It is a compilation, held against your Indian tax identifier, of what third parties have reported about you: banks, registrars, brokers, companies and similar reporting entities. You are not its author. Each line is somebody else's description of a transaction, and both the usefulness and the danger of the compilation follow from that. It shows you what the tax administration has been told, and a return that contradicts it without explanation invites an enquiry. Read it before filing rather than after, and treat each line as a question to be answered, what was this, is the description right, and does my return account for it, rather than a figure to be copied.
Annual information statement — meaning in cross-border tax
A working meaning for Annual information statement, written for the return rather than for the textbook.
- 15+Years of the founder's cross-border experience
- 18,000+Clients served across our offices in India, the USA, Canada and the UAE
- 5.0Google rating
- 4Global offices — India, USA, Canada & UAE
India's compiled record of what banks, registrars and brokers reported about a taxpayer. A return that contradicts it draws an enquiry.
Where the money is
Indian terms carry two systems at once: the tax act and the exchange-control regime, which define residence differently and govern different things. Satisfying one is not satisfying the other, and a bank will hold a transfer until both are.

What one system calls it and the other does not
One system may treat the entity as transparent and the other as opaque, and everything downstream follows from that single classification: who is taxed, when, and whether relief for the other country's tax is available at all.
Where you will actually see it
The quickest way to understand Annual information statement is to see it in place. These are the pages where it decides something.
What to do with it
Knowing the term is the first half. Knowing whether it applies to your year, and what evidence proves it, is the half that changes the outcome. Send us the facts and we will tell you what has to be filed and what it costs.
We keep these entries short and mechanism-level on purpose: enough to recognise the issue in your own paperwork, and not so much that the page reads as advice about a situation we have not seen.
Reviewed for accuracy for the 2025 and 2026 filing seasons by Udit Gupta, International Tax, Cross-Border Tax & Transfer Pricing Expert, Legal Quotient Consultants. Published as general information. For a position on your own file, call the 24-hour helpline.
Where international tax accountant comes into this file
People reach this page searching for international tax accountant. It is covered here as it applies to annual information statement — who it applies to, what has to be filed, and what it costs, at a fixed fee agreed before the work starts.
Cross-border situations we are engaged for
A property transfer reported at consideration rather than gain
A non-resident's statement showed the full consideration for a flat sold in India, while the return reported a much smaller gain. We assembled the purchase deed, the improvement invoices and the transfer costs, computed the gain and prepared a reconciliation from the reported figure to the filed one. The engagement produced a documented computation the client can produce on request, with each deduction from the reported consideration supported by its own document, and a note of what the position would be if any document were later unavailable.
Duplicate interest reported by two branches of one bank
The same fixed deposit interest appeared twice, reported by the branch holding the deposit and by the branch where the account had been opened. Filing on the compilation would have doubled the income. We obtained the bank's own statement for the account, marked the duplicate through the feedback route, and filed on the single amount with the evidence attached. The engagement produced a corrected position on record before the return was processed, and an acknowledgement of the feedback kept with the year's papers.
A fund switch described as a redemption
A switch between schemes of one fund house had been reported as a sale, so the statement showed proceeds the client did not regard as a disposal at all. The characterisation, not the arithmetic, was the question. We examined the transaction documents, set out the treatment being adopted and why, and filed with a contemporaneous note of the analysis. What the engagement produced was a documented characterisation, the fund's own statements filed alongside it, and a position the client can defend if the point is taken later.
Answering an enquiry that compared the statement with the return
An enquiry letter set a filed return against the compilation and asked about a dividend the return did not show. The amount was small and the omission genuine. We established the holding and the period, computed the correction, and replied with a revised position and an explanation of how the item had been missed. The engagement produced a corrected return, a written reconciliation of every other line in the compilation to the return as filed, and a pre-filing checklist that starts from the compilation.
Transactions still reported against a deceased holder
Bank and registrar reporting continued against a late parent's identifier after administration of the estate had begun, so the statement described transactions the executors were dealing with rather than the deceased. We separated the periods, established which receipts belonged to the estate, and documented the treatment for each. The engagement produced a reconciliation of the compilation to the estate's own records, and a note to the institutions on the identifier to report against going forward.
Joint account interest reported entirely against the first holder
Interest on an account held with a spouse was reported in one name only, while the couple had been splitting the income between their returns. The compilation therefore contradicted both returns. We established the beneficial entitlement from the account records and the source of the funds, filed consistently with it, and documented why the reported allocation differs from the filed one. The engagement produced a written basis for the split and a request to the bank to report the correct proportions in future periods.
An Adjustment in One Country and No Relief in the Other
A pricing adjustment taxes the same profit twice unless the other country makes a corresponding one. The mutual agreement route is what produces that relief, and it is opened on a timetable set by the treaty rather than by either revenue authority.
Read how this one runsA Pension Taxed Where the Treaty Did Not Intend
Pension and annuity articles allocate taxing rights differently from employment income, and a flat withholding often exceeds what a return would produce. The alternative filing is elective and has a deadline.
Read how this one runsAll case studies — every published engagement in one place.
Core International & Cross-Border Tax Services
Strategy and compliance for income, assets and families spread across borders.
Industries & Client Types We Serve Worldwide
- Foreign VAT / GST / sales tax registrations
- Marketplace withholding reviews
- Inventory nexus & PE analysis
- Multi-currency books reconciled
- Cross-border revenue sourcing & withholding
- IP structuring with real substance
- Equity for cross-border teams
- U.S. expansion: entity & PE setup
- Reg 105 / 102 waivers
- Permanent establishment risk
- Partner mobility planning
- Cross-border withholding recovery
- Section 216 rental returns
- FIRPTA withholding recovery
- Section 116 clearance
- Treaty credit optimization
Related-party purchasing, customs value versus transfer price, and foreign-affiliate structures put trading businesses inside the s.247 documentation rules.
Goods crossing a border move the tax question from income to indirect: registration thresholds, place of supply, the customs value and the transfer price between related entities all have to agree with each other. When they do not, the adjustment arrives from two authorities at once and each one uses the other's number.
- Transfer pricing documentation (s.247)
- Customs value vs transfer price
- Foreign affiliate reporting (T1134)
- Country-by-country reporting
- Reg 105 & U.S. CWA agreements
- Multi-state & country calendars
- Touring income allocation
- Royalty & image-rights withholding
- Residency analysis before moving
- Employer payroll exposure
- Totalization & social security
- Foreign tax credits
- Treaty access & PPT reviews
- FAPI & surplus computations
- Withholding-efficient routing
- Governance & substance
More on Annual information statement
Through the feedback route on the statement itself, which records your response against the reported line, and then through the entity that reported it. The compilation is not the source of the information and cannot be edited as though it were: the correction has to come from the reporting entity's own filing. So do both. Mark the line as incorrect so your position is on record before the return is filed, and ask the bank, registrar or broker to correct what it reported. Keep the acknowledgement of the feedback with the return papers. It is the evidence that the discrepancy was addressed rather than ignored.
It can. Alongside what Indian institutions report, the compilation carries information India receives from other countries under exchange arrangements, which is why an overseas account a client had not mentioned sometimes appears in it. Two consequences follow for anyone with a cross-border file. What you did not report at home may already be known here, which changes the calculation about voluntary correction considerably. And the foreign information is often described in the other country's terms and converted, so the amount shown may not match the figure in your own records even where the underlying facts are identical.
Because what gets reported is usually the transaction, not the income. A registrar reports the consideration for a property transfer and a broker reports the proceeds of a sale; neither knows your cost, your improvements or your expenses of sale. So a modest gain can sit behind a large reported number, and the difference is not an error to be corrected but a computation to be evidenced. Keep the purchase documents, the improvement invoices and the transfer costs with the return. The reported figure is where an enquiry starts, and the cost documents are what turn it into the figure you actually filed.
No. The compilation records what was reported about you, not what is taxable, and lines in it are frequently not income at all: a transfer between your own accounts, a maturity of capital, a gift, or somebody else's transaction reported against your identifier. What you cannot do is leave a difference unexplained. The discipline is to reconcile, so that for every line either it is reflected in the return or there is a documented reason it is not. That reconciliation, kept with the return, is the difference between answering an enquiry in one letter and answering it in five.
Duplicate reporting is common and has ordinary causes: two branches of one bank reporting the same account, an entity reporting a period twice, or one holding reported by both a broker and a registrar. It does not double your income, but a return filed on the compilation's totals will overstate it, and a return filed on the correct figure will appear to understate it. So identify the duplicate, mark it through the feedback route, and keep the bank's own statement showing the single credit. File on the true figure and hold the explanation for the difference, rather than filing on a total you know is wrong.
Cross-border tax is what applies when income, assets or people touch more than one tax system at once — someone living in one country and earning in another, a company selling or hiring abroad, a family holding property in a second country. The work is rarely one country's rules applied harder; it is reconciling two sets of rules and claiming the relief that stops the same income being taxed twice at full rates. See what we do.
Both countries have routes back, and using one before they contact you is what preserves the relief. On the US side there are procedures aimed at taxpayers whose failure was not wilful, including one designed for people living outside the country, and separate procedures for late account reports and information returns alone. Canada has its voluntary disclosures programme and taxpayer relief for penalties and interest. Filing quietly and hoping is the one approach with no protection attached to it. See catch-up filing.



