Who files Form T2062?

  • 15+Years of cross-border experience
  • 18,000+Clients served
  • 5.0Google rating
  • 4Global offices — India, USA, Canada & UAE
  • 24-hour helpline: +1 (416) 619-0068
  • Offices in India, the USA, Canada and the UAE
  • Google rating 5.0 out of 5
Answer

Non-residents selling Canadian real estate, private company shares and other taxable Canadian property, and their purchasers. The obligation is decided by facts rather than by tax owing, which is why a nil position does not remove it.

The rule on who files

Non-residents selling Canadian real estate, private company shares and other taxable Canadian property, and their purchasers.

Two of the firm’s advisers at the glass desk in the Delhi office

The case that is treated differently

Until the certificate issues, the purchaser holds back a share of the price and is personally liable if they release it early. Notification runs on a short clock from closing, and the lawyer's holdback stays put until the CRA responds.

Who files Form T2062?
ItemAmount
Gross amount receivedC$39,000
Withheld at source (assumed 17% of gross)C$6,630
Deductible costsC$24,180
Net amount actually earnedC$14,820
Tax on the net amount (assumed graduated result)C$3,705
Difference recoverable by filingC$2,925

Filing on a net basis recovers C$2,925 of the C$6,630 withheld. That difference is the entire reason the elective return exists, and it is lost by not filing.

The figures here are an illustration, not an engagement: amounts are picked so the mechanism is easy to follow, and every rate or threshold is an assumption of the example. Before anything is filed for you, each one is confirmed with the issuing authority for your own tax year.

How to get this moving

The full treatment — who it binds, the deadline, the penalty and the fixed fee — is on T2062 — section 116 clearance certificate. We would rather scope it properly than quote it quickly.

Reviewed for accuracy for the 2025 and 2026 filing seasons by Udit Gupta, Cross-Border Tax Expert, Legal Quotient Consultants. Published as general information. For a position on your own file, call the 24-hour helpline.

Who has to file US tax return, in practice

The search that brings most people to this page is who has to file US tax return. It is answered here for Form T2062: what creates the obligation, which filings discharge it, and the fee agreed before the work starts.

Cross-border situations we are engaged for

Case study 1

Establishing the seller's filing obligation on a jointly owned condominium

A couple sold a Toronto condominium; one had remained resident in Canada and the other had not. The lawyer had been instructed to hold back on the whole price. We established the beneficial ownership split from the original purchase documents and the funding of the deposit, and confirmed which interest the clearance process actually reached. The engagement produced a documented ownership split, an application covering the non-resident interest only, and written instructions the conveyancer could act on to size the holdback against the right amount.

Read how this one runs
Case study 2

A private company share sale that fell inside the clearance regime

A non-resident shareholder sold their holding in a Canadian operating company and had not expected a clearance application at all, having assumed the regime applied only to land. It does not. We examined what the company held and how the shares had been acquired and paid for, then built the cost history from the original subscription and the later transactions. The engagement produced a documented cost base, an application reflecting a share disposition rather than a property one, and a purchaser who knew what to retain and why.

Read how this one runs
Case study 3

Unpicking a closing where the purchaser had released the whole price

A purchaser's lawyer released the full proceeds on the strength of an assurance that an application was in hand. It was not. The exposure sat with the purchaser, who was personally liable for the amount that should have been retained, and the seller had already moved the funds abroad. We acted for the seller and worked towards a figure both sides could rely on. The engagement produced a filed application, a computed tax position on the disposition, and an agreed undertaking that returned the required amount without either party going to court.

Read how this one runs
Case study 4

A former home sold years after the owner left Canada

A seller who had emigrated some time earlier believed their years of occupation removed the need to apply. Occupation history affects the computation, not the obligation. We separated the two questions: who has to apply, which follows residence at the date of disposition, and how much tax arises, which is where the occupation history earns its keep. The engagement produced a dated history of acquisition, occupation, departure and later use, an application supported by that history, and a computed gain the seller could see the workings of.

Read how this one runs
Case study 5

Coordinating the application with a lawyer holding funds in trust

A sale closed while the clearance application was still with the CRA, and the purchaser's lawyer held the retained amount in trust with no instruction on when it could move. The seller wanted the money; the lawyer would not release it. We put the sequence in writing for both sides: the holdback stays where it is until the CRA responds, because early release is the purchaser's personal exposure. The engagement produced an agreed written protocol between the parties, a documented application file, and a release that happened on the certificate rather than on pressure.

Read how this one runs
Case study 6

Advising a purchaser on the holdback before a non-resident sale closed

A buyer had been told the retention was a formality that could be waived by agreement between the parties. It cannot, because liability for releasing early is the purchaser's own. We were engaged by the purchaser rather than the seller and set out what the regime asked of them: what to retain, on what amount, and what evidence would justify releasing it. The engagement produced a written position for the purchaser's file, a clause the lawyer built into the closing instructions, and a completion that did not leave the buyer carrying someone else's tax.

Read how this one runs
Case study 7

An Executor Administering Across Two Systems

An executor can be personally liable for what is assessed after a distribution, and the clearance that protects them is obtained rather than assumed. The engagement sequences the filings so the distribution is safe when it happens.

Read how this one runs
Case study 8

A Canadian Property Sale Held Up for a Clearance Certificate

When a non-resident sells Canadian real estate the purchaser must hold back a portion of the price until the seller produces a certificate. The file applies for it on the correct basis and works to the closing date, because the holdback is released against the certificate, not against the sale.

Read how this one runs

All case studies — every published engagement in one place.

Core International & Cross-Border Tax Services

International Tax Planning & Advisory

Strategy and compliance for income, assets and families spread across borders.

One coordinating team: filings on every side of the border are sequenced so treaty relief and foreign tax credits are claimed once — and in the right country.

U.S. & Cross-Border Tax Returns

Dual filers: U.S. citizens in Canada and Canadians with U.S. income run two parallel systems — we prepare both, in the right order, every year.

Expat & Emigration Tax

The move year is its own project: the elections and valuations filed that year decide the next decade of both countries’ returns.

Non-Resident Canadian Tax

Default withholding is 25% of gross: elective returns routinely turn over-withheld rent and pensions into refunds.

Transfer Pricing & BEPS

Documentation prepared with the return is the cheapest insurance in international tax; reconstructing it during an audit is the most expensive.

Cross-Border Estates & Trusts

Wills drafted for one country routinely misfire in the other — deemed disposition here, estate tax there, credits in between.

Cross-Border Corporate Tax

Expansion raises the same four questions every time — entity, PE, repatriation, payroll. We answer them before the tax authorities do.

India Tax for NRIs & Returning Residents

The deduction is taken on the sale price, not the gain — which is why an NRI property sale strands cash unless the certificate is applied for before closing.

Canadian Tax with a Foreign Element

Residency is decided on facts, not on a form — and the year you arrive or leave is the one where the largest amounts turn on the smallest details.

UAE Tax for Expats & Their Home Country

A zero-tax country is only half the answer — the question that decides the bill is whether the country you came from still treats you as resident.

Industries & Client Types We Serve Worldwide

Global E-commerce & Marketplaces
Technology & SaaS
Professional Services Firms
Cross-Border Real Estate
Importers, Exporters & Manufacturers
Athletes, Artists & Entertainers
Remote Workers & Digital Nomads
Investment Funds & Holding Companies

Global E-commerce & Marketplaces

  • Foreign VAT / GST / sales tax registrations
  • Marketplace withholding reviews
  • Inventory nexus & PE analysis
  • Multi-currency books reconciled
Explore E-commerce & Marketplaces

Technology & SaaS

  • Cross-border revenue sourcing & withholding
  • IP structuring with real substance
  • Equity for cross-border teams
  • U.S. expansion: entity & PE setup
Explore Technology & SaaS

Importers, Exporters & Manufacturers

  • Transfer pricing documentation (s.247)
  • Customs value vs transfer price
  • Foreign affiliate reporting (T1134)
  • Country-by-country reporting
Explore Trade & Manufacturing

Athletes, Artists & Entertainers

  • Reg 105 & U.S. CWA agreements
  • Multi-state & country calendars
  • Touring income allocation
  • Royalty & image-rights withholding
Explore Athletes & Entertainers

Remote Workers & Digital Nomads

  • Residency analysis before moving
  • Employer payroll exposure
  • Totalization & social security
  • Foreign tax credits
Explore Remote Workers

Investment Funds & Holding Companies

Holding structures live or die on treaty access, beneficial ownership and substance — the MLI's principal-purpose test now sits over every arrangement.

A holding structure is only as good as its reporting. Foreign affiliates, accrued passive income and distributions each carry their own return, and the penalties on those attach to the form rather than to any tax being owed — so a structure that saves tax can still cost money if the information returns are late.

  • Treaty access & PPT reviews
  • FAPI & surplus computations
  • Withholding-efficient routing
  • Governance & substance
Explore Funds & Holdcos

Also asked about Form T2062

Do I file T2062 or does the buyer of my Canadian property?

The application is the seller's. You are the non-resident disposing of taxable Canadian property, so the clearance certificate is sought in respect of your disposition and the information in it is yours. The purchaser's role is different, and it is not passive. Until the certificate issues, the purchaser holds back a share of the price and is personally liable if it is released early. So the buyer has a direct interest in your application being made and answered, which is why their lawyer will keep asking about it. One party files. Both are exposed to the delay.

I sold shares in a private Canadian company, not real estate, same form?

The regime is about taxable Canadian property, and that is wider than land. Private company shares can fall within it, as can certain other interests, so a share sale by a non-resident can require the same clearance process as the sale of a condominium. What differs is the evidence. A property sale rests on the purchase and sale agreement and on the cost base of the land; a share sale rests on what the company owns and on how the shares were acquired and paid for. Establish which category the property falls into before assuming either answer.

Does my lawyer handle the clearance certificate as part of the closing?

Conveyancing lawyers administer the holdback. They do not usually prepare the tax application, and the two jobs run on different clocks. The lawyer's instructions will typically be to retain the required share of the price until a certificate is produced, and to keep retaining it until then, because releasing it early is a personal exposure for the purchaser. The application itself needs the cost history of the property, the terms of the disposition and the seller's residence position. Agree in writing who is doing which part before closing, rather than in the week after it.

What if the purchaser has already released the full sale price to me?

That is the purchaser's problem first, and it will quickly become a conversation you are part of. The holdback exists because the purchaser is personally liable for the amount that should have been retained, so a buyer who released everything has taken on an exposure they can be pursued for. Sellers in this position are often asked to return funds or to give undertakings. The way out for both sides is the same: get the application in, establish what the tax on the disposition actually is, and settle the shortfall against an answer rather than an argument.

I am a non-resident selling a home I once lived in, does that change who files?

It does not change the filing obligation, which follows your residence status at the time of the disposition and the nature of the property, not your history with it. What your earlier occupation can change is the amount of tax on the gain, and that is a question of computation rather than of who applies. Bring the dates: when the property was acquired, when it was occupied, when you ceased to be resident in Canada, and how it was used after that. Those dates do most of the work in the calculation, and they belong in the application rather than in a later explanation.

Do both owners have to apply if we own the property jointly?

Each non-resident owner has their own disposition of their own interest, so the position is established owner by owner. A jointly held property sold by two non-residents means two applications, and the split follows the beneficial ownership rather than the names on the cheque. Where one owner is resident in Canada and the other is not, only the non-resident's interest goes through the clearance process, but the purchaser's holdback is then calculated on that interest and the lawyer needs the split in writing. Settle who owned what, and in what proportions, before the application is drafted.

What does "received a distribution from a foreign trust" mean on my return?

It is asking whether the trust conferred anything on you during the year — cash, property, or the use of trust property, including rent-free occupation of a house and, in some circumstances, a loan. Answering yes brings an information return, and where the distribution includes income accumulated in earlier years the tax computation can carry an interest charge for the delay. Trust accounts showing the composition of the distribution are what keep that computation from defaulting against you. See Form 3520.

What happens when a non-resident sells Canadian property?

The buyer or their solicitor is obliged to withhold on the purchase price unless you obtain a clearance certificate, so the practical work happens before closing rather than after. The certificate application reports the disposition and the gain and fixes the amount the authority requires to be held. Apply late and the withholding is computed on the gross price, tying up cash until a return recovers it. See the section 116 clearance certificate.

Our practitioners are alumni of leading accounting and tax institutions

Where our partners studied — CPA Canada (In-Depth Tax Program), AICPA, the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India and the Malaysian Institute of Accountants.

Request a Quote +1 (416) 619-0068