, quoted before work starts

One engagement for a personal return that touches more than one country: the income, the assets held abroad and the relief claimed against them.
See the fee schedule

Non-resident & departure filings

From $349

fixed, quoted before work starts

For anyone taxed by a country they do not live in — rent, pensions and investment income reaching across a border after the move.
See the fee schedule

All published fees on one page — the complete list of what each engagement costs, stated as figures rather than ranges.

What is really being tested

Canada generally treats a US limited liability company as a corporation while the US treats it as transparent. That single disagreement is enough to strand the credit for US tax against Canadian tax on the same profit.

The alternatives — a US corporation, a partnership, a branch, or a different entity entirely — all resolve the mismatch in different ways with different withholding outcomes. The analysis is done before formation because unwinding an LLC is itself a taxable event in at least one country.

This is why we start with a chronology rather than a form. Almost every position in this area is anchored to a date — of arrival, of departure, of a payment, of a transaction — and the evidence that supports it is either created around that date or reconstructed years later at several times the cost.

We do not carry numbers from memory into a filing. Any threshold, rate or day count in your advice is verified for your own year against the body that sets it, and where verification is not available the mechanism is explained without a figure attached. See also crypto and the FBAR question and simplified vs normal GST/HST registration.

What we actually file

  • Foreign affiliate, controlled-corporation and related-party information returns
  • Classification and rollover elections, filed on time
  • Withholding returns and slips on distributions
  • Surplus and attributed-income computations per entity
  • A written structure review with each position and its support

What this looks like with numbers

This is what the rule produces when you put figures through it.

Credit relief on one stream of income

Take C$168,000 of income taxed in both countries. Assume the other country charged 22% on it and the home country would charge 35% on the same amount.

Credit relief on one stream of income
ItemAmount
Income taxed in both countriesC$168,000
Tax paid abroad (assumed 22%)C$36,960
Home tax on the same income (assumed 35%)C$58,800
Credit available (lesser of the two)C$36,960
Home tax still payableC$21,840

The credit absorbs C$36,960 and leaves C$21,840 payable at home, because the home rate on this income is the higher of the two. The balance is real cash and it is due on the home timetable, which is why instalments get raised in the first meeting. That is an illustration of the mechanism, not a prediction about your file — the same computation on your figures is the first thing we do.

Example figures throughout, selected to make the rule visible, with rates and thresholds assumed for the demonstration. Your actual filing uses figures confirmed with the issuing authority for your tax year.

How the engagement runs

  1. 1We establish what happened and when, because every position here is anchored to a date
  2. 2A written scope and a fixed price, so you know the cost before committing
  3. 3The filings are prepared, cross-checked against each other, and reviewed by name
  4. 4You see the result, approve it, and we file it

What it costs

You get a number before you commit, not an estimate that drifts. The scope is written down, the fee is fixed against it, and if the scope changes we re-quote rather than invoice the difference. Comparable engagements and their fixed fees are set out on the pricing pages.

  • A named reviewer signs off every statutory filing.
  • Documents move through one secure portal, and you can meet us in person at any of our offices.
  • Your existing accountant keeps the domestic file; we take the cross-border piece, with the boundary in writing.

Your next step

Ask before the move rather than after it, because most of the useful options expire on the date. Send whatever you have — even an incomplete set. Most of the first hour of a why a Canadian should rarely own an LLC engagement is working out which documents actually matter, and that is quicker with a partial pack than with none.

Reviewed for the 2025 and 2026 filing seasons by Udit Gupta, Cross-Border Tax Expert, Legal Quotient Consultants. General guidance only. Your own facts decide the answer, so bring them to a call before relying on this.

International business tax law, in practice

If you came here for international business tax law, this is where it is dealt with. The subject is why a Canadian should rarely own an LLC, and the page covers who it reaches, what then has to be filed, and what we charge to do the work.

Canada generally treats a US limited liability company as a corporation while the US treats it as transparent.

From first contact to filed return

  1. Tell us the dates and we will tell you the position

    Arrival, departure, the years in between — the residence question turns on those before anything else.

  2. Fixed fee, defined scope, in writing

    Both agreed before work starts, so the engagement cannot grow into a larger bill.

  3. Prepared together, not passed between firms

    You are not the go-between for two sets of advisers working from two sets of assumptions.

  4. Reviewed, approved, filed

    A named practitioner checks it, you approve it, and then it goes.

What you are actually buying with why Canadian should not own LLC

Factor Legal Quotient Hourly billing model
Pricing A fixed fee, agreed in writing before work starts Hourly, billed as incurred
Experience 15+ years of cross-border work, 18,000+ clients Varies by file
Both sides of the border Prepared together by one team, so relief is claimed exactly once One country at a time, reconciled later
Who reviews it A named practitioner, published on the page Whoever the queue reaches
Where the work happens Our offices in India, the USA, Canada and the UAE Whichever single office you can travel to

Key terms behind this page, defined

Substantial presence test
The US day-count test for residence. It weights the current year most heavily and includes fractions of the two preceding years, so a pattern of visits can create residence without any single long stay.
Form 8858
The US information return for a foreign disregarded entity or foreign branch owned by a US person.
Economic substance
The requirement that an entity have real people, decisions and functions in its jurisdiction. It is built contemporaneously or not at all.
Evidence pack
The assembled documents supporting a residency, treaty or valuation position, built at the time rather than reconstructed under audit.
why Canadian should not own LLC: How we read this one

The alternatives — a US corporation, a partnership, a branch, or a different entity entirely — all resolve the mismatch in different ways with different withholding outcomes.

The engagement terms hold no matter what the analysis finds — fee and scope agreed in writing up front, a named reviewer on the output, your approval before the finished work is filed.

Why Canadian should not own LLC — what the published fees look like

The second thing that moves it is scale: one member with a single LLC is a contained review, while several members, a holding company sitting above the LLC, or a wind-up that is itself a taxable event on one side of the border all add work. Tell us which of those you are facing and the quote follows.

Transfer pricing documentation

$2,500fixed, before work starts

Covers: Intercompany pricing documented before it is questioned — the functional analysis, the benchmarking and the files that support it.

See this fee page

Payroll & mobility setup

$999fixed, before work starts

Covers: Registrations, withholding and the employer obligations that follow staff working across a border, set up once and correctly.

See this fee page

The difference a dedicated cross-border team makes

Cross-border is the whole practice

International and cross-border tax is all we do — not a sideline next to domestic work. The edge cases on this page are our ordinary Tuesday.

Late and missed years are ordinary work

An unfiled history is not a reason to wait longer. We assess what is still open and what relief the delay attracts before the first return goes in.

The fee is fixed before we start

Quoted from your documents and agreed in writing. The number you accept is the number you pay.

The quote comes from your documents

Nothing is priced from a phone call. We read what you have first, then the fee is set — so the scope and the number are agreed on the same evidence.

Two of the firm’s advisers at a desk in the Delhi office

How the engagement runs, phase by phase

Step 1

Initial call

We start with the chronology: dates, countries, and what has already been filed

Step 2

Scope and fee

You get the scope and the fee in writing before we touch anything

Step 3

Preparation and review

The work is prepared and reviewed by a named person, not a queue

Step 4

Filing and payment

Nothing is filed until you have read it

The team at work in the open-plan office

From first document to filed return

  • Step 1: Upload the file as it stands – A secure link arrives after the first call. Incomplete is fine; that is what the review is for.
  • Step 2: The number is settled up front – Priced from your own documents and confirmed in writing before any preparation begins.
  • Step 3: Both returns on one desk – One engagement covers every country the file touches, reconciled line against line.
  • Step 4: Your approval, then the filing – The return is yours to check first. We file once you say so.

Quoted up front, in writing.

Contact Us 24-hour helpline +1 (416) 619-0068

The rest of this practice

Each of these carries its own guide, pricing pointers and FAQ.

Core services for this situation

Working remotely from abroad — the tax implications Everything on tax implications working remotely abroad, at the same depth as this page.
Form NR303 — hybrid entity declaration Nr303 hybrid entity declaration — the guide, the FAQ and the fixed fee.
Indian GST registration for foreign suppliers The full guide to Indian GST registration for foreign suppliers, with the fee fixed before any work starts.
India ↔ Australia — DTAA Its own page: India ↔ Australia — DTAA — mechanism, deadlines and published fees.
Lower or nil TDS certificate under section 197 Everything on lower nil TDS certificate section 197, at the same depth as this page.
Form 1042-S — recipient statement Form 1042-s recipient statement — the guide, the FAQ and the fixed fee.
Cross-border M&A tax due diligence The full guide to m&a tax, with the fee fixed before any work starts.
Exit strategy for founders Its own page: exit strategy for founders — mechanism, deadlines and published fees.
Assignment letters & secondments Everything on assignment letters & secondments, at the same depth as this page.

Who we bring this work to

Crypto traders — relief you're probably missing Everything on crypto traders relief you're probably missing, at the same depth as this page.
Media & production companies cross-border tax Media & production companies cross border tax — the guide, the FAQ and the fixed fee.
Construction & contracting — what we charge The full guide to construction & contracting what we charge, with the fee fixed before any work starts.
Tax for railway & transit crew Its own page: railway & transit crew tax — mechanism, deadlines and published fees.
Cross-border truck drivers — relief you're probably missing Everything on cross-border truck drivers relief you're probably missing, at the same depth as this page.
Day traders — what you owe in each country Day traders what you owe in each country — the guide, the FAQ and the fixed fee.
Tax for diplomatic & consular staff The full guide to diplomatic & consular staff tax, with the fee fixed before any work starts.
IT contractors — what we charge Its own page: it contractors what we charge — mechanism, deadlines and published fees.
Touring musicians — what we charge Everything on touring musicians what we charge, at the same depth as this page.

The corridors we work every week

Zimbabwe tax for expats — country guide Everything on zimbabwe tax for expats, at the same depth as this page.
United Kingdom tax for expats — country guide United Kingdom tax for expats — the guide, the FAQ and the fixed fee.
Italy tax for expats — country guide The full guide to Italy tax for expats, with the fee fixed before any work starts.
Ecuador tax for expats — country guide Its own page: ecuador tax for expats — mechanism, deadlines and published fees.
Portugal tax for expats — country guide Everything on Portugal tax for expats, at the same depth as this page.
US–UAE tax corridor US UAE tax — the guide, the FAQ and the fixed fee.
Malta tax for expats — country guide The full guide to Malta tax for expats, with the fee fixed before any work starts.
Australia tax for expats — country guide Its own page: Australia tax for expats — mechanism, deadlines and published fees.
South Korea tax for expats — country guide Everything on South Korea tax for expats, at the same depth as this page.

The people on your file

Five named practitioners, each with the part of a cross-border file they carry. Every page on this site says who reviewed it, and the reviewer is one of these people rather than an unnamed team.

Udit Gupta

Udit Gupta

Cross-Border Tax Expert

CA (ICAI), In-Depth Tax Trained

Reviews and signs off the practice's cross-border positions, and carries final responsibility for the treaty analysis on every file that leaves the office.

Abhinav Gupta

Abhinav Gupta

Canada Tax / International Tax

Canada Tax, International Tax, Cross-Border Tax, Transfer Pricing

Canadian returns with foreign income, non-resident filings, and the transfer-pricing documentation that runs alongside intercompany work.

Raghav Gupta

Raghav Gupta

International Tax

International Tax, Transfer Pricing Specialist

Benchmarking, method selection and the local-file and master-file sets that support a group's pricing policy under examination.

Anmol Mittal

Anmol Mittal

Canada and US tax

CPA Canada, CPA USA, CA (ICAI)

Files that have to be right on both sides of the border at once — dual filings, streamlined catch-ups, and the foreign tax credit reconciliation between them.

Vinayak Indolia

Vinayak Indolia

CFO advisory

CPA, CA. Fractional CFO and Senior Advisory Specialist

Groups that need the tax position and the finance function to agree: structure reviews, intercompany policy, and the reporting a board can act on.

Meet the whole team

What these engagements turn on

Case study 1

Consultant who had formed an LLC before asking about Canada

A Canadian resident contracting with US clients had set up a limited liability company on the advice of a US attorney and filed on that basis for a couple of years before anyone looked at the Canadian side. The work was to establish how each country had treated the same profit, where the foreign tax credit had failed, and what the cost of leaving the structure in place would be against the cost of changing it. The engagement produced a written comparison of the routes out and a corrected filing position on the Canadian returns already submitted.

Case study 2

Unwinding an LLC that held one US rental property

A client had held a single rental property through a limited liability company for liability reasons and wanted to sell. The question was not the sale price but the order of events: whether to sell inside the company or distribute first, and what each country would treat as disposed of on each step. The work covered the disposition analysis on both sides and the withholding that would apply to a sale by a non-resident. The engagement produced a sequenced plan with the tax consequence of each step set out and the filings each one would require.

Case study 3

Entity choice tested before the US business was formed

A Canadian services firm was about to establish a US presence and had been told an LLC was the default. The work compared the realistic alternatives — a US corporation, a partnership, and operating as a branch of the existing Canadian company — against how each is recognised on both sides of the border, what withholding attaches to profit moving north, and how the structure would be unwound on a sale. The engagement produced a written recommendation with the reasoning preserved, and the intercompany agreements that the recommended route required from its first day of trading.

Case study 4

Stranded credit for US tax found during a Canadian review

A routine review of a client's Canadian returns showed substantial US tax paid on operating profit and almost no Canadian relief claimed for it. The cause was the classification mismatch rather than an error in the return. The work was to document the mismatch year by year, test whether any relief was in fact available on those facts, and quantify what the structure was costing each year it continued. The engagement produced a written analysis of the exposed years and a recommendation on whether to restructure or to accept the position and plan around it.

Case study 5

Partnership used in place of an LLC for joint Canadian owners

Two Canadian residents intending to operate together in the United States had assumed a limited liability company was the only sensible container. The work examined how each candidate structure would be characterised on each side of the border, and in particular which ones both countries would treat the same way, so that tax paid in one could be credited in the other. The engagement produced a recommendation, the ownership documents reflecting it, and a written note of the annual filings each owner would carry personally as a result of the choice.

Case study 6

Branch operation compared with a US corporation for a manufacturer

A Canadian manufacturer expanding into the United States wanted to know whether to incorporate there at all. The work set the branch route against a US corporation, looking at where profit would be taxed first, what withholding would apply to bringing it back, how losses in the early years would be treated, and what would happen on an eventual sale of the US business. The engagement produced a written structural recommendation, supported by the reasoning on each comparison, and a note of the transfer pricing documentation the chosen route would require.

Case study 7

Fifteen Per Cent Held Back From a Fee for Services in Canada

A payer must withhold from fees paid to a non-resident for services rendered in Canada, whether or not any tax is ultimately owed. A waiver applied for before the work is invoiced avoids the withholding; after it, the money comes back through a return.

Read how this one runs
Case study 8

An IRS Notice for a Year the Client Believed Was Settled

Most notices are proposals rather than assessments, and they carry a response window that is shorter than it looks. The engagement reads what is actually being proposed, gathers the support, and replies inside the window with the position rather than a request for time.

Read how this one runs

All case studies — every published engagement in one place.

Core International & Cross-Border Tax Services

International Tax Planning & Advisory

Strategy and compliance for income, assets and families spread across borders.

One coordinating team: filings on every side of the border are sequenced so treaty relief and foreign tax credits are claimed once — and in the right country.

U.S. & Cross-Border Tax Returns

Dual filers: U.S. citizens in Canada and Canadians with U.S. income run two parallel systems — we prepare both, in the right order, every year.

Expat & Emigration Tax

The move year is its own project: the elections and valuations filed that year decide the next decade of both countries’ returns.

Non-Resident Canadian Tax

Default withholding is 25% of gross: elective returns routinely turn over-withheld rent and pensions into refunds.

Transfer Pricing & BEPS

Documentation prepared with the return is the cheapest insurance in international tax; reconstructing it during an audit is the most expensive.

Cross-Border Estates & Trusts

Wills drafted for one country routinely misfire in the other — deemed disposition here, estate tax there, credits in between.

Cross-Border Corporate Tax

Expansion raises the same four questions every time — entity, PE, repatriation, payroll. We answer them before the tax authorities do.

India Tax for NRIs & Returning Residents

The deduction is taken on the sale price, not the gain — which is why an NRI property sale strands cash unless the certificate is applied for before closing.

Canadian Tax with a Foreign Element

Residency is decided on facts, not on a form — and the year you arrive or leave is the one where the largest amounts turn on the smallest details.

UAE Tax for Expats & Their Home Country

A zero-tax country is only half the answer — the question that decides the bill is whether the country you came from still treats you as resident.

Industries & Client Types We Serve Worldwide

Global E-commerce & Marketplaces
Technology & SaaS
Professional Services Firms
Cross-Border Real Estate
Importers, Exporters & Manufacturers
Athletes, Artists & Entertainers
Remote Workers & Digital Nomads
Investment Funds & Holding Companies

Global E-commerce & Marketplaces

  • Foreign VAT / GST / sales tax registrations
  • Marketplace withholding reviews
  • Inventory nexus & PE analysis
  • Multi-currency books reconciled
Explore E-commerce & Marketplaces

Technology & SaaS

Software revenue crosses borders by default — sourcing rules, withholding on licence-like payments and IP location decide the effective rate.

Software revenue is rarely taxed where the team sits. Licence, subscription and service income are characterised differently by each side, and the answer decides withholding at source, treaty relief and whether a foreign customer creates a taxable presence at all — questions that are cheap to settle before the contract and expensive afterwards.

  • Cross-border revenue sourcing & withholding
  • IP structuring with real substance
  • Equity for cross-border teams
  • U.S. expansion: entity & PE setup
Explore Technology & SaaS

Importers, Exporters & Manufacturers

  • Transfer pricing documentation (s.247)
  • Customs value vs transfer price
  • Foreign affiliate reporting (T1134)
  • Country-by-country reporting
Explore Trade & Manufacturing

Athletes, Artists & Entertainers

  • Reg 105 & U.S. CWA agreements
  • Multi-state & country calendars
  • Touring income allocation
  • Royalty & image-rights withholding
Explore Athletes & Entertainers

Remote Workers & Digital Nomads

  • Residency analysis before moving
  • Employer payroll exposure
  • Totalization & social security
  • Foreign tax credits
Explore Remote Workers

Investment Funds & Holding Companies

  • Treaty access & PPT reviews
  • FAPI & surplus computations
  • Withholding-efficient routing
  • Governance & substance
Explore Funds & Holdcos

Why a Canadian should rarely own an LLC — questions we are asked

Why a Canadian should rarely own an LLC — what part of this actually needs a professional?

Some of it, yes — and we will say so on the call if that is the honest answer. The parts that are worth paying for are the ones where a missed election, a missed deadline or an unverified threshold costs more than the fee: the alternatives — a US corporation, a partnership, a branch, or a different entity entirely — all resolve the mismatch in different ways with different withholding outcomes.

What if I have already filed and got it wrong?

That is a common starting point. We re-derive the position, identify whether an amendment or a disclosure route is the right vehicle, and tell you which one preserves the relief that is still available. The order matters more than the speed.

How long will it take?

It depends on the documents rather than on us. Once the pack is complete most filings turn around inside a fortnight; anything that needs a certificate from a tax authority runs on that authority's timetable, which we tell you at the start rather than at the end.

Why is a US LLC a problem for a Canadian resident owner?

Because the two countries disagree about what it is. Canada generally treats a US limited liability company as a corporation, while the United States treats it as transparent and taxes the member on the profit directly. So the US tax is charged to you personally on income Canada says belongs to a company that has distributed nothing. The relief that is supposed to prevent double taxation depends on both systems agreeing on who earned what and when, and here they do not. The result is US tax paid with no Canadian tax of your own for it to be credited against.

Can I claim a foreign tax credit for the US tax on my LLC income?

Not reliably, and that is the whole difficulty. A credit works by setting tax paid in one country against tax on the same income, in the same hands, in the same year. Where the United States taxes you on profit as it arises and Canada taxes a corporation, or taxes you only later on a distribution, the two charges attach to different persons in different periods and the credit has nothing to sit against. Some narrow relief exists in particular circumstances, but it is much narrower than owners assume and has to be tested against your facts rather than taken for granted.

I already own an LLC — can I just dissolve it?

You can, but not casually. Unwinding an LLC is itself a taxable event in at least one of the two countries, and the order of steps and the year they fall in decide how expensive it is. A distribution out may be seen as a corporate distribution on the Canadian side while the US side sees nothing happening at all, and that asymmetry is easier to manage before the entity is closed than afterwards. Establish what the LLC holds, what each country will treat as disposed of, and in which year, and then dissolve on a chosen date.

Is a US corporation better than an LLC for a Canadian owner?

It removes the classification disagreement, which is the central defect, because both countries recognise a corporation as a corporation. What it introduces instead is a withholding and repatriation question every time profit comes north. That may be a much better trade, or it may not. A partnership, a branch of the Canadian company, or a different entity again each resolve the mismatch in their own way and with their own withholding outcomes, and which one wins depends on what the US activity is, who else owns part of it, and how you expect to exit. The comparison is worth doing properly before formation.

Does it change anything if the LLC only holds a rental property?

The classification disagreement does not depend on what the company does, so the basic mismatch is unchanged. Holding real property does add a second layer to plan around: the eventual disposition, and the withholding that attends a sale by a non-resident, which is applied without regard to how modest the gain turns out to be. That makes the exit, rather than the annual rental profit, the part most worth structuring in advance. Owners who set up an LLC for one property usually did so on liability advice alone, without anyone asking how the Canadian return would treat it.

Should I take advice before or after forming the LLC?

Before, and the gap between the two is larger than it looks. Forming an LLC takes an afternoon and almost no money. Unwinding one is a taxable event in at least one country, takes months, and is done under whatever facts have accumulated in the meantime. The analysis that matters — corporation, partnership, branch or something else, and what each does to withholding and to the credit for foreign tax — is the same analysis either way. Done first it is a choice; done afterwards it is a repair, and you pay for the repair as well as the choice.

What is a PFIC, and why do Canadian mutual funds cause trouble for US persons?

A passive foreign investment company is a non-US company that is mostly passive by income or by assets — which describes almost every Canadian mutual fund and ETF. For a US owner the default regime taxes distributions and gains punitively with an interest charge for the years the value built up. Two elections fix it, and both need annual information the fund may not produce for you. Holding the same exposure through US-domiciled funds usually avoids the problem entirely. See PFICs and Canadian mutual funds.

Are foreign trusts taxable in Canada?

They can be. Canada's deemed-resident-trust rules can pull a non-resident trust into the Canadian tax system where there is a resident contributor or, in some cases, a resident beneficiary — taxing it as though it were resident here. Separate reporting applies to transfers or loans to a non-resident trust and to distributions and debts from one. The planning point is that contributing to an offshore trust from Canada rarely achieves what the brochure suggests. See non-resident trusts.

24-hour helpline: +1 (416) 619-0068

A fixed fee for why a Canadian should rarely own an LLC

One short call, one fixed quote in writing, and your approval before anything is filed.

  • Re-quoted, never silently invoiced
  • Offices in India, the USA, Canada and the UAE
  • 18,000+ clients served

Our practitioners are alumni of leading accounting and tax institutions

Where our partners studied — CPA Canada (In-Depth Tax Program), AICPA, the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India and the Malaysian Institute of Accountants.

Request a Quote +1 (416) 619-0068