Case study 1
One country over the test while three sat under it
A seller shipping direct to consumers in several countries had been watching total turnover and concluded it was comfortable. Split by destination, one country's own test had been met and the others were not close. The work was to rebuild the sales data by where the consumer was, apply each country's rule separately, and produce a running view rather than an annual one. The engagement produced a registration in the country that needed it, a monitoring schedule for the rest, and a note of the evidence relied on for each classification.
Case study 2
A single registration mistaken for regional coverage
A business had registered in one country when its sales there grew, and assumed the registration covered neighbouring markets. It did not; each country tests on its own rules, and registering in one does nothing for the next. The work was to identify every country with consumer sales, establish for each whether its test had been crossed and when, and put the results in the order they needed dealing with. The engagement produced a country-by-country position, two further registrations, and a plan for the period between crossing and registering in each.
Case study 3
Separating marketplace sales from a seller's own channel
A seller trading through both a marketplace and its own storefront could not tell which sales it was answerable for. The marketplace's reports and the seller's ledger overlapped and used different country labels. The work was to reconcile the two, establish for each destination who was treated as making the supply, and then run each country's test on the sales that remained the seller's own. The engagement produced a reconciled sales dataset, a written summary of what the marketplace accounts for, and a test result for each country.
Case study 4
Reporting the period between crossing a test and registering
A seller came to us having already registered, with an unresolved gap between the date its sales met the destination country's test and the date the registration took effect. The work was to fix both dates from the records, measure the sales in between by destination, and follow the procedure that country provides for a late start. The engagement produced a filed set of returns covering the gap, the working behind them, and a short written history of how the delay arose, in case the point is raised later.
Case study 5
Mapping obligations before a consumer channel opens
A manufacturer that had only ever sold to distributors was preparing to sell direct to consumers abroad. The work was done before the first order: identify the intended destination countries, establish each one's own test and what registration there involves, and decide which markets to open first on that basis. Fees were agreed in writing before the review started. The engagement produced a country list with the test and the registration steps for each, and the data fields the sales system had to capture from the outset.
Case study 6
Sizing an unregistered exposure during a purchase
A buyer looking at a business with consumer sales across several borders needed to know what had not been registered. The seller's records were organised by product, not by destination. The work was to re-cut the history by where the consumer was, identify the countries whose tests had been crossed and when, and describe what each of those countries provides for a seller registering late. The engagement produced a schedule of open exposures by country with the dates they arose, written so it could be put in front of the other side.
Case study 7
Three Countries in One File and Two Treaties That Disagree
Income sourced in one country, paid to a resident of a second, held through an entity in a third: three bilateral treaties, no three-way rule. The analysis works out which pair governs each flow, and whether the middle entity is entitled to anything at all.
Read how this one runs
Case study 8
An Indian Company Paying a Foreign Supplier
Payments abroad carry deduction at source and a certification filed before the money moves. Whether the treaty reduces the rate depends on what is being bought, and the classification is the decision the whole filing rests on.
Read how this one runs