The US broker will not release my father's shares — why not?
Because the custodian is protecting itself. Where a person who was not a US resident dies holding US situated assets, the custodian is exposed if it hands them over while US tax on those assets is unpaid, so it will not release until it has a transfer certificate confirming the position. The account is not frozen because of anything the family has done wrong, and arguing with the branch will not move it. The certificate is a document the estate has to obtain; the custodian is simply the party that refuses to act without seeing it.
What is a transfer certificate in a cross-border estate?
It is the document that releases US situated assets held by a custodian after the death of someone who was not a US resident. It is the practical bottleneck in most cross-border estates: the domestic filings can be complete, the beneficiaries identified and the administration otherwise ready, and nothing can be distributed because the largest holding sits behind it. Representatives usually meet the term for the first time in a letter from a broker or transfer agent, phrased as though obtaining one were a matter of filling in a form.
Do I need one if my parent was never American?
That is precisely when the question arises. The certificate belongs to the non-resident case; it exists because the asset is situated in the United States, not because the owner had any connection to it beyond holding the asset. A lifetime spent in Canada or India makes no difference to a custodian holding US securities. What the deceased's residence does affect is the basis on which the estate is taxed there and what relief a treaty may give, which is a separate question from whether the release is required at all.
Which of my father's assets count as US situated for this?
That is decided by US rules about where an asset is located, not by where the statements were posted or which currency the account was held in. Securities of US issuers and US real property are the usual candidates; some holdings that look American are not, and some that look local are. Get the custodian to state exactly what it is holding, in writing, before you form a view, because the release process and the filing that supports it both depend on that inventory being right. Guessing at the start is what causes the delay later.
Can the custodian release part of the account while we wait?
Sometimes, and it is worth asking, because custodians differ in how they handle this and some will deal with a portion or with categories of holding separately. Do not count on it. Plan the administration on the assumption that the whole holding is unavailable until the certificate is in hand, which means not committing to distributions, to a tax payment elsewhere, or to a timetable that depends on money you cannot yet reach. Representatives who have promised beneficiaries a date are the ones who end up under the most pressure.
We are also filing in Canada — do the two processes connect?
They run on separate tracks and they touch the same assets, which is exactly why they need coordinating. The Canadian side measures the growth in value of the holding up to death; the US side is concerned with the asset being situated there and with releasing it. The valuation evidence, the ownership documents and the identity records feed both. Gather them once, to a standard that satisfies the stricter of the two, and make sure the values used in each filing are the same. Two filings describing the same shares differently invites questions in both countries.
How much foreign income is tax-free in Canada?
None of it is tax-free for being foreign. A Canadian resident is taxed on worldwide income, so foreign salary, interest, dividends, rent and gains all go on the return, converted to Canadian dollars. What genuinely reduces the bill is the basic personal amount, the credit for foreign tax already paid, and any treaty article that exempts a specific type of income. The reporting thresholds people have in mind — the foreign property statement, for one — govern reporting, not exemption. See the foreign tax credit.
Is "fund transfer pricing" the same thing as transfer pricing?
No — and if you came here to calculate FTP, this is not it. Fund transfer pricing is a bank's internal allocation of funding costs and benefits between its own business units, a treasury and asset-liability management discipline used to measure branch or product profitability. Tax transfer pricing is about prices between legally separate related parties across borders, and about which country taxes the resulting profit. The words overlap; the fields do not. See our transfer pricing work.
