Reasonably priced Appeal to CIT(A) — Form 35

India's first appeal is where the grounds are fixed. Reasonably priced Appeal to CIT with a fixed fee agreed in writing before any work starts. Call the 24-hour helpline on +1 (416) 619-0068, or request a written quote today.

  • 15+Years of cross-border experience
  • 18,000+Clients served
  • 5.0Google rating
  • 4Global offices — India, USA, Canada & UAE

Secure a fixed quote

Whatever documents you hold are enough to begin: we read them and put a fixed price in writing first.

24-hour helpline: +1 (416) 619-0068
  • Offices in India, the USA, Canada and the UAE
  • Fixed fee agreed before work starts
  • 18,000+ clients served
The short answer

India's first appeal is where the grounds are fixed. The appeal runs on a deadline from the order, with a fee and a statement of facts and grounds.

Who has to deal with this

  • Substance was never documented for an entity that relies on it
  • You want a second opinion before acting on the first
  • The structure was built one decision at a time and never reviewed
  • A transaction or exit is planned in the next two years
  • Anti-abuse tests have never been applied to your treaty positions

If more than one of those is true, this is your page. If none of them is, tell us on a call and we will point you at the right one — that happens often enough that we would rather you asked.

Two of the firm’s advisers at the glass desk in the Delhi office

What appeal to cit(a) form 35 costs here

The fee for an appeal to CIT(A) turns on how many assessment years are under challenge and how much of the record already exists: the residency evidence, the withholding trail, the treaty position relied on. Drafting the statement of facts and grounds from papers you hold is different work from assembling those papers first.

CRA voluntary disclosure package — fixed-fee price

From $349

fixed, quoted before work starts

The disclosure application with the corrected filings, a documented chronology of how the failure arose, and representation through to the CRA's decision.
See the full fee page

Catch-up & voluntary disclosure

From $349

fixed, quoted before work starts

Bringing an unfiled history current: which years are still open, which programme applies, and what the exposure is before you commit.
See the fee schedule

Foreign asset & information reporting

From $349

fixed, quoted before work starts

Foreign holdings mapped once — accounts, real property, shareholdings — then reported to each authority in the form it requires.
See the fee schedule

Individual tax filing

From $349

fixed, quoted before work starts

One engagement for a personal return that touches more than one country: the income, the assets held abroad and the relief claimed against them.
See the fee schedule

Corporate cross-border filing

From $999

fixed, quoted before work starts

Company filings where income, ownership or operations cross a border, with the related-party disclosures that come with them.
See the fee schedule

Non-resident & departure filings

From $349

fixed, quoted before work starts

For anyone taxed by a country they do not live in — rent, pensions and investment income reaching across a border after the move.
See the fee schedule

Payroll & mobility setup

From $999

fixed, quoted before work starts

Payroll set up for a workforce split across countries, including the relief that stops the same salary being withheld on twice.
See the fee schedule

Transfer pricing documentation

From $2,500

fixed, quoted before work starts

Documentation for transactions between related companies: the method, the comparables and the file an authority asks to see.
See the fee schedule

All published fees on one page — the whole fee schedule in one place, with no from-to bands to decode.

The mechanism, in plain terms

India's first appeal is where the grounds are fixed. Adding an argument later is possible but harder, so the framing at filing shapes everything that follows.

The appeal runs on a deadline from the order, with a fee and a statement of facts and grounds. For non-residents the treaty position, the residency evidence and the withholding trail belong in the record from the outset.

Two things follow from that. The first is that the outcome is decided by facts you can arrange and evidence you can keep, rather than by how the return is completed at the end of the year. The second is that sequence matters: the same steps taken in a different order can produce a materially different result, which is why the first conversation is about dates and documents rather than forms.

The standard here is simple: no figure without a source for your year. Anything that cannot meet it is written as a mechanism, so you can see exactly what the rule does even where the number has to be confirmed before filing. See also form 8865 — foreign partnership and form w-8ben-e — entity treaty claim for Canada.

What we actually file

  • Board-level documentation of the commercial rationale
  • A second-opinion memorandum on the existing arrangement
  • Implementation steps mapped to their deadlines
  • A written structure review with the positions and their support
  • The filing calendar, by entity and jurisdiction, with owners

The numbers, end to end

The same point, with figures rather than adjectives.

How an information-return exposure compounds

A filer who owed no tax at all, but missed an information return for 4 years with 1 form due each year. Assume a per-form penalty of US$6,000 for the illustration.

How an information-return exposure compounds
ItemAmount
Years unfiled4
Forms due per year1
Assumed penalty per formUS$6,000
Exposure before any reliefUS$24,000
Tax actually owed on the incomeUS$0

US$24,000 of exposure against nil tax. That asymmetry is why the disclosure routes exist and why the sequence of filings matters more than the arithmetic — filed in the right order under the right route, the penalty position can be very different from this. The interesting question is where your own figures fall relative to that, which is a computation rather than an opinion.

The figures here are an illustration, not an engagement: amounts are picked so the mechanism is easy to follow, and every rate or threshold is an assumption of the example. Before anything is filed for you, each one is confirmed with the issuing authority for your own tax year.

From first call to filed

  1. 1A short call to work out what actually applies to you and what does not
  2. 2A written quote against a defined scope, with nothing billed by the hour
  3. 3We prepare, a named reviewer checks it, and you see it before it goes
  4. 4You approve, we file, and only then do you pay

Fees for this work

You get a number before you commit, not an estimate that drifts. The scope is written down, the fee is fixed against it, and if the scope changes we re-quote rather than invoice the difference. Comparable engagements and their fixed fees are set out on the pricing pages.

  • Every statutory figure in your file is verified for your own year at source.
  • Rated 5.0 out of 5 stars on Google, on a profile open for you to read.
  • Nothing is filed until you have read it.

Where to go from here

If you already have an adviser, we will tell you what they should be asking rather than replacing them. One call to our 24-hour helpline is usually enough to tell you whether this is a filing or a project, and what each would cost. The call is free, and we will say so if the answer is that you do not need us.

Reviewed for the 2025 and 2026 filing seasons by Udit Gupta, Cross-Border Tax Expert, Legal Quotient Consultants. Written as general guidance, not as a recommendation for your situation. Talk it through with us before acting on it.

Where how expats can catch up on US taxes comes into this file

The search that brings most people to this page is how expats can catch up on US taxes. It is answered here for appeal to CIT: what creates the obligation, which filings discharge it, and the fee agreed before the work starts.

India's first appeal is where the grounds are fixed.

How the engagement runs, phase by phase

  1. Share your documents

    A secure upload link arrives after the first call — send files in any state.

  2. A written fixed fee

    The quote is fixed from what you send; it does not move once accepted.

  3. Preparation, both sides at once

    The returns are drafted together, reconciled line against line.

  4. Approve, then file

    Nothing is filed until you have seen it and approved it.

How appeal to cit(a) form 35 is handled here

Factor Legal Quotient Hourly billing model
Pricing A fixed fee, agreed in writing before work starts Hourly, billed as incurred
Experience 15+ years of cross-border work, 18,000+ clients Varies by file
Both sides of the border Prepared together by one team, so relief is claimed exactly once One country at a time, reconciled later
Who reviews it A named practitioner, published on the page Whoever the queue reaches
Where the work happens Our offices in India, the USA, Canada and the UAE Whichever single office you can travel to

The vocabulary this page leans on

Hybrid mismatch
An outcome — a deduction with no inclusion, or a double deduction — arising from two countries classifying an entity or instrument differently. Anti-hybrid rules now neutralise it.
FBAR
The report of foreign bank and financial accounts filed with the US financial-crimes bureau. It is tested on the aggregate of all foreign accounts at their highest point in the year.
Advance ruling
A binding determination of the tax treatment of a proposed transaction, obtained before the transaction is carried out.
Country-by-country report
A group-level report of revenue, profit, tax, employees and assets per jurisdiction, exchanged between authorities and read alongside local files.
appeal to cit(a) form 35: Our analysis

The appeal runs on a deadline from the order, with a fee and a statement of facts and grounds.

The engagement terms hold no matter what the analysis finds — fee and scope agreed in writing up front, a named reviewer on the output, your approval before the finished work is filed.

Fixed fees around appeal to cit(a) form 35

Grounds are fixed when the appeal is lodged, so most of the cost sits before filing rather than after. Reading the order, settling which grounds go in, and evidencing a non-resident position for each year in issue is the priced work, and the fee is agreed in writing before drafting begins.

Foreign asset & information reporting

$349fixed, before work starts

Covers: Disclosure of assets and interests held abroad, built once from a single asset list and filed on every side that asks for it.

See this fee page

Individual tax filing

$349fixed, before work starts

Covers: Returns for people whose tax position did not stay in one country, including the years residence itself is in question.

See this fee page

Why choose Legal Quotient for appeal to cit(a) form 35

Every figure on a page is traceable

Where a rate or a threshold appears in our writing it names the tax year it belongs to. Where it could not be confirmed, the page describes the mechanism and quotes no number.

Both sides prepared together

Two returns built against each other by one team, so relief is claimed exactly once and nothing falls between the two systems.

Cross-border is the whole practice

International and cross-border tax is all we do — not a sideline next to domestic work. The edge cases on this page are our ordinary Tuesday.

The reporting penalties get named early

The heaviest exposure on a cross-border file is usually a disclosure form, not the tax. We identify which ones apply before a deadline turns into a penalty.

The firm’s founder at his desk in the Delhi office

Appeal to cit(a) form 35 — the four phases

Step 1

Initial call

A short call to work out what actually applies to you and what does not

Step 2

Scope and fee

A written quote against a defined scope, with nothing billed by the hour

Step 3

Preparation and review

We prepare, a named reviewer checks it, and you see it before it goes

Step 4

Filing and payment

You approve, we file, and only then do you pay

Two of the firm’s advisers at a desk in the Delhi office

A fixed quote first, in writing

  • Step 1: Send the documents as they are – No tidying required — forward what you have and we tell you what is missing.
  • Step 2: Get a fixed quote in writing – Priced from your actual documents before any work begins, not estimated after.
  • Step 3: Both countries prepared together – One team builds the filings against each other so the relief lands exactly once.
  • Step 4: Review, then file – You approve the finished work before we file it.

Quoted up front, in writing.

Contact Us 24-hour helpline +1 (416) 619-0068

The rest of this practice

Browse sideways: the pages below answer the neighbouring questions.

Services these clients use most

Pensions and annuities — the treaty article Its own page: pensions annuities treaty article — mechanism, deadlines and published fees.
IP moved between countries Everything on ip moved between countries tax, at the same depth as this page.
Indian pension received abroad Indian pension received abroad — the guide, the FAQ and the fixed fee.
Form 8288-C — section 1446(f) withholding The full guide to form 8288-c section 1446f withholding, with the fee fixed before any work starts.
Form 8865 — foreign partnership Its own page: form 8865 foreign partnership — mechanism, deadlines and published fees.
Form T1255 — principal residence (deceased) Everything on t1255 principal residence deceased, at the same depth as this page.
Setting up a US LLC as a Canadian Setting up a US LLC as a Canadian — the guide, the FAQ and the fixed fee.
Part XIII withholding review The full guide to part xiii withholding review, with the fee fixed before any work starts.
Employee vs contractor — both countries Its own page: employee vs contractor — both countries — mechanism, deadlines and published fees.

Clients who arrive with this exact page

Software developers — relief you're probably missing Its own page: software developers relief you're probably missing — mechanism, deadlines and published fees.
Tax for translators & interpreters Everything on translators & interpreters tax, at the same depth as this page.
Software developers — what we charge Software developers what we charge — the guide, the FAQ and the fixed fee.
Mining & energy cross-border tax The full guide to mining & energy cross border tax, with the fee fixed before any work starts.
Cross-border truck drivers — what we charge Its own page: cross-border truck drivers what we charge — mechanism, deadlines and published fees.
Team-sport athletes — your filing calendar Everything on team-sport athletes your filing calendar, at the same depth as this page.
Tax for construction workers abroad Construction workers abroad tax — the guide, the FAQ and the fixed fee.
Tax for cabin crew The full guide to cabin crew tax, with the fee fixed before any work starts.
Tax for djs & electronic artists Its own page: djs & electronic artists tax — mechanism, deadlines and published fees.

Where our clients live and work

Canada–Saudi Arabia tax corridor Its own page: Canada Saudi Arabia tax — mechanism, deadlines and published fees.
Philippines tax for expats — country guide Everything on Philippines tax for expats, at the same depth as this page.
Latvia tax for expats — country guide Latvia tax for expats — the guide, the FAQ and the fixed fee.
Bahrain tax for expats — country guide The full guide to Bahrain tax for expats, with the fee fixed before any work starts.
Germany tax for expats — country guide Its own page: Germany tax for expats — mechanism, deadlines and published fees.
Uganda tax for expats — country guide Everything on uganda tax for expats, at the same depth as this page.
Georgia tax for expats — country guide Georgia tax for expats — the guide, the FAQ and the fixed fee.
Colombia tax for expats — country guide The full guide to Colombia tax for expats, with the fee fixed before any work starts.
Sweden tax for expats — country guide Its own page: Sweden tax for expats — mechanism, deadlines and published fees.

The people on your file

Five named practitioners, each with the part of a cross-border file they carry. Every page on this site says who reviewed it, and the reviewer is one of these people rather than an unnamed team.

Udit Gupta

Udit Gupta

Cross-Border Tax Expert

CA (ICAI), In-Depth Tax Trained

Reviews and signs off the practice's cross-border positions, and carries final responsibility for the treaty analysis on every file that leaves the office.

Abhinav Gupta

Abhinav Gupta

Canada Tax / International Tax

Canada Tax, International Tax, Cross-Border Tax, Transfer Pricing

Canadian returns with foreign income, non-resident filings, and the transfer-pricing documentation that runs alongside intercompany work.

Raghav Gupta

Raghav Gupta

International Tax

International Tax, Transfer Pricing Specialist

Benchmarking, method selection and the local-file and master-file sets that support a group's pricing policy under examination.

Anmol Mittal

Anmol Mittal

Canada and US tax

CPA Canada, CPA USA, CA (ICAI)

Files that have to be right on both sides of the border at once — dual filings, streamlined catch-ups, and the foreign tax credit reconciliation between them.

Vinayak Indolia

Vinayak Indolia

CFO advisory

CPA, CA. Fractional CFO and Senior Advisory Specialist

Groups that need the tax position and the finance function to agree: structure reviews, intercompany policy, and the reporting a board can act on.

Meet the whole team

What these engagements turn on

Case study 1

Salary taxed in India for days a client worked elsewhere

The order treated a full year of employment income as taxable in India, on the footing that the employer was Indian. The client had spent most of the year working outside the country. We built the grounds around the treaty article governing employment income and the presence it turns on, supported by the passport record, the employer's posting letter and the payroll allocation. Residency evidence from the other country went into the same paperbook rather than being held back. The engagement produced a first-appeal record in which the split of duties was documented rather than argued.

Case study 2

Treaty relief refused because the residency evidence was never filed

The relief had been claimed in the return and disallowed in the assessment, with the order noting that nothing had been produced to show residence in the other country. The earlier adviser had not been asked for it. We obtained the residency evidence from the other country's authority for each year in issue, matched it to the periods the order covered, and framed the ground on the article relied on rather than on the disallowance alone. The appeal produced a complete record, so the point was decided on the documents instead of on their absence.

Case study 3

A remittance treated as income in an assessment order

A transfer the client had made from his own account abroad into his Indian account was assessed as unexplained income. Nothing about the deposit itself showed where it came from. We traced the funds back through the foreign bank to salary that had already been taxed where it was earned, obtained the statements covering both ends of the transfer, and set out in the grounds why a movement of a person's own money is not a receipt of income. The engagement produced a documented source-of-funds trail filed with the appeal rather than promised in it.

Case study 4

Grounds rewritten after an earlier appeal was framed too narrowly

The client came to us with an appeal already filed on a single ground, and an order that was open to challenge on several. Because the first appeal is where grounds are fixed, the choice was between arguing for the admission of further grounds and living with what had been filed. We prepared the additional grounds with the reason each had not been raised, together with the evidence supporting them, and set out the alternative readings of the same facts. The engagement produced a written position on every arguable point rather than one.

Case study 5

Withholding on a property sale that the order did not credit

Tax had been deducted by the buyer at the point of sale, and the assessment gave no credit for it. The deduction certificate named the seller slightly differently from the return. We reconstructed the withholding trail from the sale deed through the buyer's deduction records to the credit statement, documented the identity point with supporting proof, and framed the ground on the credit rather than on the computation of the gain, which was not in dispute. The engagement produced a credit claim evidenced end to end in the appeal record.

Case study 6

An Indian appeal coordinated with the Canadian credit for the same income

The same income was in dispute in India and had already been reported in Canada, where a credit had been claimed for the Indian tax. Whatever the appeal produced would change the credit. We framed the Indian grounds first, because they fix the argument, then mapped what each possible outcome would do to the Canadian return and how long that return would stay open for correction. The engagement produced an appeal filed on the Indian record and a written plan for the Canadian amendment that would follow the decision.

Case study 7

A Disclosure Where the Facts Were Not Innocent

Where non-compliance was not inadvertent, the certification-based routes are unavailable and a different practice applies, with its own protections and its own price. Establishing which side of that line the facts fall on is done before contact is made.

Read how this one runs
Case study 8

A Foreign Affiliate Return Filed Years Late

The reporting obligation on a company held abroad runs separately from the corporate return and carries its own exposure. The work is reconstructing the surplus position across the open years before any filing goes in.

Read how this one runs

All case studies — every published engagement in one place.

Core International & Cross-Border Tax Services

International Tax Planning & Advisory

Strategy and compliance for income, assets and families spread across borders.

One coordinating team: filings on every side of the border are sequenced so treaty relief and foreign tax credits are claimed once — and in the right country.

U.S. & Cross-Border Tax Returns

Dual filers: U.S. citizens in Canada and Canadians with U.S. income run two parallel systems — we prepare both, in the right order, every year.

Expat & Emigration Tax

The move year is its own project: the elections and valuations filed that year decide the next decade of both countries’ returns.

Non-Resident Canadian Tax

Default withholding is 25% of gross: elective returns routinely turn over-withheld rent and pensions into refunds.

Transfer Pricing & BEPS

Documentation prepared with the return is the cheapest insurance in international tax; reconstructing it during an audit is the most expensive.

Cross-Border Estates & Trusts

Wills drafted for one country routinely misfire in the other — deemed disposition here, estate tax there, credits in between.

Cross-Border Corporate Tax

Expansion raises the same four questions every time — entity, PE, repatriation, payroll. We answer them before the tax authorities do.

India Tax for NRIs & Returning Residents

The deduction is taken on the sale price, not the gain — which is why an NRI property sale strands cash unless the certificate is applied for before closing.

Canadian Tax with a Foreign Element

Residency is decided on facts, not on a form — and the year you arrive or leave is the one where the largest amounts turn on the smallest details.

UAE Tax for Expats & Their Home Country

A zero-tax country is only half the answer — the question that decides the bill is whether the country you came from still treats you as resident.

Industries & Client Types We Serve Worldwide

Global E-commerce & Marketplaces
Technology & SaaS
Professional Services Firms
Cross-Border Real Estate
Importers, Exporters & Manufacturers
Athletes, Artists & Entertainers
Remote Workers & Digital Nomads
Investment Funds & Holding Companies

Global E-commerce & Marketplaces

  • Foreign VAT / GST / sales tax registrations
  • Marketplace withholding reviews
  • Inventory nexus & PE analysis
  • Multi-currency books reconciled
Explore E-commerce & Marketplaces

Technology & SaaS

  • Cross-border revenue sourcing & withholding
  • IP structuring with real substance
  • Equity for cross-border teams
  • U.S. expansion: entity & PE setup
Explore Technology & SaaS

Importers, Exporters & Manufacturers

  • Transfer pricing documentation (s.247)
  • Customs value vs transfer price
  • Foreign affiliate reporting (T1134)
  • Country-by-country reporting
Explore Trade & Manufacturing

Athletes, Artists & Entertainers

Performance income is taxed where earned — Regulation 105 in Canada, withholding agreements in the U.S. — with special treaty articles overriding the usual rules.

Performance income is taxed where the performance happens, and the deduction is usually taken at source on the gross fee before expenses. Recovering the difference is a filing exercise in the other country, and it only works if the tour, the residency and the withholding certificates were documented while the work was being done.

  • Reg 105 & U.S. CWA agreements
  • Multi-state & country calendars
  • Touring income allocation
  • Royalty & image-rights withholding
Explore Athletes & Entertainers

Remote Workers & Digital Nomads

  • Residency analysis before moving
  • Employer payroll exposure
  • Totalization & social security
  • Foreign tax credits
Explore Remote Workers

Investment Funds & Holding Companies

  • Treaty access & PPT reviews
  • FAPI & surplus computations
  • Withholding-efficient routing
  • Governance & substance
Explore Funds & Holdcos

Appeal to CIT(A) — Form 35 — questions we are asked

Appeal to CIT(A) — Form 35: do I need an adviser, or can I do it alone?

Some of it, yes — and we will say so on the call if that is the honest answer. The parts that are worth paying for are the ones where a missed election, a missed deadline or an unverified threshold costs more than the fee: the appeal runs on a deadline from the order, with a fee and a statement of facts and grounds.

What if I have already filed and got it wrong?

That is a common starting point. We re-derive the position, identify whether an amendment or a disclosure route is the right vehicle, and tell you which one preserves the relief that is still available. The order matters more than the speed.

How long will it take?

It depends on the documents rather than on us. Once the pack is complete most filings turn around inside a fortnight; anything that needs a certificate from a tax authority runs on that authority's timetable, which we tell you at the start rather than at the end.

How do I challenge an Indian tax order if I live abroad?

The first appeal is made in Form 35 to the CIT(A). It runs on a deadline measured from the order itself, carries a fee, and must be accompanied by a statement of facts and grounds. Living outside India does not change the vehicle. What it changes is how long the evidence takes to gather and how late the order may reach you, since the clock runs from the order rather than from the day it lands in your hands. If an order has been passed, work from the date printed on it and start assembling the residency evidence and the withholding trail immediately.

What should go in the statement of facts and grounds?

The facts as you say they are, and every ground on which the order is said to be wrong. For a non-resident that means three things belong in the record from the outset: the treaty position relied on, the evidence of residence in the other country for the years in issue, and the trail of tax already withheld at source on the same income. These are the points an assessing officer most often treats as unproven, and they are far easier to put in at the start than to introduce once the appeal is under way. Vague grounds are the commonest avoidable weakness in a first appeal.

Can I add a new ground after my appeal is filed?

It is possible, and it is harder. The first appeal is where the grounds are fixed, and an argument brought in later has to be admitted rather than simply asserted, which means explaining why it was not raised at the proper time. Practically, the framing you file with shapes everything that follows, including what evidence is treated as relevant. We would rather spend the time before filing than argue for admission afterwards, so we draft grounds broad enough to cover the alternative readings of the same facts, with each one supported by a document in the paperbook.

Do I have to travel to India for the appeal?

Most of a first appeal is decided on what you file. The facts, the grounds and the supporting evidence carry the case, and a representative you appoint in India deals with the hearing itself. Being outside the country is therefore seldom the real obstacle. Evidence is: bank confirmations, the deduction certificates issued by the payer, and residency evidence from the authority in the country you live in all take longer to obtain from a distance, and the appeal deadline does not wait for them. We begin collecting those the day an order is received, not the week before filing.

Tax was withheld from my Indian income at the wrong rate. Should I appeal?

It depends on whether an order has been passed. An appeal is the route against an order; where no order exists and the issue is simply that too much was deducted at source, the relief usually runs through the return and the refund claim instead, supported by your residency evidence and the treaty article you rely on. Appealing the wrong thing loses time you may not have. Read the paper you have actually received, identify what it is, and match the route to it. Where both an order and an open refund position exist, they have to be handled together or the two will contradict each other.

What happens to the demand while my appeal is pending?

Filing the appeal and dealing with the recovery of the demand are separate steps, and doing the first does not do the second. An application about collection is made on its own footing, and it is usually decided on how arguable the appeal looks and what the taxpayer offers in the meantime. For a non-resident the practical pressure often comes through funds or refunds held in India rather than through correspondence. Deal with both at once: file the appeal properly framed, and make the collection position an explicit request rather than an assumption.

Is an inheritance from overseas taxable in Canada?

Canada has no inheritance or estate tax, so receiving a bequest is not income to you. Tax happens on the other side of the transaction — the deceased's final return, where a deemed disposition of their property can arise, and any tax the foreign country levies on the estate. What changes for you is what comes next: the asset you now hold may be reportable foreign property, and its value at the date of death becomes your cost base for future gains. See a foreign inheritance.

What is a foreign trust for US tax purposes?

A trust that is not a domestic trust — broadly, one that fails the tests looking at whether a US court can exercise primary supervision and whether US persons control the substantial decisions. The classification decides everything downstream: whether the settlor is taxed on the income as owner, how distributions to US beneficiaries are taxed, and which annual information returns are due. Many ordinary foreign arrangements, including some pension and education savings vehicles, land inside the definition. See Form 3520-A.

A named reviewer on every filing

Get appeal to cit(a) — form 35 handled for a fixed fee

One call to the 24-hour helpline is enough to tell you what has to be filed, what it costs, and whether you need us at all.

  • A named reviewer signs off every filing
  • Your existing accountant keeps the domestic file
  • Re-quoted, never silently invoiced

Our practitioners are alumni of leading accounting and tax institutions

Where our partners studied — CPA Canada (In-Depth Tax Program), AICPA, the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India and the Malaysian Institute of Accountants.

Request a Quote +1 (416) 619-0068